Skip to main content

The Effect of Individual Differences and Repetitive Interactions on Explicit and Implicit Attitudes Towards Robots

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 12483))

Abstract

The exploitation of Social Assistive Robotics (SAR) will bring to the emergence of a new category of users, namely experts in clinical rehabilitation, who do not have a background in robotics. The first aim of the present study was to address individuals’ attitudes towards robots within this new category of users. The secondary aim was to investigate whether repetitive interactions with the robot affect such attitudes. Therefore, we evaluated both explicit and implicit attitudes towards robots in a group of therapists rehabilitating children with neurodevelopmental disorders. The evaluation took place before they started a SAR intervention (T0), ongoing (T1), and at the end of it (T2). Explicit attitudes were evaluated using self-report questionnaires, whereas implicit attitudes were operationalized as the perception of the robot as a social partner and implicit associations regarding the concept of “robot”. Results showed that older ages and previous experience with robots were associated with negative attitudes toward robots and lesser willingness to perceive the robot as a social agent. Explicit measures did not vary across time, whereas implicit measures were modulated by increased exposure to robots: the more clinicians were exposed to the robot, the more the robot was treated as a social partner. Moreover, users’ memory association between the concept of a robot and mechanical attributes weakens across evaluations. Our results suggest that increased exposure to robots modulates implicit but not explicit attitudes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Young, G.O.: Synthetic structure of industrial plastics. In: Peters, J. (ed.) Plastics, vol. 3, 2nd edn, pp. 15–64. McGraw-Hill, New York (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Syrdal, D.S., Dautenhahn, K., Kony, K.L., Walters, M.L.: The Negative Attitudes Towards Robots Scale and Reactions to Robot Behaviour in a Live Human-Robot Interaction Study. Adaptive and Emergent Behaviour and Complex Systems (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Waytz, A., Cacioppo, J., Epley, N.: Who sees human? The stability and importance of individual differences in anthropomorphism. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 5, 219–232 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. MacDorman, K.F., Entezari, S.O.: Individual differences predict sensitivity to the uncanny valley. IS 16, 141–172 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. de Visser, E., Parasuraman, R., Freedy, A., Freedy, E., Weltman, G.: A comprehensive methodology for assessing human-robot team performance for use in training and simulation. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 50, pp. 2639–2643 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hinz, N.-A., Ciardo, F., Wykowska, A.: Individual Differences in Attitude Toward Robots Predict Behavior in Human-Robot Interaction. In: Salichs, Miguel A., Ge, S.S., Barakova, E.I., Cabibihan, J.-J., Wagner, Alan R., Castro-González, Á., He, H. (eds.) ICSR 2019. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 11876, pp. 64–73. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35888-4_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim, S.W., Lee, Y.: The effect of robot programming education on attitudes towards robots. Indian Journal of Science and Technology 9(24), 1–11 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ghiglino, D., Chevalier, P., Floris, F., Priolo, T., & Wykowska, A. (2020, April 6). Follow the white robot: efficacy of robot-assistive training for children with autism-spectrum condition. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/7pktm

  9. Perez-Osorio, J., Marchesi, S., Ghiglino, D., Ince, M., Wykowska, A.: More than you expect: priors influence on the adoption of intentional stance toward humanoid robots. In: Salichs, M.A., Ge, S.S., Barakova, E.I., Cabibihan, J.-J., Wagner, A.R., Castro-González, Á., He, H. (eds.) ICSR 2019. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 11876, pp. 119–129. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35888-4_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Syrdal, D.S., Nomura, T., Dautenhahn, K.: The Frankenstein Syndrome Questionnaire–Results from a quantitative cross-cultural survey. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Social Robotics, pp. 270–279 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Carpinella, C.M., Wyman, A.B., Perez, M.A., Stroessner, S.J.: The Robotic Social Attributes Scale (RoSAS). In: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 254–262 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Greenwald, A.G., McGhee, D.E., Schwartz, J.L.K.: Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 74, 1464–1480 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Greenwald, A.G., Nosek, B.A., Banaji, M.R.: Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 85(2), 197 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dennett, D.C.: The Intentional Stance. MIT Press, Cambridge (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schellen, E., Wykowska, A.: Intentional mindset toward robots—open questions and methodological challenges. Front. Rob. AI 5, 71 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Marchesi, S., Ghiglino, D., Ciardo, F., Baykara, E., Wykowska, A.: Do we adopt the Intentional Stance towards humanoid robots? Front. Psychol. 10, 450 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee, S., Lau, I., Kiesler, S., Chiu, C.: Human mental models of humanoid robots. In: Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, ICRA, pp. 2767–2772. IEEE, Barcelona (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zajonc, R.B.: Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 90, 751–783 (1968). Monograph Suppl. 9, 1-27

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bartneck, C., Suzuki, T., Kanda, T., Nomura, T.: The influence of people’s culture and prior experiences with Aibo on their attitude toward robots. AI Soc. 21, 217–230 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Williams, K.D., Jarvis, B.: Cyberball: a program for use in research on interpersonal ostracism and acceptance. Behav. Res. Methods 38(1), 174–180 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. MacDorman, K.F., Vasudevan, S.K., Ho, C.C.: Does Japan really have robot mania? Comparing attitudes by implicit and explicit measures. AI Soc. 23(4), 485–510 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Allport, G.W.: The Nature of Prejudice. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1954)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Deligianis, C., Stanton, C.J., McGarty, C., Stevens, C.J.: The impact of intergroup bias on trust and approach behaviour towards a humanoid robot. J. Hum.-Rob. Interact. 6(3), 4–20 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Brewer, M.B., Miller, N.: Contact and cooperation: when do they work? In: Katz, P., Taylor, D. (eds.) Eliminating Racism: Profiles in Controversy, pp. 315–326. Plenum Press, New York (1988)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Wullenkord, R., Fraune, M.R., Eyssel, F., Šabanović, S.: Getting in touch: how imagined, actual, and physical contact affects evaluation of robots. In: Proceedings of the 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN) (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kompatsiari, K., Ciardo, F., Tikhanoff, V., Metta, G., Wykowska, A.: It’s in the eyes: the engaging role of eye contact in HRI. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 1–11 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kompatsiari, K., Ciardo, F., De Tommaso, D., Wykowska, A.: Measuring engagement elicited by eye contact in Human-Robot Interaction. In: 2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 6979–6985. IEEE (2019b)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ghiglino, D., Willemse, C., De Tommaso, D., Bossi, F., Wykowska, A.: At first sight: robots’ subtle eye movement parameters affect human attentional engagement, spontaneous attunement and perceived human-likeness. Paladyn, J. Behav. Robot. 11(1), 31–39 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Abelson, R.P., Aronson, E.E., McGuire, W.., Newcomb, T.M., Rosenberg, M.J., Tannenbaum, P.H.: Theories of Cognitive Consistency: A Sourcebook (1968)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study has received support from the European Research Council under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program, ERC Starting grant ERC-2016-StG-715058, awarded to AW. The content of this paper is the sole responsibility of the authors. The European Commission or its services cannot be held responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesca Ciardo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ciardo, F., Ghiglino, D., Roselli, C., Wykowska, A. (2020). The Effect of Individual Differences and Repetitive Interactions on Explicit and Implicit Attitudes Towards Robots. In: Wagner, A.R., et al. Social Robotics. ICSR 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12483. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62056-1_39

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62056-1_39

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-62055-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-62056-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics