Skip to main content

Planning and Network Modeling of Projects

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
An Introduction to Project Modeling and Planning

Part of the book series: Springer Texts in Business and Economics ((STBE))

  • 1483 Accesses

Abstract

This Chapter introduces the basics of project modelling and planning, particularly the Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) that divides the project work into its work packages and activities. We present different types of WBS with examples and demonstrate their impacts on project execution using Gantt Charts. We introduce organizational and cost breakdown structures, associate them with WBS and discuss the estimation of activity duration and cost values and technical and resource requirements. These data provide the foundation for the network modelling that lies at the core of project scheduling practice, highlighting the importance of data requirements, data and knowledge management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ackoff, R. L. (1978). The art of problem solving. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartusch, M., Möhring, R. H., & Radermacher, F. J. (1988). Scheduling project networks with resource constraints and time windows. Annals of Operations Research, 16, 201–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besikci, U., Bilge, U., & Ulusoy, G. (2013). Resource dedication problem in a multi-project environment. Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, 25(1–2, SI), 206–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchtik, L. (2010). Secrets to mastering the WBS in real-world projects. Project Management Journal, 41(4), 132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R., Kaplan, R. S., Maisel, L. S., Morrissey, E., & Oehm, R. M. (1992). Implementing activity-based cost management: Moving from analysis to action. Montvale: Institute of Management Accountants.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Boston: Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodin, B., & Elimam, A. A. (1997). Audit scheduling with overlapping activities and sequence dependent set-up costs. European Journal of Operational Research, 97(1), 22–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eastman, C., Teicholz, P., Sacks, R., & Liston, K. (2008). BIM handbook. A guide to building information modeling. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmaghraby, S. E. E., & Kamburowski, J. (1992). The analysis of activity networks under generalized precedence relations (GPRs). Management Science, 38(9), 1245–1263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fichman, R. G., & Kemerer, C. F. (2002). Activity-based costing for component-based software development. Information Technology and Management, 3, 137–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Globerson, S. (1994). Impact of various work-breakdown structures on project conceptualization. International Journal of Project Management, 12(3), 165–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, N. G. (2016). Research and teaching opportunities in project management. In Optimization challenges in complex, networked and risky systems (pp. 329–388). Hanover: INFORMS.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Haugan, G. T. (2002). Project planning and scheduling. Vienna: Management Concepts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazır, Ö. (2015). A review of analytical models, approaches and decision support tools in project monitoring and control. International Journal of Project Management, 33(4), 808–815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hazır, Ö., & Ulusoy, G. (2020). A classification and review of approaches and methods for modeling uncertainty in projects. International Journal of Production Economics, 223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.107522.

  • Kerzner, H. (2009). Project management: A systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling (10th ed.). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurtulus, I. S., & Davis, E. (1982). Multi-project scheduling: Categorization of heuristic rules’ performance. Management Science, 28(2), 161–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurtulus, I. S., & Narula, S. C. (1985). Multi-project scheduling: Analysis of project performance. IIE Transactions, 17(1), 58–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leseure, M. J., & Brookes, N. J. (2004). Knowledge management benchmarks for project management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(1), 103–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moder, J. J., & Phillips, C. R. (1970). Project management with CPM and PERT (2nd ed.). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co..

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, K., Schwindt, C., & Zimmermann, J. (2003). Project scheduling with time windows and scarce resources (2nd ed.). Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • PMI. (2004). A guide to project management body of knowledge. PMBOK guide (3rd ed.). Newtown Square: Project Management Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • PMI. (2006). Practice standard for work breakdown structures (2nd ed.). Newtown Square: Project Management Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • PMI. (2017). A guide to project management body of knowledge. PMBOK guide (6th ed.). Newtown Square: Project Management Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1966). The logic of tacit inference. Philosophy, 41(155), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rad, P. F. (2002). Project estimating and cost management. Vienna: Management Concepts Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Raz, T., & Elnathan, D. (1999). Activity based costing for projects. International Journal Project Management, 17(1), 61–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees, M. (2015). Business risk and simulation modelling in practice: Using excel, VBA and @ RISK. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shim, J. P., Warkentin, M., Courtney, J. F., Power, D. J., Sharda, R., & Carlsson, C. (2002). Past, present, and future of decision support technology. Decision Support Systems, 33(2), 111–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanhoucke, M., Coelho, J., & Batselier, J. (2016). An overview of project data for integrated project management and control. Journal of Modern Project Management, 3(2), 6–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wikipedia. Delphi method. Accessed 29 June 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wognum, N., & Trienekens, J. (2015). The system of concurrent engineering. In J. Stjepandić et al. (Eds.), Concurrent engineering in the 21st century (pp. 21–49). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ulusoy, G., Hazır, Ö. (2021). Planning and Network Modeling of Projects. In: An Introduction to Project Modeling and Planning. Springer Texts in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61423-2_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics