Skip to main content

Labelling the State of Railway Turnouts Based on Repair Records

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Intelligent Quality Assessment of Railway Switches and Crossings

Abstract

Turnouts are the most expensive part to maintain on the railway track and therefore automated systems for detecting turnout defects are of great interest. Machine learning can improve predictive maintenance and is often used in automatic systems for precise prognosis. In this study, machine learning is used for identifying the condition of railway turnouts and potentially reducing costs by early automatic detection of defects. To train a machine learning algorithm, ordered, structured and categorized data (labelled data) are needed. A method is proposed to label the condition of turnouts in the Danish Railway based on a collection of repair records. This labelling of the turnouts is accomplished with unsupervised methods, namely a principal component analysis (PCA) followed by a cluster analysis. The labelling of the turnouts is investigated through comparisons of geometric measurements captured from the recording car. The difference in the physical properties illustrated by the geometric data indicates that the labelling is a good indicator of the relative condition of the turnout. When the data are labelled, supervised learning can be used to optimize the predictive power of machine learning algorithms (i.e. the algorithm learns from the labelled data) for classification of turnouts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kassa E, Nielsen JCO (2009) Dynamic train-turnout interaction in an extended frequency range using a detailed model of track dynamics. J Sound Vibr 320(4–5):893–914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ma Y, Mashal AA, Markine VL (2018) Modelling and experimental validation of dynamic impact in 1:9 railway crossing panel. Tribol Int 118:208–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang X, Chi Y, Li W, Zhou T (2012) Study on the dem simulation of the granular railway ballast bed tamping. Adv Mater Res 524–527(4):3256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cornish A, Kassa E, Smith R (2012) Field experimentation and analysis at switches and crossings in UK. In: 9th International conference on contact mechanics and wear of rail/wheel systems, CM 2012, pp 649–651

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lee J, Choi H, Park D, Chung Y, Kim HY, Yoon S (2016) Fault detection and diagnosis of railway point machines by sound analysis. Sensors 16(4):549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nielsen JCO, Palsson BA, Torstensson PT (2016) Switch panel design based on simulation of accumulated rail damage in a railway turnout. Wear 366:241–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pletz M, Daves W, Ossberger H (2012) A wheel set/crossing model regarding impact, sliding and deformation-explicit finite element approach. Wear 294:446–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Grossoni I, Bezin Y, Neves SGM (2016) Optimization of support stiffness at a railway crossing panel. In: Civil-comp Proceedings, 110 p

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dhar S, Zhang Y, Xu R, Danielsen HK, Juul Jensen D (2017) Synchrotron x-ray measurement of residual strain within the nose of a worn manganese steel railway crossing. In: IOP conference series: materials science and engineering, 219(1), 012016 p

    Google Scholar 

  10. Schmitt L, Létourneaux F, De Keyzer I, Crompton P (2016) CAPACITY4RAIL: towards an affordable, innovative and high-capacity European Railway System for 2030/2050. Mater Infrastruct 2(5B):105–114, Wiley Blackwell

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bo Nielsen NFN (2008) Lars Forsting, Banenorm bn1-14-2: Projektering, tilstand og eftersyn af sporskifter og sporskæringer, 64 p

    Google Scholar 

  12. Klaus Bergman NF (2008) Lars Forsting, Banenorm bn2-15-2: Projektering, etablering, tilstand og vedligeholdelse af sporskifter og sporskæringer, 31 p

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jensen PJ, Fongemie R (2016) Sporteknik: danske jernbanespors opbygning, konstruktion og komponenter. Banedanmark

    Google Scholar 

  14. Stanislav Jovanović, Dragan Božović, Mirjana Tomičić-Torlaković (2014) Railway infrastructure condition-monitoring and analysis as a basis for maintenance management. Hrvatski savez gradjevinskih inženjera, Cm 2012:347–358

    Google Scholar 

  15. CEN (2003) Railway applications—track–track geometry quality Part 1: Characterisation of track geometry. European Committee for Standardization (CEN); 2003 13848-1. https://standards.globalspec.com/std/13275308/en-13848-1

  16. Nissen A, Parida A, Kumar U (2010) Condition monitoring of railway switches and crossing by using data from track recording cars. Int J Comadem 13(3):36–41

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bergquist B, Soderholm P (2015) Data analysis for condition-based railway infrastructure maintenance. Qual Reliab Eng Int 31(5):773–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Seyed Asadzadeh M, Galeazzi R, Hovad E, Fink Andersen J, Thyregod A, Camilla FS (2018) Rodrigues, Ballast degradation modeling for turnouts based on track recording car data. In: Proceedings of the european conference of the PHM society, , Vol 4 no 1

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kumar U, Ahmadi A, Verma AK, Prabhakar V (2016) Current trends in reliability, availability, maintainability and safety, current trends in reliability, availability, maintainability and safety. Springer International Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  20. Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R (2017) The elements of statistical learning, 2nd edn. Springer series in Statistics, New York

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hovad E, Thyregod C, Fink Andersen J, Christian BL, Peter Spooner M, Rodrigues AFS, Kjær Ersbøll B (2019) The effect of driving direction on spatially aligned track recording car measurements in turnouts. Int J Rail Transport 1–15, Taylor and Francis Ltd

    Google Scholar 

  22. Alpaydin E (2009) Introduction to machine learning. MIT press

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kassambara A (2017) Practical guide to principal component methods in R: unsupervised machine learning, vol 1. STHDA

    Google Scholar 

  24. MacQueen J (1967) Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In: Le Cam LM, Neyman J (eds) Proceedings of the fifth berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability, vol 1, pp 281–297. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hopkins B, Skellam JG (1954) A new method for determining the type of distribution of plant individuals. Ann Bot 18(2):213–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kaufman L, Rousseeuw PJ (1990) Finding groups in data: an introduction to cluster analysis. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Cleveland WS, Devlin SJ (1988) Locally weighted regression: an approach to regression analysis by local fitting. J Am Stat Assoc 83(403):596–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. R Core Team (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emil Hovad .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: Clustering

Appendix: Clustering

1.1 Clustering Frequency for the Different Turnouts

The general cluster frequency for the turnouts can be seen in Fig. 8. Fewer turnouts are typically assigned to Cluster 1, but some turnout has a high frequency of Cluster 1. Typically a high frequency in Cluster 1 belongs to turnouts which are exposed to a larger tonnage (used more) and thereby more frequent maintenance is needed for these turnouts. Specifically it can be seen that the turnouts with the numbers of 1623, 5803, 5804 and 5805 (shown with the gray boxes) are more frequently assigned to Cluster 1.

Cluster 2 small community which could be seen in Fig. 8, the small community was especially separated in the third dimension (Dim.3). This community consist of two older turnouts with the numbers of 857 and number 5289 (shown with the black boxes) having campaigns captured in the period of 15,145 to 17,110 days after the renewal day. These two turnouts only had a few repairs and tamping/grindings take place in the defined time windows.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Vassos, G., Hovad, E., Duroska, P., Thyregod, C., da Silva Rodrigues, A.F., Clemmensen, L.H. (2021). Labelling the State of Railway Turnouts Based on Repair Records. In: Galeazzi, R., Kjartansson Danielsen, H., Kjær Ersbøll, B., Juul Jensen, D., Santos, I. (eds) Intelligent Quality Assessment of Railway Switches and Crossings. Springer Series in Reliability Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62472-9_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62472-9_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-62471-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-62472-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics