Skip to main content

Human, Organizational Factors and Mental Workload for Tunnel Operators in Emergency Situations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Human Mental Workload: Models and Applications (H-WORKLOAD 2020)

Abstract

Accident rates appear to be slightly lower in tunnels than on open road, however an accident in a tunnel may have much greater impact; especially in the event of fire, where the enclosed space hinders the dissipation of smoke and poses difficulty in ensuring safe escape route of the tunnel users. In order to assess the risk of such events that may cause heavy losses as well as serious damage to the tunnel infrastructure and facilities, it is crucial to focus on the key elements that constitute the road tunnel system. Taking into account that the road tunnel operator’s performance is of utmost importance for the overall safety of these critical infrastructures, this paper examines the cognitive overload that may occur during emergency situations. The analysis reveals that the main factors that have a substantial effect on the mental effort of the tunnel operator are the level of information processing, the available time to complete the necessary tasks and the number of switches the operator has to make between different task-sets. In order to improve the operator’s performance and reduce the mental workload in this safety critical domain of the transportation system, various performance shaping mechanisms are analyzed in a holistic and systemic perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

CCTV::

Close Circuit Television

CPCs::

Common Performance Conditions

CREAM::

Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method

DG::

Dangerous Goods

LIP::

Level of Information Processing

NCSR::

National Center for Scientific Research

NTUA::

National Technical University of Athens

OECD::

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development

QRA::

Quantitative Risk Assessment

PIARC::

World Roads Association

PSFs::

Performance Shaping Factors

SCADA::

Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition

TBRS::

Time-Based Resource Sharing

References

  1. Beard, A.N., Cope, D.: Assessment of the Safety of Tunnels. Commissioned by the European Parliament; Report IP/A/STOA/FWC/2005–28/SC22/29. Published in February 2008 on the European Parliament web-site under the rubric ‘Science and Technology Options Assessment’ (STOA) (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. ITA: Updated survey of existing regulations and recognized recommendations (operation and safety of road tunnels) (2011). http://www.ita-aites.org/fileadmin/filemounts/general/pdf/ItaAssociation/ProductAndPublication/Commitees/ITA_COSUF/Updated_Survey_Road_Tunnel_Regulations_August_2011.pdf

  3. Carvel, R., Marlair, G.: A history of fire incidents in tunnels. In: Beard, A., Carvel, R. (eds.) The Handbook of Tunnel Fire Safety, pp. 4–41. Thomas Telford, London (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. PIARC: Human factors and road tunnel safety regarding users. World Road Association, France (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Papaioannou, P., Georgiou, G.: Human behaviour in tunnel accidents and incidents: end users, operators and response teams, Report of European Project UPTUN, No. GRD1-2001-40739 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kirytopoulos, K., Konstandinidou, M., Nivolianitou, Z., Kazaras, K.: Embedding the human factor in road tunnel risk analysis. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 92(4), 329–337 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Reason, J.: The Human Contribution: Unsafe Acts, Accidents and Heroic Recoveries. Ashgate, Aldershot (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Reason, J.: Human Error. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Kontogiannis, T.: Ergonomic approaches to safety management and organization, Greece (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Barrouillet, P., Camos, V.: Working Memory: Loss and Reconstruction. Psychology Press, New York (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Plancher, G., Barrouillet, P.: On some of the main criticisms of the modal model: reappraisal from a TBRS perspective. Mem. Cogn. 48, 455–468 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-019-00982-w

  12. Neerincx, M.: Cognitive task load design: model, methods and examples. In: Hollnagel, E. (ed.) Handbook of Cognitive Task Design, pp. 283–305. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bainbridge, L: Ironies of automation. In: Rasmussen, J., Duncan, K., Leplat, J. (eds.) New Technology and Human Error, pp. 271–283. Wiley, Hoboken (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  14. PIARC: Risk Analysis for Road Tunnels. World Road Association, France (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kazaras, K., Kontogiannis, T., Kirytopoulos, K.: Proactive assessment of breaches of safety constraints and causal organizational breakdowns in complex systems. Saf. Sci. 62, 233–247 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. PIARC: Integrated Approach to Road Tunnel Safety. World Road Association, France (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  17. INERIS: Transport of Dangerous goods through road tunnels, Quantitative Risk Assessment Model (v. 3.60 and v. 3.61) Reference Manual. Verneuil-en-Halatte, France (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bjelland, H., Aven, T.: Treatment of uncertainty in risk assessments in the Rogfast road tunnel project. Saf. Sci. 55, 34–44 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kazaras, K., Kirytopoulos, K., Rentizelas, A.: Introducing the STAMP method in road tunnel safety assessment. Saf. Sci. 50, 1806–1817 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy logic and the calculi of fuzzy rules and fuzzy graphs. Multiple-Valued Logic 1, 1–38 (1996)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Zadeh, L.A.: Is there a need for fuzzy logic? Inf. Sci. 178(13), 2751–2779 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Konstandinidou, Μ., Nivolianitou, Ζ., Kiranoudis, C., Markatos, N.: A fuzzy modeling application of CREAM methodology for human reliability analysis. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 91, 706–716 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zio, E., Baraldi, P., Librizzi, M., Podofillini, L., Dang, V.N.: A fuzzy set-based approach for modeling dependence among human errors. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 160(13), 1947–1964 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Konstandinidou, M., Nivolianitou, Z., Kiranoudis, C., Markatos, N.: Fuzzy systems for the estimation of operators’ response time in critical situations. In: 13th International Symposium on Loss Prevention, Bruges, Belgium, 6–9 June 2010 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hollnagel, E.: Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method (CREAM). Elsevier Science Ltd., Amsterdam (1998)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This research has been co-financed by the European Union and Greek national funds through the Operational Program Competitiveness, Entrepreneurship and Innovation, under the call RESEARCH – CREATE – INNOVATE (project code: T1EDK-02374).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Myrto Konstantinidou .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Konstantinidou, M., Kazaras, K., Kirytopoulos, K. (2020). Human, Organizational Factors and Mental Workload for Tunnel Operators in Emergency Situations. In: Longo, L., Leva, M.C. (eds) Human Mental Workload: Models and Applications. H-WORKLOAD 2020. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1318. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62302-9_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62302-9_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-62301-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-62302-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics