Skip to main content

Analysis and Results

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Micro-Place Homicide Patterns in Chicago

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Criminology ((BRIEFSPOLICI))

  • 106 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter details the results of the multiple analyses conducted in the previous chapter, how the research questions were answered, and comprehensive explanations of each of the results, tables, and incorporated illustrations. This includes detailed statistics for each of the 77 Chicago community areas, as well as group-based trajectory analysis which suggests that homicide consistency in Chicago community areas is not the norm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    With finite populations the upper bound of the Gini coefficient is 1 − 1/n (Allison (1978), where n is the total number of units in the sample. Even when considering the generalized Gini coefficient, this only reduces the upper bound by a maximum of 1/396 (the reciprocal of the number of homicides in 1965, the year with the fewest homicides in the sample) – less than 3 hundredths – in this sample.

References

  • Allison, P. (1978). Measures of inequality. American Sociological Review, 43(6), 865–880.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernasco, W., & Steenbeek, W. (2016). More places than crimes: Implications for evaluating the law of crime concentration at place. Journal of Quantitative Criminology. Online First.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, R. L. (2000). Gang activity and overall levels of crime: A new mapping tool for defining areas of gang activity using police records. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 16(3), 369–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hipp, J. R., & Kim, Y. A. (2016). Measuring crime concentration across cities of varying sizes: Complications based on the spatial and temporal scale employed. Journal of Quantitative Criminology. Online First.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyndman, R. J. (1996). Computing and graphing highest density regions. The American Statistician, 50(2), 120–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagin, D. (2005). Group-based modeling of development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisburd, D. L. (2015). The law of crime concentration and the criminology of place. Criminology, 53(2), 133–157.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wheeler, A.P., Herrmann, C.R., Block, R.L. (2021). Analysis and Results. In: Micro-Place Homicide Patterns in Chicago. SpringerBriefs in Criminology(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61446-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61446-1_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-61445-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-61446-1

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics