Skip to main content

Assessment of Psychosocial Work Factors and Effects of Perceived Task Load on Questionnaire Error Rate Among Field Interviewers

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Convergence of Ergonomics and Design (ACEDSEANES 2020)

Abstract

Field interviewers are the backbone of data collection of the market research industry and have a critical role in maintaining good quality research output. To attain good quality output, previous studies suggest that intensive training needs to be complemented by an intrinsic rather than an extrinsic approach. Thus, the main objective of the study is to assess field interviewers’ psychosocial working conditions and determine how perceived task load relates to questionnaire error rates. Overall, the two-phase assessment of field interviewers jointly suggests points for improvement rather than urgent concerns. Results of the assessment done using the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ) with n = 72 respondents recommend adopting flexible leadership styles and autonomy levels for field management. Significant correlations between the NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) raw scores and output quality (as dictated by error rates) also confirm that higher temporal demand, mental demand, and perceived performance are significantly moderately associated to lower output quality; higher frustration level is significantly moderately related to higher output quality. Results of the study particularly recommends adopting flexible leadership and autonomy level towards field interviewers and setting fieldwork timelines that fully consider the capacity of field interviewers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Atalay KD, Can GF, Erdem SR, Müderrisoglu IH (2016) Assessment of mental workload and academic motivation in medical students. J Pakistan Med Assoc 66(5):574–578

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernal B (2020)The life of field interviewers. https://www.rappler.com/nation/107026-life-survey-takers. Accessed 15 Jan 2020

  • Bouzgarrou L, Merchaoui I, Omrane A, Ameur NA, Malchaire J, Chaari N (2017) Ergonomic evaluation of the perceived mental workload among tunisian university hospital caregivers. Open J Nurs 7(10):1144–1156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennickell A.B (2020) Who’s asking? Interviewers, Their Incentives, and Data Quality in Field Surveys. US Federal Reserve Board, Washington, DC. https://www.federalreserve.gov/econresdata/scf/files/iariw20067.pdf. Accessed 15 Jan 2020

  • Kennickell AB (2017) Interviewers and data quality: Evidence from the 2001 survey of consumer finances. Stat J IAOS 33(1):153–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristensen TS, Hannerz H, Høgh A, Borg V (2005) The Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire—a tool for the assessment and improvement of the psychosocial work environment. Scandinavian J Work Envir Health 31(6):438–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruger J, Dunning D (1999) Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. J Person Soc Psychol 77(6):1121–1134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohela-Karlsson M, Björklund C, Jensen I (2010) The effects of psychosocial work factors on production loss, and the mediating effect of employee health. J Occup Environ Med 52(3):310–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pejtersen J, Kristensen T, Borg V, Bjorner J (2010) The second version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire. Scandinavian J Public Health 38(3):8–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peneff J (1988) The observers observed: french survey researchers at work. Soc. Problems 35(5):520–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philipson T, Lawless T (1997) Multiple-output agency incentives in data production; experimental evidence. Euro Econ Rev 41(3–5):961–970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen J, Murphy J, Peytchev A, Riley S, Lindblad M (2011) The effects of differential interviewer incentives on a field data collection effort. Field Methods 23(1):24–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waterhouse I, Child I (1953) Frustration and the quality of performance iii. an experimental study. J Personality 21(3):298–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kate Allison R. King .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

King, K.A.R., Custodio, B.P. (2021). Assessment of Psychosocial Work Factors and Effects of Perceived Task Load on Questionnaire Error Rate Among Field Interviewers. In: Gutierrez, A.M.J., Goonetilleke, R.S., Robielos, R.A.C. (eds) Convergence of Ergonomics and Design. ACEDSEANES 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1298. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63335-6_27

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics