Abstract
Disruptive change is often seen as a risk to many regions around the world. Uncertainty around the future, unprecedented events and a general belief in the past induces this problematic situation. Almost everywhere this problem is tackled with traditional planning approaches. In many cases this does not lead to satisfying solutions but offer solace only for the short-term. When a longer time horizon is taken into account, subsequent policies increase risks and decrease the quality of the land. Especially when uncertainties increase transformational planning approaches should be applied. In the Groningen region incremental planning has led to an increased vulnerability of population, nature and the land. People no longer trust their governments. At the same time, policies and people’s ideas in Groningen focus on the short term and minimal uncertainties. This discrepancy can only be overcome with a creative, design-led process, in which a positive future can be envisioned, and the alternative projects are conceived as the new points of departure for a development process towards that desired future. In Groningen building with nature of the Wadden sea in combination with growing healthy food locally establishes the first novel ideas to start this process.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ainsworth-Land GT (1986) Grow or die. The unifying principle of transformation, Reissued edn. Wiley, New York/Chichester/Brisbane/Toronto/Singapore
Batty M (2012) Building a science of cities. Cities 29(Suppl 1):S9–S16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2011.11.008
Boelens L (2010) Theorizing practice and practising theory: outlines for an actor- relational – approach in planning. Plan Theory 9(1):28–62
Chapin FS III, McGuire AD, Ruess RW, Hollingsworth TN, Mack MC, Johnstone JF, Kasischke ES, Euskirchen ES, Jones JB, Jorgenson MT, Kielland K, Kofinas GP, Turetsky MR, Yarie J, Lloyd AH, Taylor DL (2010) Resilience of Alaska’s boreal forest to climatic change. Can J For Res 40:1360–1370. https://doi.org/10.1139/X10-074
Davy B (2008) Plan it without a condom! Plan Theory 7(3):301–317
Folke C, Carpenter SR, Walker B, Scheffer M, Chapin T, Rockström J (2010) Resilience thinking: integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecol Soc 15(4):20. [online] http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art20/
Geels FW (2002) Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multilevel perspective and a case study. Res Policy 31:1257–1274
Geels FW (2005) Processes and patterns in transitions and system innovations: refining the co-evolutionary multi-level perspective. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 72:681–696
Geels FW (2011) The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: responses to seven criticisms. Environ Innov Soc Trans 1:24–40
Geels FW, Kemp R (2006) Transitions, transformations and reproduction: dynamics of socio-technical systems. In: McKelvey M, Holmén M (eds) Flexibility and stability in economic transformation. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 227–256
Gu D, Gerland P, Pelletier F, Cohen B (2015) Risks of exposure and vulnerability to natural disasters at the city level: a global overview. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, Technical Paper No. 2015/2, New York
Gunder M (2011) Fake it until you make it, and then…. Plan Theory 10(3):201–212
Gunderson L, Holling CS (eds) (2002) Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island Press, Washington, DC
Homan T (2005) Organisatiedynamica. Theorie en praktijk van organisatieverandering. Boom Uitgevers, Amsterdam
IPCC (2014) In: Field CB, Barros VR, Dokken DJ, Mach KJ, Mastrandrea MD, Bilir TE, Chatterjee M, Ebi KL, Estrada YO, Genova RC, Girma B, Kissel ES, Levy AN, MacCracken S, Mastrandrea PR, White LL (eds) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/New York, p 1132
Kemp R, Rip A, Schot JW (2001) Constructing transition paths through the management of niches. In: Garud R, Karnoe P (eds) Path dependence and creation. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 269–299
Lindblom CE (1959) The science of “Muddling through”. Public Adm Rev 19(2):79–88. Published by: Blackwell Publishing on behalf of the American Society for Public Administration. http://www.jstor.org/stable/973677
Madhav N, Oppenheim B, Gallivan M, Mulembakani P, Rubin E, Wolfe N (2015) Pandemics: risks, impacts, and mitigation. In: Patel V, Chisholm D, Dua T, Laxminarayan R, Medina-Mora ME (eds) Mental, neurological, and substance use disorders, Disease control priorities, 3rd edn, vol 4. World Bank, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0426-7. License: Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 3.0 IGO
Miraftab F (2009) Insurgent planning: situating radical planning in the Global South. Plan Theory 8(1):32–50
Newman S (2011) Post-anarchism and space: revolutionary fantasies and autonomous zones. Plan Theory 10(4):344–365
Perez C (2002) Technological revolutions and financial capital. Edgar Elgar, Cheltenham
Roggema R (2008) The use of spatial planning to increase the resilience for future turbulence in the spatial system of the Groningen region to deal with climate change. Proceedings UKSS-conference, Oxford, 1–3 September 2008
Roggema R (2012) Swarm planning: the development of a methodology to deal with climate adaptation. PhD thesis. Delft University of Technology and Wageningen University and Research Centre, Delft/Wageningen
Roggema R (2019) ReciproCity, giving instead of taking. Inaugural lecture. Hanze University of Applied Sciences, Groningen
Roggema R (2020) Forum for design food-energy-water-futures. Workshop report M-Nex Groningen, 1–6 March 2020. http://m-nex.net/m-nex-design-workshop-groningen-forum-for-design-food-energy-water-futures/
Roggema R, Vermeend T, Van den Dobbelsteen A (2012) Incremental change, transition or transformation? Optimising change pathways for climate adaptation in spatial planning. Sustainability 4:2525–2549
Roggema R, Genel Altinkaya Ö, Psarra I (2020) De Toukomst is al lang begonnen. Hanze University of Applied Sciences Groningen/National Program Groningen, Groningen
Rosegrant MW, Cline SA (2003) Global food security: challenges and policies. Science 302(5652):1917–1919
Ten Hooven M (2020) Geen doembeeld maar een groen beeld. Vrij Nederland 144(17–18):18–23
von Thünen JH (1826) Der isolirte Staat in Beziehung auf Landwirtschaft und Nationalökonomie. Wirtschaft & Finan
Willett W, Rockström J, Loken B, Springmann M, Lang T, Vermeulen S, Garnett T, Tilman D, DeClerck F, Wood A, Jonell M, Clark M, Gorden LJ, Fanzo J, Hawkes C, Zurayk R, Rivera JA, De Vries W, Sibanda LM, Afshin A, Chaudhary A, Herrero M, Augustina R, Branca F, Lartey A, Fan S, Crona B, Fox E, Bignet V, Troell M, Lindahl T, Singh S, Cornell SE, Srinath Reddy K, Naraïn S, Nishtar S, Murray CJL (2019) Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet Comm 393(10170):447–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Roggema, R. (2021). Le Fouture de Groningen; Towards Transformational Food-Positive Landscapes. In: Roggema, R. (eds) TransFEWmation: Towards Design-led Food-Energy-Water Systems for Future Urbanization . Contemporary Urban Design Thinking. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61977-0_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61977-0_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-61976-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-61977-0
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)