Abstract
The attribution of the category of person to a living being is not irrelevant at all, since it indicates who is entitled to rights, dignity, and duties by law. Throughout approximately 15 centuries, since Boethius first defined the term, the most influential philosophers have provided an interpretation on which are the defining features of persons. Current neuroscience, influenced by mainstream utilitarian bioethics, takes John Locke’s definition of person as starting point: the being with intelligence, self-consciousness, and memory. This notion has been subsequently refined by analytic philosophy and contemporary thinkers such as Daniel Dennett, ending up in a cognitivist conception of person. In this text, we will discuss how current neuroscience has embraced this definition and the subsequent reductionism it leads to. In fact, for some authors, personhood is an illusion held by human beings. We will present other philosophical perspectives on the issue and will concentrate on the phenomenological interpretation to achieve a comprehensive notion of person. From this perspective, the person is understood as an embodied mind where the role of the environment, including interpersonal relationships, is utterly radical. This vision presupposes the inability of neuroscience, or any other individual discipline, to cover by itself what a person is. Thus, the phenomenological approach on the person is presented as a paradigmatic example to promote dialogue between scientific and humanistic disciplines.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hopkins PD. Why uploading will not work, or, the ghosts haunting transhumanism. Int J Mach Conscious. 2012;4(1):229–43.
Yang Y, Jackson R. Astrocyte identity: evolutionary perspectives on astrocyte functions and heterogeneity. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2019;56:40–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2018.11.006.
Huettel SA, Song AW, McCarthy G. Functional magnetic resonance imaging. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates; 2004.
Higbee KL, Clay SL. College students’ beliefs in the ten-percent myth. J Psychol Interdiscip Appl. 1998;132(5):469–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223989809599280.
Powell K. How does the teenage brain work? Nature. 2006;442:865–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/442865a.
Logothetis NK, Auguth M, Oeltermann A, Jon P, Trinath T. A neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the BOLD signal in fMRI. Nature. 2001;412(6843):150–7.
Chugani HT, Phelps ME, Mazziotta JC. Positron emission tomography study of human brain functional development. Ann Neurol. 1987;22(4):487–97. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410220408.
Menon V, Crottaz-Herbette S. Combined EEG and fMRI studies of human brain function. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2005;66:291–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0074-7742(05)66010-2.
Mukamel R, Fried I. Human intracranial recordings and cognitive neuroscience. Annu Rev Psychol. 2012;63:511–37. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120709-145401.
Amengual G. La persona humana. El debate sobre su concepto. Madrid: Síntesis; 2015.
Boethius. Liber De Persona et Duabus Naturis Contra Eutychen Et Nestorium. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1918.
Descartes R. Meditations on first philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996.
Locke J. An essay concerning human understanding. Hazleton: Pennsylvania State University, Electronic Classics Series; 1999.
Denis L. Kant’s metaphysics of morals. A critical guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.
Husserl E. Cartesian meditations. Dordrecht: Martinus Dijhoff; 1988.
Scheler M. El puesto del hombre en el cosmos. Buenos Aires: Losada; 1971.
Strawson P. Individuals: an essay in descriptive metaphysics. London: Methuen; 1974.
Frankfurt HG. Freedom of the will and the concept of a person. J Philos. 1971;68:5–20. https://doi.org/10.2307/2024717.
Dennett D. Conditions of Personhood. In: What is a person, edited by Michael F. Goodman. Clifton (NJ):Humana Press; 1988, p. 145–67.
Tooley M. Abortion & Infanticide. Philos Public Aff. 1972;2(1):37–65.
Singer P. Practical ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1993.
Engelhardt HT. The foundations of bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press; 1986.
Kobusch T. Die Entdeckung der Person. Darmstadt: WBG; 1993.
Spaemann R. Persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006.
Libet B, Wright EW, Gleason CA. Readiness-potentials preceding unrestricted “spontaneous” vs. pre-planned voluntary acts. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1982;54(3):322–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(82)90181-X.
Blackmore S. Mind over matter? The Guardian – Medical Research (Opinion). Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2007/aug/28/mindovermatter2007.
Wagner NF, Northoff G. Habits: bridging the gap between personhood and personal identity. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014;8(May):1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00330.
Wolff A, Di Daniel A, Giovanni J, Takashi N. The temporal signature of self : Temporal measures of resting- state EEG predict self-consciousness 2019. 2018:789–803. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24412.
Farah MJ, Heberlein AS. Personhood and neuroscience: naturalizing or nihilating? Am J Bioeth. 2007;7(1):37–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265160601064199.
Fletcher J. Humanhood: essays on biomedical ethics. Buffalo: Prometheus Books; 1979.
Wise S. “Practical autonomy” entitles some animals to rights. Nature. 2002;416:785. https://doi.org/10.1038/416785a.
Hadariová L, Vesteg M, Hampl V, Krajčovič J. Reductive evolution of chloroplasts in non-photosynthetic plants, algae and protists. Curr Genet. 2018;64(2):365–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00294-017-0761-0.
Fuchs T. Ecology of the brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2018.
Anderson ML. Embodied cognition: a field guide. Artif Intell. 2003;149(1):91–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0004-3702(03)00054-7.
Haugeland J. Mind embodied and embedded. Mind Cogn: 1993 Int Symp Academia Sinica. 1993:233–67.
Clark A, Chalmers D. The extended mind. Analysis. 1998;58(1):7–19.
Froese T, Di Paolo EA. The enactive approach: theoretical sketches from cell to society. Pragmat Cogn. 2011;19(1):1–36. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.19.1.01fro.
Tomasello M, Farrar MJ. Joint attention and early language. Child Dev. 1986;57(6):1454–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1986.tb00470.x.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bernacer, J., Güell, F. (2021). The Notion of Person in Neuroscience: From Cognitivism to a Comprehensive Phenomenology. In: Gargiulo, P.Á., Mesones Arroyo, H.L. (eds) Psychiatry and Neuroscience Update. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61721-9_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61721-9_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-61720-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-61721-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)