Skip to main content

Trust-Aware Curation of Linked Open Data Logs

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Conceptual Modeling (ER 2020)

Abstract

Trust was widely discussed and formalized in the literature. In the context of Big Data and Connected World, it becomes crucial for developing data-driven solutions. Trusted data increase the quality of decision support systems. Recently, companies are racing towards Linked Open Data (LOD) and Knowledge Bases (KB) to improve their added value, but ignore their SPARQL query-logs. If well cured, these logs can present an asset for analysts. A naive and direct use of these logs is too risky because their provenance and quality are highly questionable. Users of these logs in a trusted way have to be assisted by providing them with in-depth knowledge of the whole LOD environment and tools to cure these logs. In this paper, we propose an ontology-based model inspired by the recent developments in \(<trust, risk, value>\)-ontology engineering. Then, a trust-aware curation approach is presented, composed of enriched ETL-like operators integrating trust metrics that keep only trustworthy queries. Finally, experiments are conducted to study the effectiveness and efficiency of our proposal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For simplicity, we use query-logs to refer to LOD query-logs.

  2. 2.

    https://aksw.github.io/LSQ/.

  3. 3.

    https://github.com/stamparm/ipsum.

  4. 4.

    http://www.scholarlydata.org/ontology/doc/alignments/.

  5. 5.

    Complex query: query with complex shapes like Forrest, Bouquet and depth > 7.

  6. 6.

    Simple query: query with simple/ chain shapes and depth <3.

References

  1. Abedjan, Z., Golab, L., Naumann, F.: Data profiling: a tutorial. In: ICDE, pp. 1747–1751 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Almendros Jiménez, J.M., Becerra Terón, A., Cuzzocrea, A.M.: Detecting and diagnosing syntactic and semantic errors in SPARQL queries. In: EDBT/ICDT Workshops (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Amaral, G., Sales, T.P., Guizzardi, G., Porello, D.: Towards a reference ontology of trust. In: OTM Conferences, pp. 3–21 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Beheshti, A., Benatallah, B., Nouri, R., Tabebordbar, A.: CoreKG: a knowledge lake service. Proc. VLDB Endow. 11(12), 1942–1945 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Beheshti, A., Benatallah, B., Tabebordbar, A., Motahari-Nezhad, H.R., Barukh, M.C., Nouri, R.: DataSynapse: a social data curation foundry. Distrib. Parallel Databases 37(3), 351–384 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Behkamal, B., Kahani, M., Bagheri, E.: Quality metrics for linked open data. In: DEXA, pp. 144–152 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bonifati, A., Martens, W., Timm, T.: DARQL: Deep analysis of SPARQL queries. In: WWW, pp. 187–190 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bonifati, A., Martens, W., Timm, T.: An analytical study of large SPARQL query logs. VLDB J. 1–25 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cai, L., Zhu, Y.: The challenges of data quality and data quality assessment in the big data era. Data Sci. J. 14 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ceolin, D., Maccatrozzo, V., Aroyo, L., De-Nies, T.: Linking trust to data quality. In: METHOD Workshop (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dividino, R., Sizov, S., Staab, S., Schueler, B.: Querying for provenance, trust, uncertainty and other meta knowledge in RDF. JWS 7(3), 204–219 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Djebri, A.E.A., Tettamanzi, A.G.B., Gandon, F.: Linking and negotiating uncertainty theories over linked data. In: Companion of WWW, pp. 859–865 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dong, X.L., et al.: Knowledge-based trust: estimating the trustworthiness of web sources. arXiv preprint arXiv:1502.03519 (2015)

  14. Dumitrache, A., et al.: Crowdtruth 2.0: quality metrics for crowdsourcing with disagreement. arXiv preprint arXiv:1808.06080 (2018)

  15. Gambetta, D., et al.: Can we trust trust? Br. J. Sociol. 13, 213–237 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gaona-García, P.A., et al.: A fuzzy logic system to evaluate levels of trust on linked open data resources. Revista Facultad de Ingeniería Universidad de Antioquia 86, 40–53 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hartig, O.: Querying trust in RDF data with TSPARQL. In: ESWC, pp. 5–20 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hung, E., Deng, Y., Subrahmanian, V.S.: RDF aggregate queries and views. In: ICDE, pp. 717–728 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Khouri, S., Lanasri, D., Saidoune, R., Boudoukha, K., Bellatreche, L.: Loglinc: log queries of linked open data investigator for cube design. In: DEXA, pp. 352–367 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Llave, M.R.: Data lakes in business intelligence: reporting from the trenches. Procedia Comput. Sci. 138, 516–524 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Malyshev, S., Krötzsch, M., González, L., Gonsior, J., Bielefeldt, A.: Getting the most out of Wikidata: semantic technology usage in Wikipedia’s knowledge graph. In: Vrandečić, D., et al. (eds.) ISWC 2018. LNCS, vol. 11137, pp. 376–394. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00668-6_23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Sales, T.P., Almeida, J.P.A., Santini, S., Baião, F., Guizzardi, G.: Ontological analysis and redesign of risk modeling in archimate. In: EDOC, pp. 154–163 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sales, T.P., Baião, F., Guizzardi, G., Almeida, J.P.A., Guarino, N., Mylopoulos, J.: The common ontology of value and risk. In: ER, pp. 121–135 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Skoutas, D., Simitsis, A.: Ontology-based conceptual design of ETL processes for both structured and semi-structured data. IJSWIS 3(4), 1–24 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Suriarachchi, I., Plale, B.: Crossing analytics systems: a case for integrated provenance in data lakes. In: e-Science, pp. 349–354 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tian, Y., Umbrich, J., Yu, Y.: Enhancing source selection for live queries over linked data via query log mining. In: JIST, pp. 176–191 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Prof. Giancarlo Guizzardi for his valuable comments on risk, value, and trust ontologies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dihia Lanasri .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lanasri, D., Khouri, S., Bellatreche, L. (2020). Trust-Aware Curation of Linked Open Data Logs. In: Dobbie, G., Frank, U., Kappel, G., Liddle, S.W., Mayr, H.C. (eds) Conceptual Modeling. ER 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12400. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62522-1_44

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62522-1_44

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-62521-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-62522-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics