Skip to main content

\(\mathcal {C}\)o\(\mathcal {M}\)erger: A Customizable Online Tool for Building a Consistent Quality-Assured Merged Ontology

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
The Semantic Web: ESWC 2020 Satellite Events (ESWC 2020)

Abstract

Merging ontologies enables the reusability and interoperability of existing knowledge. With growing numbers of relevant ontologies in any given domain, there is a strong need for an automatic, scalable multi-ontology merging tool. We introduce \(\mathcal {C}\)o\(\mathcal {M}\)erger, which covers four key aspects of the ontology merging field: compatibility checking of the user-selected Generic Merge Requirements (GMR)s, merging multiple ontologies with adjustable GMRs, quality assessment of the merged ontology, and inconsistency handling of the result. \(\mathcal {C}\)o\(\mathcal {M}\)erger is freely accessible through a live portal and the source code is publicly distributed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The tool can read a set of RDF alignment type, containing the similarity relations between entities with at least a given similarity value.

  2. 2.

    Currently, two ontology matching approaches are embedded in our tool: SeeCOnt method  [11] and a string matching based on the Jaccard similarity coefficient  [12].

  3. 3.

    https://github.com/fusion-jena/CoMerger/blob/master/MergingDataset/result.md.

  4. 4.

    http://comerger.uni-jena.de/.

  5. 5.

    https://github.com/fusion-jena/CoMerger.

References

  1. Chiticariu, L., Kolaitis, P.G., Popa, L.: Interactive generation of integrated schemas. In: ACM SIGMOD, pp. 833–846 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mahfoudh, M., Thiry, L., Forestier, G., Hassenforder, M.: Algebraic Graph Transformations for Merging Ontologies. In: Ait Ameur, Y., Bellatreche, L., Papadopoulos, G.A. (eds.) MEDI, pp. 154–168. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11587-0_16

  3. Priya, M., Ch, A.K.: A novel method for merging academic social network ontologies using formal concept analysis and hybrid semantic similarity measure. Library Hi Tech (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Priya, M., Kumar, C.A.: An approach to merge domain ontologies using granular computing. Granular Comput. 1–26 (2019). ISSN: 23644966. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-019-00193-3

  5. Raunich, S., Rahm, E.: Target-driven merging of taxonomies with atom. Inf. Syst. 42, 1–14 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Noy, N.F., Musen, M.A.: The prompt suite: interactive tools for ontology merging and mapping. IJHCS 59(6), 983–1024 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Babalou, S., König-Ries,B.: GMRs: reconciliation of generic merge requirements in ontology integration. In: SEMANTICS Poster and Demo (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Babalou, S., König-Ries, B.: Towards building knowledge by merging multiple ontologies with CoMerger: a partitioning-based approach. http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.02659

  9. Babalou, S., Grygorova, E., König-Ries, B.: How good is this merged ontology?. In: 17th Extended Semantic Web Conference (ESWC 2020), Poster and Demo Track, June 2020

    Google Scholar 

  10. Babalou, S., König-Ries, B.: A subjective logic based approach to handling inconsistencies in ontology merging. In: Panetto, H., Debruyne, C., Hepp, M., Lewis, D., Ardagna, C.A., Meersman, R. (eds.) OTM 2019. LNCS, vol. 11877, pp. 588–606. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33246-4_37

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Algergawy, A., Babalou, S., Kargar, M.J., Davarpanah, S.H.: Seecont: a new seeding-based clustering approach for ontology matching. In: ADBIS, pp. 245–258 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jaccard, P.: Étude comparative de la distribution florale dans une portion des alpes et des jura. Bull Soc. Vaudoise Sci. Nat. 37, 547–579 (1901)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

S. Babalou is supported by a scholarship from German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samira Babalou .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Babalou, S., Grygorova, E., König-Ries, B. (2020). \(\mathcal {C}\)o\(\mathcal {M}\)erger: A Customizable Online Tool for Building a Consistent Quality-Assured Merged Ontology. In: Harth, A., et al. The Semantic Web: ESWC 2020 Satellite Events. ESWC 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12124. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62327-2_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62327-2_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-62326-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-62327-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics