Advertisement

Learning Eco-Innovation from Nature: Towards Identification of Solution Principles Without Secondary Eco-Problems

Conference paper
  • 314 Downloads
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 597)

Abstract

Environmentally-friendly implementation of new technologies and eco-innovative solutions often faces additional secondary ecological problems. On the other hand, existing biological systems show a lesser environmental impact as compared to the human-made products or technologies. The paper defines a research agenda for identification of underlying eco-inventive principles used in the natural systems created through evolution. Finally, the paper proposes a comprehensive method for capturing eco-innovation principles in biological systems in addition and complementary to the existing biomimetic methods and TRIZ methodology and illustrates it with an example.

Keywords

Eco-innovation Biomimetics Inventive principles TRIZ 

References

  1. 1.
    VDI Standard 4521: Inventive problem Solving with TRIZ. Fundamentals, Terms and Definitions. The Association of German Engineers (VDI), Beuth Publishers, Duesseldorf, Germany (2016)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cohen, Y.H., Reich, Y.: Biomimetic Design Method for Innovation and Sustainability. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33997-9
  3. 3.
    Hashemi Farzaneh, H., Lindemann, U.: A Practical Guide to Bio-inspired Design. Springer, Heidelberg (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-57684-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Helms, M.: Biologically inspired design: process and products. Des. Stud. 30, 606–622 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    AskNature database of the Biomimicry Institute. https://asknature.org/. Accessed 22 July 2020
  6. 6.
    Vincent, J.: Biomimetics - a review. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part H: J. Eng. Med. 223(8), 919–939 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Altshuller, G.S.: Creativity as an Exact Science. The Theory of the Solution of Inventive Problems. Gordon & Breach Science Publishers, New York (1984)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cavallucci, D., Cascini, G., Duflou, J., Livotov, P., Vaneker, T.: TRIZ and knowledge-based innovation in science and industry. Proc. Eng. 131, 1–2 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Livotov, P., et al.: Eco-innovation in process engineering: contradictions, inventive principles and methods. Therm. Sci. Eng. Prog. 9, 52–65 (2019)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bogatyrev, N., Bogatyreva, O.: BioTRIZ: a win-win methodology for eco-innovation. In: Azevedo, S.G., Brandenburg, M., Carvalho, H., Cruz-Machado, V. (eds.) Eco-Innovation and the Development of Business Models. GINS, vol. 2, pp. 297–314. Springer, Cham (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05077-5_15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bogatyrev, N., Bogatyreva, O.: TRIZ-based algorithm for biomimetic design. Proc. Eng. 131, 377–387 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vincent, J.: The trade-off – a central concept for biomimetics. Bioinspired Biomimetic Nanobiomater. 6(2), 67–76 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vincent, J., Cavallucci, D.: Development of an ontology of biomimetics based on Altshuller’s matrix. In: Cavallucci, D., De Guio, R., Koziołek, S. (eds.) TFC 2018. IAICT, vol. 541, pp. 14–25. Springer, Cham (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02456-7_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mann, D.: Natural world contradiction matrix: how biological systems resolve trade-offs and compromises. Proc. Eng. 9, 714–723 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Savelli, S., Abramov, O.Y.: Nature as a source of function-leading areas for FOS-derived solutions. TRIZ Rev.: J. Int. TRIZ Assoc. MATRIZ 1(1), 86–98 (2019)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Weaver, J., Kleinke, D.: Extending the TRIZ methodology to connect engineering design problems to biological solutions. In: NCIIA 16th Annual Conference (2012)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Williamson, E.D.: Life sciences today and tomorrow: emerging biotechnologies. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 37(5), 553–565 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fayemi, P.-E., Gilles, M., Gazo, C.: Innovative technical creativity methodology for bio-inspired design. In: Cavallucci, D., De Guio, R., Koziołek, S. (eds.) TFC 2018. IAICT, vol. 541, pp. 253–265. Springer, Cham (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02456-7_21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    The Biomimicry Design Process. https://toolbox.biomimicry.org/methods/process/. Accessed 22 July 2020
  20. 20.
    Flowers, T.J., Colmer, T.D.: Plant salt tolerance: adaptations in halophytes. Ann. Bot. 115(3), 327–331 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Van de Riet, K.: Biomimicry of Mangroves Teaches How to Improve Coastal Barriers. https://www.ansys.com/blog/biomimicry-mangroves-improve-coastal-erosion-coastal-barriers. Accessed 22 July 2020

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Offenburg University of Applied SciencesOffenburgGermany
  2. 2.Politeknik Negeri MalangMalangIndonesia

Personalised recommendations