Skip to main content

Evaluating Remanufacturing Lithium-Ion Batteries

  • 442 Accesses

Part of the Springer Proceedings in Earth and Environmental Sciences book series (SPEES)

Abstract

Waste management of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) after retirement is worrying as the wide application of electric vehicles. More and more attention has been paid to the remanufacturing of LIBs, because it can reduce the environmental burden of spent LIBs and the risk of raw materials supply when remanufacturing LIBs. This paper use the life cycle assessement to evaluate the environmental impacts and employ the process-based cost model to calculate the economic influence. Results show that remanufacturing NCM111 battery with pyrometallurgical recycling method could decrease the greenhouse gas (GHG) emission by 4.76% and reduce costs by 8.11%. In addition, this study uses sensitivity analysis method to analyze the influence of battery types. The cost of remanufacturing NCM811 is the least among three types of LIBs, which costs 19.72 dollars per cell. Remanufacturing NCM622 emits the most GHG among three types of LIBs, which emits 11,009.75 g GHG per cell. In a word, remanufacturing LIBs is environmentally-friendly and commercially-profitable.

Keywords

  • Lithium-ion battery
  • Environmental impact
  • Economic benefit
  • Remanufacturing
  • Pyrometallurgical recycling method

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Gu, H., Liu, Z., Qing, Q.: Optimal electric vehicle production strategy under subsidy and battery recycling. Energy Policy 109, 579–589 (2017). doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.07.043.

  • Li, L., Dababneh, F., Zhao, J.: Cost-effective supply chain for electric vehicle battery remanufacturing. Applied Energy 226, 277–286 (2018). doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.05.115.

  • Qiao, Q., Zhao, F., Liu, Z., Hao, H.: Electric vehicle recycling in China: Economic and environmental benefits. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 140, 45–53 (2019). doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.09.003.

  • Council, G.O.o.t.S.: Energy Saving and New Energy Vehicle Industry Planning from 2012 to 2020 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxena, S., Le Floch, C., MacDonald, J., Moura, S.: Quantifying EV battery end-of-life through analysis of travel needs with vehicle powertrain models. Journal of Power Sources 282, 265–276 (2015). doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.01.072.

  • Ziemann, S., Müller, D.B., Schebek, L., Weil, M.: Modeling the potential impact of lithium recycling from EV batteries on lithium demand: A dynamic MFA approach. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 133, 76–85 (2018). doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.01.031.

  • Xiong, S., Ji, J., Ma, X., 2020. Environmental and economic evaluation of remanufacturing lithium-ion batteries from electric vehicles. Waste Manage. 102, 579–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habib, K., Hamelin, L., Wenzel, H.: A dynamic perspective of the geopolitical supply risk of metals. Journal of Cleaner Production 133, 850–858 (2016). doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.118.

  • Olivetti, E.A., Ceder, G., Gaustad, G.G., Fu, X.: Lithium-Ion Battery Supply Chain Considerations: Analysis of Potential Bottlenecks in Critical Metals. Joule 1(2), 229–243 (2017). doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2017.08.019.

  • Zhu, X., Yu, L., 2019. Screening Contract Excitation Models Involving Closed-Loop Supply Chains Under Asymmetric Information Games: A Case Study with New Energy Vehicle Power Battery. Applied Sciences 9, 146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gu, X., Ieromonachou, P., Zhou, L., Tseng, M.-L., 2018a. Developing pricing strategy to optimise total profits in an electric vehicle battery closed loop supply chain. Journal of Cleaner Production 203, 376–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gu, X.Y., Ieromonachou, P., Zhou, L., Tseng, M.L., 2018b. Optimising quantity of manufacturing and remanufacturing in an electric vehicle battery closed-loop supply chain. Ind. Manage. Data Syst. 118, 283–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, X.X., Hu, S.Y., Chen, D.J., Zhu, B., 2017. Estimation of Waste Battery Generation and Analysis of the Waste Battery Recycling System in China. Journal of Industrial Ecology 21, 57–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qiao, Q., Zhao, F., Liu, Z., Hao, H., 2019. Electric vehicle recycling in China: Economic and environmental benefits. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 140, 45–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, J.B., Gaines, L., Sullivan, J., Wang, M.Q., 2012. Impact of Recycling on Cradle-to-Gate Energy Consumption and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Automotive Lithium-Ion Batteries. Environmental Science & Technology 46, 12704–12710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciez, R.E., Whitacre, J.F., 2019. Examining different recycling processes for lithium-ion batteries. Nature Sustainability 2, 148–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, J.B., Gaines, L., Kelly, J.C., James, C., Gallagher, K.G., 2015. The significance of Li-ion batteries in electric vehicle life-cycle energy and emissions and recycling’s role in its reduction. Energy & Environmental Science 8, 158–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clift, R., 2006. Sustainable development and its implications for chemical engineering. Chemical Engineering Science 61, 4179–4187.

    Google Scholar 

  • ANL, 2018a. GREET. Argonne National Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • ANL, 2018b. BatPaC. Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne National Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • ANL, 2018c. ReCell, Argonne National Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linda, G., 2018. Lithium-ion battery recycling processes: Research towards a sustainable course. Sustainable Materials and Technologies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciez, R.E., Whitacre, J.F., 2017. Comparison between cylindrical and prismatic lithium-ion cell costs using a process based cost model. Journal of Power Sources 340, 273–281.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaoming Ma .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Yu, M., Bai, B., Ma, X. (2021). Evaluating Remanufacturing Lithium-Ion Batteries. In: Gutierrez, R.M. (eds) Wastewater Technologies and Environmental Treatment. Springer Proceedings in Earth and Environmental Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61989-3_8

Download citation