Abstract
While in recent years both environmental footprints and planetary boundaries have gained tremendous popularity throughout the ecological and environmental sciences, their relationship remains largely unexplored. By investigating the roots and developments of environmental footprints and planetary boundaries, this chapter challenges the isolation of the two research fields and provides novel insights into the complementary use of them. Our analysis demonstrates that knowledge of planetary boundaries improves the policy relevance of environmental footprints by providing a set of consensus-based estimates of the regenerative and absorptive capacity at the global scale and, in reverse, that the planetary boundaries framework (PBF) benefits from well-grounded footprint models which allow for more accurate and reliable estimates of human pressure or impact on the planet’s environment. A framework for integration of environmental footprints and planetary boundaries is thus proposed, which lays the foundation for evolving environmental impact assessment to environmental sustainability assessment aimed at measuring the sustainability gap between current magnitudes of human activities and associated capacity thresholds. This chapter also proposes a research agenda that will further scientific discussions on how to set practical and tangible policy targets for adaptation and mitigation of worldwide environmental unsustainability.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ahlroth S (2014) The use of valuation and weighting sets in environmental impact assessment. Resour Conserv Recycl 85:34–41
Allen M (2009) Tangible targets are critical. Nature Rep Climate Change 3:114–115
Barbier EB, Burgess JC, Folke C (1994) Paradise lost?—The ecological economics of biodiversity. Earthscan, London, UK
Barnosky AD, Hadly EA, Bascompte J, Berlow EL, Brown JH, Fortelius M, Getz WM, Harte J, Hastings A, Marquet PA, Martinez ND, Mooers A, Roopnarine P, Vermeij G, Williams JW, Gillespie R, Kitzes J, Marshall C, Matzke N, Mindell DP, Revilla E, Smith AB (2012) Approaching a state shift in Earth’s biosphere. Nature 486:52–58
Biermann F (2012) Planetary boundaries and earth system governance: exploring the links. Ecol Econ 81:4–9
Borucke M, Moore D, Cranston G, Gracey K, Iha K, Larson J, Lazarus E, Morales JC, Wackernagel M, Galli A (2013) Accounting for demand and supply of the biosphere’s regenerative capacity: the National Footprint Accounts’ underlying methodology and framework. Ecol Ind 24:518–533
Brook BW, Ellis EC, Perring MP, Mackay AW, Blomqvist L (2013) Does the terrestrial biosphere have planetary tipping points? Trends Ecol Evol 28:396–401
Catton W (1986) Carrying capacity and the limits to freedom. Soc Ecol Session 1:XI. World Congress of Sociology. New Delhi, India
Costanza R (2000) The dynamics of the ecological footprint concept. Ecol Econ 32:341–345
Costanza R, Patten BC (1995) Defining and predicting sustainability. Ecol Econ 15:193–196
Daily GC, Ehrlich PR (1992) Population, sustainability, and Earth’s carrying capacity. Bioscience 42:761–771
Daly HE (1990) Toward some operational principles of sustainable development. Ecol Econ 2:1–6
De Vries W, Kros J, Kroeze C, Seitzinger SP (2013) Assessing planetary and regional nitrogen boundaries related to food security and adverse environmental impacts. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 5:392–402
Ehrlich PR (1982) Human carrying capacity, extinctions, and nature reserves. Bioscience 32:331–333
Erb K-H, Haberl H, Defries R, Ellis EC, Krausmann F, Verburg PH (2012) Pushing the planetary boundaries. Science 338:1419–1420
Ewing BR, Hawkins TR, Wiedmann TO, Galli A, Ercin AE, Weinzettel J, Steen-Olsen K (2012) Integrating ecological and water footprint accounting in a multi-regional input–output framework. Ecol Ind 23:1–8
Fang K, Heijungs R (2015) Rethinking the relationship between footprints and LCA. Environ Sci Technol 49:10–11
Fang K, Heijungs R, De Snoo GR (2014) Theoretical exploration for the combination of the ecological, energy, carbon, and water footprints: overview of a footprint family. Ecol Ind 36:508–518
Fischer J, Manning AD, Steffen W, Rose DB, Daniell K, Felton A, Garnett S, Gilna B, Heinsohn R, Lindenmayer DB, MacDonald B, Mills F, Newell B, Reid J, Robin L, Sherren K, Wade A (2007) Mind the sustainability gap. Trends Ecol Evol 22:621–624
Galli A, Wiedmann T, Ercin E, Knoblauch D, Ewing E, Giljum S (2012) Integrating ecological, carbon and water footprint into a “Footprint Family” of indicators: definition and role in tracking human pressure on the planet. Ecol Ind 16:100–112
Gerbens-Leenes W, Hoekstra AY, Van der Meer TH (2009) The water footprint of bioenergy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:10219–10223
Germain M, Van Steenberghe V (2003) Constraining equitable allocations of tradable CO2 emission quotas by acceptability. Environ Resour Econ 26:469–492
Goldfinger S, Wackernagel M, Galli A, Lazarus E, Lin D (2014) Footprint facts and fallacies: a response to Giampietro and Saltelli (2014) “Footprints to Nowhere” . Ecol Ind 46:622–632
Goodland R, Daly H (1996) Environmental sustainability: universal and non-negotiable. Ecol Appl 6:1002–1017
Guttikunda SK, Tang Y, Carmichael GR, Kurata G, Pan L, Streets DG, Woo J-H, Thongboonchoo N, Fried A (2005) Impacts of Asian megacity emissions on regional air quality during spring 2001. J Geophys Res 110:D20301–D20301
Hadian S, Madani K (2015) A system of systems approach to energy sustainability assessment: are all renewables really green? Ecol Ind 52:194–206
Heijungs R, Frischknecht R (1998) A special view on the nature of the allocation problem. Int J Life Cycle Assess 3:321–332
Heijungs R, De Koning A, Guinée JB (2014) Maximizing affluence within the planetary boundaries. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:1331–1335
Hellweg S, I Canals LM (2014) Emerging approaches, challenges and opportunities in life cycle assessment. Science 344:1109–1113
Hoekstra AY (2009) Human appropriation of natural capital: a comparison of ecological footprint and water footprint analysis. Ecol Econ 68:1963–1974
Hoekstra AY, Hung PQ (2002) Virtual water trade: a quantification of virtual water flows between nations in relation to international crop trade. Value of water research report series (No. 11), UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education, Delft, The Netherlands
Hoekstra AY, Mekonnen MM (2012) The water footprint of humanity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:3232–3237
Hoekstra AY, Wiedmann TO (2014) Humanity’s unsustainable environmental footprint. Science 344:1114–1117
Hoekstra AY, Mekonnen MM, Chapagain AK, Mathews RE, Richter BD (2012) Global monthly water scarcity: blue water footprints versus blue water availability. PLoS ONE 7:e32688–e32688
Hughes TP, Carpenter S, Rockström J, Scheffer M, Walker B (2013) Multiscale regime shifts and planetary boundaries. Trends Ecol Evol 28:389–395
IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change. Working group III contribution to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, New York, USA
Kates RW, Clark WC, Corell R, Hall JM, Jaeger CC, Lowe I, McCarthy JJ, Schellnhuber HJ, Bolin B, Dickson NM, Faucheux S, Gallopin GC, Grübler A, Huntley B, Jäger J, Jodha NS, Kasperson RE, Mabogunje A, Matson P, Mooney H, Moore BIII, O’Riordan T, Svedin U (2001) Environment and development: sustainability science. Science 292:641–642
Kissinger M, Rees WE, Timmer V (2011) Interregional sustainability: governance and policy in an ecologically interdependent world. Environ Sci Policy 14:965–976
Kitzes J, Wackernagel M (2009) Answers to common questions in ecological footprint accounting. Ecol Ind 9:812–817
Kosoy N, Brown PG, Bosselmann K, Duraiappah A, Mackey B, Martinez-Alier J, Rogers D, Thomson R (2012) Pillars for a flourishing Earth: planetary boundaries, economic growth delusion and green economy. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 4:74–79
Kratena K (2004) Ecological value added’ in an integrated ecosystem–economy model—an indicator for sustainability. Ecol Econ 48:189–200
Lancker E, Nijkamp P (2000) A policy scenario analysis of sustainable agricultural development options: a case study for Nepal. Impact Assess Project Appraisal 18:111–124
Laurent A, Olsen SI, Hauschild MZ (2012) Limitations of carbon footprint as indicator of environmental sustainability. Environ Sci Technol 46:4100–4108
Leach AM, Galloway JN, Bleeker A, Erisman JW, Kohn R, Kitzes J (2012) A nitrogen footprint model to help consumers understand their role in nitrogen losses to the environment. Environ Develop 1:40–66
Lenton TM, Williams HT (2013) On the origin of planetary-scale tipping points. Trends Ecol Evol 28:380–382
Lenzen M, Murray SA (2001) A modified ecological footprint method and its application to Australia. Ecol Econ 37:229–255
Lenzen M, Moran D, Kanemoto K, Foran B, Lobefaro L, Geschke A (2012) International trade drives biodiversity threats in developing nations. Nature 486:109–112
Lewis SL (2012) We must set planetary boundaries wisely. Nature 485:417–417
Liu C, Kroeze C, Hoekstra AY, Gerbens-Leenes W (2012) Past and future trends in grey water footprints of anthropogenic nitrogen and phosphorus inputs to major world rivers. Ecol Ind 18:42–49
Meadows DH, Meadow DL, Randers J, Behrens W (1972) The limits to growth. Universe Books, New York, USA
Minx J, Baiocchi G, Wiedmann T, Barrett J, Creutzig F, Feng K, Förster M, Pichler P-P, Weisz H, Hubacek K (2013) Carbon footprints of cities and other human settlements in the UK. Environ Res Lett 8:035039–035039
Moldan B, Janoušková S, Hák T (2012) How to understand and measure environmental sustainability: Indicators and targets. Ecol Ind 17:4–13
Molden D (2009) The devil is in the detail. Nat Rep Climate Change 3:116–117
Moran DD, Wackernagel M, Kitzes JA, Goldfinger SH, Boutaud A (2008) Measuring sustainable development—Nation by nation. Ecol Econ 64:470–474
Niccolucci V, Bastianoni S, Tiezzi EBP, Wackernagel M, Marchettini N (2009) How deep is the footprint? A 3D representation. Ecol Model 220:2819–2823
Nykvist B, Persson Å, Moberg F, Persson L, Cornell S, Rockström J (2013) National environmental performance on planetary boundaries: a study for the Swedish environmental protection agency. Stockholm Resilience Center & Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
Parry M, Lowe J, Hanson C (2009) Overshoot, adapt and recover. Nature 458:1102–1103
Peters GP (2010) Carbon footprints and embodied carbon at multiple scales. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 2:245–250
Rees WE (1992) Ecological footprint and appropriated carrying capacity: what urban economics leaves out. Environ Urbanization 4:121–130
Rees WE (1996) Revisiting carrying capacity: area-based indicators of sustainability. Popul Environ 17:195–215
Ridoutt BG, Pfister S (2013) Towards an integrated family of footprint indicators. J Ind Ecol 17:337–339
Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson Å, Chapin FS III, Lambin EF, Lenton TM, Scheffer M, Folke C, Schellnhuber HJ, Nykvist B, De Wit CA, Hughes T, Van der Leeuw S, Rodhe H, Sörlin S, Snyder PK, Costanza R, Svedin U, Falkenmark M, Karlberg L, Corell RW, Fabry VJ, Hansen J, Walker B, Liverman D, Richardson K, Crutzen P, Foley JA (2009a) A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461:472–475
Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson Å, Chapin FS III, Lambin E, Lenton TM, Scheffer M, Folke C, Schellnhuber HJ, Nykvist B, De Wit CA, Hughes T, Van der Leeuw S, Rodhe H, Sörlin S, Snyder PK, Costanza R, Svedin U, Falkenmark M, Karlberg L, Corell RW, Fabry VJ, Hansen J, Walker B, Liverman D, Richardson K, Crutzen P, Foley J (2009b) Planetary boundaries: exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecology and Society 14:32–32
Rogelj J, McCollum D, O’Neill BC, Riahi K (2013) 2020 emissions levels required to limit warming to below 2 ℃. Nat Climate Change 3:405–412
Smeets E, Weterings R (1999) Environmental indicators: typology and overview. Technical report (No. 25). TNO Centre for Strategy, Technology and Policy, The Netherlands
Steffen W, Stafford Smith M (2013) Planetary boundaries, equity and global sustainability: why wealthy countries could benefit from more equity. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 5:403–408
UNEP (2013) The emissions gap report 2013: a UNEP synthesis report https://www.unep.org/pdf/UNEPEmissionsGapReport2013.pdf.
Wackernagel M, Rees WE (1996) Our ecological footprint: reducing human impact on the earth. New Society, Gabriola Island, British Columbia, Canada
Wackernagel M, Rees WE (1997) Perceptual and structural barriers to investing in natural capital: economics from an ecological footprint perspective. Ecol Econ 20:3–24
Wang F, Sims JT, Ma L, Ma W, Dou Z, Zhang F (2011) The phosphorus footprint of China’s food chain: implications for food security, natural resource management, and environmental quality. J Environ Qual 40:1081–1089
Wiedmann T, Lenzen M (2007) On the conversion between local and global hectares in ecological footprint analysis. Ecol Econ 60:673–677
Wiedmann T, Minx J (2008) A definition of ‘carbon footprint’ . In: Pertsova CC (ed) Ecological economics research trends. Nova Science Publishers, Hauppauge, New York, USA, pp 1–11
Wiedmann TO, Schandl H, Lenzen M, Moran D, Suh S, West J, Kanemoto K (2015) The material footprint of nations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112:6271–6276
Zijp MC, Posthuma L, Van de Meent D (2014) Definition and applications of a versatile chemical pollution footprint methodology. Environ Sci Technol 48:10588–10597
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fang, K. (2021). Understanding the Complementarities of Environmental Footprints and Planetary Boundaries. In: Environmental Footprints. SpringerBriefs in Environmental Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61018-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61018-0_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-61017-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-61018-0
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)