Abstract
Digitalization is a key driver throughout all drivers of change because its emerging and rapidly changing digital technologies lead to new products, services, and/or business models. Actors working in knowledge and technology transfer constantly have to keep up with the latest technological developments and cope with their enormous implications. To face these challenges, a variety of knowledge and technology transfer methods exist. This chapter provides an overview of these methods and illuminates the technology radar method as a potential digital tool for facilitating knowledge and technology transfer. Following the lean approach by Eric Ries, we document the process of the development of the technology radar. We present a web-based technology radar that is accessible to everyone on nearly any device, which encourages collaborative development. User testing with experts in the field of knowledge and technology transfer delivers insights and feedback for the further development of this digital tool. The results are conclusively discussed and then an outlook on the upcoming version of the technology radar, as well as different forms of usage in terms of knowledge and technology transfer, is provided.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ardilio, A. (2012). Fraunhofer TechnologieRadar: Trends erkennen – Technologien umsetzen. In H. J. Bullinger (Ed.), Fokus Technologiemarkt. Technologiepotenziale identifizieren - Marktchancen realisieren (pp. 78–90). Munich: Hanser.
Auth, G., Meyer, P., & Porst, G. (2017). Erkennung und Nutzung von Technikinnovationen für den Digital Workplace der Deutschen Telekom. Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik, 54(6), 935–949. https://doi.org/10.1365/s40702-017-0365-7.
Autio, E., & Laamanen, T. (1995). Measurement and evaluation of technology transfer: Review of technology transfer mechanisms and indicators. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management,10(718), 643–664.
AutoScout24. (2018). AutoScout24 technology radar. https://github.com/Scout24/as24-tech-radar. Accessed 3 February 2020.
Batistella, C., De Toni, A. F., & Pillon, R. (2016). Interorganisational technology/knowledge transfer: A framework from critical literature review. The Journal of Technology Transfer,41, 1195–1234.
Berndt, M., Hartmann, F., & Mietzner, D. (2019). Zukunftsperspektiven für den IT-Mittelstand in Deutschland, Fachkräftesituation und neue Arbeitsformen, Dokumentation zum Foresightprozess. Studie im Rahmen des Kompetenzzentrums IT-Mittelstand (KIW), Wildau 2019, https://doi.org/10.15771/fg-irf_2019_2.
Boronowsky, M., Woronowicz, T., Hoffmann, P., & Boboev, S. (2015). Showrooms as a window to science based innovation. Applied Computer Systems, 17, 21–26. https://doi.org/10.1515/acss-2015-0003.
Châlons, C., & Dufft, N. (2016). Die Rolle der IT als Enabler für Digitalisierung. In F. Abolhassan (Ed.), Was treibt die Digitalisierung? Warum an der Cloud kein Weg vorbeiführt (pp. 27–37). Wiesbaden: Springer.
Coxon, A. (2019). Science communication: Why it’s important and how should we go about it? In H. Walton, M. R. J. Aquino, C. V. Talbot, & C. A. Melia (Eds.), Guide for psychology postgraduates: Surviving postgraduate study (pp. 91–95). Leicester: The British Psychological Society.
Delivery Hero. (2019). Delivery hero tech radar. https://github.com/deliveryhero/tech-radar. Accessed 3 February 2020.
Downes, L., & Nunes, P. (2013, March). Big bang disruption. Harvard Business Review, pp. 44–56. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2709801.
Folkerts, C., & Schüning, T. (2005). Forschungs- und Entwicklungsdatenbanken im Internet. In Wissens- und Technologietransfer. Analysen, Konzepte, Instrumente. Transferstelle Dialog der Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg.
GitHub. (2018). ThoughtWorks build-your-own-radar. https://github.com/thoughtworks/build-your-own-radar. Accessed 3 February 2020.
GitHub. (2019). XT tech radar. https://github.com/pagesource/xt-techradar. Accessed 3 February 2020.
Golovatchev, J., & Budde, O. (2010). Technology and innovation radar—Effective instruments for the development of a sustainable innovation strategy. 2010 IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation & Technology, Singapore, 760–764. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMIT.2010.5492855.
Goodwin, T. (2015). The battle is for the customer interface. TechCrunch. https://techcrunch.com/2015/03/03/in-the-age-of-disintermediation-the-battle-is-all-for-the-customer-interface/. Accessed 21 January 2020.
Granig, P., & Mussnig, W. (2007). Innovationsbewertung. Potentialprognose und -steuerung durch Ertrags- und Risikosimulation. Deutscher Universitätsverlag.
Haag, C., Schuh, G., Kreysa, J., & Schmelter, K. (2011). Technologiebewertung. In G. Schuh (Ed.), Technologiemanagement. Handbuch Produktion und Management 2 (pp. 309–366). Berlin: Springer.
Haile, T. (2014). What you think you know about the web is wrong. Time. https://time.com/12933/what-you-think-you-know-about-the-web-is-wrong/. Accessed 3 February 2020.
Haslinda, Fahmy, Sukinah, Roslina, Fariha, Suhana, … Shiratuddin, N. (2015). Evaluation of e-Book applications using ISO 25010. 2015 International Symposium on Technology Management and Emerging Technologies (ISTMET), Langkawi, Kedah, Malaysia, 114–118. https://doi.org/10.1109/istmet.2015.7359012.
Haufe Group. (2019). Haufe technology radar. https://techradar.haufe.io/. Accessed 3 February 2020.
IFTF. (2020). Signals. Institute for the Future. http://www.iftf.org/what-we-do/foresight-tools/signals. Accessed 9 February 2020.
Innovation Hub 13. (2019). Transfersteckbrief. Digitale Integration. Innovation Camp. https://innohub13.de/wp-content/uploads/DigitaleIntegration_32582.pdf. Accessed 31 January 2020.
ISO. (2011). ISO/IEC 25010:20011(en). Systems and software engineering—Systems and software Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE)—System and software quality models.https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso-iec:25010:ed-1:v1:en:fig:4. Accessed 21 February 2020.
Jacobi, H. F., & Landherr, M. (2013). Treiber der unternehmerischen Wettbewerbsfähigkeit im globalen Kontext. In E. Westkämper, D. Spath, C. Constantinescu, & Lentes, J. (Eds.), Digitale Produktion. Berlin: Springer.
Kadi, I., Idri, A., & Ouhbi, S. (2016). Quality evaluation of cardiac decision support systems using ISO 25010 standard. 2016 IEEE/ACS 13th International Conference of Computer Systems and Applications (AICCSA), Agadir, Morocco. https://doi.org/10.1109/AICCSA.2016.7945657.
Kesting, T. (2013). Grundlagen des Hochschul-Wissens- und Technologietransfers. In Wissens- und Technologietransfer durch Hochschulen aus einer marktorientierten Perspektive. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler.
Kiel, D., Arnold, C., Collisi, M., & Voigt, K. I. (2016). The impact of the industrial internet of things on established business models. Proceedings of the International Association for Management of Technology (IAMOT) Conference, Orlando, FL, 673–695. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304495085_The_Impact_of_the_Industrial_Internet_of_Things_on_Established_Business_Models.
KIW. (2020a). Mittelstand-Digital Kompetenzzentrum-4.0 IT-Wirtschaft. https://itwirtschaft.de/. Accessed 3 February 2020.
KIW. (2020b). Tech Radar 2020. Mittelstand-Digital Kompetenzzentrum-4.0 IT-Wirtschaft. https://radar.itwirtschaft.de/. Accessed 3 February 2020.
Kröcher, U. (2005). Forschungs- und Entwicklungsdatenbanken im Internet. In Wissens- und Technologietransfer. Analysen, Konzepte, Instrumente. Transferstelle dialog der Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg.
Kulicke, M., Meyer, N., Stahlecker, T., & Jackwerth-Rice, T. (2019). Evaluation des Programms WIPANO -„Wissens- und Technologietransfer durch Patente und Normen“. Studie im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums für Wirtschaft und Energie. Fraunhofer ISI. Karlsruhe.
Mangelsdorf, A., Kreibich, M., Kudernatsch, W., Brunnlieb, C., Heinze, L., & Boysen, M., (2019). Besser messen, besser kommunizieren und besser fördern - Perspektiven für den Wissens- und Technologietransfer in Deutschland. Working Paper of the Institute for Innovation and Technology (46). https://www.iit-berlin.de/de/publikationen/besser-messen-besser-kommunizieren-und-besser-foerdern.
Maurya, A. (2013). Running lean. Beijing: O’Reilly.
Meissner, D., & Sultanian, E. (2007). Wissens- und Technologietransfer - Grundlagen und Diskussion von Studien und Beispielen. CEST.
Mietzner, D., Ambacher, N., Hartmann, F., & Schmid, S. (2015). Trends in der personalisierten Medizin und deren Eintrittswahrscheinlichkeit. In E. Eppinger, B. Halecker, K. Hölzle, & M. Kamprath (Eds.), Dienstleistungspotenziale und Geschäftsmodelle in der personalisierten Medizin (pp. 361–412). Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler Verlag.
Mietzner, D., & Schulz, C. (2014). How to solve corporate innovation challenges through innovation camps? Presentation at XXV ISPIM Conference - Innovation for a Sustainable Economy and Society, Dublin, Ireland. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.31060.50560.
Ngah, N., Fahmy, S., Sukinah, R., Fariha, Zi., Suhana, A., & Shiratuddin, N. (2015). Evaluation of e-Book applications using ISO 25010. 2015 International Symposium on Technology Management and Emerging Technologies (ISTMET). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTMET.2015.7359012.
Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., & Wegberg, J. T. A. (2011). Business model generation: Ein Handbuch für Visionäre, Spielveränderer und Herausforderer. Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag.
Pelton, J. N. (2019). The prime drivers of change. In Preparing for the next cyber revolution. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02137-5_3.
Peter, M., Gatziu Grivas, S., Horn, D., Rüegg, F., Barba, R., & Graf, M. (2019). The technology matrix—A tool-based method for technology scouting. 12th IADIS International Conference on Information Systems. Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Piller, F. T., & Hilgers, D. (2013). Innovative Methoden zum Transfer wissenschaftlicher Ergebnisse in die industrielle Anwendung. Düsseldorf: Symposion Publishing.
Reinhard, M. (2001). Wissens- und Technologietransfer in Deutschland - ein langer Weg zu mehr Effizienz. ifo Schnelldienst 2001(54), 14–17.
Ries, E. (2011). The lean startup: How today’s entrepreneurs use continuous innovation to create radically successful businesses. New York: Crown.
Ries, E. (2013). Lean startup. Schnell, risikolos und erfolgreich Unternehmen gründen. Munich: Redline-Verlag.
Rohrbeck, R. (2007). Technology scouting—A case study on the Deutsche Telekom Laboratories. ISPIM-Asia 2007 Conference, New Delhi, India.
Rohrbeck, R. (2010). Harnessing a network of experts for competitive advantage: Technology scouting in the ICT industry. R&D Management, 40(2), 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2010.00601.x.
Rohrbeck, R., Heuer, J., & Arnold, H. (2006). The technology radar—An instrument of technology intelligence and innovation strategy. 2006 IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1109/icmit.2006.262368.
Rollwagen, I., Hofmann, J., & Schneider, S. (2008). Improving the business impact of foresight. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20(3), 337–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320802000070.
Runiewicz-Wardyn, M. (2013). Knowledge as a driver of technological change and regional growth. In Knowledge flows, technological change and regional growth in the European Union. Contributions to Economics. Heidelberg: Springer.
Schimpf, S., Heubach, D., & Rummel, S. (2016). Technologieentwicklung als Innovationstreiber in bestehenden und disruptiven Märkten – von der Beobachtung zur Umsetzung. In T. Abele (Ed.), Die frühe Phase des Innovationsprozesses (pp. 31–49). Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler.
Smith, E. (2001). The role of tacit and explicit knowledge in the workplace. Journal of Knowledge Management, 5(4), 311–321. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270110411733.
Suwawi, D. D. J., Darwiyanto, E., & Rochmani, M. (2015). Evaluation of academic website using ISO/IEC 9126. In 2015 3rd International Conference on Information and Communication Technology (ICoICT), Nusa Dua. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICoICT.2015.7231426.
ThoughtWorks. (2020). Technology radar (vol. 23). An opinionated guide to technology frontiers. https://www.thoughtworks.com/radar. Accessed 1 December 2020.
Urbach, N., Ahlemann, F., Böhmann, T., Drews, P., Brenner, W., Schaudel, F., & Schütte, R. (2019). The impact of digitalization on the IT department. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 61, 123–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-018-0570-0.
Urbach, N., & Röglinger, M. (2018). Digitalization cases: How organizations rethink their business for the digital age. Cham: Springer.
Warnecke, C., & Rohde, S. (2019). Wissenstransfer durch Universitäten im Ruhrgebiet: Die Rolle der Hochschullehrer. Standort, 43, 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00548-019-00583-4.
Wolff, M. F. (1992). Scouting for technology. Research Technology Management, 35, 10–12.
Zalando. (2019). Zalando tech radar. https://opensource.zalando.com/tech-radar/. Accessed 3 February 2020.
Zinkl, W. (2005). Ein Innovationsmarkt für Wissen und Technologie. Diskussionsbeitrag zur Neuausrichtung der Innovationspolitik in der Schweiz. Zürich: Avenir Suisse.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Berndt, M., Mietzner, D. (2021). Facilitating Knowledge and Technology Transfer via a Technology Radar as an Open and Collaborative Tool. In: Mietzner, D., Schultz, C. (eds) New Perspectives in Technology Transfer. FGF Studies in Small Business and Entrepreneurship. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61477-5_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61477-5_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-61476-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-61477-5
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)