Skip to main content

Algorithms for Generating Sets of Gambles for Decision Making with Lower Previsions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Integrated Uncertainty in Knowledge Modelling and Decision Making (IUKM 2020)

Abstract

\(\varGamma \)-maximin, \(\varGamma \)-maximax, maximality and interval dominance are well-known criteria for decision making using lower previsions when precise probabilities are not available. This study proposes algorithms for generating a set of gambles that has a precise number of \(\varGamma \)-maximin (or \(\varGamma \)-maximax) gambles that can be used to generate random decision problems for benchmarking algorithms for finding \(\varGamma \)-maximin (or \(\varGamma \)-maximax) gambles. Since \(\varGamma \)-maximin and \(\varGamma \)-maximax imply maximality and interval dominance, the algorithms can also be used as an alternative algorithm for generating random decision problems with pre-determined numbers of maximal and interval dominant gambles.

Supported by Data Science Research Center, Department of Statistics, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Walley, P.: Statistical Reasoning with Imprecise Probabilities. Chapman and Hall, London (1991)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Anscombe, F.J., Aumann, R.J.: A definition of subjective probability. Ann. Math. Stat. 34, 199–205 (1963)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Williams, P.M.: Notes on conditional previsions. Int. J. Approximate Reasoning 44(3), 366–383 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2006.07.019

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Troffaes, M.C.M., Hable, P.: Introduction to Imprecise Probabilities: Computation, pp. 329–337. Wiley (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118763117.ch16

  5. Nakharutai, N., Troffaes, M.C.M., Caiado, C.: Efficient algorithms for checking avoiding sure loss. Proc. Mach. Learn. Res. 62, 241–252 (2017)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Nakharutai, N., Troffaes, M.C.M., Caiado, C.: Improved linear programming methods for checking avoiding sure loss. Int. J. Approximate Reasoning 101, 293–310 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2018.07.013

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Troffaes, M.C.M.: Decision making under uncertainty using imprecise probabilities. Int. J. Approximate Reasoning 45, 17–29 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2006.06.001

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Kikuti, D., Cozman, F.G., Filho, R.S.: Sequential decision making with partially ordered preferences. Artif. Intell. 175(7), 1346–1365 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2010.11.017

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Jansen, C., Augustin, T., Schollmeyer, G.: Decision theory meets linear optimization beyond computation. In: Antonucci, A., Cholvy, L., Papini, O. (eds.) ECSQARU 2017. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10369, pp. 329–339. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61581-3_30

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Huntley, N., Hable, P., Troffaes, M.C.M.: Introduction to Imprecise Probabilities: Decision Making, pp. 190–206. Wiley (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118763117.ch8

  11. Nakharutai, N., Troffaes, M.C.M., Caiado, C.: Improving and benchmarking of algorithms for decision making with lower previsions. Int. J. Approximate Reasoning 113, 91–105 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2019.06.008

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Troffaes, M.C.M., de Cooman, G.: Lower Previsions: Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. Wiley (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118762622

Download references

Acknowledgement

This research is supported by Data Science Research Center, Department of Statistics, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand. The author would like to thank Prof. Matthias Troffaes and Assoc. Prof. Camila C.S. Caiado for their helps and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nawapon Nakharutai .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Nakharutai, N. (2020). Algorithms for Generating Sets of Gambles for Decision Making with Lower Previsions. In: Huynh, VN., Entani, T., Jeenanunta, C., Inuiguchi, M., Yenradee, P. (eds) Integrated Uncertainty in Knowledge Modelling and Decision Making. IUKM 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12482. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62509-2_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62509-2_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-62508-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-62509-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics