Skip to main content

The ‘Afterlife’ of Deference (1997–2016)

  • 70 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter examines how demands for a codified constitution in the 1980s inspired the New Labour constitutional programme of the 1990s. Through a desire to make society and the political system more egalitarian, New Labour transformed the old constitution to such an extent that it no longer resembled what Bagehot and Dicey had tried to harness through their descriptions of English historical customs and mores. The constitution has been ‘deformed’ by the constitutional settlement bequeathed by New Labour, and Brexit is in part the result of a problem which has not been resolved, this being the difficulty of making an aristocratic structure match a democratic one in the second half of the twentieth century and the first decades of the twenty-first.

This title is in reference to the following chapter: ‘Concluding Note: The Afterlife of a Political Discourse’ taken from Alan S. Kahan, Liberalism in Nineteenth Century Europe. The Political Culture of Limited Suffrage, New York, Palgrave, Macmillan, 2003, pp. 193–200.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-62539-9_9
  • Chapter length: 27 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-030-62539-9
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

Notes

  1. 1.

    Bogdanor (2009, p. 276).

  2. 2.

    Barnett (1997, p. 329).

  3. 3.

    This is the way Vernon Bogdanor describes the old constitution. Bogdanor (2015b).

  4. 4.

    The following Acts were passed: The Referendum (Scotland and Wales) Act (1997), The Scotland Act (1998), The Government of Wales Act (1998), The Northern Ireland Act (1998), The Greater London Authority (Referendum) Act (1998), The European Parliamentary Elections Act (1998), The Human Rights Act (1998), the House of Lords Act (1999), The Local Government Act (2000), the Freedom of Information Act (2000), The Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act (2000), The Constitutional Reform Act (2005).

  5. 5.

    Vernon Bogdanor, The New British Constitution, Chap. 9 ‘Towards a Written Constitution’, 2009, pp. 216–231.

  6. 6.

    See Iain McLean, What’s Wrong with the British Constitution? Chap. 14: ‘We the People’, 2010, pp. 313–335 and Gordon (2010).

  7. 7.

    King (2010, p. 351).

  8. 8.

    Ibid., p. 365.

  9. 9.

    It was initially called the Department for Constitutional Affairs, in 2003, which was rather significant for a country with an uncodified constitution.

  10. 10.

    St John-Stevas (1965–1986, vol. 5, p. 212).

  11. 11.

    King (2010, p. 351).

  12. 12.

    Ibid., p. 360.

  13. 13.

    Bogdanor (2009, pp. 53–88).

  14. 14.

    ‘The principle of Parliamentary sovereignty means neither more nor less than this, namely, that Parliament thus defined has, under the English Constitution, the right to make or unmake any law whatever; and, further, that no person or body is recognised by the law of England as having a right to override or set aside the legislation of Parliament.’ Dicey (1982, pp. 3–4).

  15. 15.

    On the link between Britishness and New Labour, see Aughey (2001, pp. 103–104).

  16. 16.

    Ibid., p. 49.

  17. 17.

    Stein Rokkan and Derek Urwin, ‘Introduction: Centres and Peripheries in Western Europe’, in: Stein Rokkan and Derek Urwin (ed.), The Politics of Territorial Identity: Studies in European Regionalism, London, Sage, 1982, p. 11.

  18. 18.

    Ian Ward, The English Constitution. Myths and Realities, p. 174.

  19. 19.

    Nairn (2001, p. 278).

  20. 20.

    Ian Ward, The English Constitution. Myths and Realities, p. vii.

  21. 21.

    These men had defended the idea of a commonwealth founded on an equal starting position and on a more democratic nature than the constitutional monarchy which was set up after the Glorious Revolution of 1688. This republican language, along with John Locke’s contractualist theory, crossed the Atlantic and successfully helped the Founding Fathers in their framing of the American Republic, which is law-based. Interestingly, egalitarian deference was alive there, as it allowed the notion that some would be in power and others would give them their assent. The structure also required enough egalitarian deference to work.

  22. 22.

    Marquand (2008, p. 374).

  23. 23.

    Sedley (1999, pp. 5–6).

  24. 24.

    Ian Ward, The English Constitution. Myths and Realities, pp. 192–193.

  25. 25.

    Allan (2003, p. 2). See the review of this book: Poole (2002). See also Ian Ward, The English Constitution. Myths and Realities, pp. 190–193.

  26. 26.

    Allan (2003, p. 6).

  27. 27.

    Bogdanor (2009, p. 310).

  28. 28.

    King (2010, p. 66).

  29. 29.

    Ibid., p. 67.

  30. 30.

    Joy Johnson, ‘Spinner takes all’, Red Pepper, May 1999. Cited in Foley (2000, p. 197).

  31. 31.

    Ibid.

  32. 32.

    See http://www.iraqinquiry.org.uk/the-report/, accessed 1 June 2017.

  33. 33.

    See http://www.iraqinquiry.org.uk/media/247010/2016-09-06-sir-john-chilcots-public-statement.pdf, p. 11, accessed 1 June 2017.

  34. 34.

    Francis Beckett, ‘Young and Wasted’, New Statesman, 8 January 2010. http://www.newstatesman.com/society/2010/01/remarkable-personal-free, accessed 23 May 2017. This is also the point of his book: Beckett (2010).

  35. 35.

    In the report by Sir Thomas Legg entitled ‘Review of past Additional Costs Allowance payment, 1 Feb 2010’, the introduction refers negatively to a ‘culture of deference’ allowing secrecy and abuses. See http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200910/cmselect/cmmemest/348/app1.pdf, p. 5, accessed 10 August 2015.

  36. 36.

    Walden (2006). See also George Walden and Nick Cohen, ‘The Anti-Elitist Elite versus the Underclass’, Standpoint, October 2011.

  37. 37.

    Ortega y Gasset (1993).

  38. 38.

    King (2010, p. 355).

  39. 39.

    Ibid., p. 345.

  40. 40.

    The Conservative Party Manifesto 2015, p. 73. See https://issuu.com/conservativeparty/docs/ge_manifesto_low_res/3?e=16696947/12317396, accessed 28 March 2017.

  41. 41.

    Bogdanor (2009, p. 310).

  42. 42.

    Peter Hennessy, ‘Brexit: “An unprecedented geopolitical shift”’, http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-eu-referendum-36625209, accessed 24 June 2017.

  43. 43.

    Ibid.

  44. 44.

    Ibid.

  45. 45.

    Ibid.

  46. 46.

    Nairn (2001).

  47. 47.

    Heffer (1999).

  48. 48.

    Aughey (2001, p. 182).

  49. 49.

    Ibid., p. 61.

  50. 50.

    Aughey lists the following problems related to the European Union: identity, sovereignty, self-government and legitimacy. Ibid., p. 171.

  51. 51.

    Nairn (2001, pp. 15–16).

  52. 52.

    Lord Acton, ‘The History of Freedom in Christianity’ (1877), in: Acton (1985, vol. 1, p. 53).

  53. 53.

    Aughey (2001, p. 167).

  54. 54.

    Churchill (1936, p. 93).

Bibliography

Primary Sources

    Works

    • Dicey, A.V. 1982. Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution (1885). Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 8th ed., 1915, cxlviii–435 pages.

      Google Scholar 

    Articles

    Secondary Sources

      Works: Classical Texts

      • Acton, John Emerich Edward Dalberg. 1985. Selected Writings of Lord Acton, Essays in the History of Liberty. Vol. 1. Indianapolis: Liberty Classics.

        Google Scholar 

      Works

      • Allan, Trevor. 2003. Constitutional Justice: A Liberal Theory of the Rule of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 331 pages.

        CrossRef  Google Scholar 

      • Aughey, Arthur. 2001. Nationalism, Devolution and the Challenge to the United Kingdom State, xii–209. London and Sterling: Pluto Press.

        Google Scholar 

      • Barnett, Anthony. 1997. This Time: Our Constitutional Revolution. London: Vintage. pp. xi371.

        Google Scholar 

      • Beckett, Francis. 2010. What Did the Baby Boomers Ever Do for Us? Why the Children of the Sixties Lived the Dream and Failed the Future. London: Biteback. pp. xvi218.

        Google Scholar 

      • Bogdanor, Vernon. 2009. The New British Constitution, xiii–319. Oxford and Portland: Hart Publishing.

        Google Scholar 

      • Foley, Michael. 2000. The British Presidency: Tony Blair and the Politics of Public Leadership, x–374. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press.

        Google Scholar 

      • Gordon, Richard. 2010. Repairing British Politics: A Blueprint for Constitutional Change, xxiii–173. Oxford and Portland: Hart Publishing.

        Google Scholar 

      • Heffer, Simon. 1999. Nor Shall My Sword: The Reinvention of England, vii–137. London: Phoenix.

        Google Scholar 

      • Johnson, Nevil. 2004. Reshaping the British Constitution. Essays in Political Interpretation, xii–324. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

        CrossRef  Google Scholar 

      • King, Anthony. 2010. The British Constitution (2007), x–437. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

        Google Scholar 

      • Marquand, David. 2008. Britain Since 1918. The Strange Career of British Democracy, xv–477. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.

        Google Scholar 

      • McLean, Iain. 2010. What’s Wrong with the British Constitution? vi–384. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

        Google Scholar 

      • Nairn, Tom. 2001. After Britain: New Labour and the Return of Scotland (2000), xi–324. London: Granta Books.

        Google Scholar 

      • Ortega y Gasset, José. 1993. The Revolt of the Masses (1930). New York and London: W.W. Norton and Company. 190 pages.

        Google Scholar 

      • Rokkan, Stein, and Derek Urwin, eds. 1982. The Politics of Territorial Identity: Studies in European Regionalism. London: Sage. 438 pages.

        Google Scholar 

      • Sedley, Sir Stephen. 1999. Freedom, Law and Justice, xiv–59. London: Sweet and Maxwell, Hamlyn Lectures.

        Google Scholar 

      • Walden, George. 2006. New Elites: A Career in the Masses. London: Gibson Square. (New Edition), 304 pages.

        Google Scholar 

      Articles

      • Churchill, Winston. 1936. What Good’s a Constitution? Our Heritage of Freedom. Collier’s 22: 386–393.

        Google Scholar 

      • Poole, Thomas. 2002. Dogmatic Liberalism? T. R. S. Allan and the Common Law Constitution. Modern Law Review 65 (3): 463–475.

        CrossRef  Google Scholar 

      • Ward, Ian. 2004. The English Constitution. Myths and Realities, vii–213.Oxford and Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing.

        Google Scholar 

      Download references

      Author information

      Authors and Affiliations

      Authors

      Corresponding author

      Correspondence to Catherine Marshall .

      Rights and permissions

      Reprints and Permissions

      Copyright information

      © 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

      About this chapter

      Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

      Cite this chapter

      Marshall, C. (2021). The ‘Afterlife’ of Deference (1997–2016). In: Political Deference in a Democratic Age. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62539-9_9

      Download citation

      • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62539-9_9

      • Published:

      • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

      • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-62538-2

      • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-62539-9

      • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)