Skip to main content

Spin-offs, Environmental KIBS and the Role of Universities for Sustainability

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Rethinking Clusters

Part of the book series: Sustainable Development Goals Series ((SDGS))

  • 386 Accesses

Abstract

The chapter analyzes the role of Universities in supporting the development of a sustainability-oriented offering of spin-offs. In particular we focus on environmental KIBS (eKIBS) as peculiar spin-offs who could exploit their interaction with Universities to overcome the complexity of the circular economy framework. Based on five case studies of spin-offs originated in the University of Padova (Italy), the chapter suggests how universities support innovation in eKIBS, especially providing access to scientific frontiers and to physical, human and reputational resources. The importance of geographical and cognitive proximity is highlighted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The study has been developed within the Unicity project, funded by the University of Padova with the aim at capturing the role of the University in the development of the city of Padova and its territory related to knowledge transfer. More information at: http://www.unicitylab.eu

References

  • Ankrah, S., & Al-tabbaa, O. (2015). Universities-industry collaboration: A systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 31(3), 387–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anvur. (2017). Rapporto biennale sullo stato del sistema universitario e della ricerca 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apa, R., De Marchi, V., Grandinetti, R., & Sedita, S. R. (2020). University-SME collaboration and innovation performance: The role of informal relationships and absorptive capacity. Journal of Technology Transfer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-020-09802-9

  • Bettencourt, L. A., Ostrom, A. L., Brown, S. W., & Roundtree, R. I. (2002). Client co-production in knowledge-intensive business services. California Management Review, 44(4), 100–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bettiol, M., De Marchi, V., Di Maria, E., & Grandinetti, R. (2013). Determinants of market extension in knowledge-intensive business services: Evidence from a regional innovation system. European Planning Studies, 21(4), 498–515. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.722930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bettiol, M., & Di Maria, E. (2010). L’evoluzione dei servizi di design e comunicazione in Veneto. Economiae Società Regionale, 2, 75–83. https://doi.org/10.3280/ES2010-010006

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonaccorsi, A., & Piccaluga, A. (1994). A theoretical framework for the evaluation of university-industry relationships. R&D Management, 24(3), 229–247. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.1994.tb00876.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cainelli, G., De Marchi, V., & Grandinetti, R. (2015). Does the development of environmental innovation require different resources? Evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 94, 211–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cainelli, G., De Marchi, V., & Grandinetti, R. (2019). Do knowledge-intensive business services innovate differently? Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2019.1585639

  • Castaldi, C., Faber, J., & Kishna, M. J. (2013). Co-innovation by Kibs in environmental services—A knowledge-based perspective. International Journal of Innovation Management, 17(05), 1350020. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919613500205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciriaci, D., Montresor, S., & Palma, D. (2015). Do KIBS make manufacturing more innovative? An empirical investigation of four European countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 95, 135–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.02.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, D. J. (1998). Introduction. In Constructing correct software (pp. 1–27). London: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, P. (2001). Regional innovation systems, clusters, and the knowledge economy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 945–974. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/10.4.945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, P., & Memedovic, O. (2003). Strategies for regional innovation systems: Learning transfer and applications. Vienna: United Nations Industrial Development Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Marchi, V. (2012). Environmental innovation and R&D cooperation: Empirical evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms. Research Policy, 41(3), 614–623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Marchi, V., & Grandinetti, R. (2013). Knowledge strategies for environmental innovations: The case of Italian manufacturing firms. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(4), 569–582. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-03-2013-0121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Marchi, V., & Grandinetti, R. (2016). Regional innovation systems or innovative regions? Evidence from Italy. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 108(2), 234–249. https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • den Hertog, P. (2000). Knowledge-intensive business services as co-producers of innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management, 4(04), 491–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Maria, E., De Marchi, V., & Spraul, K. (2019). Who benefits from university—Industry collaboration for environmental sustainability? International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 20(6), 1022–1041. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-10-2018-0172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djellal, F., & Gallouj, F. (2016). Service innovation for sustainability: Paths for greening through service innovation. In M. Toivonen (Ed.), Service innovation: Novel ways of creating value in actor systems (pp. 187–215). Tokyo: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54922-2_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes, C. I., & Ferreira, J. J. M. (2013). Knowledge spillovers: Cooperation between universities and KIBS. R and D Management, 43(5), 461–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franceschini, S., Faria, L. G. D., & Jurowetzki, R. (2016). Unveiling scientific communities about sustainability and innovation. A bibliometric journey around sustainable terms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 127, 72–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freel, M. (2006). Patterns of technological innovation in knowledge-intensive business services. Industry and Innovation, 13(3), 335–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662710600859157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Muiña, F. E., González-Sánchez, R., Ferrari, A. M., & Settembre-Blundo, D. (2018). The paradigms of Industry 4.0 and circular economy as enabling drivers for the competitiveness of businesses and territories: The case of an Italian ceramic tiles manufacturing company. Social Sciences, 7(12), 255. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci7120255

  • Kemp, R., & Pearson, P. (2007). Final report MEI project about measuring eco-innovation. UM Merit, Maastricht, 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch, A., & Strontmann, H. (2008). Absorptive capacity and innovation in the knowledge intensive business service sector. Economics of Innovation & New Technology, 17(6), 511–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438590701222987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacy, P., & Rutqvist, J. (2016). Waste to wealth: The circular economy advantage. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137530707

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Loiseau, E., Saikku, L., Antikainen, R., Droste, N., Hansjürgens, B., Pitkänen, K., … Thomsen, M. (2016). Green economy and related concepts: An overview. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 361–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, I. (2005). Knowledge intensive business services: Prospects and policies. Foresight, 7(6), 39–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, I., Kastrinos, N., Flanagan, K., Bilderbeek, R., Den Hertog, P., Huntink, W., & Bouman, M. (1995). Knowledge-intensive business services: Users, carriers and sources of innovation. European innovation monitoring system reports. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, E., & Doloreux, D. (2009). What we should know about knowledge-intensive business services. Technology in Society, 31(1), 64–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2008.10.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niesten, E., Jolink, A., Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, A. B., Chappin, M., & Lozano, R. (2017). Sustainable collaboration: The impact of governance and institutions on sustainable performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 155, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orsato, R. J. (2009). What are sustainability strategies? In Sustainability strategies (pp. 23–42). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz-de-Mandojana, N., Aragón-Correa, J. A., Delgado-Ceballos, J., & Ferrón-Vílchez, V. (2012). The effect of director interlocks on firms’ adoption of proactive environmental strategies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20(2), 164–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2011.00893.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pace, L. A., & Miles, I. (2019). The influence of KIBS-client interactions on absorptive capacity-building for environmental innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 23(4), 553–580. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-01-2019-0026

  • Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., … Sobrero, M. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university-industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2), 423–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rennings, K. (2000). Redefining innovation—Eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 32(2), 319–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothaermel, F. T., Agung, S. D., & Jiang, L. (2007). University entrepreneurship: A taxonomy of the literature. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4), 691–791. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtm023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shichijo, N., Sedita, S. R., & Baba, Y. (2015). How does the entrepreneurial orientation of scientists affect their scientific performance? Evidence from the quadrant model. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 27(9), 999–1013. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2015.1044959

  • Szalavetz, A. (2019). Industry 4.0 and capability development in manufacturing subsidiaries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 145(May 2018), 384–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.06.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tseng, M. L., Tan, R. R., Chiu, A. S. F., Chien, C. F., & Kuo, T. C. (2018). Circular economy meets industry 4.0: Can big data drive industrial symbiosis? Resources, Conservation and Recycling,131, 146–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.12.028

  • Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zenker, A., & Doloreux, D. (2008). KIBS, perceptions and innovation patterns. International Journal of Services Technology and Management, 10(2/3/4), 337. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSTM.2008.022127

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The research has been supported by the project Unicity, financed by the University of Padova (Italy), CISR-Centro Studi Regionali ‘Giorgio Lago’ and Department of Economics and Management ‘Marco Fanno’. Research has been also supported by the project ‘Manufacturing activities and value creation: redesigning firm’s competitiveness through digital manufacturing in a circular economy framework’—grant n. BIRD161248/16 (University of Padova, Department of Economics and Management). The authors want to thank Benedetta Martini and Umberto Velluso for their contribution to fieldwork activities.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eleonora Di Maria .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Di Maria, E., De Marchi, V., Bonel, E. (2021). Spin-offs, Environmental KIBS and the Role of Universities for Sustainability. In: Sedita, S.R., Blasi, S. (eds) Rethinking Clusters. Sustainable Development Goals Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61923-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61923-7_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-61922-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-61923-7

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics