Skip to main content
Book cover

New Challenges for the Eurozone Governance pp 247–266Cite as

Austerity, Human Rights Erosion and Political Radicalization: Implications for Eurozone Governance Reform

  • 257 Accesses

Abstract

The chapter contributes to the analysis of the process of human rights and social cohesion erosion set in motion by austerity programmes in the Eurozone and to enquire about how this experience influences the current debate on the Eurozone governance reform in the context of COVID-19 crisis. The orthodox neoliberal adjustment policies imposed on several EU countries between 2010 and 2017 exacerbated economic recession, increased inequality and generated an extensive violation of human rights leading to far-reaching political radicalization. This experience has influenced the current debate on Eurozone reform functioning as a negative mirror of ineffective solutions and citizens’ distrust risks, which might contribute to the emergence of new and more adequate solutions. The main argument put forward if that a pragmatic governance reform of the Eurozone likely to be facilitated by a change in Germany’s position, is a necessary but not a sufficient condition to respond effectively to COVID-19 crisis insofar the EU has also to enhance the priority to human rights protection in order to regain citizens’ confidence and interrupt the trend of rising political influence of anti-EU radical parties which constitute one the most significant risks for the EU in the current crisis context.

Keywords

  • Human rights
  • Austerity policies
  • Eurozone governance
  • Political economy

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-62372-2_13
  • Chapter length: 20 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-030-62372-2
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Learn about institutional subscriptions
Fig. 1

Source Eurostat (https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/tgm/table.do?tab=table&init=1&language=en&pcode=tec00115&plugin=1)

Fig. 2

Source EUROSTAT (2020) EU-SILC Survey

Fig. 3

Source EUROSTAT (2020) EU-SILC Survey

Notes

  1. 1.

    IMF (2016, Table 1, p. 37).

  2. 2.

    OECD (2017, Fig. 3, p. 10; 2018, Fig. 4).

  3. 3.

    IMF (2016, Table 1, p. 37).

  4. 4.

    OECD (2016, ibidem, pp. 87–89).

  5. 5.

    See IEO (2016, pp. 33).

  6. 6.

    CESCR (2015a, p. 2, para. 7; 2015b, pp. 3–4, para. 11; 2016), p. 3, para. 11).

  7. 7.

    CRPD (2016, p. 3, para. 19).

  8. 8.

    Human Rights Council (2017, paras 11–16, pp. 4–5).

  9. 9.

    For a contrasting case, see the Latvian Constitutional Court which declared that a law introducing cuts in pensions should be considered invalid as it violated the right to social security foreseen in the ICESR—see Latvian Constitutional Court, 21 December 2009, case no.2009-43-01.

  10. 10.

    For example in relation to Portugal the case ECHR, 8 October 2013, da Conceição Mateus v. Portugal and Santos and Januario v. Portugal. Regarding Greece the case ECHR, 7 May 2013, Koufaki v. Greece and ADEDY v. Greece.

References

  • BBC (2019), Europe and right-wing nationalism: A country by country guide, BBC 13 November 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busch, B. and Matthes, J. (2019), A Eurozone Budget—For which purposes exactly? in Forum, Summer vol 17, 11/2019. DICE Report II/2019, Summer vol. 17, pp. 23–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caetano, José and Caleiro, António Bento (2020), Have the recent dynamics of economic globalization biased social justice in the European Union? in Yilmaz Bayar (ed.) Handbook of Research on Social and Economic Development in the European Union, IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caudal, Nicolas et al. (2013), A budget for the Euro Area, Trésor Economics nº 120, October 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Causa, Orsetta, de Serres, Alain and Ruiz, Nicolas (2014), Can growth-enhancing policies lift all boats? An analysis based on household disposable incomes, OECD Economics Department Working Papers, OECD Publishing, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • CESCR Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights (2014), Concluding Observations on the fourth periodic report on Portugal (E/C.12/PRT/CO/4).

    Google Scholar 

  • CESCR Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights (2015a), Concluding Observations on the second periodic report on Greece (E/C.12/GRC/CO/2).

    Google Scholar 

  • CESCR Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights (2015b), Concluding Observations on the third periodic report on Ireland (E/C.12/IRL/CO/3).

    Google Scholar 

  • CESCR Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights (2016), Concluding Observations on the sixth periodic report on Cyprus (E/C.12/CYP/CO/6).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cisotta, R. and Daniel Gallo, D. (2014), The Portuguese Constitutional Court Case Law on Austerity Measures: A Reappraisal, LUISS Academy, Working Paper, 4/2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colasanti, Fabio (2016), Financial assistance to Greece: Three Programmes, European Policy Centre, Discussion Paper, February 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornia, G. Andrea, Stewart, Frances and Jolly, Richard (eds.) (1987), Adjustment with a Human Face, vol 1 Protecting the vulnerable and promoting growth, Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe (2017), GRETA Report concerning the implementation of the Council of Europe Convention on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings by Portugal—Second evaluation round.

    Google Scholar 

  • CRPD Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2016), Concluding Observations on the initial Report on Portugal CRPD/C/PRT/CO/1, 20 May 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durach, Flavia (2015), The transformation of Euroscepticism: A cross country analysis of Eurobarameter results 2007–2014 in Bargaoanu,Alina et al. (eds.) United by or against Euroscepticism? An assessment of public attitude towards Europe in the context of crisis, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 16–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisl, A. and Tomay, Mattia (2020), European Debt Mutualisation: Finding a legitimate balance between solidarity and responsability mechanisms, Policy Paper nº 255, July 2020, Notre Europe, Jacques Delors Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • EU Commission (2013), The distribution of wealth between households, Research note 11/2013, December 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat (2020), Gini Coefficient, EU-SILC survey, 30 July 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghailani, Dalila (2016), Violations of fundamental rights: Collateral damage of the Eurozone crisis? (1) OSE Research Paper No.32—December 20, European Social Observatory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Human Rights Council (2017), Report of the Special Rapporteur on adequate housing as a componente of the right to an adequate standard of living and on the right to non-discrimination in this context, 28 February 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, Diana (1987), Economic Theories of Development: An analysis of comparative paradigms, Prentice Hall / Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • IEO (2016), The IMF and the crises in Greece, Ireland and Portugal: An evaluation by the Independent Evaluation Office, July 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • IMF (2016), Completes Ninth Review of Cyprus’ EFF, January 11 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Killick, Tony (1993) The Adaptive Economy—Adjustment Policies in Small, Low-income countries, EDI Development Studies, The World Bank, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koukiadaki, Aristea (2014), Can the austerity measures be challenged in supranational Courts—The cases of Greece and Portugal, ETUC University of Manchester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kundnani, Hans and Parello-Plesner, J. (2012), Germany and China: Why the emerging special relationship matters for Europe, ECFR Policy Brief 55, May 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labrianidis, Lois and Pratsinakis, Manolis, (2014) Outward migration from Greece during the crisis, Research Report, London School of Economic’s Hellenic Observatory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mavrodi, G., Moutselos, M. (2017), Immobility in Times of Crisis? The case of Greece in Laffleur and Stanek (eds.) South-North Migration of EU citizens in Times of Crisis, IMISCOE pp. 33–48, Research Series, Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mushovel, Fabian (2020), Fiscal consolidation and inequality in the distributive effect of fiscal reforms in Greece and Portugal in Campos, Nauro, Paul de Grauwe and Yumei, Ji Structural reforms and economic Growth in Europe, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neves, T.S. and Ferraz, C. (2020), When shock is not shocking: Psychodynamics underlying the acceptance of austerity in Psychoanalysis, culture and society (in publication).

    Google Scholar 

  • Observatório da Emigraçao (2019), Emigraçao Portuguesa Relatório Estatistico 2019, Lisboa.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2016a), Labour Market reforms in Portugal 2011–2015: A preliminary assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2017), Economic Survey Portugal, February 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2018), Economic Surveys Greece, April 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pisany-Ferry, Jean (2018), Euro-area reform: An anatomy of the debate, Policy Insight nº 95, October 2018, Centre for Economic Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Autonoma University Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal

    Miguel Santos Neves

Authors
  1. Miguel Santos Neves
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miguel Santos Neves .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Évora, Évora, Portugal

    Prof. José Caetano

  2. University of Évora, Évora, Portugal

    Prof. Isabel Vieira

  3. University of Évora, Évora, Portugal

    Prof. António Caleiro

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Neves, M.S. (2021). Austerity, Human Rights Erosion and Political Radicalization: Implications for Eurozone Governance Reform. In: Caetano, J., Vieira, I., Caleiro, A. (eds) New Challenges for the Eurozone Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62372-2_13

Download citation