A Semantic Framework for Enabling Radio Spectrum Policy Management and Evaluation

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 12507)


Because radio spectrum is a finite resource, its usage and sharing is regulated by government agencies. These agencies define policies to manage spectrum allocation and assignment across multiple organizations, systems, and devices. With more portions of the radio spectrum being licensed for commercial use, the importance of providing an increased level of automation when evaluating such policies becomes crucial for the efficiency and efficacy of spectrum management. We introduce our Dynamic Spectrum Access Policy Framework for supporting the United States government’s mission to enable both federal and non-federal entities to compatibly utilize available spectrum. The DSA Policy Framework acts as a machine-readable policy repository providing policy management features and spectrum access request evaluation. The framework utilizes a novel policy representation using OWL and PROV-O along with a domain-specific reasoning implementation that mixes GeoSPARQL, OWL reasoning, and knowledge graph traversal to evaluate incoming spectrum access requests and explain how applicable policies were used. The framework is currently being used to support live, over-the-air field exercises involving a diverse set of federal and commercial radios, as a component of a prototype spectrum management system.


Dynamic spectrum access Policies Reasoning 


Acknowledgement of Support and Disclaimer

This work is funded in support of National Spectrum Consortium (NSC) project number NSC-17-7030. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of AFRL.


  1. 1.
    eXtensible Access Control Markup Language (XACML) Version 3.0.
  2. 2.
    ISO/IEC 13249–3:2016 Information technology – Database languages - SQL multimedia and application packages - Part 3: SpatialGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    IEEE Standard Definitions and Concepts for Dynamic Spectrum Access: Terminology Relating to Emerging Wireless Networks, System Functionality, and Spectrum Management. IEEE Std 1900.1-2008, pp. 1–62 (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Federal Communications Commission, FCC 14–31. Technical report (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Standard Spectrum Resource Format (SSRF), Data Exchange Standard, Version 3.1.0 (MC4EB Pub 8). Technical report (2014)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Curbera, F., Hallam-Baker, P., Hondo, V.M., Nadalin, A., Nagaratnam, N., Sharp, C.: Web services policy framework (ws-policy) (2006).
  7. 7.
    Dumontier, M., et al.: The semanticscience integrated ontology (SIO) for biomedical research and knowledge discovery. J. Biomed. Semant. 5, 14 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dundua, B., Rukhaia, M.: Towards integrating attribute-based access control into ontologies. In: 2019 IEEE 2nd Ukraine Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (UKRCON), pp. 1052–1056 (2019)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ferraiolo, D.F., Kuhn, D.R.: Role-based access controls (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Finin, T., et al.: ROWLBAC: representing role based access control in OWL. In: Proceedings of the 13th ACM symposium on Access Control Models and Technologies, SACMAT 2008, pp. 73–82. Association for Computing Machinery, Estes Park (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    García, R., Castellà, D., Gil, R.: Semantic copyright management of media fragments. In: DATA 2013 - Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Data Technologies and Applications, pp. 230–237 (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    García, R., Gil, R., Delgado, J.: A web ontologies framework for digital rights management. Artif. Intell. Law 15(2), 137–154 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gkoutos, G.V., Schofield, P.N., Hoehndorf, R.: The Units Ontology: a tool for integrating units of measurement in science. Database 2012 (2012)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Glimm, B., Horrocks, I., Motik, B., Stoilos, G., Wang, Z.: HermiT: an OWL 2 reasoner. J. Autom. Reasoning 53(3), 245–269 (2014). Scholar
  15. 15.
    Groth, P., Gibson, A., Velterop, J.: The anatomy of a nanopublication. Inf. Serv. Use 30(1–2), 51–56 (2010). publisher: IOS PressGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hu, V.C., Kuhn, D.R., Ferraiolo, D.F., Voas, J.: Attribute-based access control. Computer 48(2), 85–88 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kirrane, S., Mileo, A., Decker, S.: Access control and the resource description framework: a survey. Semant. Web 8(2), 311–352 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kolovski, V., Parsia, B., Katz, Y., Hendler, J.: Representing web service policies in OWL-DL. In: Gil, Y., Motta, E., Benjamins, V.R., Musen, M.A. (eds.) ISWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3729, pp. 461–475. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). Scholar
  19. 19.
    McCusker, J.P., Chastain, K., Rashid, S., Norris, S., McGuinness, D.L.: SETLr: the semantic extract, transform, and load-r. Technical report, e26476v1, PeerJ Inc. (2018)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    McCusker, J., Rashid, S.M., Agu, N., Bennett, K.P., McGuinness, D.L.: The Whyis knowledge graph framework in action. In: International Semantic Web Conference (P&D/Industry/BlueSky) (2018)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Muppavarapu, V., Chung, S.M.: Semantic-based access control for grid data resources in open grid services architecture - data access and integration (OGSA-DAI). In: 2008 20th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, vol. 2, pp. 315–322 (2008). iSSN: 2375–0197Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Perry, M., Herring, J.: OGC GeoSPARQL-a geographic query language for RDF data. OGC Implement. Stand. 40 (2012)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sharma, N.K., Joshi, A.: Representing attribute based access control policies in OWL. In: 2016 IEEE Tenth International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC), pp. 333–336 (2016)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tran Thi, Q.N., Dang, T.K.: X-STROWL: a generalized extension of XACML for context-aware spatio-temporal RBAC model with OWL. In: Seventh International Conference on Digital Information Management (ICDIM 2012), pp. 253–258 (2012)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zhang, Y.: Dynamic spectrum access in cognitive radio wireless networks. In: 2008 IEEE International Conference on Communications, pp. 4927–4932 (2008). iSSN: 1938–1883Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zhao, Q., Sadler, B.M.: A survey of dynamic spectrum access. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 24(3), 79–89 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tetherless World ConstellationRensselaer Polytechnic InstituteTroyUSA
  2. 2.The Rensselaer Institute for Data Exploration and ApplicationsTroyUSA
  3. 3.Memory Based Research LLCPittsburghUSA
  4. 4.Capraro Technologies Inc.UticaUSA
  5. 5.LGS Labs, CACI International Inc.Florham ParkUSA
  6. 6.Air Force Research LaboratoryRomeUSA

Personalised recommendations