Skip to main content

Life Cycle Inventory Data and Databases

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Life Cycle Inventory Analysis

Abstract

Life cycle inventory (LCI) databases are commonly used in life cycle assessment (LCA) studies. They enable modern, larger case studies, make data collection more efficient, and help to establish comparability across different case studies. A database typically tries to provide one coherent and consistent modeling space, thereby allowing users to take different datasets in the appropriate database, which implies that the goal and scope of datasets in the database match the goal and scope of case studies done with the database.

This chapter explains the principal elements of LCI data, different types of databases in LCA, and explores common issues in modern LCA databases: starting a database, maintaining it, providing quality assurance, and not the least, making the database available to users. The second part of the chapter deals with data exchange and data exchange formats, as well as with interoperability concepts to allow the use of datasets from different databases in one study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Introduction to “Life Cycle Inventory Analysis”

  2. 2.

    Development of Unit Process Datasets

  3. 3.

    We implicitly define LCI data library here; in an LCI library, the provider of the datasets does not attempt to harmonize them, for example, to preserve the original modeling of the datasets. A “classic” example of an LCI library is ProBas, from the German Environmental Protection Agency, http://probas.umweltbundesamt.de/

  4. 4.

    ISO/TS 14048 (2002) Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Data documentation format. 1st ed Geneva, Switzerland. ISO/TS 14048 was prepared by Technical Committee ISO/TC 207 “Technical Management,” Subcommittee SC 5 “Life Cycle Assessment” in 1993. This standard was last reviewed and confirmed in 2013, therefore the version of 2002 remains current

  5. 5.

    Development of Unit Process Datasets

  6. 6.

    https://www.ecoinvent.org/about/projects/sri-project/sri-project.html

  7. 7.

    The United Nations Standard Products and Services Code, http://www.unspsc.org/

  8. 8.

    https://nexus.openlca.org/

  9. 9.

    https://www.lifecycleinitiative.org/applying-lca/lca-databases-map/

  10. 10.

    Data Quality in Life Cycle Inventories

  11. 11.

    http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eussd/smgp/ef_pilots.htm#compliant, accessed April 21, 2019

  12. 12.

    For US EPA, see “Data Quality”, Chap. 5, Sect. 3.5.2, for UNEP/SETAC, see GLAD, Global Life Cycle Access to Data, Chap. 5, Sect. 3.5.3; for European Commission, see Environmental Footprint, Chap. 5, Sect. 3.5.1)

  13. 13.

    The link between life cycle inventory analysis and life cycle impact assessment

  14. 14.

    Since no database starts with guaranteed financial support over an unlimited time

  15. 15.

    For example, Thinkstep, with the GaBi LCA software and the various GaBi databases, and GreenDelta, with the PSILCA social LCA database.

  16. 16.

    XML was first proposed by the W3C consortium in 1998 with the idea to provide a language that is usable over the internet, easy to write and to process, with formal and concise design, among other things (https://www.w3.org/TR/1998/REC-xml-19980210). It has been broadly adopted since.

  17. 17.

    JSON-LD was developed with support from search engines, to overcome some disadvantages of XML in data interchange; it is now a recommendation of W3C (https://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld/). In JSON, data is not organized in a hierarchical tree as in XML but in a “map” (https://www.educba.com/json-vs-xml/), with simple annotations, with makes processing faster and the overall format less heavy. JSON-LD is simply speaking JSON for linked data, so that the format can directly represent ontologies for example.

  18. 18.

    https://www.ecoinvent.org/files/ecospold1_data_exchange_format.zip

  19. 19.

    Weidema B. SPOLD ‘99 format – an electronic data format for exchange of LCI data (1999.06.24) https://lca-net.com/files/sis.pdf

  20. 20.

    https://www.ecoinvent.org/files/documentation_on_ecospold2_format.v1.0.13.zip

  21. 21.

    https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/LCDN/developerILCDDataFormat.xhtml

  22. 22.

    http://greendelta.github.io/olca-schema/

  23. 23.

    https://github.com/GreenDelta/olca-converter

  24. 24.

    https://github.com/GreenDelta/olca-conversion-service

  25. 25.

    https://github.com/USEPA/Federal-LCA-Commons-Elementary-Flow -List/tree/master/fedelemflowlist

  26. 26.

    Data quality in life cycle inventories

References

  • Archer SA, Murphy RJ, Steinberger-Wilckens R (2018) Methodological analysis of palm oil biodiesel life cycle studies. Renew Sust Energ Rev 94:694–704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciroth A, Franze J (2011) LCA of an Ecolabeled notebook: consideration of social and environmental impacts along the entire life cycle. greendeltatc.com

  • De Rosa M, Weidema B, Merciai S, Schmidt J (2017) LCM Luxemburg, September 6 th 2017. Making the dream come true: sharing linked data and software with BONSAI

    Google Scholar 

  • Frischknecht R (1998) Life cycle inventory analysis for decision-making: scope-dependent inventory system models and context-specific joint product allocation. ESU-services, Uster. Research-collection ETHZ Switzerland

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Frischknecht R, Jungbluth N (eds) (2007) ecoinvent 2 overview and methodology. ecoinvent Rep no 1 1:1–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilgen P-W, Ackermann R, Fleischer G (1994) In: Fleischer, G. (ed.) Stoff-und Energieflussanalyse für die Aluminium-Dose. Produktionsintegrierter Umweltschutz, EF, Berlin, ISBN: 978-3-924511-81-4

    Google Scholar 

  • ILCD Handbook (2010) Joint research general guide for life cycle assessment – Detailed Guidance Centre. Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Ispra

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingwersen WW, Kahn E, Cooper J (2018) Bridge processes: a solution for LCI datasets independent of background databases. Int J Life Cycle Assess 23:2266–2270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISO/TS 14048 (2002) Environmental management – life cycle assessment – data documentation format, 1st edn. ISO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • JRC-IES (2010) Specific guide for life cycle inventory data sets. Joint Research Center, Ispra

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim HM, Laskowski M (2018) Toward an ontology-driven blockchain design for supply-chain provenance. Intell Syst Account Finance Manag 25:18–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesage P, Samson R (2016) The Quebec life cycle inventory database project. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21:1282–1289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Rocamora A, Solís-Guzmán J, Marrero M (2016) LCA databases focused on construction materials: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 58:565–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonnemann G, Strothmann P, Weyand S, Valdivia S (2016) Opportunities for national life cycle network creation and expansion around the world. Technical report. https://www.researchgate.net

  • Srocka M (2009) openLCA: open source software für life cycle assessments – Stand und Weiterentwicklung. In: Feifel S, Walk W, Wursthorn S, Schebek L (eds) Ökobilanzwerkstatt 2009. KIT Scientific Publishing, Karlsruhe, pp 11–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Takano A, Winter S, Hughes M, Linkosalmi L (2014) Comparison of life cycle assessment databases: a case study on building assessment. Build Environ 79:20–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UBA (1995) Schmitz S, Oels H-J, Tiedemann A: Ökobilanz für Getränkeverpackungen, Teil B: Vergleichende Untersuchung der durch Verpackungssysteme für Frischmilch und Bier hervorgerufenen Umweltbeeinflussungen. UBA Texte 52/95. Berlin 1995

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP/SETAC (2011) Global guidance principles for life cycle assessment databases – “Shonan Guidance Principles.” UNEP/SETAC

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Wang Z, Fan C et al (2011) Development of Chinese reference life cycle database (CLCD) – guidelines, documentation and tools. Life Cycle Manag Conf LCM

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Ciroth .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ciroth, A., Burhan, S. (2021). Life Cycle Inventory Data and Databases. In: Ciroth, A., Arvidsson, R. (eds) Life Cycle Inventory Analysis . LCA Compendium – The Complete World of Life Cycle Assessment. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62270-1_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics