Skip to main content

Conclusion and Discussion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Armenian Civil Society

Part of the book series: Societies and Political Orders in Transition ((SOCPOT))

  • 138 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter summarises the main findings of this book. We revisit the three hypotheses that guided our inquiry. All three are supported to some extent by the data we assembled. Howard’s (The Weakness of Civil Society in Post-Communist Europe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003) prediction regarding the persisting post-communist weakness of civil society in terms of membership and distrust is correct regarding the formal domain of Armenian civil society. The younger generation is more active, signalling a change. The civil society ecosystem as a whole is gradually developing and becoming more complex and interconnected. We conclude with reflections on the current change in Armenia and its implications for civil society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    A small but successful protest in Yerevan in 2013 against raising public transportation fees. The dram is the Armenian currency.

References

  • Broers, L. (2005). After the ‘revolution’: Civil society and the challenges of consolidating democracy in Georgia. Central Asian Survey, 24(3), 333–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, M. (2013). Civil society. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemment, J. (2004). The riddle of the third sector: Civil society, international aid, and NGOs in Russia. Anthropological Quarterly, 77(2), 215–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, M. M. (2003). The weakness of civil society in post-communist Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ishkanian, A., & Manusyan, S. (2019). The postprotest context in Armenia: Divergent pathways for civic actors. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Retrieved June 4, 2020, from https://carnegieeurope.eu/2019/10/24/postprotest-context-in-armenia-divergent-pathways-for-civic-actors-pub-80143

  • Salmenniemi, S. (2010). Struggling for citizenship: Civic participation and the state in Russia. Demokratizatsiya, 18(4), 309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voicu, M., & Voicu, B. (2003). Volunteering in Romania: A Rara Avis. In P. Dekker & L. Halman (Eds.), The values of volunteering: Cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 143–159). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Paturyan, Y., Gevorgyan, V. (2021). Conclusion and Discussion. In: Armenian Civil Society. Societies and Political Orders in Transition. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63226-7_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics