Skip to main content

Abductive Spaces: Modeling Concept Framework Revision with Category Theory

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Abduction in Cognition and Action

Abstract

A formal model of abductive inference is provided in which abduction is conceived as expansive and contractive movements through a topological space of theoretical and practical commitments. A pair of presheaves over the (Heyting algebra) space of commitments corresponds to communities sharing commitments on the one hand and possible obstructions to commitments on the other. In this framework, abductive inference is modeled by the dynamics of redistributed communities of commitment made in response to obstructive encounters. This semantic-pragmatic model shows how elementary category theory tools can be used to formalize abductive inference while hewing close to ordinary intuitions about collective agency and reasoning.

Space is the place.

Sun Ra, cosmic jazz maestro

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    We omit the corresponding formal characterizations for simplicity of presentation.

  2. 2.

    From a logical point of view, this assumption amounts to conceiving of the commitment-space as a Lindenbaum algebra.

  3. 3.

    Formally, a Heyting algebra is defined as follows [6]: First, we define a bounded lattice as a partially ordered set \(\mathcal {A}\) in which for every pair \(a, b \in A = \text{ Ob }(\mathcal {A})\) there exists a supremum or least upper bound \(a \vee b\) and an infimum or greatest lower bound \(a \wedge b\) and there exists a top and a bottom, 1 and 0, respectively, such that for every \(a \in A\), \(a \preceq 1\) and \(0 \preceq a\). In categorical terms, the supremum of a and b is their coproduct \(a + b\), while the infimum is \(a \times b\), and the bottom is an initial object such that for every object a, there exists a unique morphism \(0 \rightarrow a\). Analogously, the top is a terminal object such that there exists a unique \(a \rightarrow 1\) for every object a. A Heyting algebra is then a bounded lattice \(\mathcal {A}\) with two functors \(\wedge : A \times A \rightarrow A\) and \(\Rightarrow : A \times A \rightarrow A\), left and right adjoints, respectively. The interpretation is that given \(c, a, b \in A\), \(x \wedge a \preceq b\) is equivalent to \(x \preceq a \Rightarrow b\). In logical terms, \(x\wedge a\) is a conjunction between x and a, while \(a \Rightarrow b\) is an implication with antecedent a and consequent b. In categorical terms \(a \Rightarrow b\) is the exponential \(b^a\).

  4. 4.

    It should be noted that this particular interpretation serves a merely heuristic purpose. The structures and dynamics discussed in the following sections do not depend upon any particular interpretation of the commitments in the Heyting algebra presented, only upon the structure of the algebra (category) itself.

  5. 5.

    \(\mathbf {Sets_{\subseteq }}\) notates the category whose objects are sets and whose arrows or morphisms are all inclusion functions between sets. This category is a faithful subcategory of the category Set of sets and functions.

  6. 6.

    Here, as is standard, \(\lnot c\) is shorthand for \(c \Rightarrow \bot \).

  7. 7.

    Of significant interest, but beyond the reach of the present exposition, is the system of controlled variation among such concrete timeslices. This system may be formalized in terms of the category of natural transformations among the relevant pairs of \(\mathbf {OB}\) and \(\mathbf {COM}\) functors.

  8. 8.

    The ancient Greek concept of \(\kappa \iota \nu \eta \sigma \iota \sigma \) would hold resources here for understanding and expressing the direct connection between movement and change, even to the point of identifying them.

  9. 9.

    We omit the technical details for reasons of space.

References

  1. Bell, J.L.: Toposes and Local Set Theories: An Introduction. Clarendon/Oxford University Press, Oxford (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Boutilier, C., Becher, V.: Abduction as Belief Revision. Artif. Intell. 77, 43–94 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brandom, R.: Articulating Reasons: An Introduction to Inferentialism. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brandom, R.: From Empiricism to Expressivism: Brandom Reads Sellars. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Caterina, G., Gangle, R.: Iconicity and Abduction. Springer, Berlin (2016)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Esakia, L.: Heyting Algebra: Duality Theory. Springer, Basel (2019)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Fann, K.T.: Peirce’s Theory of Abduction. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague (1970)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Fong, B., Spivak, D.I.: An Invitation to Applied Category Theory: Seven Sketches in Compositionality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gangle, R.: Diagrammatic Immanence. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh (2015)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Goldblatt, R.: Topoi: The Categorical Analysis of Logic. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Harman, G.: The Inference to the Best Explanation. Philos. Rev. 74, 88–95 (1965)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lakhtakia, A.: Models and Modelers of Hydrogen. World Scientific, Singapore (1996)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Peirce, C.S.: Hartshorne, C., Weiss, P., Burks, A. (eds.) Collected Papers, vols. 1–8. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1931–1958)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Peirce, C.S.: Peirce Edition Project. The Essential Peirce, vols. 1–2. Indiana University Press, Bloomington (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sellars, W.: Philosophy and the scientific image of man. In: Science, Perception and Reality. Ridgeview Publishing Co., Atascadero, CA (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Spivak, D.I.: Category Theory for the Sciences. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Vickers, S.: Topology via Logic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (1989)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rocco Gangle .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gangle, R., Caterina, G., Tohmé, F. (2021). Abductive Spaces: Modeling Concept Framework Revision with Category Theory. In: Shook, J.R., Paavola, S. (eds) Abduction in Cognition and Action. Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, vol 59. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61773-8_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics