Skip to main content

Neural Networks for Detecting Irrelevant Questions During Visual Question Answering

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Neural Networks and Machine Learning – ICANN 2020 (ICANN 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 12397))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Visual question answering (VQA) is a task to produce correct answers to questions about images. When given an irrelevant question to an image, existing models for VQA will still produce an answer rather than predict that the question is irrelevant. This situation shows that current VQA models do not truly understand images and questions. On the other hand, producing answers for irrelevant questions can be misleading in real-world application scenarios. To tackle this problem, we hypothesize that the abilities required for detecting irrelevant questions are similar to those required for answering questions. Based on this hypothesis, we study what performance a state-of-the-art VQA network can achieve when trained on irrelevant question detection. Then, we analyze the influences of reasoning and relational modeling on the task of irrelevant question detection. Our experimental results indicate that a VQA network trained on an irrelevant question detection dataset outperforms existing state-of-the-art methods by a big margin on the task of irrelevant question detection. Ablation studies show that explicit reasoning and relational modeling benefits irrelevant question detection. At last, we investigate a straight-forward idea of integrating the ability to detect irrelevant questions into VQA models by joint training with extended VQA data containing irrelevant cases. The results suggest that joint training has a negative impact on the model’s performance on the VQA task, while the accuracy on relevance detection is maintained. In this paper we claim that an efficient neural network designed for VQA can achieve high accuracy on detecting relevance, however integrating the ability to detect relevance into a VQA model by joint training will lead to degradation of performance on the VQA task.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://virajprabhu.github.io/qpremise/dataset/.

  2. 2.

    https://visualqa.org/evaluation.html.

References

  1. Anderson, P., Fernando, B., Johnson, M., Gould, S.: SPICE: semantic propositional image caption evaluation. In: Leibe, B., Matas, J., Sebe, N., Welling, M. (eds.) ECCV 2016. LNCS, vol. 9909, pp. 382–398. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46454-1_24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson, P., et al.: Bottom-up and top-down attention for image captioning and visual question answering. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 6077–6086 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Antol, S., et al..: VQA: visual question answering. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 2425–2433 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ben-Younes, H., Cadene, R., Thome, N., Cord, M.: BLOCK: bilinear superdiagonal fusion for visual question answering and visual relationship detection. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 33, pp. 8102–8109 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cadene, R., Ben-Younes, H., Cord, M., Thome, N.: MUREL: multimodal relational reasoning for visual question answering. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 1989–1998 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fu, D., et al.: What can computational models learn from human selective attention? A review from an audiovisual unimodal and crossmodal perspective. Front. Integr. Neurosci. 14, 10 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Goyal, Y., Khot, T., Summers-Stay, D., Batra, D., Parikh, D.: Making the V in VQA matter: elevating the role of image understanding in visual question answering. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 6904–6913 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gurari, D., et al.: VizWiz grand challenge: answering visual questions from blind people. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 3608–3617 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jiang, Y., Natarajan, V., Chen, X., Rohrbach, M., Batra, D., Parikh, D.: Pythia v0. 1: the winning entry to the VQA challenge 2018. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.09956 (2018)

  10. Kafle, K., Kanan, C.: An analysis of visual question answering algorithms. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 1965–1973 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Karpathy, A., Fei-Fei, L.: Deep visual-semantic alignments for generating image descriptions. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 3128–3137 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kiros, R., et al.: Skip-thought vectors. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 3294–3302 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Krishna, R., et al.: Visual Genome: connecting language and vision using crowdsourced dense image annotations. Int. J. Comput. Vision 123(1), 32–73 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Lin, T.-Y., et al.: Microsoft COCO: common objects in context. In: Fleet, D., Pajdla, T., Schiele, B., Tuytelaars, T. (eds.) ECCV 2014. LNCS, vol. 8693, pp. 740–755. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10602-1_48

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Mahendru, A., Prabhu, V., Mohapatra, A., Batra, D., Lee, S.: The promise of premise: harnessing question premises in visual question answering. arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.00601 (2017)

  16. Ray, A., Christie, G., Bansal, M., Batra, D., Parikh, D.: Question relevance in VQA: identifying non-visual and false-premise questions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.06622 (2016)

  17. Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., Sun, J.: Faster R-CNN: towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 91–99 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We gratefully acknowledge support from the China Scholarship Council (CSC) and the German Research Foundation (DFG) under project Crossmodal Learning (TRR 169).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mengdi Li .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Li, M., Weber, C., Wermter, S. (2020). Neural Networks for Detecting Irrelevant Questions During Visual Question Answering. In: Farkaš, I., Masulli, P., Wermter, S. (eds) Artificial Neural Networks and Machine Learning – ICANN 2020. ICANN 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12397. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61616-8_63

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61616-8_63

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-61615-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-61616-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics