Skip to main content

Shifting the Balance-of-Power in STV Elections

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Electronic Voting (E-Vote-ID 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNSC,volume 12455))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 690 Accesses

Abstract

In the context of increasing automation of Australian electoral processes, and accusations of deliberate interference in elections in Europe and the USA, it is worthwhile understanding how little a change in the recorded ballots could change an election result. In this paper we construct manipulations of the ballots in order to change the overall balance of power in an Australian Federal Senate election – the upper house of Parliament. This gives, hopefully tight, over-estimations of the Margin of Victory (MOV) for the party or coalition winning the Senate. This is critical information for determining how well we can trust the reported results, and how much auditing should be applied to the election process to be certain that it reports the true result. The challenge arising in Australian Federal Senate elections is that they use a complicated Single Transferable Vote (STV) method for which it is intractable to compute the true MOV, hence we must rely on greedy methods to find small manipulations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Where \(\delta ^m_i > \varDelta _{i,j}\), we reset \(\delta ^m_i\) to \(\lceil \varDelta _{i,j} / \gamma \rceil \).

References

  1. Blom, M., Conway, A., Stuckey, P.J., Teague, V.J.: Did that lost ballot box cost me a seat? Computing manipulations of STV elections. In: IAAI (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Blom, M., Stuckey, P.J., Teague, V.J.: Computing the margin of victory in preferential parliamentary elections. In: Krimmer, R., Volkamer, M., Cortier, V., Goré, R., Hapsara, M., Serdült, U., Duenas-Cid, D. (eds.) E-Vote-ID 2018. LNCS, vol. 11143, pp. 1–16. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00419-4_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Blom, M., Stuckey, P.J., Teague, V.: Towards computing the margin of victory in STV elections. Inf. J. Comput. 31(4), 636–653 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Conway, A.: Australian federal senate simulator. https://github.com/SiliconEconometrics/PublicService (2019). Accessed Aug 2019

  5. Miragliotta, N.L.: Little differences, big effects: An example of the importance of choice of method for transferring surplus votes in PR-STV voting systems. Representation 41, 15–24 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Australian federal senate election rules (2019). www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/cea1918233/s273.html. Accessed Aug 2019

  7. Weeks, L.: Tolerable chance or undesirable arbitrariness? Distributing surplus votes under PR-STV. Parliamentary Aff. 64, 530–551 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Xia, L.: Computing the margin of victory for various voting rules. In: Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, EC 2012, pp. 982–999. ACM, New York (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michelle Blom .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Blom, M., Conway, A., Stuckey, P.J., Teague, V.J. (2020). Shifting the Balance-of-Power in STV Elections. In: Krimmer, R., et al. Electronic Voting. E-Vote-ID 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12455. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60347-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60347-2_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-60346-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-60347-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics