Abstract
Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) is a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique that estimates magnetic susceptibility of tissue from Larmor frequency offset measurements. The generation of QSM requires solving a challenging ill-posed field-to-source inversion problem. Inaccurate field-to-source inversion often causes large susceptibility estimation errors that appear as streaking artifacts in the QSM, especially in massive hemorrhagic regions. Recently, several deep learning (DL) QSM techniques have been proposed and demonstrated impressive performance. Due to the inherent non-existent ground-truth QSM references, these DL techniques used either calculation of susceptibility through multiple orientation sampling (COSMOS) maps or synthetic data for network training. Therefore, they were constrained by the availability and accuracy of COSMOS maps, or suffered from performance drop when the training and testing domains were different. To address these limitations, we present a model-based DL method, denoted as uQSM. Without accessing to QSM labels, uQSM is trained using the well-established physical model. When evaluating on multi-orientation QSM datasets, uQSM achieves higher levels of quantitative accuracy compared to TKD, TV-FANSI, MEDI, and DIP approaches. When qualitatively evaluated on single-orientation datasets, uQSM outperforms other methods and reconstructed high quality QSM.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Arjovsky, M., Chintala, S., Bottou, L.: Wasserstein generative adversarial networks. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 214–223 (2017)
Bilgic, B., Chatnuntawech, I., Fan, A.P., et al.: Fast image reconstruction with L2-regularization. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 40(1), 181–191 (2014)
Bollmann, S., Rasmussen, K.G.B., Kristensen, M., et al.: DeepQSM-using deep learning to solve the dipole inversion for quantitative susceptibility mapping. NeuroImage 195, 373–383 (2019)
Brett, M., Anton, J.L., Valabregue, R., et al.: Region of interest analysis using an SPM toolbox. In: 8th International Conference on Functional Mapping of the Human Brain, Sendai, p. 497 (2002)
Chen, Y., Jakary, A., Avadiappan, S., et al.: QSMGAN: improved quantitative susceptibility mapping using 3D generative adversarial networks with increased receptive field. NeuroImage 207, 116389 (2019)
De Rochefort, L., Brown, R., Prince, M.R., et al.: Quantitative MR susceptibility mapping using piece-wise constant regularized inversion of the magnetic field. Magn. Reson. Med. 60(4), 1003–1009 (2008)
Goodfellow, I., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., et al.: Generative adversarial nets. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 2672–2680 (2014)
Griswold, M.A., et al.: Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn. Reson. Med. 47(6), 1202–1210 (2002)
Haacke, E., Tang, J., Neelavalli, J., et al.: Susceptibility mapping as a means to visualize veins and quantify oxygen saturation. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 32(3), 663–676 (2010)
Jenkinson, M., Bannister, P., Brady, M., et al.: Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. Neuroimage 17(2), 825–841 (2002)
Jenkinson, M., Smith, S.: A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images. Med. Image Anal. 5(2), 143–156 (2001)
Jung, W., Yoon, J., Ji, S., et al.: Exploring linearity of deep neural network trained QSM: QSMnet+. NeuroImage 211, 116619 (2020)
Kingma, D.P., Ba, J.: Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. arXiv (2014)
Li, W., Wu, B., Liu, C.: Quantitative susceptibility mapping of human brain reflects spatial variation in tissue composition. NeuroImage 55(4), 1645–1656 (2011)
Liu, C.: Susceptibility tensor imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 63(6), 1471–1477 (2010)
Liu, J., Liu, T., de Rochefort, L., et al.: Morphology enabled dipole inversion for quantitative susceptibility mapping using structural consistency between the magnitude image and the susceptibility map. NeuroImage 59(3), 2560–2568 (2012)
Liu, T., Liu, J., De Rochefort, L., et al.: Morphology enabled dipole inversion (MEDI) from a single-angle acquisition: comparison with COSMOS in human brain imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 66(3), 777–783 (2011)
Liu, T., Spincemaille, P., De Rochefort, L., et al.: Calculation of susceptibility through multiple orientation sampling (COSMOS): a method for conditioning the inverse problem from measured magnetic field map to susceptibility source image in MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 61(1), 196–204 (2009)
Liu, T., Wisnieff, C., Lou, M., et al.: Nonlinear formulation of the magnetic field to source relationship for robust quantitative susceptibility mapping. Magn. Reson. Med. 69(2), 467–476 (2013)
Marques, J., Bowtell, R.: Application of a Fourier-based method for rapid calculation of field inhomogeneity due to spatial variation of magnetic susceptibility. Concepts Magn. Reson. Part B Magn. Reson. Eng. 25(1), 65–78 (2005)
Milovic, C., Bilgic, B., Zhao, B., et al.: Fast nonlinear susceptibility inversion with variational regularization. Magn. Reson. Med. 80(2), 814–821 (2018)
Odena, A., Dumoulin, V., Olah, C.: Deconvolution and checkerboard artifacts. Distill 1(10), e3 (2016)
Polak, D., Chatnuntawech, I., Yoon, J., et al.: Nonlinear dipole inversion (NDI) enables robust quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM). NMR Biomed., e4271 (2020)
de Rochefort, L., Liu, T., Kressler, B., et al.: Quantitative susceptibility map reconstruction from MR phase data using Bayesian regularization: validation and application to brain imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 63(1), 194–206 (2010)
Salomir, R., de Senneville, B.D., Moonen, C.T.: A fast calculation method for magnetic field inhomogeneity due to an arbitrary distribution of bulk susceptibility. Concepts Magn. Reson. Part B Magn. Reson. Eng. 19(1), 26–34 (2003)
Schweser, F., Zivadinov, R.: Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) with an extended physical model for MRI frequency contrast in the brain: a proof-of-concept of quantitative susceptibility and residual (QUASAR) mapping. NMR Biomed. 31(12), e3999 (2018)
Shmueli, K., de Zwart, J.A., van Gelderen, P., et al.: Magnetic susceptibility mapping of brain tissue in vivo using MRI phase data. Magn. Reson. Med. 62(6), 1510–1522 (2009)
Smith, S.M.: Fast robust automated brain extraction. Hum. Brain Mapp. 17(3), 143–155 (2002)
Uecker, M., Lai, P., Murphy, M.J., et al.: ESPIRiT-an eigenvalue approach to autocalibrating parallel MRI: where sense meets GRAPPA. Magn. Reson. Med. 71(3), 990–1001 (2014)
Ulyanov, D., Vedaldi, A., Lempitsky, V.: Deep image prior. In: Proceedings of the IEEE CVPR, pp. 9446–9454 (2018)
Wang, Y., Liu, T.: Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM): decoding MRI data for a tissue magnetic biomarker. Magn. Reson. Med. 73(1), 82–101 (2015)
Wharton, S., Schäfer, A., Bowtell, R.: Susceptibility mapping in the human brain using threshold-based k-space division. Magn. Reson. Med. 63(5), 1292–1304 (2010)
Wu, B., Li, W., Guidon, A., Liu, C.: Whole brain susceptibility mapping using compressed sensing. Magn. Reson. Med. 67(1), 137–147 (2012)
Yoon, J., Gong, E., Chatnuntawech, I., et al.: Quantitative susceptibility mapping using deep neural network: QSMnet. NeuroImage 179, 199–206 (2018)
Acknowledgement
We thank Professor Jongho Lee for sharing the multi-orientation QSM datasets.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
1 Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Liu, J., Koch, K.M. (2020). Model-Based Learning for Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping. In: Deeba, F., Johnson, P., Würfl, T., Ye, J.C. (eds) Machine Learning for Medical Image Reconstruction. MLMIR 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12450. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61598-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61598-7_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-61597-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-61598-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)