Skip to main content

Early Experience with Ceramic-on-Ceramic Resurfacing

  • 455 Accesses

Abstract

Hip resurfacing is an effective procedure, enabling higher levels of activity in younger people. Issues with high levels of cobalt and chromium ions in some brands of this device have led to a serious apprehension about metal-on-metal bearings in general. Ceramic-on-ceramic bearings have been widely used for decades in total hip arthroplasty, and the newest ceramic composite ‘Biolox Delta’ has been used for over 10 years. Endoprosthetic fixation using plasma-sprayed titanium and/or hydroxyapatite has also been widely used for over 10 years. We combined these three technologies into an anatomic cementless ceramic hip resurfacing device, H1. The contours of this device were derived from experimental work on the native hip margins, and were modified to enable manufacturing with the Delta ceramic composite. Extensive preclinical laboratory tests of the device were done, single-use instruments were developed and then clinical trials were conducted. Ninety-five patients have been operated with the ceramic resurfacing and were followed up to 2 years. So far, the outcomes are promising and the clinical trial continues.

Keywords

  • Hip resurfacing
  • Hip arthroplasty
  • Ceramic
  • Cementless
  • Clinical trial
  • Single-use instruments

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Amstutz HC, Le Duff MJ, Campbell PA, Gruen TA, Wisk LE. Clinical and radiographic results of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing with a minimum ten-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:2663–71.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  2. Daniel J, Pradhan C, Ziaee H, Pynsent P, McMinn D. Results of Birmingham hip resurfacing at 12 to 15 years. Bone Joint J. 2014;96:1298–306.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  3. Treacy R, McBryde C, Shears E, Pynsent P. Birmingham hip resurfacing. Bone Joint J. 2011;93:27–33.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Van Der Straeten C, Van Quickenborne D, De Roest B, Calistri A, Victor J, De Smet K. Metal ion levels from well-functioning Birmingham Hip Resurfacings decline significantly at ten years. Bone Joint J. 2013;95:1332–8.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  5. Clarke I, Good V, Williams P, Schroeder D, Anissian L, Stark A, et al. Ultra-low wear rates for rigid-on-rigid bearings in total hip replacements. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2000;214:331–47.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Berstock J, Beswick A, Lenguerrand E, Whitehouse M, Blom A. Mortality after total hip replacement surgery. Bone Joint Res. 2014;3:175–82.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. McMinn D, Snell K, Daniel J, Treacy R, Pynsent P, Riley R. Mortality and implant revision rates of hip arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis: registry based cohort study. BMJ. 2012;344:e3319.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Seppänen M, Mäkelä K, Virolainen P, Remes V, Pulkkinen P, Eskelinen A. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: short-term survivorship of 4,401 hips from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop. 2012;83:207–13.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  9. Langton D, Jameson S, Joyce T, Hallab N, Natu S, Nargol A. Early failure of metal-on-metal bearings in hip resurfacing and large-diameter total hip replacement. Bone Joint J. 2010;92:38–46.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Langton D, Joyce T, Jameson S, Lord J, Van Orsouw M, Holland J, et al. Adverse reaction to metal debris following hip resurfacing. Bone Joint J. 2011;93:164–71.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Van Der Straeten C, Grammatopoulos G, Gill HS, Calistri A, Campbell P, De Smet KA. The 2012 Otto Aufranc Award: the interpretation of metal ion levels in unilateral and bilateral hip resurfacing. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471:377–85.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  12. Willert H-G, Buchhorn GH, Fayyazi A, Flury R, Windler M, Köster G, et al. Metal-on-metal bearings and hypersensitivity in patients with artificial hip joints. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:28–36.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  13. Cobb JP, Davda K, Ahmad A, Harris SJ, Masjedi M, Hart AJ. Why large-head metal-on-metal hip replacements are painful: the anatomical basis of psoas impingement on the femoral head-neck junction. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93:881–5.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. AOA. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Beraudi A, Stea S, De Pasquale D, Bordini B, Catalani S, Apostoli P, et al. Metal ion release: also a concern for ceramic-on-ceramic couplings? Hip Int. 2014;24:321–6.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  16. NJR. National Joint Registry. National Joint Registry for England and Wales. 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sargeant A, Goswami T, Swank M. Ion concentrations from hip implants. J Surg Orthop Adv. 2005;15:113–4.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kretzer JP, Sonntag R, Kiefer H, Reinders J. Ion release in ceramic and metal-on-metal bearings. Bone Joint J. 2016;98:122.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Trampuz A, Maiolo EM, Winkler T, Perka C. Biofilm formation on ceramic, metal and polyethylene bearing components from hip joint replacement systems. Bone Joint J Orthop Proc. 2016;98-B:80.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Girard J. Is it time for cementless hip resurfacing? HSS J. 2012;8:245–50.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  21. Gross TP, Liu F. Current status of modern fully porous coated metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2014;29:181–5.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  22. Hutt J, Lavigne M, Lungu E, Belzile E, Morin F, Vendittoli P-A. Comparison of whole-blood metal ion levels among four types of large-head, metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty implants. A concise follow-up, at five years, of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98:257–66.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  23. BEIs ACoGIHTa. Threshold limit values for chemical substances and physical agents and biological exposure indices. Paper presented at: American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists TLVs and BEIs, Cincinnati, OH. 2010.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been carried out by the Embody Orthopaedic team, led by Susannah Clarke, Camilla Halewood and Rob Wozencroft.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Justin Cobb .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cobb, J. (2021). Early Experience with Ceramic-on-Ceramic Resurfacing. In: Drescher, W.R., Koo, KH., Windsor, R.E. (eds) Advances in Specialist Hip Surgery . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61830-8_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61830-8_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-61829-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-61830-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)