Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Absorptive Capacity Approach to Technology Transfer at Corporate Accelerators: A Systematic Literature Review

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
New Perspectives in Technology Transfer

Part of the book series: FGF Studies in Small Business and Entrepreneurship ((FGFS))

Abstract

Corporate accelerators are the specific programs designed by incumbent companies to scan, select, and accelerate the growth of promising technology startups for definite mutually beneficial objectives such as gaining access to disruptive innovation of the startup or outreaching to incumbents’ customers for fast time to market. Based on the theoretical background, this study contributes to literature by adopting systematic literature review of “corporate accelerators” as the methodology to deliver cumulative insights and a final absorptive capacity process model was built based on examining prior single or multiple case studies which applied to their context as a limitation. Absorptive capacity theory enhances the understanding of technology transfer’s modus operandi at corporate acceleration settings. As a result of the systematic literature review, the author offers a conceptual model to inform future research and practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Apriliyanti, I. D., & Alon, I. (2017). Bibliometric analysis of absorptive capacity. International Business Review,26(5), 896–907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1997). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reis (77/78), 345–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. (1962, June). The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing. Review of Economic Studies, 29, 155–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badaracco, J., & Badaracco, J. L. (1991). The knowledge link: How firms compete through strategic alliances. Boston: Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, S., Obwegeser, N., & Avdagic, Z. (2016). Corporate accelerators: Transferring technology innovation to incumbent. MCIS 2016 Proceedings. Paper 57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantarello, S., Martini, A., & Nosella, A. (2012). A multi-level model for organizational ambidexterity in the search phase of the innovation process. Creativity and Innovation Management,21(1), 28–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S., Fehder, D. C., Hochberg, Y. V., & Murray, F. (2019). The design of startup accelerators. Research Policy,48(7), 1781–1797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (2000). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. In Strategic learning in a knowledge economy. Woburn: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, A. J., Turner, J., & Potocki, A. D. (2018). IGNITE your corporate innovation: Insights from setting up an ag-tech start-up accelerator. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review,21(6), 833–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2014). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crișan, E. L., Salanță, I. I., Beleiu, I. N., Bordean, O. N., & Bunduchi, R. (2019). A systematic literature review on accelerators. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-019-09754-9.

  • Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ,2(4), 169–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damanpour, F., & Aravind, D. (2012). Organizational structure and innovation revisited: From organic to ambidextrous structure. In Handbook of organizational creativity (pp. 483–513). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damanpour, F., & Wischnevsky, J. D. (2006). Research on innovation in organizations: Distinguishing innovation-generating from innovation-adopting organizations. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management,23(4), 269–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dell’Anno, D., & Del Giudice, M. (2015). Absorptive and desorptive capacity of actors within university-industry relations: Does technology transfer matter? Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship,4(1), 13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drori, I., & Wright, M. (2018). Accelerators: Characteristics, trends and the new entrepreneurial ecosystem. In Accelerators. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, R. B. (1976). The ambidextrous organization: Designing dual structures for innovation. The Management of Organization,1(1), 167–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, J. M., & Thomas, A. (1984). Treating progress functions as a managerial opportunity. Academy of Management Review,9(2), 235–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao, S., Yeoh, W., Wong, S. F., & Scheepers, R. (2017). A literature analysis of the use of absorptive capacity construct in IS research. International Journal of Information Management,37(2), 36–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutmann, T., Kanbach, D., & Seltman, S. (2019). Exploring the benefits of corporate accelerators: Investigating the SAP Industry 4.0 Startup Program. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 17(3), 218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanbach, D. K., & Stubner, S. (2016). Corporate accelerators as recent form of startup engagement: The what, the why, and the how. Journal of Applied Business Research,32(6), 1761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, T. (2016). Corporate accelerators: Building bridges between corporations and startups. Business Horizons,59(3), 347–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kupp, M., Marval, M., & Borchers, P. (2017). Corporate accelerators: Fostering innovation while bringing together startups and large firms. Journal of Business Strategy,38(6), 47–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, P. J., Koka, B. R., & Pathak, S. (2006). The reification of absorptive capacity: A critical review and rejuvenation of the construct. Academy of Management Review,31(4), 833–863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, P. J., & Lubatkin, M. (1998). Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal,19(5), 461–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, B., & March, J. G. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology,14(1), 319–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenthaler, U. (2007). The drivers of technology licensing: An industry comparison. California Management Review,49(4), 67–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenthaler, U. (2009). Absorptive capacity, environmental turbulence, and the complementarity of organizational learning processes. Briarcliff Manor, NY: Academy of Management.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenthaler, U., & Lichtenthaler, E. (2010). Technology transfer across organizational boundaries: Absorptive capacity and desorptive capacity. California Management Review,53(1), 154–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madhavan, R., & Grover, R. (1998). From embedded knowledge to embodied knowledge: New product development as knowledge management. Journal of Marketing,62(4), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmoud-Jouini, S. Ben, Duvert, C., & Esquirol, M. (2018). Key factors in building a corporate accelerator capability: Developing an effective corporate accelerator requires close attention to the relationships between startups and the sponsoring company. Research Technology Management,61(4), 26–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2018.1471274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science,2(1), 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moschner, S.-L., Fink, A. A., Kurpjuweit, S., Wagner, S. M., & Herstatt, C. (2019). Toward a better understanding of corporate accelerator models. Business Horizons, 62, 637–647.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., Byosiere, P., Borucki, C. C., & Konno, N. (1994). Organizational knowledge creation theory: A first comprehensive test. International Business Review,3(4), 337–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., Von Krogh, G., & Voelpel, S. (2006). Organizational knowledge creation theory: Evolutionary paths and future advances. Organization Studies,27(8), 1179–1208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1966). The logic of tacit inference. Philosophy,41(155), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter, N., Jackson, P., & Schildhauer, T. (2018). Outsourcing creativity: An abductive study of open innovation using corporate accelerators. Creativity and Innovation Management,27(1), 69–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. (1942). Creative destruction. In Capitalism, socialism and democracy (pp. 82–85). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selig, C. J., Gasser, T., & Baltes, G. H. (2018). How corporate accelerators foster organizational transformation: An internal perspective. 2018 IEEE international conference on engineering, technology and innovation (ICE/ITMC) (pp. 1–9). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. M. (2006). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Broadway Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shankar, R. K., & Shepherd, D. A. (2019). Accelerating strategic fit or venture emergence: Different paths adopted by corporate accelerators. Journal of Business Venturing,34(5), 105886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M. L., & Anderson, P. (1986). Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 439–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M. L., & O’Reilly, C. A., III. (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review,38(4), 8–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly, 26, xiii–xxiii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiblen, T., & Chesbrough, H. W. (2015). Engaging with startups to enhance corporate innovation. California Management Review,57(2), 66–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review,27(2), 185–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Business Administration, Duzce University, 81100, Duzce, Turkey

    Ufuk Gür

Authors
  1. Ufuk Gür
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ufuk Gür .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Wildau, Germany

    Dana Mietzner

  2. Berlin, Germany

    Christian Schultz

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gür, U. (2021). Absorptive Capacity Approach to Technology Transfer at Corporate Accelerators: A Systematic Literature Review. In: Mietzner, D., Schultz, C. (eds) New Perspectives in Technology Transfer. FGF Studies in Small Business and Entrepreneurship. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61477-5_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation