Skip to main content

Accountability, social justice and educational research

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Educational Research for Social Justice

Part of the book series: Education Science, Evidence, and the Public Good ((EDUS,volume 1))

Abstract

Accountability has become a central plank of education policies across the world over the last four decades. The form this takes varies, and can include national tests, school inspection and teacher appraisal. A substantial body of research has demonstrated that accountability policies have many unintended negative impacts on teachers and on pupils. Drawing on data from England (UK), this chapter focuses particularly on the way in which current policies further disadvantage those who are already disadvantaged, and are thus contrary to social justice. Despite evidence about negative impacts, policy makers continue to support accountability policies. Their motivations, and the evidence they have drawn on, are explored. It is argued that politicians and educationalists tend to have contrasting understandings of the purposes of education and how it contributes to the public good, and that this results in tensions between the two groups, and a tendency for politicians to disregard evidence from educational research. It is also suggested that researchers could do more to make their findings accessible and usable. The chapter concludes by reviewing recent changes in English accountability policies, and some signs that the negative impacts of current forms of accountability are being recognised internationally, which may result in change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Before this time Her Majesty’s Inspectorate (HMI) existed to assess standards and trends throughout the education system; to advise central government on the state of the system nationally; and to contribute to the maintenance and improvement of standards in the system by the identification and dissemination of good practice. Only a small minority of schools underwent full inspections; HMI visited others as part of curriculum reviews etc. Ofsted, in contrast, was designed to inspect all state-funded schools, giving them grades ranging from Outstanding to Inadequate, and publishing reports which could provide information for parents.

  2. 2.

    In 2017, the NUT merged with the Association of Teachers and Lecturers to become the National Education Union (NEU).

  3. 3.

    Academies and free schools, making up about 40% of all schools, are run by multi-academy trusts funded directly by the DfE. Other schools are funded via Local Authorities. Sponsored academies are schools that were previously failing, and are now run by a multi-academy trust (which the government assumes will bring about improvement). They contrast with converter academies which have chosen to become academies.

  4. 4.

    Science tests taken at age 11 and statutory tests at age 14 were in the original package but have been discontinued.

  5. 5.

    GCSE (General Certificate of Secondary Education) exams at age 16 are used both to determine future educational and employment opportunities open to young people, and to measure school performance.

  6. 6.

    Other forms of accountability are more local: to the school governing body or multi-academy trust, or the Local Authority (for schools funded through a Local Authority). This chapter does not discuss these.

  7. 7.

    Some government statistics are based on current eligibility for free school meals rather than disadvantage. Both measures are used in this chapter.

  8. 8.

    For a discussion of these see Chapter 7, Hutchings 2021.

  9. 9.

    When converter academies were created in 2010, only schools graded ‘Outstanding’ by Ofsted were allowed to apply to convert.

  10. 10.

    Teacher Tapp is an app which allows teachers to share thoughts and opinions by answering three short multiple-choice questions sent to their phones at 3:30 pm each day. They are sent the results, which are also published online. The number of teachers responding to questions on the app is growing. In October 2019 there were almost 5000.

  11. 11.

    High-stakes tests are those for which the results that have real consequences for pupils and/or teachers and their schools. GCSE exams have consequences for both. The national tests taken by primary school children have real consequences only for teachers and schools.

  12. 12.

    Alternative provision is education arranged by local authorities for pupils who, because of exclusion, illness or other reasons, would not otherwise receive suitable education; pupils on a fixed period exclusion; and pupils being directed by schools to off-site provision to improve their behaviour.

  13. 13.

    The European Computer Driving Licence has now been removed from the list of qualifications that ‘count’ for accountability purposes.

  14. 14.

    Schools can ask for specific children to be ‘disapplied’ from taking national tests. In the NUT research, some headteachers said they put in requests for specific individuals, on the grounds that preparing for and taking the tests was placing inappropriate pressure on the children in question, but that their requests had been turned down.

  15. 15.

    The number of countries scoring significantly higher than England in reading decreased from 12 in 2015 to 9 in 2018; in maths, it decreased from 19 to 12; and in science increased from 9 to 10 (Sizmur et al. 2019).

  16. 16.

    Current tests include TIMSS (Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study) and PIRLS (Progress in International Reading Literacy Study), in addition to PISA.

  17. 17.

    In addition to concerns about the impact of PISA, critics have voiced concerns about the validity of PISA’s findings, identifying serious problems with sampling, international comparability, and the use of statistics (e.g. Goldstein 2004, 2013; Kreiner 2011; Meyer and Benavot 2013; Meyer et al. 2014).

  18. 18.

    This concern was not fully addressed until some 25 years later when the Conservatives were again in power, and introduced a Spelling Punctuation and Grammar test for 11-year-olds, in which they have to show understanding of over 50 grammatical terms, including some which few adults are aware of: e.g. fronted adverbial, modal verb (DfE 2013b).

  19. 19.

    Other policies have focused on improving attainment for disadvantaged groups. When Blair’s New Labour was elected, the same accountability policies were continued; New Labour was attempting to find ‘a third way’ between capitalism and socialism, and maintained many of the education policies created by the Conservatives. However, they also put in place a number of strategies to raise attainment in deprived areas: sponsored academies, Education Action Zones, Excellence in Cities, the London Challenge, and City Challenge. And subsequently, the Coalition government introduced the Pupil Premium – additional funding a school received for each disadvantaged pupil, but discontinued some previous policies.

  20. 20.

    Teacher Tapp (5 Nov 2018) reported that the motivation secondary teachers most frequently indicated was wanting to make a difference to pupils’ lives. Among primary teachers, this was second only to wanting to work with children.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Merryn Hutchings .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hutchings, M. (2021). Accountability, social justice and educational research. In: Ross, A. (eds) Educational Research for Social Justice . Education Science, Evidence, and the Public Good, vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62572-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62572-6_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-62571-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-62572-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics