Skip to main content

Popular and Communitarian Communication in Rural Social Movements: Beyond “Diffusionism” to Emancipatory Participation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Evolution of Popular Communication in Latin America

Abstract

This study discusses the notions of communitarian and popular communication in the context of communitarian rural development experiences. It analyzes the process of renewing popular knowledge and the traditional patterns of a “communication for development” into another form of communication, organic to the interests and needs of social movements. The aim is to identify communicative practices interrelated with the emergence of collective knowledge and cooperative systems. The study is based on bibliographic, documental research and on in-depth interviews with community leaders. It concludes that the processes of communication rooted in social movements contexts, highlighted in this reflection, are consistent with the praxis of a participative development that allows a shift from the traditional view of the “communication for development” and the consolidation of an epistemology associated with popular communication.

Research developed with the support of the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq—acronym from the Portuguese). Partial and modified version of the Spanish text entitled “Comunicación popular y conocimiento en movimientos sociales rurales: el adiós al modelo de ‘Difusión de Innovaciones’.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Cooperativa de Produção Agropecuária União da Vitória.

  2. 2.

    See Gumucio-Dagron and Tufte (2008), a work that gathers their contributions and those of another 147 authors.

  3. 3.

    Available on: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0004/000400/040066sb.pdf.

  4. 4.

    Hopefully starting to be recognized as a component of “Southern Epistemologies” (Sousa Santos and Meneses 2009).

  5. 5.

    We refer to the so-called social movements, not to the large public demonstrations that happened around the world in the last decades, mainly, those mobilized with a great deal of help from digital social networks.

  6. 6.

    MST is the social movement to which COPAVI is linked.

  7. 7.

    Communities formed by remaining quilombos, or communities with a predominantly black population, descendants of ex-slaves.

  8. 8.

    See: http://aspta.org.br/category/videos/?programas=programa-paraiba.

  9. 9.

    See: http://www.asabrasil.org.br/.

  10. 10.

    See: http://aspta.org.br/.

  11. 11.

    MST was created in January 1984 and it is nowadays one of the most successful social movements in Brazil.

  12. 12.

    See: http://cirandas.net/cooperativa-de-producao-agropecuaria-vitoria-ltda.

  13. 13.

    There are similar projects in other parts of Brazil and, in general, they are called “Creole Seed.”

  14. 14.

    Collective ownership is a characteristic of all MST settlements. In general, when they settle on the land, the land is shared amongst settlers.

  15. 15.

    Exchange that dialogue favors, but it is possible to go beyond that. For example, at the Borborema Union there is a programme called “Experimental Farmers,” which consists in a concrete exchange experience based on practice. For example, if a farmer or a community implemented a new orchard irrigation system, the experience is shared with farmers from other areas, as forms of instruction and socialization of knowledge.

  16. 16.

    The printed newsletters are not of the traditional informative type. They are documentary newsletters as they talk about successful experiences in general, using examples of families who innovated in their practices.

  17. 17.

    Produced by a member of the movement in the name of Workers and Rural Workers Union of Remigio, Paraiba, and was broadcast by local radio.

References

  • Baran, P. (1964). A economia política do desenvolvimento (2nd ed.). Rio de Janeiro: Zahar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertaux, D. (2005). Los relatos de vida. Perspectiva etnosociológica. Barcelona: Edicions Bellaterra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cadavid Bringe, A. (2014). Los actuales debates sobre ‘comunicación, desarrollo y cambio social. In B. A. Cadavid & A. Gumucio Dagron (Orgs.), Pensar desde la experiencia. Comunicación participativa en el cambio social (pp. 37–54). Bogotá: Uniminuto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaparro, M. (2015). Claves para repensar los medios y el mundo que habitamos. La distopía del desarrollo. Bogotá: Desde Abajo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deliberador, L. Y., & Rampazzo, A. C. (2006). Comunicação e educação para a cidadania em uma cooperativa de assentamento do MST. Comunicação & Educação, USP, ECA, a.XI(n.3), 341–352, set.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaz Bordenave, J. (1983). Além dos meios e mensagens. Introdução à comunicação como processo, tecnologia, sistema e ciência. Petrópolis: Vozes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esteva, G. (2009). Más allá del desarrollo: la buena vida. América Latina en Movimiento, Quito, ano 33, n. 445, pp. 1–5, jun.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1977). Extensão ou comunicação? (3rd ed.). Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furtado, C. (1973). A hegemonia dos Estados Unidos e o subdesenvolvimento da América Latina. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira.

    Google Scholar 

  • González, J. A. (2012). Entre culturas e cibercultur@s: incursões e outras rotas não lineares. Editora Metodista: São Bernardo do Campo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gumucio-Dagron, A. (2014). Comunicación para el cambio social: clave del desarrollo participativo. In G. J. M. Pereira & B. A. Cadavid (Eds.), Comunicación, desarrollo y cambio social. Interrrelaciones entre comunicación, movimientos ciudadanos y medios (pp. 19–35). Bogotá: Pontificia Univ. Javeriana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gumucio-Dagron, A., & Tufte, T. (2008). Raíces e importancia: introducción. In A. Gumucio-Dagron & T. Tufte (Orgs.), Antología de comunicación para el cambio social (pp. 16–45). New Jersey/La Paz: Communication for Social Change Consortium/ Plural.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplun, M. (1985). El comunicador popular. Quito: CIESPAL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marí Sáez, V. M. (2016). Comunicaciones Ininterrumpidas. Madrid, Ppc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melucci, A. (1989). Um objetivo para os movimentos sociais? Lua Nova: Revista de Cultura e Política, São Paulo, CEDEC, n.17, jun. Disponível em. Retrieved March 12, 2020, from http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-64451989000200004.

  • Melucci, A. (1999). Acción colectiva, vida cotidiana y democracia. Cidade do México: El Colegio de México.

    Google Scholar 

  • O Território. (n.d.). Portal da Cidadania. Disponível em. Retrieved June 13, 2014, from http://www.territoriosdacidadania.gov.br/dotlrn/clubs/territriosrurais/borboremapb/one-community?page_num=0.

  • Peruzzo, C. M. K. (2004). Comunicação nos movimentos populares: a participação na Construção da Cidadania. 4.ed. Petrópolis: Vozes. Disponível em. http://www.4shared.com/office/hIItKg_o/COMUNICAO_NOS_MOVIMENTOS_POPUL.htm.

  • Peruzzo, C. M. K. (2008). Conceitos de comunicação popular, alternativa e comunitária revisitados. Reelaborações no setor. Revista Palabra Clave, Universidad de La Sabana, 11, 1.2, pp. 367–379, Disponível em. Retrieved March 17, 2020, from https://palabraclave.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/palabraclave/article/view/1503/1690.

  • Peruzzo, C. M. K. (2014). Comunicação para o desenvolvimento, comunicação para a transformação social. In A. Monteiro Neto (Org.). Sociedade, política e desenvolvimento. Desenvolvimento nas Ciências Sociais: O Estado das Artes, Livro 2 (pp. 161–195). Brasília: Ipea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schavelzon, S. (2015). Plurinacionalidad y vivir bien/buen vivir. Dos conceptos leídos desde Bolivia y Ecuador pos-constituyentes. Ecuador/Buenos Aires: Abya-YALA/CLACSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schramm, W. (1976). Comunicação de massa e desenvolvimento: o papel da informação nos países em crescimento (2nd ed.. Tradução de Muniz Sodré e Robert Lent.). Rio de Janeiro: Bloch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Servaes, J. (1996). Introduction: Participatory communication and research in development settings. In J. Servaes, T. L. Jacobson, & S. A. White (Eds.), Participatory communication for social change (pp. 13–25). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Servaes, J. (2004). Comunicación para el desarrollo: tres paradigmas, dos modelos. Revista Comunicação Midiática, Bauru, UNESP, a. 1, n. 1–2, pp. 19–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva, J. de S. (2011). Hacia el ‘dia después del desarrollo’. Descolonizar la comunicación y la educación para construir comunidades felices con modos de vida sostenibles. Campina Grande: Asociación Latinoamericana de Educación Radiofónica (ALER).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sousa Santos, Boaventura, & Meneses, M. P. (Orgs.) (2009). Epistemologias do sul. Coimbra: Almedina/CES.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vargas, T., & Uranga, W. (2010). Gestión de procesos comunicacionales. Una estrategia de intervención. In G. Cicalese (Coord.), Comunicación comunitaria. Apuntes para abordar las dimensiones de la construcción colectiva (pp. 77–93). Buenos Aires: La Crujía.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cicilia M. Krohling Peruzzo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Krohling Peruzzo, C.M. (2021). Popular and Communitarian Communication in Rural Social Movements: Beyond “Diffusionism” to Emancipatory Participation. In: Suzina, A.C. (eds) The Evolution of Popular Communication in Latin America. Palgrave Studies in Communication for Social Change. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62557-3_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics