Skip to main content

What Is Positron Emission Tomography?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
PET/CT and PET/MR in Melanoma and Sarcoma

Abstract

The scientific basis of nuclear medicine is the radiotracer, with its union of a pharmaceutical and a radionuclide. There are a number of existing tracers approved for use in the United States and elsewhere, but by far the most commonly used (and the only one used for melanoma and sarcoma) is fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG). FDG is a positron emitter, with the emitted positron being annihilated and producing two photons detected by the ring of detectors in the PET scanner. The PET is done together with a CT scan, which is used for both anatomic localization and attenuation correction. FDG is selectively taken up by cancer cells due to their heavy anaerobic metabolism, though other causes such as inflammation can also produce an increase in uptake. Common alterations in biodistribution include elevated glucose levels and/or insulin secretion and brown fat activation. The SUV (standardized uptake value) has been created as a semiquantitative measure of local uptake, correlates with prognosis, and is sometimes used for therapy assessment, but has technical problems resulting in significant variability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mettler FA, Guiberteau MJ. Radioactivity, radionuclides, and radiopharmaceuticals. In: Essentials of nuclear medicine. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2019. p. 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mettler FA, Guiberteau MJ. Hybrid PET/CT neoplasm imaging. In: Essentials of nuclear medicine. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2019. p. 328–61.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Mettler FA, Guiberteau MJ. Instrumentation and quality control. In: Essentials of nuclear medicine. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2019. p. 19–59.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Macpherson RE, Pratap S, Tyrrell H, Khonsari M, Wilson S, Gibbons M, et al. Retrospective audit of 957 consecutive (18)F-FDG PET-CT scans compared to CT and MRI in 493 patients with different histological subtypes of bone and soft tissue sarcoma. Clin Sarcoma Res. 2018;8:9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Burger IA, Huser DM, Burger C, von Schulthess GK, Buck A. Repeatability of FDG quantification in tumor imaging: averaged SUVs are superior to SUVmax. Nucl Med Biol. 2012;39(5):666–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Schmitt RJ, Kreidler SM, Glueck DH, Amaria RN, Gonzalez R, Lewis K, et al. Correlation between early 18F-FDG PET/CT response to BRAF and MEK inhibition and survival in patients with BRAF-mutant metastatic melanoma. Nucl Med Commun. 2016;37(2):122–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Zukotynski K, Yap JT, Giobbie-Hurder A, Weber J, Gonzalez R, Gajewski TF, et al. Metabolic response by FDG-PET to imatinib correlates with exon 11 KIT mutation and predicts outcome in patients with mucosal melanoma. Cancer Imaging. 2014;14:30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Malik D, Sood A, Mittal BR, Basher RK, Bhattacharya A, Singh G. Role of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in restaging and prognosis of recurrent melanoma after curative surgery. World J Nucl Med. 2019;18(2):176–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kang S, Ahn BC, Hong CM, Song BI, Lee HJ, Jeong SY, et al. Can (18)F-FDG PET/CT predict recurrence in patients with cutaneous malignant melanoma? Nuklearmedizin. 2011;50(3):116–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Son SH, Kang SM, Jeong SY, Lee SW, Lee SJ, Lee J, et al. Prognostic value of volumetric parameters measured by pretreatment 18F FDG PET/CT in patients with cutaneous malignant melanoma. Clin Nucl Med. 2016;41(6):e266–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hwang JP, Lim I, Kong CB, Jeon DG, Byun BH, Kim BI, et al. Prognostic value of SUVmax measured by pretreatment Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with Ewing sarcoma. PLoS One. 2016;11(4):e0153281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kubo T, Furuta T, Johan MP, Ochi M. Prognostic significance of (18)F-FDG PET at diagnosis in patients with soft tissue sarcoma and bone sarcoma; systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer. 2016;58:104–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen L, Wu X, Ma X, Guo L, Zhu C, Li Q. Prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET-CT-based functional parameters in patients with soft tissue sarcoma: a meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(6):e5913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jorge Daniel Oldan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Oldan, J.D., Ivanovic, M., Khandani, A.H. (2021). What Is Positron Emission Tomography?. In: Khandani, A.H. (eds) PET/CT and PET/MR in Melanoma and Sarcoma. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60429-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60429-5_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-60428-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-60429-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics