Abstract
Urgent structural change is required in higher education to allow collaboration both within and across universities so that achieving a rapid sustainability transition can become the overarching and main purpose of education, research and work in society. A review of the literature reveals that fragmentation, caused by traditional hierarchical faculty and disciplinary organisation, is a major obstacle to such goals. Additionally, universities today operate under a competitive paradigm that prevents the transfer and application of available knowledge, thereby blocking the development of new knowledge and coherent future-oriented approaches. Fragmentation and competition prevent universities from pooling resources, understanding major challenges holistically and using systemic approaches to address them. Political agendas, funding priorities and existing mechanisms of dissemination and evaluation of academic activity contribute to inertia. Rather than applying fragmented sustainability goals within rigid silo structures, action for sustainability needs to be coordinated among academic actors both horizontally and diagonally. This requires spaces for strategic thinking, concertation, open discussion and knowledge sharing. The insights achieved in strong sustainability research environments need to direct efforts towards achieving a rapid sustainability transition, and priority must be given to structures, networks and research that already enable concertation and collaboration.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adger WN (2006) Vulnerability. Glob Environ Change 16(3):268–281
Adloff F, Neckel S (2019) Futures of sustainability as modernization, transformation, and control: a conceptual framework. Sustain Sci 14(4):1015–1025
Alexander S (2012) Planned economic contraction: the emerging case for degrowth. Environ Politics 21(3):349–368
Andersen AS, Kjeldsen TH (2015) Theoretical foundations of PPL at Roskilde university. In: Andersen AS, Heilesen SB (eds) The Roskilde Model: problem-oriented learning and project work. Springer, Cham, pp 3–16
Avery H, Nordén B (2017) Working with the divides: two critical axes in development for transformative professional practices. Int J Sustain High Educ 18(5):666–680
Acosta A (2013) Extractivism and neoextractivism: two sides of the same curse. In: Lang M, Mokrani M (eds) Beyond development: alternative visions from Latin America. Transnational Inst., pp 61–86
Baker-Shelley A, van Zeijl-Rozema A, Martens P (2017) A conceptual synthesis of organisational transformation: how to diagnose, and navigate, pathways for sustainability at universities? J Clean Prod 145:262–276
Berkes F (2007) Understanding uncertainty and reducing vulnerability: lessons from resilience thinking. Nat Hazards 41(2):283–295
Beynaghi A, Trencher G, Moztarzadeh F, Mozafari M, Maknoon R, Leal Filho W (2016) Future sustainability scenarios for universities: moving beyond the United Nations decade of education for sustainable development. J Clean Prod 112(4):3464–3478
Chan W (2004) International cooperation in higher education: theory and practice. J Stud Int Educ 8(1):32–55
Cooke RA (1987) The organizational culture inventory. Human Synergistics, Plymouth
Fiksel J (2006) Sustainability and resilience: toward a systems approach. Sustain Sci Prac Policy 2(2):14–21
Florin P, Guillermin M, Dedeurwaerdere T (2015) A pragmatist approach to transdisciplinarity in sustainability research: from complex systems theory to reflexive science. Futures 65:45–56
Gallopín GC (2002) Planning for resilience: scenarios, surprises, and branch points. In: Gundersen LH, Holling CS (eds) Panarchy. Understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island Press, Washington, pp 361–392
Goldstein BE (2009) Resilience to surprises through communicative planning. Ecol Soc 14(2):article 33
Gough I (2017) Heat, greed and human need: climate change, capitalism and sustainable wellbeing. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham and Northampton
Hallinger P, Chatpinyakoop C (2019) A bibliometric review of research on higher education for sustainable development, 1998–2018. Sustainability 11(8):2401
Holmarsdottir HB, Desai Z, Botha LR, Breidlid A, Bastien S, Mukoma W, Nomlomo V (2013) COMPARE forum: the idea of North-South and South-South collaboration. Compare: J Comparative Int Educ 43(2):265–286
Holste JS, Fields D (2010) Trust and tacit knowledge sharing and use. J Knowl Manag 14(1):128–140
Jary D (1999) The implications of the audit society? The case of higher education. In: Dent M, O’Neill M, Bagley C (eds) Professions, new public management and the European welfare state. Staffordshire University Press, Stoke on Trent, pp 29–52
Lindhult E (2016) Co-Production, Action Research and the Movement towards Mode III Co-Production of Knowledge. Paper developed from contribution to Action Research Seminar, Aalborg University. October 7, 2016
Lynch K (2006) Neo-liberalism and marketisation: the implications for higher education. Eur Educ Res J 5(1):1–17
Marginson S (2006) Dynamics of national and global competition in higher education. High Educ 52(1):1–39
Marginson S (2008) Academic creativity under new public management: foundations for an investigation. Educ Theor 58(3):269–287
Marquard M, Sempler M, Mikkelsen H (2016) Transformative learning circles. http://www.creativeuniversity.aau.dk/digitalAssets/217/217625_maria-marquard–marianne-sempler–hans-mikkelsen.pdf. Last accessed 11 Mar 2020
Melber H (2015) Knowledge is power and power affects knowledge: challenges for research collaboration in and with Africa. Afr Dev 40(4):21–42
Miller TR, Muñoz-Erickson T, Redman CL (2011) Transforming knowledge for sustainability: towards adaptive academic institutions. Int J Sustain High Educ 12(2):177–192
Mochizuki Y, Yarime M (2015) Education for sustainable development and sustainability science: re-purposing higher education and research. In: Barth M, Michelsen G, Rieckmann M, Thomas I (eds) Routledge handbook of higher education for sustainable development. Routledge, pp 35–48
Oleksiyenko A (2018) Zones of alienation in global higher education: corporate abuse and leadership failures. Tert Educ Manag 24(3):193–205
Olsson P, Galaz V, Boonstra WJ (2014) Sustainability transformations: a resilience perspective. Ecol Soc 19(4):Art. 1
Pahl-Wostl C (2009) A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Glob Environ Change 19(3):354–365
Payo A, Becker P, Otto A, Vervoort J, Kingsborough A (2015) Experiential lock-in: Characterizing avoidable maladaptation in infrastructure systems. J Infrastruct Syst 22(1):02515001
Power M (1997) The audit society: rituals of verification. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Raworth K (2017) Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. Chelsea Green Publishing
Ruiz-Mallén I, Heras M (2020) What sustainability? Higher education institutions’ pathways to reach the Agenda 2030 goals. Sustainability 12(4):1290
Schwartz P (1991) The art of the long view. Doubleday, New York
Sevaldson B (2015) Gigamaps: their role as bridging artefacts and a new Sense Sharing Model. In: Relating systems thinking and design 4. Systemic design research network. Banff, pp 1–11
Shore S, Wright S (2000) Coercive accountability: the rise of audit culture in higher education. In: Strathern M (ed) Audit cultures: anthropological studies in accountability, ethics and the academy. Routledge, London, pp 57–89
Spangenberg JH (2019) Scenarios and indicators for sustainable development: towards a critical assessment of achievements and challenges. Special Issue. Sustainability ix–x
Sriskandarajah N, Tidball K, Wals AEJ, Blackmore C, Bawden R (2010) Resilience in learning systems: case studies in university education. Environ Educ Res 16(5–6):559–573
Steffen W, Richardson K, Rockström J, Cornell SE, Fetzer I, Bennett EM, Folke C (2015) Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 347(6223):1259855
Vogt M, Weber C (2020) The role of universities in a sustainable society. Why value-free research is neither possible nor desirable. Sustainability 12(7):2811
von Weizsäcker EU, de Larderel J, Hargroves K, Hudson C, Smith M, Rodrigues M (2014) Decoupling 2: technologies, opportunities and policy options. A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. UNEP
Waddell S (2011) Global action networks: creating our future together. Palgrave Macmillan
Waddock S, Meszoely GM, Waddell S, Dentoni D (2015) The complexity of wicked problems in large scale change. J Organ Change Manag 28(6):993–1012
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Avery, H., Nordén, B. (2021). We Can Only Do It Together: Addressing Global Sustainability Challenges Through a Collaborative Paradigm. In: Leal Filho, W., Salvia, A.L., Brandli, L., Azeiteiro, U.M., Pretorius, R. (eds) Universities, Sustainability and Society: Supporting the Implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals. World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63399-8_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63399-8_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-63398-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-63399-8
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)