Skip to main content

We Can Only Do It Together: Addressing Global Sustainability Challenges Through a Collaborative Paradigm

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Universities, Sustainability and Society: Supporting the Implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals

Part of the book series: World Sustainability Series ((WSUSE))

Abstract

Urgent structural change is required in higher education to allow collaboration both within and across universities so that achieving a rapid sustainability transition can become the overarching and main purpose of education, research and work in society. A review of the literature reveals that fragmentation, caused by traditional hierarchical faculty and disciplinary organisation, is a major obstacle to such goals. Additionally, universities today operate under a competitive paradigm that prevents the transfer and application of available knowledge, thereby blocking the development of new knowledge and coherent future-oriented approaches. Fragmentation and competition prevent universities from pooling resources, understanding major challenges holistically and using systemic approaches to address them. Political agendas, funding priorities and existing mechanisms of dissemination and evaluation of academic activity contribute to inertia. Rather than applying fragmented sustainability goals within rigid silo structures, action for sustainability needs to be coordinated among academic actors both horizontally and diagonally. This requires spaces for strategic thinking, concertation, open discussion and knowledge sharing. The insights achieved in strong sustainability research environments need to direct efforts towards achieving a rapid sustainability transition, and priority must be given to structures, networks and research that already enable concertation and collaboration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adger WN (2006) Vulnerability. Glob Environ Change 16(3):268–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Adloff F, Neckel S (2019) Futures of sustainability as modernization, transformation, and control: a conceptual framework. Sustain Sci 14(4):1015–1025

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander S (2012) Planned economic contraction: the emerging case for degrowth. Environ Politics 21(3):349–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen AS, Kjeldsen TH (2015) Theoretical foundations of PPL at Roskilde university. In: Andersen AS, Heilesen SB (eds) The Roskilde Model: problem-oriented learning and project work. Springer, Cham, pp 3–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Avery H, Nordén B (2017) Working with the divides: two critical axes in development for transformative professional practices. Int J Sustain High Educ 18(5):666–680

    Google Scholar 

  • Acosta A (2013) Extractivism and neoextractivism: two sides of the same curse. In: Lang M, Mokrani M (eds) Beyond development: alternative visions from Latin America. Transnational Inst., pp 61–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker-Shelley A, van Zeijl-Rozema A, Martens P (2017) A conceptual synthesis of organisational transformation: how to diagnose, and navigate, pathways for sustainability at universities? J Clean Prod 145:262–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F (2007) Understanding uncertainty and reducing vulnerability: lessons from resilience thinking. Nat Hazards 41(2):283–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Beynaghi A, Trencher G, Moztarzadeh F, Mozafari M, Maknoon R, Leal Filho W (2016) Future sustainability scenarios for universities: moving beyond the United Nations decade of education for sustainable development. J Clean Prod 112(4):3464–3478

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan W (2004) International cooperation in higher education: theory and practice. J Stud Int Educ 8(1):32–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke RA (1987) The organizational culture inventory. Human Synergistics, Plymouth

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiksel J (2006) Sustainability and resilience: toward a systems approach. Sustain Sci Prac Policy 2(2):14–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Florin P, Guillermin M, Dedeurwaerdere T (2015) A pragmatist approach to transdisciplinarity in sustainability research: from complex systems theory to reflexive science. Futures 65:45–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallopín GC (2002) Planning for resilience: scenarios, surprises, and branch points. In: Gundersen LH, Holling CS (eds) Panarchy. Understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island Press, Washington, pp 361–392

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein BE (2009) Resilience to surprises through communicative planning. Ecol Soc 14(2):article 33

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough I (2017) Heat, greed and human need: climate change, capitalism and sustainable wellbeing. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham and Northampton

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallinger P, Chatpinyakoop C (2019) A bibliometric review of research on higher education for sustainable development, 1998–2018. Sustainability 11(8):2401

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmarsdottir HB, Desai Z, Botha LR, Breidlid A, Bastien S, Mukoma W, Nomlomo V (2013) COMPARE forum: the idea of North-South and South-South collaboration. Compare: J Comparative Int Educ 43(2):265–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Holste JS, Fields D (2010) Trust and tacit knowledge sharing and use. J Knowl Manag 14(1):128–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Jary D (1999) The implications of the audit society? The case of higher education. In: Dent M, O’Neill M, Bagley C (eds) Professions, new public management and the European welfare state. Staffordshire University Press, Stoke on Trent, pp 29–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindhult E (2016) Co-Production, Action Research and the Movement towards Mode III Co-Production of Knowledge. Paper developed from contribution to Action Research Seminar, Aalborg University. October 7, 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch K (2006) Neo-liberalism and marketisation: the implications for higher education. Eur Educ Res J 5(1):1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Marginson S (2006) Dynamics of national and global competition in higher education. High Educ 52(1):1–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Marginson S (2008) Academic creativity under new public management: foundations for an investigation. Educ Theor 58(3):269–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Marquard M, Sempler M, Mikkelsen H (2016) Transformative learning circles. http://www.creativeuniversity.aau.dk/digitalAssets/217/217625_maria-marquard–marianne-sempler–hans-mikkelsen.pdf. Last accessed 11 Mar 2020

  • Melber H (2015) Knowledge is power and power affects knowledge: challenges for research collaboration in and with Africa. Afr Dev 40(4):21–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller TR, Muñoz-Erickson T, Redman CL (2011) Transforming knowledge for sustainability: towards adaptive academic institutions. Int J Sustain High Educ 12(2):177–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Mochizuki Y, Yarime M (2015) Education for sustainable development and sustainability science: re-purposing higher education and research. In: Barth M, Michelsen G, Rieckmann M, Thomas I (eds) Routledge handbook of higher education for sustainable development. Routledge, pp 35–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Oleksiyenko A (2018) Zones of alienation in global higher education: corporate abuse and leadership failures. Tert Educ Manag 24(3):193–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson P, Galaz V, Boonstra WJ (2014) Sustainability transformations: a resilience perspective. Ecol Soc 19(4):Art. 1

    Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl C (2009) A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Glob Environ Change 19(3):354–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Payo A, Becker P, Otto A, Vervoort J, Kingsborough A (2015) Experiential lock-in: Characterizing avoidable maladaptation in infrastructure systems. J Infrastruct Syst 22(1):02515001

    Google Scholar 

  • Power M (1997) The audit society: rituals of verification. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Raworth K (2017) Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. Chelsea Green Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Mallén I, Heras M (2020) What sustainability? Higher education institutions’ pathways to reach the Agenda 2030 goals. Sustainability 12(4):1290

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz P (1991) The art of the long view. Doubleday, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sevaldson B (2015) Gigamaps: their role as bridging artefacts and a new Sense Sharing Model. In: Relating systems thinking and design 4. Systemic design research network. Banff, pp 1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Shore S, Wright S (2000) Coercive accountability: the rise of audit culture in higher education. In: Strathern M (ed) Audit cultures: anthropological studies in accountability, ethics and the academy. Routledge, London, pp 57–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Spangenberg JH (2019) Scenarios and indicators for sustainable development: towards a critical assessment of achievements and challenges. Special Issue. Sustainability ix–x

    Google Scholar 

  • Sriskandarajah N, Tidball K, Wals AEJ, Blackmore C, Bawden R (2010) Resilience in learning systems: case studies in university education. Environ Educ Res 16(5–6):559–573

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffen W, Richardson K, Rockström J, Cornell SE, Fetzer I, Bennett EM, Folke C (2015) Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 347(6223):1259855

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogt M, Weber C (2020) The role of universities in a sustainable society. Why value-free research is neither possible nor desirable. Sustainability 12(7):2811

    Google Scholar 

  • von Weizsäcker EU, de Larderel J, Hargroves K, Hudson C, Smith M, Rodrigues M (2014) Decoupling 2: technologies, opportunities and policy options. A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. UNEP

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddell S (2011) Global action networks: creating our future together. Palgrave Macmillan

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddock S, Meszoely GM, Waddell S, Dentoni D (2015) The complexity of wicked problems in large scale change. J Organ Change Manag 28(6):993–1012

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Helen Avery .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Avery, H., Nordén, B. (2021). We Can Only Do It Together: Addressing Global Sustainability Challenges Through a Collaborative Paradigm. In: Leal Filho, W., Salvia, A.L., Brandli, L., Azeiteiro, U.M., Pretorius, R. (eds) Universities, Sustainability and Society: Supporting the Implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals. World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63399-8_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics