Skip to main content

The Relevance of Technology Transfer

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
New Perspectives in Technology Transfer

Abstract

The economic strength of nations worldwide is increasingly dependent on its research systems to sustain innovation and new product and service development. Besides research, education and entrepreneurial innovation are seen as core factors to promote a dynamic and competitive modern economy and nearly all governments in the world pursue research and technological development programs to fund research activities especially at universities, research laboratories, and companies, intending to constantly advance their economy. How can knowledge from basic research be used for industrial practice at an early stage? What are the different channels of knowledge transfer? And above all, how can this process be accelerated? In this chapter, we will discuss the mechanisms and consequences of new technology transfer instruments and approaches and depict their relevance for a more productive technology transfer. We end with an outlook on the potential role of artificial intelligence and machine learning for the future of technology transfer.

This chapter draws on an earlier publication by the authors in Piller and Hilgers (2013).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bercovitz, J., & Feldman, M. (2011). The mechanisms of collaboration in inventive teams: Composition, social networks, and geography. Research Policy,40(1), 81–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, N., Jones, C. I., Van Reenen, J., & Webb, M. (2019). Are ideas getting harder to find? (Version 4.0 of the National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper w23782). https://web.stanford.edu/~chadj/IdeaPF.pdf.

  • BMBF. (2018). Bundesbericht Forschung und Innovation 2018. Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogers, M., Zobel, A. K., Afuah, A., Almirall, E., Brunswicker, S., Dahlander, L., … Hagedoorn, J. (2017). The open innovation research landscape: Established perspectives and emerging themes across different levels of analysis. Industry and Innovation, 24(1), 8–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruneel, J., d’Este, P., & Salter, A. (2010). Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university–industry collaboration. Research Policy,39(7), 858–868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chai, S., & Shih, W. (2017). Why big data isn’t enough. MIT Sloan Management Review,58(2), 57–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, K., & Piller, F. T. (2019). The market for open innovation. The 2020 open innovation accelerator survey (3rd, totally revised ed.). Raleigh, NC: Lulu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furman, J., & Seamans, R. (2019). AI and the economy. Innovation Policy and the Economy,19(1), 161–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gopalakrishnan, S., & Santoro, M. D. (2004). Distinguishing between knowledge transfer and technology transfer activities: The role of key organizational factors. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management,51(1), 57–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J. (2009). eScience: A transformed scientific method. In J. Hey, S. Tansley, & K. Tolle (Eds.), The fourth paradigm: Data-intensive scientific discovery (pp. 17–31). Redmond, WA: Microsoft Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kakatkar, C., Bilgram, V., & Füller, J. (2018). Innovation analytics: Leveraging artificial intelligence in the innovation process. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3293533.

  • Katila, R., & Ahuja, G. (2002). Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal,45(6), 1183–1194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kavusan, K., Noorderhaven, N. G., & Duysters, G. M. (2016). Knowledge acquisition and complementary specialization in alliances: The impact of technological overlap and alliance experience. Research Policy,45(10), 2153–2165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laursen, K., Reichstein, T., & Salter, A. (2011). Exploring the effect of geographical proximity and university quality on university–industry collaboration in the United Kingdom. Regional Studies,45(4), 507–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y. S. (1996). ‘Technology transfer’ and the research university: A search for the boundaries of university-industry collaboration. Research Policy,25(6), 843–863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mollick, E. (2014). The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing,29(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nambisan, S., Wright, M., & Feldman, M. (2019). The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes. Research Policy,48(8), 103773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pechmann, A., Piller, F. T., & Schumacher, G. (2010). Technologie- und Erkenntnistransfer aus der Wissenschaft in die Industrie. Schriftenreihe Projektträger Jülich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piller, F. T., & Hilgers, D. (Eds.). (2013). Handbook technology transfer: New methods to transfer academic research into industrial practice (Original: Praxishandbuch Technologietransfer: Innovative Methoden zum Transfer wissenschaftlicher Ergebnisse in die industrielle Anwendung). Düsseldorf: Symposion Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piller, F. T., Möslein, K., Ihl, C., & Reichwald, R. (2017). Interaktive Wertschöpfung kompakt: Open Innovation, Individualisierung und neue Formen der Arbeitsteilung. New York and Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rai, A., Constantinides, P., & Sarker, S. (2019). Editor’s comments: Next-generation digital platforms: Toward human–AI hybrids. MIS Quarterly,43(1), iii–x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajalo, S., & Vadi, M. (2017). University-industry innovation collaboration: Reconceptualization. Technovation,62, 42–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rindfleisch, A., O’Hern, M., & Sachdev, V. (2017). The digital revolution, 3D printing, and innovation as data. Journal of Product Innovation Management,34(5), 681–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotman, D. (2019). AI is reinventing the way we invent. MIT Technology Review. https://www.technologyreview.com/s/612898/ai-is-reinventing-the-way-we-invent/.

  • Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review,25(1), 217–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinmo, M., & Rasmussen, E. (2018). The interplay of cognitive and relational social capital dimensions in university-industry collaboration: Overcoming the experience barrier. Research Policy,47(10), 1964–1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Wijk, R., Jansen, J. J., & Lyles, M. A. (2008). Inter- and intra-organizational knowledge transfer: A meta-analytic review and assessment of its antecedents and consequences. Journal of Management Studies,45(4), 830–853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walter, A. (2005). Technologietransfer. In S. Albers & O. Gassmann (Eds.), Handbuch Technologie- und Innovationsmanagement (pp. 101–118). Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review,27(2), 185–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dennis Hilgers .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Piller, F., Hilgers, D., Schmidthuber, L. (2021). The Relevance of Technology Transfer. In: Mietzner, D., Schultz, C. (eds) New Perspectives in Technology Transfer. FGF Studies in Small Business and Entrepreneurship. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61477-5_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics