Abstract
The following represents an overview of the ethico-legal aspects of induced abortion from the perspective of the classical Ḥanafī School of Islamic law. The school considers abortion to be a sin and a crime after the clear manifestation of the creation of the human being in the womb. While some Ḥanafī jurists take clear manifestation of creation to refer to ensoulment (120 days postconception based on the interpretation of a ḥadīth), others take it to refer to the physical formation of the fetus. Prior to the manifestation of creation, there is considerable legal diversity within the school concerning the ethico-legal status of induced abortion.
This chapter examines the ethico-legal perspectives on induced abortion within the Ḥanafī School of Islamic law. The presentation is purely academic and hence does not constitute a fatwā. Since the Ḥanafī School is the largest school of Islamic law, and given the inherent plurality of the Sunnī ethico-legal tradition, providing a comprehensive reading of all of the different opinions presented by Ḥanafī jurists, both classical and modern, is not feasible. This piece instead outlines the dominant positions of leading authorities within the school and highlights several areas of contestation that remain part of the continuing Ḥanafī discourse on the ethical and legal aspects of abortion. As there are many ethico-legal dimensions of induced abortion and it is not possible to analyze all of these in detail within the scope of the current work, the chapter focuses on the following interrelated questions: What is the legal status leading Ḥanafī authorities assign to induced abortion? How does this status relate to timing of abortion? What are the criteria for determining when a fetus becomes a human being? Does the mother need the father’s permission for abortion? Does abortion have penal consequences? Is abortion in case of pregnancy from rape permissible? The discussion of these questions will be preceded by a brief description of the Ḥanafī School and followed by a short evaluation of the arguments presented.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
‘Abd al-Majīd Maḥmūd ‘Abd al-Majīd. (1979). al-Ittijāhāt al-fiqhiyya ‘inda aṣḥāb al-ḥadīth fī l-qarn al-thālith al-hijrī. Cairo: Dār al-Wafā’.
Abū Zahra. (1997). Abū Ḥanīfa. Cairo: Dār al-Fikr al-‘Arabī.
Al-Bazzāzī, Muḥammad b. Muḥammad al-Kirdarī. (2010). al-Fatāwā al-Bazzāziyya. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr.
‘Alī Ḥaydar. (2003). Durar al-ḥukkām sharḥ majallat al-aḥkām. Translated from Ottoman to Arabic by Fahmī al-Ḥusaynī. Riyad: Dār ‘Ālam al-Kutub.
Al-Kawthari, Muhammad ibn Adam. (2006). Birth control & abortion in Islam. Santa Barbara: White Thread Press.
Al-Mawṣilī, Abū al-Faḍl ‘Abd Allāh b. Maḥmūd. al-Ikhtiyār li-ta‘līl al-mukhtār. Damascus: Dar Qubā’.
Al-Maydānī, ‘Abd al-Ghanī al-Ghunaymī. (2002). al-Lubāb fī sharḥ al-kitāb. Damascus: Maktabat al-‘Ilm al-Ḥadīth.
Al-Qāsim, ‘Abd al-Muḥsin. (2007). al-Masbūk ‘alā minḥat al-sulūk sharḥ tuḥfat al-muluk. Riyad.
Al-Sarakhsī, Shams al-A’imma Muḥammad b. Aḥmad. (1993). al-Mabsūṭ. Beirut: Dar al Ma’rifa.
Ibn ‘Ābidīn, Muḥammad Amīn. (1979). Ḥashiyat nasamāt al-asḥār ‘alā sharḥ ifāḍat al-anwār ‘alā matn uṣūl al manār. Muṣṭafā al-Bābī al-Ḥalabī.
Ibn ‘Ābidīn, Muḥammad Amīn. (2003). Radd al-muhtār ‘alā al-durr al-mukhtār sharḥ tanwīr al-abṣār Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyya.
Ibn Nujaym. al-Baḥr al-rā’iq. Dār al-Kitāb al-Islāmī.
Kamāl al-Dīn Muḥammad b. ‘Abd al-Waḥīd. Fatḥ al-Qadīr li-l-‘ājiz al-faqīr, with Shams al-Dīn Qāḍī Zāda, Kashf al-rumūz wa l-asrār, with Jalāl al-Dīn al-Khwārazmī, al Kifāya ‘alā l-hidāya, with Akmal al-Dīn al-Bābirtī, al-‘Ināya ‘alā l-hidāya, with Sa‘d Allāh b. ‘Īsā, Ḥāshiyat Sa‘dī Chalabī ‘alā sharḥ al-‘ināya. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyya.
Muslim. Ibn al-Ḥajjāj Abū l-Ḥasan al-Qushayrī al-Nīsābūrī. al-Musnad al-ṣaḥīḥ al-mukhtaṣar. Beirut: Dār Iḥyā’ al-Turāth al-‘Arabī.
Qāḍī Khān, Fakhr al-Dīn Ḥasan b. Manṣūr. (2010). Fatāwā Qāḍīkhān. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr.
Sirāj al-Dīn ‘Umar b. Ibrāhīm b. Nujaym. (2002). al-Nahr al-fā’iq sharḥ kanz al-daqā’iq. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyya.
Stodolsky, V. (2012). A new historical model and periodization for the perception of the Sunnah of the Prophet and his companions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The University of Chicago.
Ucatli, A. (2009). Islam Hukukunda Cenine Mudahelenin Hukmu. Unpublished master’s thesis. Istanbul University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stodolsky, M.V., Padela, A.I. (2021). Abortion in Hanaf ī Law. In: Bagheri, A. (eds) Abortion. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63023-2_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63023-2_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-63022-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-63023-2
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)