Abstract
This chapter looks at some perspectives on economic geography, in its evolutionary form, and innovation studies to discuss the relationship among social and economic inclusion, innovation processes, sustainable development, and cluster development. Recent and vibrant literature emphasizes the importance of technological changes in the current historic moment, namely deep transitions and technological revolutions. In this respect, the focus on sustainability is particularly relevant, because the environmental dimension is the substrate on which these technical transitions would be happening in terms of not only technology, but also of the whole society and economy. Moreover, the inclusion of excluded groups and, consequently, less developed regions plays a central role in this debate, too. For this reason, these aspects must be incorporated into approaches to innovation systems through concepts such as eco-innovation and inclusive innovation, which enjoy different knowledge bases (i.e., analytical, synthetic, and symbolic). The findings of the study indicate important contributions for the understanding and formulation of innovation policies in different levels of inclusiveness, in order to capture better, differentiated knowledges and, at the same time, to promote citizens’ autonomy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arocena, R., Göransson, B., & Sutz, J. (2015). Knowledge policies and universities in developing countries: Inclusive development and the “developmental university”. Technology in Society, 41, 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2014.10.004
Asheim, B. (2007). Differentiated knowledge bases and varieties of regional innovation systems. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 20(3), 223–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610701722846
Asheim, B. (2018). Smart specialisation, innovation policy and regional innovation systems: What about new path development in less innovative regions? Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 32(1), 8–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2018.1491001
Asheim, B., Boschma, R., & Cooke, P. (2011). Constructing regional advantage: Platform policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge bases. Regional Studies, 45(7), 893–904. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2011.596701
Asheim, B., & Gertler, M. (2005). The geography of innovation: Regional innovation systems. In J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 291–317). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Asheim, B., Grillitsch, M., & Trippl, M. (2015). Regional innovation systems: Past—presence—future. Papers in Innovation Studies, 2015(36), 1–19. Retrieved January 3, 2020, from http://wp.circle.lu.se/upload/CIRCLE/workingpapers/201536_Asheim_et_al.pdf.
Aoyama, Y., Murphy, J. T., & Hanson, S. (2011). Key concepts in economic geography. London: Sage.
Balland, P.-A., Boschma, R., & Frenken, K. (2015). Proximity and innovation: From statics to dynamics. Regional Studies, 49(6), 907–920. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.883598
Boschma, R. A. (2005). Proximity and Innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340052000320842
Boschma, R., Coenen, L., Frenken, K., & Truffer, B. (2017). Towards a theory of regional diversification: Combining insights from evolutionary economic geography and transition studies. Regional Studies, 51(1), 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1258460
Boschma, R., & Martin, R. (Eds.). (2010). The handbook of evolutionary economic geography. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Coenen, L., & Morgan, K. (2020). Evolving geographies of innovation: Existing paradigms, critiques and possible alternatives. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift - Norwegian Journal of Geography, 74(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/00291951.2019.1692065
Cozzens, S., & Sutz, J. (2012). Innovation in informal settings: A research agenda. Ottawa: IDRC.
Edquist, C. (Ed.). (2006). Systems of Innovation: Technologies, institutions and organizations. London: Routledge.
Fagerberg, J., Martin, B. R., & Andersen, E. S. (Eds.). (2013). Innovation studies: Evolution and future challenges. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Foster, C., & Heeks, R. (2013). Conceptualising inclusive innovation: Modifying systems of innovation frameworks to understand diffusion of new technology to low-income consumers. European Journal of Development Research, 25(3), 333–355.
Friedman, T. L. (2007). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York, NY: Picador.
Fujita, M., Krugman, P., & Venables, A. J. (2002). Economia espacial. São Paulo, Brasil: Futura.
Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31(8–9), 1257–1274. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8
Geels, F. W. (2019). Socio-technical transitions to sustainability: A review of criticisms and elaborations of the multi-level perspective. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 39, 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.06.009
Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. (2007). Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy, 36(3), 399–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003
Glaeser, E. L. (2011). Triumph of the city: How our greatest invention makes us richer, smarter, greener, healthier. New York, NY: The Penguin Press.
Hansen, T., & Coenen, L. (2015). The geography of sustainability transitions: Review, synthesis and reflections on an emergent research field. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 17, 92–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2014.11.001
Healy, A., & Morgan, K. (2012). Spaces of Innovation: Learning, proximity and the ecological turn. Regional Studies, 46(8), 1041–1053. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2012.672725
Heeks, R., Amalia, M., Kintu, R., & Shah, N. (2013). Inclusive innovation: Definition, conceptualisation and future research priorities. Development Informatics Working Paper Series, 53, 1–28.
Heeks, R., Foster, C., & Nugroho, Y. (2014). Introduction: New models of inclusive innovation for development. Innovation and Development, 4(2), 175–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/2157930X.2014.928982
Horbach, J., & Reif, C. (Eds.). (2018). New developments in eco-innovation research. Cham: Springer.
Kemp, R. (2010). Eco-innovation: Definition, measurement and open research. Economia Politica, 3, 397–420.
Köhler, J., Geels, F. W., Kern, F., Markard, J., Wieczorek, A., Alkemade, F., et al. (2019). An agenda for sustainability transitions research: State of the art and future directions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 31, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004
Lazzeretti, L., Capone, F., Caloffi, A., & Sedita, S. R. (2019). Rethinking clusters. Towards a new research agenda for cluster research. European Planning Studies, 27(10), 1879–1903. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1650899
Marshall, A. (1982). Princípios de economia: Tratado introdutório. São Paulo, Brasil: Abril Cultural.
Mazzucato, M., & Perez, C. (2014). Innovation as growth policy: The challenge for Europe. SPRU Working Paper Series, 2014(13), 1–28.
Morgan, K. (2004). The exaggerated death of geography: Learning, proximity and territorial innovation systems. Journal of Economic Geography, 4(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/4.1.3
Morgan, K. (2018). Experimental governance and territorial development. Paris: OECD.
Moulaert, F., & Sekia, F. (2003). Territorial innovation models: A critical survey. Regional Studies, 37(3), 289–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340032000065442
Perez, C. (2004). Revoluciones tecnológicas y capital financiero: la dinâmica de las grandes burbujas financieras y las épocas de bonanza. México, DF: Siglo XXI Editores.
Perez, C. (2013). Unleashing a golden age after the financial collapse: Drawing lessons from history. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 6, 9–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2012.12.004
Perez, C., & Leach, T. M. (2018). A smart green ‘European Way of Life’: The path for growth, jobs and wellbeing. Beyond the Technological Revolution Working Paper Series, 2018(1), 3–24.
Porter, M. E. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 76(6), 77–90.
Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2018). The revenge of the places that don’t matter (and what to do about it). Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 11(1), 189–209. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsx024
Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Crescenzi, R. (2008). Mountains in a flat world: Why proximity still matters for the location of economic activity. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 1(3), 371–388. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsn011
Saunders, D. (2010). Arrival city: How the largest migration in history is reshaping our world. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
Schot, J., Boni, A., Ramirez, M., & Steward, F. (2018). Addressing SDGs through Transformative Innovation Policy. TIPC Research Briefing, 2018(1), 1–8.
Schot, J., & Kanger, L. (2018). Deep transitions: Emergence, acceleration, stabilization and directionality. Research Policy, 6(47), 1045–1059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.03.009
Scott, A. J., & Storper, M. (2003). Regions, globalization, development. Regional Studies, 37(6&7), 579–593. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340032000108697a
Sovacool, B. K., & Hess, D. J. (2017). Ordering theories: Typologies and conceptual frameworks for sociotechnical change. Social Studies of Science, 47(5), 703–750. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312717709363
Storper, M. (1997). The regional world: Territorial development in a global economy. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Storper, M. (2013). Keys to the city: How economics, institutions, social interactions, and politics shape development. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Tartaruga, I. G. P. (2016). Innovaciones sociales e inclusivas: límites y posibilidades para el desarrollo territorial en el contexto de la globalización. In C. A. R. Miranda, M. C. H. Moreno, F. H. Tapia, A. P. Sánchez (Coords), Gestión territorial para el desarrollo rural: construyendo un paradigma (pp. 207–227). Ciudad de México: Juan Pablos Editor. Retrieved March 27, 2017, from https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8xtj7rx6QofUmktNTJ3NmUxMGM/view.
Truffer, B., Murphy, J. T., & Raven, R. (2015). The geography of sustainability transitions: Contours of an emerging theme. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 17, 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2015.07.004
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tartaruga, I.G.P., Sperotto, F.Q. (2021). Rethinking Clusters in the Sense of Innovation, Inclusion, and Green Growth. In: Sedita, S.R., Blasi, S. (eds) Rethinking Clusters. Sustainable Development Goals Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61923-7_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61923-7_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-61922-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-61923-7
eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)