Abstract
With the rise of digital technologies, digital transformation (DT) has become an issue in the field of higher education. In higher education institutions and enterprises alike, DT means to digitalize internal processes and offer digital services and products. There are barriers that must be overcome to master this challenge. Our study follows an explorative mixed methods design. We identify the barriers to DT and transfer them to a research model. We examine the influence of individually perceived barriers on the DT process, thus contributing to the theoretical foundation of DT barriers in higher education institutions. This paper offers an approved scale to measure barriers to DT and a valid operationalization of DT barriers. The identified predictors can explain over 50% of the alteration problems of the DT process. Results indicate that management students have a significantly low level of concern regarding their privacy and traceability but demand more commitment at the organizational level.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Fitzgerald, M., Kruschwitz, N., Bonnet, D., Welch, M.: Embracing digital technology: a new strategic imperative. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 55, 1–12 (2013)
Castro, R.: Blended learning in higher education: trends and capabilities. Educ. Inf. Technol. 24, 2523–2546 (2019)
Reid, P.: Categories for barriers to adoption of instructional technologies. Educ. Inf. Technol. 19, 383–407 (2014)
Vogelsang, K., Liere-Netheler, K., Packmohr, S., Hoppe, U.: Barriers to digital transformation in manufacturing: development of a research agenda. In: Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 4937–4946 (2019)
Hirsch-Kreinsen, H.: Digitization of industrial work: development paths and prospects. J. Labour Mark. Res. 49, 1–14 (2016)
Friga, P.N., Bettis, R.A., Sullivan, R.S.: Changes in graduate management education and new business school strategies for the 21st century. AMLE 2, 233–249 (2003)
Löffler, A., Prifti, L., Knigge, M., Kienegger, H., Krcmar, H.: Teaching business process change in the context of the digital transformation: a review on requirements for a simulation game. Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik (MKWI), 759–770 (2018)
Creswell, J.W.: A Concise Introduction to Mixed Methods Research. SAGE, Los Angeles (2015)
Laurell, C., Sandström, C., Eriksson, K., Nykvist, R.: Digitalization and the future of management learning. Manag. Learn. 51, 89–108 (2019)
Vogelsang, K., Droit, A., Liere-Netheler, K.: Designing a flipped classroom course–a process model. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik, pp. 345–359 (2019)
Whitaker, J., New, J.R., Ireland, R.D.: MOOCs and the online delivery of business education what’s new? What’s not? What now? AMLE 15, 345–365 (2016)
Arbaugh, J.B.: What might online delivery teach us about blended management education? J. Manag. Educ. 38, 784–817 (2014)
Smuts, R.G., Lalitha, V.V.M., Khan, H.U.: Change management guidelines that address barriers to technology adoption in an HEI context. In: 2017 IEEE 7th International Advance Computing Conference (IACC), pp. 754–758 (2017)
Fuglsang Østergaard, S., Graafland Nordlund, A.: The 4 biggest challenges to our higher education model – and what to do about them. In: World Economic Forum, Davos (2019)
Janson, A., Söllner, M., Bitzer, P., Leimeister, J.M.: Examining the effect of different measurements of learning success in technology-mediated learning research. In: 35th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), 1–10 (2014)
Irons, L.R., Keel, R., Bielema, C.L.: Blended learning and learner satisfaction: keys to user acceptance? USDLA J. 16, 1–12 (2002)
Gregory, M.S.-J., Lodge, J.M.: Academic workload: the silent barrier to the implementation of technology-enhanced learning strategies in higher education. Distance Educ. 36, 210–230 (2015)
Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., Tondeur, J.: The technology acceptance model (TAM): a meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Comput. Educ. 128, 13–35 (2019)
Abrahams, D.A.: Technology adoption in higher education: a framework for identifying and prioritising issues and barriers to adoption of instructional technology. J. Appl. Res. High. Educ. 2, 34–49 (2010)
Porter, W.W., Graham, C.R., Bodily, R.G., Sandberg, D.S.: A qualitative analysis of institutional drivers and barriers to blended learning adoption in higher education. Internet High. Educ. 28, 17–27 (2016)
Al-Senaidi, S., Lin, L., Poirot, J.: Barriers to adopting technology for teaching and learning in Oman. Comput. Educ. 53, 575–590 (2009)
Burch, Z.A., Mohammed, S.: Exploring faculty perceptions about classroom technology integration and acceptance: a literature review. Int. J. Res. Educ. Sci. 5, 722–729 (2019)
Petter, S.C., Gallivan, M.J.: Toward a framework for classifying and guiding mixed method research in information systems. In: Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 1–10 (2004)
Thomson, S.B.: Sample size and grounded theory. J. Adm. Gov. 5, 45–52 (2010)
Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods. SAGE, Los Angeles (2014)
Leonardi, P.M.: Materiality, sociomateriality, and socio-technical systems. In: Materiality and Organizing: Social Interaction in a Technological World, p. 384. OUP, Oxford (2012)
Schnackenberg, A., Tomlinson, E.: The role of transparency in the trustworthiness-trust relationship. In: Proceedings 2012, p. 15203 (2012)
Proserpio, L., Gioia, D.A.: Teaching the virtual generation. AMLE 6, 69–80 (2007)
Boyton, A.C., Zmud, R.W.: An assessment of critical success factors. Sloan Manag. Rev. 25, 17–27 (1984)
Moorthy, K., et al.: Barriers of mobile commerce adoption intention. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 12, 37–53 (2017)
Klötzer, C., Pflaum, A.: Toward the development of a maturity model for digitalization within the manufacturing industry’s supply chain. In: Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 4210–4219 (2017)
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D.: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27, 425–478 (2003)
Cramer, H., et al.: The effects of transparency on trust in and acceptance of a content-based art recommender. User Model. User Adapt. Interact. 18, 455–496 (2008)
Al-Jabri, I.M., Roztocki, N.: Adoption of ERP systems: does information transparency matter? Telemat. Inform. 32, 300–310 (2015)
Cech, F., Tellioğlu, H., Tellio, H.: Impact of the Digital Transformation: An Online Real-Time Delphi Study. arXiv preprint, 1–15 (2019)
Polites, G.L., Karahanna, E.: Shackled to the status Quo: the inhibiting effects of incumbent system habit, switching costs, and inertia on new system acceptance. MIS Q. 36, 21–42 (2012)
Bienhaus, F., Haddud, A.: Procurement 4.0: factors influencing the digitisation of procurement and supply chains. Bus. Process. Manag. J. 24, 965–984 (2018)
Wixom, B.H., Todd, P.A.: A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Inf. Syst. Res. 16, 85–102 (2005)
Piccoli, G., Rodriguez, J.A., Palese, B., Bartosiak, M.: The dark side of digital transformation: the case of information systems education. In: Thirty Eighth International Conference on Information Systems, Seoul 201, pp. 1–20 (2017)
Ramsey, E., McCole, P.: E‐business in professional SMEs: the case of New Zealand. J. Small Bus. Enterp. Dev. 12, 528–544 (2005)
Wang, T., Jong, M.S., Towey, D.: Challenges to flipped classroom adoption in Hong Kong secondary schools. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering (TALE), pp. 108–110 (2015)
Koehler, M.J., Mishra, P., Kereluik, K., Shin, T.S., Graham, C.R.: The Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Framework. In: Spector, J.M., Merrill, M.D., Elen, J., Bishop, M.J. (eds.) Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, pp. 101–111. Springer, New York (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_9
Buabeng-Andoh, C.: Factors influencing teachers’ adoption and integration of information and communication technology into teaching: a review of the literature. Int. J. Educ. Dev. Using ICT 8, 136–155 (2012)
Arbaugh, J.B., Duray, R.: Technological and structural characteristics, student learning and satisfaction with web-based courses. Manag. Learn. 33, 331–347 (2002)
Curaj, A., Georghiou, L., Cassingena Harper, J., Egron-Polak, E. (eds.): Mergers and Alliances in Higher Education. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13135-1
Beck, H.P., Milligan, M.: Factors influencing the institutional commitment of online students. Internet High. Educ. 20, 51–56 (2014)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Vogelsang, K., Brink, H., Packmohr, S. (2020). Measuring the Barriers to the Digital Transformation in Management Courses – A Mixed Methods Study. In: Buchmann, R.A., Polini, A., Johansson, B., Karagiannis, D. (eds) Perspectives in Business Informatics Research. BIR 2020. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 398. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61140-8_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61140-8_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-61139-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-61140-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)