Advertisement

Interpretive Play and the Player Psychology of Optimal Arousal Regulation

  • Matthew HigginsEmail author
  • Peter Howell
Conference paper
  • 295 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 12497)

Abstract

Building on previous discussions of interpretive play in story-focused digital games, a psychological foundation of narrative interpretation is proposed. First, how narrative information is synthesized with prior experiences and expectations into ‘situation models’ in long-term memory. Second, how pleasure is derived from increased arousal through engaging with novel, unfamiliar stimuli. This psychological foundation is then compared to contemporary approaches to narrative design, particularly in Her Story and Dear Esther. The relevance of the proposed cognitive psychological foundation is also considered in regard to digital games with no documented intentional use psychologically, primarily through an analysis of player behaviour and response in Gone Home. Results are comparable to the psychological model, particularly the prominent roles of recalling and forming expectations, and how player attention is often attracted to novel, unfamiliar, or unexpected stimuli. The ongoing aim of this work is to further investigate interpretive play in the context of digital games and continue to develop the cognitive psychological foundation. Future work shall also contextualise the research and findings though the development of commercial games.

Keywords

Interpretive play Arousal regulation Digital games Narrative Cognitive psychology Schema 

References

  1. 1.
    Upton, B.: The Aesthetic of Play. MIT Press, Cambridge (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bozdog, M., Galloway, D.: Worlds at our fingertips: reading (in) what remains of edith finch. Games Cult. 1555412019844631 (2019)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sparrow, G.: What Remains of Edith Finch. Annapurna Interactive, Los Angeles (2017)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boyd, B.: On the Origin of Stories. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    The Chinese Room: Dear Esther. The Chinese Room, Curve Digital, Brighton, United Kingdom and London, United Kingdom (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barlow, S.: Her Story. Self-published (2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    The Fullbright Company M.C.: Gone Home. The Fullbright Company and Majesco Entertainment, Portland (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Baddeley, A.: Working memory. Science 255, 556–559 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    An, S.: Schema theory in reading. Theory Pract. Lang. Stud. 3 (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mandler, J.M.: Stories, Scripts, and Scenes: Aspects of Schema Theory. Psychology Press (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bartlett, F.C.: Remembering: An Experimental and Social Study. Cambridge University, Cambridge (1932)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mercier, P., Kalampalikis, N.: Repeated reproduction: back to bartlett A French replication of narrative and an extension to proverbs. Cult. Psychol. 26(3), 500–527 (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X19871197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rubínová, E., Blank, H., Koppel, J., Ost, J.: Schema and deviation effects in remembering repeated unfamiliar stories. Br. J. Psychol. (2020)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Howell, P.: Disruptive game design: a commercial design and development methodology for supporting player cognitive engagement in digital games. Creative Technologies, Doctor of Philosophy. University of Portsmouth (2015)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Howell, P.: A theoretical framework of ludic knowledge: a case study in disruption and cognitive engagement. In: 10th International Conference in the Philosophy of Computer Games, Valletta, Malta, October 2016Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    The Chinese Room: Amnesia: A Machine for Pigs. Frictional Games, Helsingborg (2013)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Douglas, J.Y., Hargadon, A.: The pleasures of immersion and engagement: schemas, scripts and the fifth business. Digit. Creat. 12, 153–166 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Van Dijk, T.A., Kintsch, W.: Strategies of discourse comprehension (1983)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zwaan, R.A., Radvansky, G.A.: Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychol. Bull. 123, 162 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zwaan, R.A., Langston, M.C., Graesser, A.C.: The construction of situation models in narrative comprehension: an event-indexing model. Psychol. Sci. 6, 292–297 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zacks, J.M., Speer, N.K., Swallow, K.M., Braver, T.S., Reynolds, J.R.: Event perception: a mind-brain perspective. Psychol. Bull. 133, 273 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zacks, J.M., Swallow, K.M.: Event segmentation. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 16, 80–84 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Newtson, D., Engquist, G.: The perceptual organization of ongoing behavior. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 12, 436–450 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dream, Q.: Detroit: Become Human. Sony Interactive Entertainment, San Mateo (2018)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Oatley, K.: A taxonomy of the emotions of literary response and a theory of identification in fictional narrative. Poetics 23, 53–74 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Csikszentmihalyi, M., Csikzentmihaly, M.: Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper & Row, New York (1990)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Oliver, M.B., Bartsch, A.: Appreciation of entertainment. J. Media Psychol. 23, 29–33 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cohen, A.R., Stotland, E., Wolfe, D.M.: An experimental investigation of need for cognition. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 51, 291 (1955)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cacioppo, J.T., Petty, R.E.: The need for cognition. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 42, 116 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Cacioppo, J.T., Petty, R.E., Feng Kao, C.: The efficient assessment of need for cognition. J. Personal. Assess. 48, 306–307 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Litman, J.: Curiosity and the pleasures of learning: wanting and liking new information. Cogn. Emot. 19, 793–814 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Edelman, S.: Curiosity and exploration (1997). Accessed 11 May 20Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Litman, J.A., Jimerson, T.L.: The measurement of curiosity as a feeling of deprivation. J. Personal. Assess. 82, 147–157 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Litman, J.A.: Interest and deprivation factors of epistemic curiosity. Personal. Individ. Differ. 44, 1585–1595 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Costikyan, G.: Uncertainty in Games. MIT Press, Cambridge (2013)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    To, A., Ali, S., Kaufman, G.F., Hammer, J.: Integrating curiosity and uncertainty in game design. In: Digra/fdg (2016)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kruglanski, A.W., Webster, D.M.: Motivated closing of the mind: seizing and freezing. Psychol. Rev. 103, 263 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Webster, D.M., Kruglanski, A.W.: Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 67, 1049 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hiel, A.V., Mervielde, I.: The need for closure and the spontaneous use of complex and simple cognitive structures. J. Soc. Psychol. 143, 559–568 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Berlyne, D.E.: Aesthetics and Psychobiology. Appleton-Century-Crofts. Meredith Corporation, New York (1971)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Gaver, W.W., Mandler, G.: Play it again, sam: on liking music. Cogn. Emot. 1, 259–282 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Reisenzein, R., Horstmann, G., Schützwohl, A.: The cognitive-evolutionary model of surprise: a review of the evidence. Top. Cogn. Sci. 11, 50–74 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Nell, V.: Lost in a Book: The Psychology of Reading for Pleasure. Yale University Press, New Haven (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Matsubara, M., Augereau, O., Sanches, C.L., Kise, K.: Emotional arousal estimation while reading comics based on physiological signal analysis. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on coMics ANalysis, Processing and Understanding, pp. 1–4. (2016)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Gregersen, A., Langkjær, B., Heiselberg, L., Wieland, J.L.: Following the viewers: investigating television drama engagement through skin conductance measurements. Poetics 64, 1–13 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Bhattacharjee, T., Datta, S., Das, D., Choudhury, A.D., Pal, A., Ghosh, P.K.: A heart rate driven kalman filter for continuous arousal trend monitoring. In: 2018 40th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), pp. 3572–3577. IEEE (2018)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Hirokawa, E.: Effects of music listening and relaxation instructions on arousal changes and the working memory task in older adults. J. Music Ther. 41, 107–127 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Piaget, J.: Piaget’s Theory. Piaget and His School, pp. 11–23. Springer, Heidelberg (1976).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-46323-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Brewer, W.F.: The nature of narrative suspense and the problem of rereading. In: Suspense: Conceptualizations, Theoretical Analyses, and Empirical Explorations, pp. 107–127 (1996)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Brewer, W.F., Lichtenstein, E.H.: Stories are to entertain: a structural-affect theory of stories. Center for the Study of Reading Technical Report; no. 265 (1982)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Truffaut, F., Hitchcock, A., Scott, H.G.: Hitchcock. Simon and Schuster (1984)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Smith, P.: Hemingway’s early manuscripts: the theory and practice of omission. J. Mod. Lit. 10, 268–288 (1983)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Barlow, S.: Telling Lies. Annapurna Interactive, California (2019)Google Scholar
  54. 54.
  55. 55.
    Games, B.: Thirty Flights of Loving. Idle Thumbs, San Francisco (2012)Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Variable State: Virginia. 505 Games, Milan, Italy (2016)Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Pinchbeck, D., Stevens, B.: Presence, narrative and schemata. In: Proceedings of Presence 2005: The 8th International Workshop on Presence, pp. 221–226 (2005)Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Pinchbeck, D., Stevens, B., Van Laar, S., Hand, S., Newman, K.: Narrative, agency and observational behaviour in a first person shooter environment. In: Proceedings of Narrative AI and Games Symposium: Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and the Simulation of Behaviour (AISOB 2006), pp. 53–61. SSAISB (2006)Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Pinchbeck, D.: Story and recall in first-person shooters. Int. J. Comput. Games Technol. 2008, 6 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Pinchbeck, D.: Dear esther: an interactive ghost story built using the source engine. In: Spierling, U., Szilas, N. (eds.) ICIDS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5334, pp. 51–54. Springer, Heidelberg (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89454-4_9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Game Developers ConferenceGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Valve Corporation: Half-Life 2. Self-published, Bellevue (2004)Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Pitkänen, J.: Studying thoughts: stimulated recall as a game research method. Game research methods, pp. 117–132 (2015)Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Braun, V., Clarke, V.: Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 3, 77–101 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Higgins, M.: White Lake. Self-published (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of PortsmouthPortsmouthUK

Personalised recommendations