Abstract
Obtaining a job—or residency position—as an international medical graduate (IMG) has historically been challenging relative to US-trained physicians. After many years of training in other countries, seeking clinical or research opportunities in the United States, preparing for board examinations, and going through the residency application process, only about half of IMGs who apply to the Match are assigned a position. This disparity raises several important questions: Why is this the case? What options exist for IMGs who do not match? What are the current trends in IMGs specialty match outcomes? What systemic and personal challenges surrounding the residency application could help explain these trends? In this chapter, these questions are explored from begging to end. In addition, the ways in which IMGs contribute to American healthcare and some ways to support them through existing challenges are introduced. A case is also made as to why IMGs should not be forced to “choose a specialty just to get a job.”
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Liang M, Curtin L, Signer M, Savoia M. Understanding the interview and ranking behaviors of unmatched international medical students and graduates in the 2013 main residency match. J Grad Med Educ. 2015;7(4):610–6.
Murphy B. Choosing a medical specialty: 4 questions to help get you started [Internet]. American Medical Association; 2020 [cited 28 February 2020]. Available from: https://www.ama-assn.org/residents-students/specialty-profiles/choosing-medical-specialty-4-questions-help-get-you-started
Ahmed A, Hwang W, Thomas C, Deville C. International medical graduates in the US physician workforce and graduate medical education: current and historical trends. J Grad Med Educ. 2018;10(2):214–8.
Whitcomb M. Comparison of IMG-dependent and non-IMG-dependent residencies in the National Resident Matching Program. JAMA. 1996;276(9):700–3.
Jenkins T, Franklyn G, Klugman J, Reddy S. Separate but equal? The sorting of USMDs and non-USMDs in internal medicine residency programs. J Gen Intern Med. 2019;35(5):1458–64.
Stillman M, Miller K, Ziegler C, Upadhyay A, Mitchell C. Program characteristics influencing allopathic students’ residency selection. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2016;116(4):214.
Jolly P, Boulet J, Garrison G, Signer M. Participation in U.S. graduate medical education by graduates of international medical schools. Acad Med. 2011;86(5):559–64.
Radabaugh C, Welcher C, Skochelak S. Long-term potential implications of immigration barriers for medical education. JAMA. 2019;321(8):741.
Tsugawa Y, Jena A, Orav E, Jha A. Quality of care delivered by general internists in US hospitals who graduated from foreign versus US medical schools: observational study. BMJ. 2017;356:j273.
Kehoe A, McLachlan J, Metcalf J, Forrest S, Carter M, Illing J. Supporting international medical graduates’ transition to their host-country: realist synthesis. Med Educ. 2020;50(10):1015–32.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nambudiri, V.E., Salinas, K.E. (2021). Choosing a Specialty Just to Get a Job. In: Tohid, H., Maibach, H. (eds) International Medical Graduates in the United States. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62249-7_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62249-7_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-62248-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-62249-7
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)