Skip to main content

Measuring the Barriers to the Digital Transformation in Management Courses – A Mixed Methods Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Perspectives in Business Informatics Research (BIR 2020)

Abstract

With the rise of digital technologies, digital transformation (DT) has become an issue in the field of higher education. In higher education institutions and enterprises alike, DT means to digitalize internal processes and offer digital services and products. There are barriers that must be overcome to master this challenge. Our study follows an explorative mixed methods design. We identify the barriers to DT and transfer them to a research model. We examine the influence of individually perceived barriers on the DT process, thus contributing to the theoretical foundation of DT barriers in higher education institutions. This paper offers an approved scale to measure barriers to DT and a valid operationalization of DT barriers. The identified predictors can explain over 50% of the alteration problems of the DT process. Results indicate that management students have a significantly low level of concern regarding their privacy and traceability but demand more commitment at the organizational level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Fitzgerald, M., Kruschwitz, N., Bonnet, D., Welch, M.: Embracing digital technology: a new strategic imperative. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 55, 1–12 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Castro, R.: Blended learning in higher education: trends and capabilities. Educ. Inf. Technol. 24, 2523–2546 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Reid, P.: Categories for barriers to adoption of instructional technologies. Educ. Inf. Technol. 19, 383–407 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Vogelsang, K., Liere-Netheler, K., Packmohr, S., Hoppe, U.: Barriers to digital transformation in manufacturing: development of a research agenda. In: Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 4937–4946 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hirsch-Kreinsen, H.: Digitization of industrial work: development paths and prospects. J. Labour Mark. Res. 49, 1–14 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Friga, P.N., Bettis, R.A., Sullivan, R.S.: Changes in graduate management education and new business school strategies for the 21st century. AMLE 2, 233–249 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Löffler, A., Prifti, L., Knigge, M., Kienegger, H., Krcmar, H.: Teaching business process change in the context of the digital transformation: a review on requirements for a simulation game. Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik (MKWI), 759–770 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Creswell, J.W.: A Concise Introduction to Mixed Methods Research. SAGE, Los Angeles (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Laurell, C., Sandström, C., Eriksson, K., Nykvist, R.: Digitalization and the future of management learning. Manag. Learn. 51, 89–108 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Vogelsang, K., Droit, A., Liere-Netheler, K.: Designing a flipped classroom course–a process model. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik, pp. 345–359 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Whitaker, J., New, J.R., Ireland, R.D.: MOOCs and the online delivery of business education what’s new? What’s not? What now? AMLE 15, 345–365 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Arbaugh, J.B.: What might online delivery teach us about blended management education? J. Manag. Educ. 38, 784–817 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Smuts, R.G., Lalitha, V.V.M., Khan, H.U.: Change management guidelines that address barriers to technology adoption in an HEI context. In: 2017 IEEE 7th International Advance Computing Conference (IACC), pp. 754–758 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fuglsang Østergaard, S., Graafland Nordlund, A.: The 4 biggest challenges to our higher education model – and what to do about them. In: World Economic Forum, Davos (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Janson, A., Söllner, M., Bitzer, P., Leimeister, J.M.: Examining the effect of different measurements of learning success in technology-mediated learning research. In: 35th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), 1–10 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Irons, L.R., Keel, R., Bielema, C.L.: Blended learning and learner satisfaction: keys to user acceptance? USDLA J. 16, 1–12 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gregory, M.S.-J., Lodge, J.M.: Academic workload: the silent barrier to the implementation of technology-enhanced learning strategies in higher education. Distance Educ. 36, 210–230 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., Tondeur, J.: The technology acceptance model (TAM): a meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Comput. Educ. 128, 13–35 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Abrahams, D.A.: Technology adoption in higher education: a framework for identifying and prioritising issues and barriers to adoption of instructional technology. J. Appl. Res. High. Educ. 2, 34–49 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Porter, W.W., Graham, C.R., Bodily, R.G., Sandberg, D.S.: A qualitative analysis of institutional drivers and barriers to blended learning adoption in higher education. Internet High. Educ. 28, 17–27 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Al-Senaidi, S., Lin, L., Poirot, J.: Barriers to adopting technology for teaching and learning in Oman. Comput. Educ. 53, 575–590 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Burch, Z.A., Mohammed, S.: Exploring faculty perceptions about classroom technology integration and acceptance: a literature review. Int. J. Res. Educ. Sci. 5, 722–729 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Petter, S.C., Gallivan, M.J.: Toward a framework for classifying and guiding mixed method research in information systems. In: Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 1–10 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Thomson, S.B.: Sample size and grounded theory. J. Adm. Gov. 5, 45–52 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods. SAGE, Los Angeles (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Leonardi, P.M.: Materiality, sociomateriality, and socio-technical systems. In: Materiality and Organizing: Social Interaction in a Technological World, p. 384. OUP, Oxford (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Schnackenberg, A., Tomlinson, E.: The role of transparency in the trustworthiness-trust relationship. In: Proceedings 2012, p. 15203 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Proserpio, L., Gioia, D.A.: Teaching the virtual generation. AMLE 6, 69–80 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Boyton, A.C., Zmud, R.W.: An assessment of critical success factors. Sloan Manag. Rev. 25, 17–27 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Moorthy, K., et al.: Barriers of mobile commerce adoption intention. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 12, 37–53 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Klötzer, C., Pflaum, A.: Toward the development of a maturity model for digitalization within the manufacturing industry’s supply chain. In: Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 4210–4219 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D.: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27, 425–478 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Cramer, H., et al.: The effects of transparency on trust in and acceptance of a content-based art recommender. User Model. User Adapt. Interact. 18, 455–496 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Al-Jabri, I.M., Roztocki, N.: Adoption of ERP systems: does information transparency matter? Telemat. Inform. 32, 300–310 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Cech, F., Tellioğlu, H., Tellio, H.: Impact of the Digital Transformation: An Online Real-Time Delphi Study. arXiv preprint, 1–15 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Polites, G.L., Karahanna, E.: Shackled to the status Quo: the inhibiting effects of incumbent system habit, switching costs, and inertia on new system acceptance. MIS Q. 36, 21–42 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Bienhaus, F., Haddud, A.: Procurement 4.0: factors influencing the digitisation of procurement and supply chains. Bus. Process. Manag. J. 24, 965–984 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Wixom, B.H., Todd, P.A.: A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Inf. Syst. Res. 16, 85–102 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Piccoli, G., Rodriguez, J.A., Palese, B., Bartosiak, M.: The dark side of digital transformation: the case of information systems education. In: Thirty Eighth International Conference on Information Systems, Seoul 201, pp. 1–20 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ramsey, E., McCole, P.: E‐business in professional SMEs: the case of New Zealand. J. Small Bus. Enterp. Dev. 12, 528–544 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Wang, T., Jong, M.S., Towey, D.: Challenges to flipped classroom adoption in Hong Kong secondary schools. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering (TALE), pp. 108–110 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Koehler, M.J., Mishra, P., Kereluik, K., Shin, T.S., Graham, C.R.: The Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Framework. In: Spector, J.M., Merrill, M.D., Elen, J., Bishop, M.J. (eds.) Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, pp. 101–111. Springer, New York (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  43. Buabeng-Andoh, C.: Factors influencing teachers’ adoption and integration of information and communication technology into teaching: a review of the literature. Int. J. Educ. Dev. Using ICT 8, 136–155 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Arbaugh, J.B., Duray, R.: Technological and structural characteristics, student learning and satisfaction with web-based courses. Manag. Learn. 33, 331–347 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Curaj, A., Georghiou, L., Cassingena Harper, J., Egron-Polak, E. (eds.): Mergers and Alliances in Higher Education. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13135-1

    Book  Google Scholar 

  46. Beck, H.P., Milligan, M.: Factors influencing the institutional commitment of online students. Internet High. Educ. 20, 51–56 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henning Brink .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Vogelsang, K., Brink, H., Packmohr, S. (2020). Measuring the Barriers to the Digital Transformation in Management Courses – A Mixed Methods Study. In: Buchmann, R.A., Polini, A., Johansson, B., Karagiannis, D. (eds) Perspectives in Business Informatics Research. BIR 2020. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 398. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61140-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61140-8_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-61139-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-61140-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics