Skip to main content

Multi-well Deconvolution for Well Test Interpretations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Software Engineering Perspectives in Intelligent Systems (CoMeSySo 2020)

Abstract

An important problem of numerical flow simulation in the frame of an oil field development is the need to improve the quality and quantity of the input data, in particular, the data on cross-well formation properties. Well test is the most informative means of a reservoir borehole-to-borehole survey. When studying the cross-well formation properties based on the interpretation of continuous curves of pressure variations measured by telemetry sensors on down-hole pumps, the impact of adjacent wells and high noise contamination of the obtained data shall be taken into account. In an attempt to solve this issue this article studies multi-well deconvolution as a means to study all components of the pressure variations curve. The multi-well deconvolution can identify the relevant response to a change in the operating mode of a certain well and can process this response in traditional ways. The multi-well deconvolution method makes it possible to assess and account for noise impacts on the pressure curve. This approach also simplifies the curve processing, as the diagnosis of an interpreted formation model is done easier. This work proposes a new approach to building self-influence and influence functions: we propose to set them down as a sum of elementary time functions representing individual filtration modes of the formation. The well bore impact is represented exponentially; the bilinear flow – as a fourth root; the linear flow – as a second root; the radial flow – as a logarithm; the boundary effect – as a linear function. This way the self-influence and influence functions coefficients are set down linearly and Newton method can be used to define them. This approach was tested on two synthetic curves of the bottom-hole pressure obtained by modelling. The simulation and deconvolution curves of the bottom-hole pressure converged closely and this proved that the formation parameters selected for the modelling and retrieved during the self-influence and influence curves processing are close and this, consequently, proves high efficiency of the proposed approach. #COMESYSO1120.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Businov, S.N., Umrikhin, I.D.: Surveys of oil and gas wells and formations. Nedra, Moscow, Russia (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Earlougher Jr., R.: Well tests methods. Institute of Computes Sciences, Izhevsk, Russia (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Houze, O., Viturat, D., Fjaere, O.S.: Dynamic Data Analysis. Kappa Engineering, Paris, France (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cumming, J.A., Wooff, D.A., Whittle, T., Gringarten, A.C.: Multiwell deconvolution. SPE Reservoir Eval. Eng. 17(04), 457–465 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gringarten, A.C.: New Development in Well Test Analysis. Phase 2. Imperial College London, UK (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zheng, S.-Y., Wang, F.: Multi-Well Deconvolution Algorithm for the Diagnostick, Analysis of Transient Pressure With Interference From Permanent Down-hole Gauges. SPE, 121949 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wang, F.: Processing and analysis of transient pressure from permanent down-hole gauges. Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK, p. 235 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Guliaev, D.N., Batmanova, O.V.: Pulse-code well interference test and algorithms of multi-well deconvolution – new technologies of cross-well formation properties definition. Vestnik of Russian New University, Series: Complex Systems: Models, Analysis, Control, vol. 4, pp. 26–32 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Krichevsky, V.S.: Well surveys - way to incremental oil production. https://sofoil.com/MRT%20report.pdf. Accessed 08 May 2020

  10. SOFOIL: Multiwell well testing. Technology Overview. https://docplayer.ru/79765531-Multiskvazhinnye-gdi-tehnologicheskiy-obzor.html. Accessed 08 May 2020

Download references

Acknowledgements

Research conducted with support of state program for SRISA “Fundamental science research (47GP), theme №0065-2019-0019 “Non-developed zones identifications of oil fields and remaining reserves evaluation which is based on complexing of mathematic modelling, field development analysis and reservoir surveillance”” (reg # AAAA-A19-119020190071-7).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ivan Vladimirovich Afanaskin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Afanaskin, I.V. (2020). Multi-well Deconvolution for Well Test Interpretations. In: Silhavy, R., Silhavy, P., Prokopova, Z. (eds) Software Engineering Perspectives in Intelligent Systems. CoMeSySo 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1295. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63319-6_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics