Smart cities are often criticized for preoccupation with technology, for ignoring the negative effects of technology, for irrelevance to the needs of the poor, and for ubiquitous data collection creating perfect conditions for surveillance societies and autocratic states. In response, cities pursue smartness and sustainability simultaneously, becoming global (by participation in global digital networks) and local (by addressing local needs and circumstances) at the same time. In the pursuit of smart sustainable cities, they make explicit policy decisions about how technology should serve their residents, businesses and visitors, and avoid disrupting them. Many decisions are about standards—which standards should be followed and how, and increasingly, standards and policy guidelines are adopted by cities from international organizations, circumventing national authorities. This chapter reviews international standards and policy guidelines published by international standards organizations or intergovernmental bodies, with stated goals to support member states in the development and management of smart sustainable cities. We conducted the review through exploratory research and comparative policy analysis. The result could be used to raise awareness and address knowledge needs among city managers, policy analysts, and smart city researchers.
- Smart cities
- Smart sustainable cities
- International standards
- International policy guidelines
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use onlyLearn about institutional subscriptions
ISO, https://www.iso.org/home.html, last visited 2020-02-01.
ITU, https://www.itu.int/en/Pages/default.aspx, last visited 2020-02-01.
EC, https://ec.europa.eu/, last visited 2020-02-01.
UNESCWA, https://www.unescwa.org/, last visited 2020-02-01.
BRICS Countries—Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa, http://infobrics.org/, last visited 2020-02-01.
“A biophilic city is more than simply a biodiverse city. It is a place that learns from nature and emulates natural systems, incorporates natural forms and images into its buildings and cityscapes, and designs and plans in conjunction with nature. A biophilic city cherishes the natural features that already exist but also works to restore and repair what has been lost or degraded”, from “Biophilic Cities”, by Timothy Beatly, ISBN: 9781597267144, https://islandpress.org/books/biophilic-cities, last visited 2020-02-01.
Austrian Society for Environment and Technology. (2015). Smart City STANDARDS – standardization for the sustainable development of cities and municipalities. Retrieved February 06, 2020, from https://www.oegut.at/de/projekte/bauen/sc_standards.php.
Azevedo Guedes, A. L., Carvalho Alvarenga, J., Goulart, M. d. S. S., Rodriguez y Rodriguez, M. V., & Soares, C. A. P. (2018). Smart cities: The main drivers for increasing the intelligence of cities. Sustainability, 10(3121), 19.
Bareño, J., Lindner, R., Kempen, B., Klien, E., & Dambruch, J.. (2016). D2.1 – The scope of Smart City standardization V1.
Bertot, J., Estevez, E., & Janowski, T. (2016). Digital Public Service Innovation: Framework Proposal. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, Montevideo, Uruguay, 1–3 March 2016, page 113–122, ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/2910019.2910108.
Bosch, P., Jongeneel, S., Rovers, V., Neumann, H.-M., Airaksinen, M., & Huovila, A.. (2017). CITYkeys indicators for smart city projects and smart cities2017.
British Standards Institute. (2015). PD 8100:2015 – Smart cities overview – Guide.
Bureau of Indian Standards. (2017). Pre-standardization study report technical requirements analysis of unified, secure & resilient ICT framework for smart infrastructure, New Delhi.
Capgemini. (2012). What is a standard? What is a policy? Retrieved February 03, 2020, from https://www.capgemini.com/2012/10/what-is-a-standard-what-is-a-policy/#%22.
Chauhan, R., Estevez, E., & Janowski, T. (2008). A Model for Policy Interventions in Support of Electronic Governance. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, Cairo, Egypt, 1–4 December 2008, pages 199–205, ACM Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1509096.1509135.
Encyclopedia Britannica. (2020). Glocalization. Retrieved February 03, 2020, from https://www.britannica.com/topic/glocalization.
Estevez,, E., & Janowski, T. (2013). Electronic Governance for Sustainable Development – Conceptual Framework and State of Research. Government Information Quarterly, volume 30, supplement 1, pages S94–S109, Elsevier, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.11.001.
Estevez, E., Janowski, T., & Dzhusupova, Z. (2013). Electronic Governance for Sustainable Development – How EGOV Solutions Contribute to SD Goals? Proceedings of the 14th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, 17-20 June 2013, Quebec City, Canada, pages 92-101, ACM Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2479724.2479741.
Estevez, E., Vasco Lopes, N., & Janowski, T. (2016). Smart sustainable cities reconnaissance study.
ETSI. (2017). ETSI TS 103 463 V1.1.1. Eur. Telecommun. Stand. Inst., no. Access, Terminals, Transmission and Multiplexing (ATTM): Key performance indicators for sustainable digital multiservice cities.
Global Policy Journal and Observer Research Foundation. (2017). Smart cities movement in BRICS.
Hoornweg, M. V. D., Nunez, F., Freire, M., Palugyai, N., & Herrera, E. W. (2007). City indicators: Now to Nanjing.
Huovila, A., Bosch, P., & Airaksinen, M. (2019). Comparative analysis of standardized indicators for smart sustainable cities: What indicators and standards to use and when? Cities, 89, 141–153.
ISO. (2012a). ISO 39001:20012 Road traffic safety (RTS) management systems – Requirements with guidance for use.
ISO. (2012b). ISO 20121 – Event sustainability management system. Retrieved January 31, 2020, from http://www.iso20121.org/.
ISO. (2012c). ISO 13153:2012 – Framework of the design process for energy-saving single-family residential and small commercial buildings. Retrieved January 31, 2020, from https://www.iso.org/standard/53401.html.
ISO. (2012d). ISO 13153:2012 – Framework of the design process for energy-saving single-family resi-dential and small commercial buildings. Retrieved January 31, 2020, from https://www.iso.org/standard/41300.html.
ISO. (2018a). ISO 37120:2018 Sustainable cities and communities – Indicators for city services and quality of life.
ISO. (2018b). ISO 50001:2018 – Energy management system. Retrieved January 31, 2020, from https://www.iso.org/iso-50001-energy-management.html.
ISO. (2019a). ISO 37122:2019 Sustainable cities and communities – Indicators for smart cities.
ISO. (2019b). ISO/IEC 30146:2019 Information Technology – Smart city indicators.
ISO. (2020). ISO/IEC 21972:2020 Information Technology – Upper level ontology for smart city indicators.
ISO/IEC. (2014). Information Technology smart cities.
ITU. (2019). Smart sustainable cities. Retrieved February 01, 2020, from https://www.itu.int/en/mediacentre/backgrounders/Pages/smart-sustainable-cities.aspx.
ITU-T SG20. (2016). Recommendation ITU-T Y.4901/L.1601. Key performance indicators related to the use of information and communication technology in smart sustainable cities (p. 26).
ITU-T SG20. (2017). Key performance indicators for smart sustainable cities to assess the achievement of sustainable development goals. Recomm. ITU-T Y.4903/L.1603 (pp. 1–50).
Paola, R., Benevolo, C., Veglianti, E., & Li, Y. (2019). Technological forecasting & social change understanding smart cities as a glocal strategy: A comparison between Italy and China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 142, 26–41.
Smart City Standards Normung für die nachhaltige Entwicklung von Städten und Kommunen. (2015). (pp. 1–54).
Smiciklas, J., Ashirangkura, R., Hyodo, A., Walker-Turner, A., & Xu, L.. (2017) Implementing ITU-T international standards to shape smart sustainable cities: The case of Singapore.
The Government Summit. (2015). Smart cities: Regional perspectives. United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia, 1–100.
Torres, D., Guzmán, S., Smiciklas, J., & Cash, C.. (2017). Implementing ITU-T international standards to shape smart sustainable cities: The case of Dubai.
Tritthart, W., Thielen, P., Storch, A., Schrattenecker, I., & Purker, L.. (2015). Smart City Standards Normung für die nachhaltige Entwicklung von Städten und Kommunen.
WHO. (2015). Global status report on road safety 2015. Glob. Status Rep. Road Saf. 2015, no. ISBN 978 92 4 156506 6 (p. 340).
Worldsensing. (2019). The quick guide to smart city standards. Retrieved February 03, 2020, from https://blog.worldsensing.com/smart-cities/smartcitystandards/.
Yigitcanlar, T., Kamruzzamanf, M., Buysb, L., Ioppoloc, G., Sabatini-Marquesd, J., Costad, E. M., & Yune, J. H. J. (2018). Understanding ‘smart cities’: Intertwining development drivers with desired outcomes in a multidimensional framework. Cities, 81, 145–160.
Editors and Affiliations
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Estevez, E., Cenci, K., Fillottrani, P., Janowski, T. (2021). Review of International Standards and Policy Guidelines for Smart Sustainable Cities. In: Estevez, E., Pardo, T.A., Scholl, H.J. (eds) Smart Cities and Smart Governance. Public Administration and Information Technology, vol 37. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61033-3_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-61032-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-61033-3