Skip to main content

Building a Bridge from Qualitative Analysis to a Simulation of the Arab Spring Protests

  • 211 Accesses

Part of the Springer Proceedings in Complexity book series (SPCOM)

Abstract

This paper builds a ‘bridge’ between a qualitative analysis and the design of an agent-based simulation by applying the CSNE framework, which distinguishes between context, scope and narrative elements. Qualitative data were constructed from ethnographic interviews on the Arab Spring in Egypt and Morocco. To identify narrative elements, the data were analysed by coding procedures from grounded theory and a computational analysis. Through a series of conversations and structured questions, the scope and context, which were largely implicit in the data, were specified, and a simulation was produced in a process akin to ‘rapid prototyping’. The aim was to produce the design for a simulation that included the key elements and behaviours identified from the qualitative data and as few other elements as possible. This paper describes this process, the CSNE framework, as well as the simulation that resulted. The lessons learned for such an exercise are reported.

Keywords

  • Protests
  • Arab spring
  • Egypt
  • Morocco
  • Interviews
  • Qualitative analysis
  • Context
  • Scope
  • Agent-based simulation
  • Qual2rule

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-61503-1_22
  • Chapter length: 13 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-030-61503-1
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 22.1
Fig. 22.2
Fig. 22.3
Fig. 22.4
Fig. 22.5
Fig. 22.6

References

  1. S. Moss, B. Edmonds, Sociology and simulation: - statistical and qualitative cross-validation. Am. J. Sociol. 110(4), 1095–1131 (2005)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  2. B. Edmonds, Using qualitative evidence to inform the specification of agent-based models. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 18(1), 18 (2015), http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/18/1/18.html

  3. B. Edmonds, A context- and scope-sensitive analysis of narrative data to aid the specification of agent behaviour. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 18(1), 17 (2015), http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/18/1/17.html

  4. A. Strauss, J.M. Corbin, Basics of Qualitative Research. Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, London, New Delhi, 1990)

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. Dornschneider, High-stakes decision-making within complex social environments. A computational model of belief systems in the arab spring. Cogn. Sci. (2019). Forthcoming

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. Dornschneider, N. Henderson, A computational model of cognitive maps: analyzing violent and nonviolent activity in egypt and germany. J. Confl. Resolut. 60(2), 368–399 (2016)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  7. E. Fieldhouse, L. Lessard-Phillips, B. Edmonds, Cascade or echo chamber? A complex agent-based simulation of voter turnout. Party Polit. 22(2), 241–256 (2016)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  8. F. Squazzoni, W. Jager, B. Edmonds, Social simulation in the social sciences: a brief overview. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 32(3), 279–294 (2014)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  9. B. Edmonds, S. Moss, From KISS to KIDS – an ‘anti-simplistic’ modelling approach, in Multi Agent Based Simulation 2004, eds. by P. Davidsson et al. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 3415 (Springer, Berlin, 2005), pp. 130–144

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Granovetter, Threshold models of collective behavior. Am. J. Sociol. 83(6), 1420–1443 (1978)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  11. B. Edmonds, S. Dornschneider, A simulation of arab spring protests informed by qualitative evidence (Version 1.1.0). CoMSES Computational Model Library (2019), https://www.comses.net/codebases/3bb159f5-b15c-4e34–9ace-397888c6563a/releases/1.1.0/. Accessed 29 April 2019

Download references

Acknowledgements

BE acknowledges the support of EU Commission funding as part of the H2020 “Populism and Civic Engagement” (PaCE) project, number 822337. SD acknowledges the support of a fellowship for prospective researchers from the Swiss National Fund (PBGEP1_145336), and a COFUND Junior Research Fellowship from Durham University and the European Union. We also thank the participants of the Lorentz workshop on “Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Evidence using Social Simulation” (April 2019, Leiden) for their comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephanie Dornschneider .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Dornschneider, S., Edmonds, B. (2021). Building a Bridge from Qualitative Analysis to a Simulation of the Arab Spring Protests. In: Ahrweiler, P., Neumann, M. (eds) Advances in Social Simulation. ESSA 2019. Springer Proceedings in Complexity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61503-1_22

Download citation