Skip to main content

Our Themes on Abduction in Human Reasoning: A Synopsis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Abduction in Cognition and Action

Abstract

Psychological experiments have shown that humans do not reason according to classical logic. Therefore, we might argue that logic-based approaches in general are not suitable for modeling human reasoning. Yet, we take a different view and are convinced that logic can help us as an underlying formalization of a cognitive theory, but claim rather that classical logic is not adequate for this purpose. In this chapter we investigate abduction and its link to human reasoning. In particular we discuss three different variations we have explored and show how they can be adequately modeled within a novel computational and integrated, cognitive theory, the Weak Completion Semantics.

The authors are mentioned in alphabetical order.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    One should observe that under completion as defined in [4], \( essay \leftrightarrow \bot \) would be an element of this set. The Weak Completion Semantics however does not map undefined relations to false but rather considers them unknown.

  2. 2.

    In the sequel, all models are computed with respect to three-valued Łukasiewicz logic where not explicitly mentioned otherwise.

References

  1. Adams, E.W.: Subjunctive and indicative conditionals. Found. Lang. 6(1), 89–94 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Byrne, R.M.J.: Suppressing valid inferences with conditionals. Cognition 31, 61–83 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Byrne, R.M.J.: The Rational Imagination: How People Create Alternatives to Reality. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Clark, K.L.: Negation as failure. In: Gallaire, H., Minker, J. (eds.) Logic and Data Bases, vol. 1, pp. 293–322. Plenum Press, New York, NY (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Costa, A., Dietz Saldanha, E.-A., Hölldobler, S., Ragni, M.: A computational logic approach to human syllogistic reasoning. In: Gunzelmann, G., Howes, A., Tenbrink, T., Davelaar, E.J. (eds.) Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2017), pp. 883–888. Cognitive Science Society, Austin, TX (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dietz, E.-A., Hölldobler, S., Höps, R.: A computational logic approach to human spatial reasoning. In: IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI 2015), pp. 1627–1634. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dietz, E.-A., Hölldobler, S., Pereira, L.M.: On conditionals. In: Gottlob, G., Sutcliffe, G., Voronkov, A. (eds.) Global Conference on Artificial Intelligence (GCAI). Epic Series in Computing. EasyChair (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dietz, E.-A., Hölldobler, S., Ragni, M.: A computational logic approach to the suppression task. In: Miyake, N., Peebles, D., Cooper, R.P. (eds.) Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 1500–1505. Cognitive Science Society (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dietz, E.-A., Hölldobler, S., Ragni, M.: A computational logic approach to the abstract and the social case of the selection task. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Logical Formalizations of Commonsense Reasoning (COMMONSENSE) (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dietz Saldanha, E.-A., Hölldobler, S., Pereira, L.M.: Contextual reasoning: usually birds can abductively fly. In: Proceedings of 14th International Conference on Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning (LPNMR), pp. 64–77. Springer (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dietz Saldanha, E.-A., Hölldobler, S., Philipp, T.: Contextual abduction and its complexity issues. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Defeasible and Ampliative Reasoning (DARe) co-located with the 14th International Conference on Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning (LPNMR). CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 1872, pp. 58–70. CEUR-WS.org (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hölldobler, S.: Logik und Logikprogrammierung 1: Grundlagen. Kolleg Synchron, Synchron (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hölldobler, S., Kencana Ramli, C.D.P.: Logics and networks for human reasoning. In: Alippi, C., Polycarpou, M.M., Panayiotou, C.G., Ellinas, G. (eds.) International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks (ICANN), Part II. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5769, pp. 85—94. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hölldobler, S., Philipp, T., Wernhard, C.: An abductive model for human reasoning. Logical Formalizations of Commonsense Reasoning (Commonsense 2011). AAAI Spring Symposium Series Technical Reports, pp. 135–138. Cambridge, MA (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kakas, A., Kowalski, R., Toni, F.: Abductive logic programming. J. Logic Comput. 2(6), 719–770 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kleene, S.C.: Introduction to Metamathematics. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1952)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lloyd, J.W.: Foundations of Logic Programming. Springer, New York, NY, USA (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Łukasiewicz, J.: O logice trójwartościowej. Ruch Filozoficzny 5, 169–171 (1920). English translation: On three-valued logic. In: Łukasiewicz, J., Borkowski, L. (eds.) Selected Works, pp. 87–88. North Holland, Amsterdam (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pearl, Judea: Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference. Cambridge University Press, New York, USA (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Reiter, Raymond: A logic for default reasoning. Artif. Intell. 13(1–2), 81–132 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Dietz Saldanha, E.-A., Hölldobler, S., Rocha, I.L.: Obligation versus factual conditionals under the weak completion semantics. In: Hölldobler, S., Malikov, A., Wernhard, C. (eds.) YSIP2—Proceedings of the Second Young Scientist’s International Workshop on Trends in Information Processing, Dombai, Russian Federation, 16–20 May 2017. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 1837, pp. 55–64. CEUR-WS.org (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Stenning, K., van Lambalgen, M.: Semantic interpretation as computation in nonmonotonic logic: the real meaning of the suppression task. Cogn Sci 6(29), 916–960 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Stenning, K., van Lambalgen, M.: Human Reasoning and Cognitive Science. A Bradford Book (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Luís Moniz Pereira acknowledges support from FCT/MEC NOVA LINCS PEst UID/CEC/04516/2019.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emmanuelle-Anna Dietz Saldanha .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dietz Saldanha, EA., Hölldobler, S., Pereira, L.M. (2021). Our Themes on Abduction in Human Reasoning: A Synopsis. In: Shook, J.R., Paavola, S. (eds) Abduction in Cognition and Action. Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, vol 59. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61773-8_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics