Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cycling to Work

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology ((BRIEFSAPPLSCIENCES))

  • 284 Accesses

Abstract

In 1817, Karl von Drais travelled 14 kms around Mannheim on a strange two-wheeled vehicle, a ‘running machine’, which is considered to be the ancestor of the bicycle. Two centuries after its invention, the bicycle is back on centre stage, and it may just be one of the keys to the mobility of the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Utility cycling emphasises its function as a means of transport, while recreational cycling refers to a leisure or sporting activity.

  2. 2.

    The research presented in this book is taken from the Volteface research programme. Relating to the social challenges of the energy transition, a dozen of projects have been carried out at the University of Lausanne with the support of Romande Energie and the Canton of Vaud [13].

  3. 3.

    Active mobility includes forms of travel that utilise human energy (walking, cycling, scooters, skateboarding, etc.). In Switzerland, we speak most frequently about ‘soft mobility’ in French (mobilité douce) or, in German, ‘slow transport’ (Langsamverkehr).

  4. 4.

    The terms mechanical, conventional or traditional bicycle in this book denote bicycles, which are propelled purely by the energy expended by their users (in contrast to e-bikes).

  5. 5.

    This telephone survey is carried out every 5 years using a sample of more than 50,000 people. The latter are questioned in detail about their mobility behaviour on a specific reference day (the day before the survey). The survey takes place throughout the year to avoid seasonal bias.

  6. 6.

    Another source, the Structural survey, shows lower figures though: 6.7% of the commuters (people working outside their home) travel less than 1 km, 25% between 1 and 5 kms and 21.3% between 5 and 10 kms. This would mean that half of the commuters work at a distance that is accessible by e-bike at least [17].

  7. 7.

    Furthermore, the car occupancy rate is low: 1.10 person for commuting journeys, 1.56 for all journeys.

  8. 8.

    However, only 27% of circuits (a circuit is a succession of journeys starting at home and returning back there) are made up of more than a simple round trip (OFS and ARE 2017).

References

  1. S. Bendiks, A. Degros, Cycle Infrastructure (nai010 publishers, Rotterdam, 2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. C.A. Celis-Morales, D.M. Lyall, P. Welsh, J. Anderson, L. Steell, Y. Guo, R. Maldonado, D.F. Mackay, J.P. Pell, N. Sattar, J.M.R. Gill, Association between active commuting and incident cardiovascular disease, cancer, and mortality: prospective cohort study. BMJ j1456 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j1456

  3. A. Degros, Traffic space is public space! Les espaces de trafic sont des espaces publics! GeoAgenda 1, 18–21 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  4. E. Fishman, C. Cherry, E-bikes in the mainstream: reviewing a decade of research. Transp. Rev. 36(1), 72–91 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2015.1069907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Givoni, Alternative pathways to low carbon mobility, in Moving Towards Low Carbon Mobility. ed. by M. Givoni, D. Banister (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2013), pp. 209–230

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Givoni, D. Banister (eds.), Moving Towards Low Carbon Mobility (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. B. Gojanovic, J. Welker, K. Iglesias, C. Daucourt, G. Gremion, Electric bicycles as a new active transportation modality to promote health. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 43(11), 2204–2210 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e31821cbdc8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. T. Götschi, J. Garrard, B. Giles-Corti, Cycling as a part of daily life: a review of health perspectives. Transp. Rev. 36(1), 45–71 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2015.1057877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. F. Héran, Le retour de la bicyclette: une histoire des déplacements urbains en Europe, de 1817 à 2050 (La Découverte, Paris, 2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. P.L. Jacobsen, Safety in numbers: More walkers and bicyclists, safer walking and bicycling. Inj. Prev. 9(3), 205–209 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1136/ip.9.3.205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. L. Mertens, S. Compernolle, B. Deforche, J.D. Mackenbach, J. Lakerveld, J. Brug, C. Roda, T. Feuillet, J.-M. Oppert, K. Glonti, H. Rutter, H. Bardos, I. De Bourdeaudhuij, D. Van Dyck, Built environmental correlates of cycling for transport across Europe. Health Place 44, 35–42 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2017.01.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. B. Meyer, Vorwärts Rückwärts: Zur Geschichte des Fahrradfahrens in der Schweiz (Bautz, Nordhausen, 2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. N. Niwa, B. Frund, Volteface. La transition énergétique : un projet de société (Editions d’en bas & Editions Charles Léopold Mayer, Lausanne, Paris, 2018)

    Google Scholar 

  14. OFEN, Statistique globale suisse de l’énergie 2016 (Office fédéral de l’énergie, Berne, 2017)

    Google Scholar 

  15. OFEV, Indicateurs de l’évolution des émissions de gaz à effet de serre en Suisse 1990–2015 (Office fédéral de l’environnement, Berne, 2017)

    Google Scholar 

  16. OFEV, Pollution sonore en Suisse. Résultats du monitoring national sonBASE, état en 2015 (Office fédéral de l’environnement, Berne, 2018)

    Google Scholar 

  17. OFS, La pendularité en Suisse 2016 (Office fédéral de la statistique, Neuchâtel, 2018)

    Google Scholar 

  18. OFS, ARE, Comportement de la population en matière de transports: Résultats de microrecensement mobilité et transports 2015 (Office fédéral de la statistique et Office fédéral du développement territorial, Neuchâtel, Berne, 2017)

    Google Scholar 

  19. R. Oldenziel, M. Emanuel, A.A. de la Bruhèze, F. Veraart (eds.), Cycling Cities: The European Experience; Hundred Years of Policy and Practice (Foundation for the History of Technology, Eindhoven, 2016)

    Google Scholar 

  20. C. Reid, Bike Boom: The Unexpected Resurgence of Cycling (Island Press, Washington, DC, 2017) https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-817-6

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. B. Spielmann, ‘Im Übrigen ging man zu Fuss’: Alltagsmobilität in der Schweiz von 1848 bis 1939 (LIBRUM, Basel, 2020)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick Rérat .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rérat, P. (2021). Introduction. In: Cycling to Work. SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62256-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62256-5_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-62255-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-62256-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics