Skip to main content

Understanding European Solidarity, Spirit and Identity: Theory

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Education and Solidarity in the European Union
  • 210 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter serves as an introduction to theories of solidarity and its connection to spirit and identity. It points especially to Durkheim’s concepts of individuality and interdependence in the division of labour, and to Hegel who highlights the importance of critical thinking in acknowledging and challenging contradictions and conflicts that stimulates an awakening of consciousness, of spirit. The chapter finally focuses on the work of Habermas, most notably that of public sphere, communicative action and learning processes in providing an open space for individuals to express opinion. In more practical terms, when applying the theory of solidarity to issues and instruments, we learn that solidarity at European level is complex because it is demonstrated to different extents depending on the issue and on the instrument to be adopted. For solidarity to be achievable, it requires the four key components of common values and goals, risk sharing, equality, and trust.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This is similar to Ferdinand Tönnies’s distinction between Germeinschaft and Gesellschaft, in which social order is no longer dependent on the importance of tight-knit communities but rather has transformed into an order based on collections of self-interested individuals.

  2. 2.

    The example in which the sons kill their authoritarian father, giving a model of people who are equally free, pursuing similar goals and acting in solidarity (Steinvorth 2017).

  3. 3.

    YouGov survey, April 2018 in P. Genschel and A. Hemerijck (2018).

Bibliography

  • Baynes, K. (2016). Habermas. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benchimol, A., & Maley, W. (2007). Spheres of Influence: Intellectual and Cultural Publics from Shakespeare to Habermas. Bern: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beutler, B. (2017). Solidarity in the EU: A Critique of Solidarity and of the EU. In A. Grimmel & S. My Giang, Solidarity in the European Union: A Fundamental Value in Crisis. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunkhorst, H., Kreide, R., & Lafont, C. (2018). The Habermas Handbook. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1973). Moral Education: A Study in the Theory and Application of the Sociology of Education. New York: The Free Press, Macmillan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1997). The Division of Labour in Society. Hampshire: Macmillan Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (2003). Moral Education. New York: Dover Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Union. (2012a, October 26). Consolidated Version of the Treaty of the European Union. Official Journal of the European Union (C/326/13), Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Union. (2012b, October 26). Consolidated Version of the Treaty of the Functioning of the European Union. Official Journal of the European Union (C/326/47).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Union. (2012c, October 26). Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Official Journal of the European Union (C326/391), Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forst, R. (2018). The Discourse Theory of Morality: Discourse Ethics—Notes on a Program of Philosophical Justification (1983). In H. Brunkhorst, R. Kreide, & C. Lafont (Eds.), The Habermas Handbook. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genschel, P., & Hemerijck, A. (2018). Solidarity in Europe (School of Transnational Governance Policy Briefs, 2018/01). Florence: European University Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1978). Durkheim. Glasgow: Harvester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1962). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Boston: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1975). Legitimation Crisis. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1989). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Enquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Boston: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1990). Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Boston: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1996). Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Boston: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1998). The Inclusion of the Other. Boston: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (2001a). Why Europe Needs a Constitution (New Left Review, N. 11).

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (2001b). The Postnational Constellation: Political Essays. Boston: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (2004). Europe: The Faltering Project. Polity Press: Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (2012). The Crisis of the European Union: A Response. Boston: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (2015). The Lure of Technology. Boston: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hechter, M. (2001). Sociology of Solidarity. In N. Smelser & P. Baltes (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Studies. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G. (2007). Lectures on the Philosophy of Spirit (edition translated by R. Williams). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joerges, C. (2018). European Citizenship. In H. Brunkhorst, R. Kreide, & C. Lafont (Eds.), The Habermas Handbook. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karagiannis, N. (2007a). Introduction: Solidarity in Europe: Politics, Religion and Knowledge. In N. Karagiannis (Ed.), European Solidarity. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karagiannis, N. (2007b). European Solidarity. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knodt, M., & Tews, A. (2017). European Solidarity and Its Limits: Insights from Current Political Challenges. In A. Grimmel & S. My Giang, Solidarity in the European Union: A Fundamental Value in Crisis. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kybceck, E. (2015). Geist (Spirit): History of the Concept. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioural Sciences. Oxford: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Möllers, C. (2018). Democracy, Law, and Society: Between Facts and Norms (1992): Points of Reference: The Emergence of Political Philosophy from Theoretical Philosophy. In H. Brunkhorst, R. Kreide, & C. Lafont (Eds.), The Habermas Handbook. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, J.-W. (2007). Constitutional Patriotism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, M., & St. John, S. K. (2019). Conclusion. In S. K. St. John & M. Murphy, Educations and Public Policy in the European Union: Crossing Boundaries. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, Springer Nature.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunner-Winkler, G. (2018). Learning Processes. In H. Brunkhorst, R. Kreide, & C. Lafont (Eds.), The Habermas Handbook. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Offe, C. (2000). Democracy and Trust. Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory, 47(96), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Offe, C. (2007). Obligations Versus Costs: Types and Contexts of Solidary Action. In N. Karagiannis (Ed.), European Solidarity. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Outhwaite, W. (2007). Who Needs Solidarity? In N. Karagiannis (Ed.), European Solidarity. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, W. S. (1995). Durkheim and Moral Education for Children: A Recently Discovered Lecture. Journal of Moral Education, 24(1), 19–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sangiovanni, A. (2012). Solidarity in the European Union: Problems and Prospects. In J. Dickson & P. Eleftheriadis (Eds.), Philosophical Foundations of European Law. Oxford: Oxford Scholarship Online.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sangiovanni, A. (2013). Solidarity in the European Union. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 33(2), 213–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • St. John, S. K., & Murphy, M. (2019). Educations and Public Policy in the European Union: Crossing Boundaries. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, Springer Nature.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinvorth, U. (2017). Applying the Idea of Solidarity to Europe. In A. Grimmel & S. My Giang, Solidarity in the European Union: A Fundamental Value in Crisis. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strecker, D. (2018). The Theory of Communicative Action (1981): A Classic of Social Theory. In H. Brunkhorst, R. Kreide, & C. Lafont (Eds.), The Habermas Handbook. New York: Columbia Univerity Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah K. St. John .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

St. John, S.K. (2021). Understanding European Solidarity, Spirit and Identity: Theory. In: Education and Solidarity in the European Union. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63042-3_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics