Abstract
Accountability has become a central plank of education policies across the world over the last four decades. The form this takes varies, and can include national tests, school inspection and teacher appraisal. A substantial body of research has demonstrated that accountability policies have many unintended negative impacts on teachers and on pupils. Drawing on data from England (UK), this chapter focuses particularly on the way in which current policies further disadvantage those who are already disadvantaged, and are thus contrary to social justice. Despite evidence about negative impacts, policy makers continue to support accountability policies. Their motivations, and the evidence they have drawn on, are explored. It is argued that politicians and educationalists tend to have contrasting understandings of the purposes of education and how it contributes to the public good, and that this results in tensions between the two groups, and a tendency for politicians to disregard evidence from educational research. It is also suggested that researchers could do more to make their findings accessible and usable. The chapter concludes by reviewing recent changes in English accountability policies, and some signs that the negative impacts of current forms of accountability are being recognised internationally, which may result in change.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Before this time Her Majesty’s Inspectorate (HMI) existed to assess standards and trends throughout the education system; to advise central government on the state of the system nationally; and to contribute to the maintenance and improvement of standards in the system by the identification and dissemination of good practice. Only a small minority of schools underwent full inspections; HMI visited others as part of curriculum reviews etc. Ofsted, in contrast, was designed to inspect all state-funded schools, giving them grades ranging from Outstanding to Inadequate, and publishing reports which could provide information for parents.
- 2.
In 2017, the NUT merged with the Association of Teachers and Lecturers to become the National Education Union (NEU).
- 3.
Academies and free schools, making up about 40% of all schools, are run by multi-academy trusts funded directly by the DfE. Other schools are funded via Local Authorities. Sponsored academies are schools that were previously failing, and are now run by a multi-academy trust (which the government assumes will bring about improvement). They contrast with converter academies which have chosen to become academies.
- 4.
Science tests taken at age 11 and statutory tests at age 14 were in the original package but have been discontinued.
- 5.
GCSE (General Certificate of Secondary Education) exams at age 16 are used both to determine future educational and employment opportunities open to young people, and to measure school performance.
- 6.
Other forms of accountability are more local: to the school governing body or multi-academy trust, or the Local Authority (for schools funded through a Local Authority). This chapter does not discuss these.
- 7.
Some government statistics are based on current eligibility for free school meals rather than disadvantage. Both measures are used in this chapter.
- 8.
- 9.
When converter academies were created in 2010, only schools graded ‘Outstanding’ by Ofsted were allowed to apply to convert.
- 10.
Teacher Tapp is an app which allows teachers to share thoughts and opinions by answering three short multiple-choice questions sent to their phones at 3:30Â pm each day. They are sent the results, which are also published online. The number of teachers responding to questions on the app is growing. In October 2019 there were almost 5000.
- 11.
High-stakes tests are those for which the results that have real consequences for pupils and/or teachers and their schools. GCSE exams have consequences for both. The national tests taken by primary school children have real consequences only for teachers and schools.
- 12.
Alternative provision is education arranged by local authorities for pupils who, because of exclusion, illness or other reasons, would not otherwise receive suitable education; pupils on a fixed period exclusion; and pupils being directed by schools to off-site provision to improve their behaviour.
- 13.
The European Computer Driving Licence has now been removed from the list of qualifications that ‘count’ for accountability purposes.
- 14.
Schools can ask for specific children to be ‘disapplied’ from taking national tests. In the NUT research, some headteachers said they put in requests for specific individuals, on the grounds that preparing for and taking the tests was placing inappropriate pressure on the children in question, but that their requests had been turned down.
- 15.
The number of countries scoring significantly higher than England in reading decreased from 12 in 2015 to 9 in 2018; in maths, it decreased from 19 to 12; and in science increased from 9 to 10 (Sizmur et al. 2019).
- 16.
Current tests include TIMSS (Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study) and PIRLS (Progress in International Reading Literacy Study), in addition to PISA.
- 17.
In addition to concerns about the impact of PISA, critics have voiced concerns about the validity of PISA’s findings, identifying serious problems with sampling, international comparability, and the use of statistics (e.g. Goldstein 2004, 2013; Kreiner 2011; Meyer and Benavot 2013; Meyer et al. 2014).
- 18.
This concern was not fully addressed until some 25Â years later when the Conservatives were again in power, and introduced a Spelling Punctuation and Grammar test for 11-year-olds, in which they have to show understanding of over 50 grammatical terms, including some which few adults are aware of: e.g. fronted adverbial, modal verb (DfE 2013b).
- 19.
Other policies have focused on improving attainment for disadvantaged groups. When Blair’s New Labour was elected, the same accountability policies were continued; New Labour was attempting to find ‘a third way’ between capitalism and socialism, and maintained many of the education policies created by the Conservatives. However, they also put in place a number of strategies to raise attainment in deprived areas: sponsored academies, Education Action Zones, Excellence in Cities, the London Challenge, and City Challenge. And subsequently, the Coalition government introduced the Pupil Premium – additional funding a school received for each disadvantaged pupil, but discontinued some previous policies.
- 20.
Teacher Tapp (5 Nov 2018) reported that the motivation secondary teachers most frequently indicated was wanting to make a difference to pupils’ lives. Among primary teachers, this was second only to wanting to work with children.
References
Alexander, R. (Ed.). (2010). Children, their world, their education: Final report and recommendations of the Cambridge Primary Review. London: Routledge.
Allen, B. (2018). The pupil premium is not working (part I): Do not measure attainment gaps. [Blog] Retrieved from https://rebeccaallen.co.uk/2018/09/10/the-pupil-premium-is-not-working/
Allen, R., Mian, E., & Sims, S. (2016). Social inequalities in access to teachers. Social Market Foundation Commission on Inequality in Education: Briefing 2. London: Social Market Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.smf.co.uk/publications/social-inequalities-in-access-to-teachers/
Amrein, A., & Berliner, D. (2002). High-stakes testing, uncertainty, and student learning. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10(18). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v10n18.2002
Amrein, A., & Berliner, D. (2003). The effects of high-stakes testing on student motivation and learning. Educational Leadership, 60(5), 32–38.
Ball, S. (1990). Politics and policy making in education. London: Routledge.
Ball, S. (2003b). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215–228.
Bassey, M., et al. (2013). Letters: Gove will bury pupils in facts and rules. The Independent, 20 March. Retrieved from https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/letters/letters-gove-will-bury-pupils-in-facts-and-rules-8540741.html
BBC. (2015). Exam focus damaging pupils’ mental health, says NUT. 4 July. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-33380155
Bell, L., & Stevenson, H. (2006). Education policy: Process, themes and impact. London: Routledge.
Bennett, R., & Burgess, K. (2015). True scale of child mental health crisis uncovered. The Times, 12 March, pp. 1, 8.
Berliner, D. (2011). Rational responses to high stakes testing: The case of curriculum narrowing and the harm that follows. Cambridge Journal of Education, 41(3), 287–302.
Blair, T. (1995). Leader’s speech. Brighton, UK. 3 October. Retrieved from http://www.britishpoliticalspeech.org/speech-archive.htm?speech=201
Blunkett, D. (2000). Influence or irrelevance: can social science improve government? Speech made by David Blunkett, Secretary of State for Education and Employment to a meeting convened by the ESRC, 2 February. Research Intelligence, 71, 12–21.
Brill, F., Grayson, H., Kuhn, L., & O’Donnell, S. (2018). What impact does accountability have on curriculum, standards and engagement in education? A literature review. Slough: NFER.
Burns, J. (2016). Primary pupils ‘feel test pressure’ – Survey. BBC News. 9 May. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-36229995
Callaghan, J. (1976). Speech at Ruskin College, 18 October. http://www.educationengland.org.uk/documents/speeches/1976ruskin.html
Carnoy, M., & Loeb, S. (2002). Does external accountability affect student outcomes? A cross-state analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(4), 305–331.
CBI [Confederation of British Industry]. (2015). Tomorrow’s world: Inspiring primary scientists. London: Confederation of British Industry.
Childline. (2016). It turned out someone did care: Annual review 2015–16. London: National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children. Retrieved from https://learning.nspcc.org.uk/media/1373/childline-annual-review-2015-16.pdf
Coulby, D., & Bash, L. (1991). Contradiction and conflict: The 1988 Education Act in action. London: Cassell.
Currie, C., Zanotti, C., Morgan, A., Currie, D., de Looze, M., Roberts, C., Samdal, O., Smith, O., & Barnekow, V. (Eds.). (2012). Social determinants of health and well-being among young people. Health behaviour in school-aged children (HBSC) study: International report from the 2009/2010 survey. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.
DES [Department of Education and Science]. (1985). White paper: Better schools (Cmnd 9469). London: HMSO.
DES. (1987). The National curriculum: A consultation document. London: DES and Welsh Office.
DES. (1988). National curriculum task group on assessment and testing: A report. London: DES and Welsh Office.
DFE [Department For Education]. (1992). Choice and diversity: A new framework for schools. (Cm 2021). London: HMSO.
DfE [Department for Education]. (2012a). New primary curriculum to bring higher standards in English, maths and science [Press release]. 11 June 2012. London: DfE. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-primary-curriculum-to-bring-higher-standards-in-english-maths-and-science
DfE. (2013a). GCSE and equivalent results in England, 2011 to 2012 (revised). London: DfE. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/statistics-gcses-key-stage-4
DfE. (2013b). English programmes of study: key stages 1 and 2. National curriculum in England. London: DfE.
DfE. (2018a). Principles for a clear and simple accountability system. London: DfE. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/principles-for-a-clear-and-simple-school-accountability-system
DfE. (2018b). National curriculum assessments at Key Stage 1 and phonics screening checks in England, 2018 (Updated 25 October 2019). London: DfE. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/statistics-key-stage-1
DfE. (2018c). National curriculum assessments at Key Stage 2 in England, 2018 (revised). London: DfE. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/statistics-key-stage-2
DfE. (2019b). News story: Standards continue to rise in England’s schools [Press Release]. 24 January. London: DfE. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/news/standards-continue-to-rise-in-englands-schools
Dunford, J.E. (1976). Her Majesty’s inspectorate of schools in England and Wales 1860–1870. [Doctoral thesis]. Durham University, Durham, UK. Retrieved from http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/9794/
Ellis, S., & Moss, G. (2014). Ethics, education policy and research: The phonics question reconsidered. British Educational Research Journal, 40(2), 241–260.
Foster, D., & Long, R. (2017). Briefing paper: Number 7308, 29 August 2017: Regional Schools Commissioners. London: House of Commons Library.
Francis, B., & Hutchings, M. (2013). Parent Power: Using money and information to boost children’s chances of educational success. London: The Sutton Trust.
Friedman, M., & Friedman, R. (1980). Free to choose. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Jovanovich.
Furlong, J. (2003). BERA at 30. Have we come of age? Inaugural Presidential Address, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK. September. British Educational Research Journal, 30(3), 343–358.
Garner, R. (2014). Schools are becoming ‘exam factories’ which don’t equip students for the world of work, claims CBI. The Independent, 17 January. Retrieved from https://www.independent.co.uk/news/education/education-news/schools-are-becoming-exam-factories-which-dont-equip-students-for-the-world-of-work-claims-cbi-9067650.html
Garner, R. (2015). Leading headteacher exposes ‘underhand’ tactics used by schools to get round curbs on selection. The Independent, 4 March. Retrieved from https://www.independent.co.uk/news/education/education-news/leading-headteacher-exposes-underhand-tactics-used-by-schools-to-get-round-curbs-on-selection-10055011.html
Gibb, N. (2015b). Reforming education through international evidence. Speech at OECD Education Policy Outlook Conference: Making reforms happen. London, UK. 22 January. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/nick-gibb-reforming-education-through-international-evidence
Gibb, N. (2019). Twitter @NickGibbUK, 3 December 2019. Retrieved from https://twitter.com/nickgibbuk/status/1201948381658206212
Gillard, D. (2018). Education in England: A history. Retrieved from http://www.educationengland.org.uk/history/
GL Assessment. (2019). Curriculum gap: How a narrow curriculum disadvantages the disadvantaged. London: The GL Education Group. Retrieved from https://www.gl-assessment.co.uk/media/344285/gl2370_closing_the_gap_report_final_3_january_2019.pdf
Global Education Monitoring Report Team. (2017). Accountability in education: Meeting our commitments (Global education monitoring report, 2017/8). Paris: UNESCO.
Goldstein, H. (2004). International comparisons of student attainment: Some issues arising from the PISA study. Assessment in Education, 11(3), 319–330.
Goldstein, H. (2013). Educational policy: What can PISA tell us? Retrieved from http://hgeduc.blogspot.com/
Gorard, S. (2016). The complex determinants of school intake characteristics and segregation, England 1989 to 2014. Cambridge Journal of Education, 46(1), 131–146.
Gorard, S. (2018). Education policy: Evidence of equity and effectiveness. Bristol: Policy Press.
Gove, M. (2013a). Secretary of State for Education Michael Gove’s statement in the House on the OECD’s 2012 PISA results. December 3. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/2012-oecd-pisa-results
Gove, M. (2013b). I refuse to surrender to the Marxist teachers hell-bent on destroying our schools: Education Secretary berates ‘the new enemies of promise’ for opposing his plans. Daily Mail, 23 March. Retrieved from https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2298146/I-refuse-surrender-Marxist-teachers-hell-bent-destroying-schools-Education-Secretary-berates-new-enemies-promise-opposing-plans.html
Gove, M. (2014). Michael Gove speaks about the future of education reform. Education Reform Summit, London, UK. 10 July. London: DfE. Speech at Education Reform Summit, London, 10 July. Retrieved from http://www.ukpol.co.uk/michael-gove-2014-speech-on-education-reform/
Griffiths, B. (1987). Memorandum from Griffiths to Thatcher. Margaret Thatcher Archive. 1987 Jul 17 Fr (Archive TNA) PREM19/2121 f291. Margaret Thatcher Foundation. Retrieved from https://www.margaretthatcher.org/
Griffiths, B. (1988). Memoranda from Griffiths to Thatcher. Margaret Thatcher Archive 1988 Dec 16 Fr. (Archive TNA) PREM 19/2643 f208. Margaret Thatcher Foundation. Retrieved from https://www.margaretthatcher.org/
Hanushek, E., & Kimko, D. (2000). Schooling, labor-force quality, and the growth of nations. American Economic Review, 90(5), 1184–1208.
Hanushek, E., & Raymond, M. (2005). Does school accountability lead to improved student performance? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24(2), 297–327.
Hanushek, E., & Woessmann, L. (2010). The high cost of low educational performance: The long-run economic impact of improving PISA outcomes. Paris: OECD. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/44417824.pdf
Harford, S. (2019). Response to letter from Headteachers’ Roundtable. Retrieved from https://headteachersroundtable.wordpress.com/2019/09/26/letter-to-ofsted-and-the-inspectorates-response/
Harlen, W., & Deakin Crick, R. (2002). A systematic review of the impact of summative assessment and tests on students’ motivation for learning (EPPI-Centre Review). London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education.
Hayek, F. (1973). Law, legislation and liberty, Volume 1. London: Routledge and Keagan Paul.
Hazell, W. (2018). Exclusive: England held back by rote-learning, warns Pisa boss. Times Educational Supplement, 23 April. Retrieved from https://www.tes.com/news/exclusive-england-held-back-rote-learning-warns-pisa-boss
Hobbs, G., & Vignoles, A. (2009). Is children’s free school meal ‘eligibility’ a good proxy for family income? British Educational Research Journal, 36(4), 673–690.
House of Commons. (1991). Debate: Reading standards. House of Commons Hansard, 15 January, vol. 183, col. 724. Retrieved from https://hansard.parliament.uk/
House of Commons. (2003). Debate: Government targets. House of Commons Hansard, 7 July, vol. 408, col. 797. Retrieved from https://hansard.parliament.uk/
House of Commons. (2007). Debate: Literacy and numeracy standards. House of Commons Hansard, 28 June, vol. 462, col. 459. Retrieved from https://hansard.parliament.uk/
House of Commons. (2013). Statement on the future of examinations. House of Commons Hansard, 11 June, vol. 564, col. 161. Retrieved from https://hansard.parliament.uk/
House of Commons Education Committee. (2005). [Education and Skills Committee]. Teaching children to read. Eighth Report of Session 2004–05. HC 121, incorporating HC 1299-I from Session 2003–04. Retrieved from https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200405/cmselect/cmeduski/121/121.pdf
House of Commons Education Committee. (2008). [Children Schools and Families Committee]. Testing and assessment. Third Report of Session 2007–08. HC169-1. Retrieved from https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200708/cmselect/cmchilsch/169/169.pdf
House of Commons Education Committee. (2014). Oral evidence: Academies and free schools. HC 981. Wedenesday 5 March. Retrieved from http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/committeeevidence.svc/evidencedocument/education-committee/academies-and-free-schools/oral/7266.ht
House of Commons Education Committee. (2015). Exams for 15–19 year-olds in England – follow up. Written evidence. Supplementary evidence submitted by the Department for Education. EXA0039. Retrieved from http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/committeeevidence.svc/evidencedocument/education-committee/exams-for-1519-year-olds-in-england-follow-up/written/17097.html
House of Commons Education Committee. (2017a). Primary assessment. Eleventh Report of Session 2016–17. HC682. Retrieved from https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmeduc/682/682.pdf
House of Commons Education Committee. (2017b). Primary assessment: Government response to the committee’s eleventh report of session 2016–17. HC501. Retrieved from https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cmselect/cmeduc/501/501.pdf
Hutchings, M. (2015). Exam factories: The impact of accountability measures on children and young people. London: NUT.
Hutchings, M. (2021b). Inequality, social mobility and the ‘glass floor’: How more affluent parents secure educational advantage for their children. In Ross. A. (Ed) Educational research for social justice (pp. 137–169). Cham: Springer.
Hutchinson, J., & Crenna-Jennings, W. (2019). Unexplained pupil exits: A growing problem. Working Paper. London: Education Policy Institute. Retrieved from https://epi.org.uk/publications-and-research/unexplained-pupil-exits/
Institute of Directors. (2016). Lifelong learning: Reforming education for an age of technical and demographic change. Policy Report. London: IoD. Retrieved from https://www.iod.com/Portals/0/PDFs/Campaigns%20and%20Reports/Employment%20and%20Skills/Life%20Long%20Learning%20Report.pdf?ver=2016-09-14-124014-230
Jerrim, J., & Shure, N. (2016). Achievement of 15-year-olds in England: PISA 2015 national report. London: DfE.
Johnston, R., & Watson, J. (2005). The effects of synthetic phonics teaching on reading and spelling attainment: A seven year longitudinal study. Edinburgh: The Scottish Executive. Retrieved from https://dera.ioe.ac.uk/14793/1/0023582.pdf
Kamens, D. (2015). A maturing global testing regime meets the world economy: test scores and economic growth, 1960–2012. Comparative Education Review, 59(3), 420–446.
Kreiner, S. (2011). Is the foundation under PISA solid? A critical look at the scaling model underlying international comparisons of student attainment (Research Report 11/1). Copenhagen: Department of Biostatistics, University of Copenhagen.
Lobascher, S. (2011). What are the potential impacts of high-stakes testing on literacy education in Australia? Literacy Learning: The Middle Years, 19(2), 9–19.
Lowe, R. (1862). Debate: Education: The revised code of regulations, House of Commons Hansard, vol 165, col.242. Retrieved from https://hansard.parliament.uk/
McCallum, A.(2021) Who gets to be creative in class? Creativity as a matter of social justice in secondary English lessons. In Ross. A. (Ed) Educational research for social justice (pp. 79–95). Cham: Springer.
McCulloch, G. (2018). Educational research: Which way now? British Educational Research Journal, 44(2), 175–190.
McKee, R. (2017). Parents pushing for special needs diagnosis for children, survey says. The Guardian, 24 February. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/education/2017/feb/24/parents-pushing-for-special-needs-diagnosis-for-children-survey-says
Meadows, M. (2015). Teacher ethics in summative assessment. Paper presented at Oxford University Centre for Educational Assessment. Retrieved from http://www.slideshare.net/ofqual/ofqual-ethicssymposiummichellemeadows
Medical Research Council. (2000). Framework for the development and evaluation of RCTs for complex investigations. London: Medical Research Council.
Medical Research Council. (2008). Developing and evaluating complex interventions: New guidance. London: Medical Research Council.
Meyer, H.-D., & Benavot, A. (Eds.). (2013). PISA, power, and policy: The emergence of global educational governance. Oxford: Symposium Books.
Meyer, H.-D., Zahedi, K., et al. (2014). Open letter to Andreas Schleicher, OECD, Paris. Policy Futures in Education, 12(7), 872–877.
More than a Score. (2019). Retrieved from https://www.morethanascore.org.uk/
Morgan, N. (2015). Speech: Why knowledge matters [Press Release]. Carlton Club, London, UK. 27 January. London: DfE. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/nicky-morgan-why-knowledge-matters
Moss, G. (2017). Assessment, accountability and the literacy curriculum: Reimagining the future in the light of the past. Literacy, 51(2), 56–63.
Moss, G. (2016). Knowledge, education and research: Making common cause across communities of practice. British Educational Research Journal, 42(6), 927–944.
National Union of Teachers. (2016). The mismeasurement of learning: How tests are damaging children and primary education. London: NUT.
Neelands, J., Belfiore, E., Hart, C. F. N., Perrin, L., Brock, S., Holdaway, D., & Woddis, J. (2015). Enriching Britain: Culture, creativity and growth. Coventry: The University of Warwick.
Newcastle Commission. (1861). Report of the commissioners appointed to enquire into the state of popular education in England, Volume I. London: HMSO. Retrieved from http://www.educationengland.org.uk/documents/newcastle1861/newcastle1.html
NFER [National Foundation for Educational Research]. (2018). NAHT and NFER publish major new studies into school accountability [Press release]. 14 September. Slough: NFER. Retrieved from https://www.nfer.ac.uk/news-events/press-releases/naht-and-nfer-publish-major-new-studies-into-school-accountability/
Nye, P. (2018). Some MATs look to have been hit hard by the withdrawal of ECDL. London: FFT Education Datalab. Retrieved from https://ffteducationdatalab.org.uk/2018/11/some-mats-look-to-have-been-hit-hard-by-the-withdrawal-of-ecdl/
OECD [Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development]. (2011). Education at a glance: 2011 OECD indicators. Paris: OECD.
OECD. (2015). PISA 2015 results (Volume III). Students’ well-being. Paris: OECD.
OECD. (2019a). PISA 2018 results (Volume III): What school life means for students’ lives. Paris: OECD.
Ofsted. (2019a). Teacher well-being at work in schools and further education providers. Ref. no: 190034. London: Ofsted. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/teacher-well-being-at-work-in-schools-and-further-education-providers
Owen, D. (2019). What is off-rolling, and how does Ofsted look at it on inspection? Ofsted blog: schools, early years, further education and skills. 10 May. Retrieved from https://educationinspection.blog.gov.uk/2019/05/10/what-is-off-rolling-and-how-does-ofsted-look-at-it-on-inspection/
Putwain, D. (2008). Test anxiety and GCSE performance: The effect of gender and socio-economic background. Educational Psychology in Practice, 24(4), 319–334.
Ramirez, F., Luo, X., Schofer, E., & Meyer, J. (2006). Student achievement and national economic growth. American Journal of Education, 113(1), 1–29.
Rapple, B. (1992). A Victorian experiment in economic efficiency in education. Economics of Education Review, 11(4), 301–316.
Ravitch, D. (2010). The death and life of the great American school system: How testing and choice re undermining education. New York: Basic Books.
Rodway, C., Tham, S.-G., Ibrahim, S., Turnbull, P., Windfuhr, K., Shaw, J., Kapur, N., & Appleby, L. (2016). Suicide in children and young people in England: a consecutive case series. The Lancet Psychiatry, 3(8), 751–759.
Ross, A. (2000b). Curriculum: Construction and critique. London: Falmer Press.
Sharp, A. (2013). Exam culture and suicidal behaviour among young people. Education and Health, 31(1), 7–11.
Shepherd, J. (2013a). Michael Gove labels professors critical of new curriculum as ‘bad academia’. The Guardian, 21 March. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/education/2013/mar/21/michael-gove-professors-new-national-curriculum
Sizmur, J., Ager, R., Bradshaw, J., Classick, R., Galvis, M., Packer, J., Thomas, D., & Wheater, R. (2019). Achievement of 15-year-olds in England: PISA 2018 results (Research report DFE-RR961). London: Department for Education.
Spielman, A. (2018). HMCI commentary: curriculum and the new education inspection framework. London: DfE. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/hmci-commentary-curriculum-and-the-new-education-inspection-framework
Symes, W. (2017). Response to ‘Accountability measures: the factory farm version of education’. The Psychology of Education Review, 41(1), 41–44.
Teacher Tapp. (2018). When (and why) do teachers decide they want to be teachers? What Teachers Tapped this Week #58. 5 November. Retrieved from https://teachertapp.co.uk/what-teachers-tapped-this-week-58-5th-november-2018/
Teacher Tapp. (2019a). Why are teachers walking out? The leading causes of teacher burnout in the UK. Retrieved from https://teachertapp.co.uk/why-uk-teachers-are-walking-out/
Teacher Tapp. (2019b). 5: The increasing creep of 3-year GCSE courses. Retrieved from https://teachertapp.co.uk/what-teachers-tapped-teacher-gifts-for-confessions-mugs-creep/
Thatcher, M. (1987a). Speech to conservative rally, Solihull, May 28. Thatcher Archive: Speaking Text. Retrieved from https://www.margaretthatcher.org/document/106852
Thatcher, M. (1987b). Speech to conservative party conference, Blackpool, October 9. Thatcher Archive: CCOPR 664/87. Retrieved from https://www.margaretthatcher.org/document/106941
Thatcher, M. (1993). The Thatcher years. London: HarperCollins.
Thomson, D. (2018). The link between exclusions, alternative provision and off-rolling. London: FFT Education Datalab. Retrieved from https://ffteducationdatalab.org.uk/2018/11/the-links-between-exclusions-alternative-provision-and-off-rolling/
Tierney, S. (2018). Graphically exposing Ofsted bias? @LeadingLearner, 12 June. Retrieved from https://leadinglearner.me/2018/06/12/graphically-exposing-ofsted-bias/
von der Embse, N., Prendergast, L., Segool, N., Saecki, E., & Ryan, S. (2016). The influence of test-based accountability on school climate and teacher stress across four states. Teaching and Teacher Education, 59, 492–502.
West, A., Mattei, P., & Roberts, J. (2011). Accountability and sanctions in English schools. British Journal of Educational Studies, 59(1), 41–62.
Wheater, R., Ager, R., Burge, B., & Sizmur, J. (2013). Achievement of 15-year-olds in England: PISA 2012 national report (OECD Programme for International Student Assessment). London: DfE.
Whitty, G. (2002). Making sense of education policy. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
Whitty, G. (2006). Education(al) research and education policy making: Is conflict inevitable? British Educational Research Journal, 32(2), 159–176.
Wilby, P. (2017). David Laws: ‘The quality of education policymaking is poor’. The Guardian, 1 August. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/education/2017/aug/01/david-laws-education-policy-schools-minister-thinktank-epi
Wiliam, D. (2010). Standardized testing and school accountability. Educational Psychologist, 45(2), 107–122.
Worth, J., & Van den Brande, J. (2019). Teacher labour market in England: Annual report 2019. Slough: NFER.
Zhao, Y. (2014). How does PISA put the world at risk: Part 4: Misleading the world. National Education Policy Centre blog. Retrieved from https://nepc.colorado.edu/blog/how-does-pisa-put-world-risk
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hutchings, M. (2021). Accountability, social justice and educational research. In: Ross, A. (eds) Educational Research for Social Justice . Education Science, Evidence, and the Public Good, vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62572-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62572-6_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-62571-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-62572-6
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)