Abstract
Field interviewers are the backbone of data collection of the market research industry and have a critical role in maintaining good quality research output. To attain good quality output, previous studies suggest that intensive training needs to be complemented by an intrinsic rather than an extrinsic approach. Thus, the main objective of the study is to assess field interviewers’ psychosocial working conditions and determine how perceived task load relates to questionnaire error rates. Overall, the two-phase assessment of field interviewers jointly suggests points for improvement rather than urgent concerns. Results of the assessment done using the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ) with n = 72 respondents recommend adopting flexible leadership styles and autonomy levels for field management. Significant correlations between the NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) raw scores and output quality (as dictated by error rates) also confirm that higher temporal demand, mental demand, and perceived performance are significantly moderately associated to lower output quality; higher frustration level is significantly moderately related to higher output quality. Results of the study particularly recommends adopting flexible leadership and autonomy level towards field interviewers and setting fieldwork timelines that fully consider the capacity of field interviewers.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Atalay KD, Can GF, Erdem SR, Müderrisoglu IH (2016) Assessment of mental workload and academic motivation in medical students. J Pakistan Med Assoc 66(5):574–578
Bernal B (2020)The life of field interviewers. https://www.rappler.com/nation/107026-life-survey-takers. Accessed 15 Jan 2020
Bouzgarrou L, Merchaoui I, Omrane A, Ameur NA, Malchaire J, Chaari N (2017) Ergonomic evaluation of the perceived mental workload among tunisian university hospital caregivers. Open J Nurs 7(10):1144–1156
Kennickell A.B (2020) Who’s asking? Interviewers, Their Incentives, and Data Quality in Field Surveys. US Federal Reserve Board, Washington, DC. https://www.federalreserve.gov/econresdata/scf/files/iariw20067.pdf. Accessed 15 Jan 2020
Kennickell AB (2017) Interviewers and data quality: Evidence from the 2001 survey of consumer finances. Stat J IAOS 33(1):153–163
Kristensen TS, Hannerz H, Høgh A, Borg V (2005) The Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire—a tool for the assessment and improvement of the psychosocial work environment. Scandinavian J Work Envir Health 31(6):438–449
Kruger J, Dunning D (1999) Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. J Person Soc Psychol 77(6):1121–1134
Lohela-Karlsson M, Björklund C, Jensen I (2010) The effects of psychosocial work factors on production loss, and the mediating effect of employee health. J Occup Environ Med 52(3):310–317
Pejtersen J, Kristensen T, Borg V, Bjorner J (2010) The second version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire. Scandinavian J Public Health 38(3):8–24
Peneff J (1988) The observers observed: french survey researchers at work. Soc. Problems 35(5):520–535
Philipson T, Lawless T (1997) Multiple-output agency incentives in data production; experimental evidence. Euro Econ Rev 41(3–5):961–970
Rosen J, Murphy J, Peytchev A, Riley S, Lindblad M (2011) The effects of differential interviewer incentives on a field data collection effort. Field Methods 23(1):24–36
Waterhouse I, Child I (1953) Frustration and the quality of performance iii. an experimental study. J Personality 21(3):298–311
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
King, K.A.R., Custodio, B.P. (2021). Assessment of Psychosocial Work Factors and Effects of Perceived Task Load on Questionnaire Error Rate Among Field Interviewers. In: Gutierrez, A.M.J., Goonetilleke, R.S., Robielos, R.A.C. (eds) Convergence of Ergonomics and Design. ACEDSEANES 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1298. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63335-6_27
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63335-6_27
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-63334-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-63335-6
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)