Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Oxymoron of the Internet Voting in Illiberal and Hybrid Political Contexts

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Electronic Voting (E-Vote-ID 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNSC,volume 12455))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper explores the phenomenon of e-voting, in particular, new i-voting technologies, within the context of hybrid and authoritarian political regimes. While e-voting and i-voting are not particularly widespread, more and more illiberal countries are implementing these innovations, which has been overlooked in the academia so far. The paper attempts to fill in this gap. Firstly, we provide a general overview of the problem and identify the key features of non-democracies adopting e-voting and i-voting. Secondly, we explore the case of Russia, a hybrid regime, which may become a role model for other countries in the near future. The research exposes the potential of e-voting, and in particular, i-voting as a tool for the regime stability and provides some avenues of the future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.idea.int/data-tools/data/icts-elections.

  2. 2.

    Krivonosova I.: E-voting in Moscow: A Gratuitous Gimmick—RIDDLE. (n.d.). Retrieved June 2, 2020, from https://www.ridl.io/en/e-voting-in-moscow-a-gratuitous-gimmick/.

  3. 3.

    Krivonosova I.: E-voting in Moscow: A Gratuitous Gimmick—RIDDLE. (n.d.). Retrieved June 2, 2020, from https://www.ridl.io/en/e-voting-in-moscow-a-gratuitous-gimmick/.

  4. 4.

    V Gosdumu Vnesli Zakonoproekt o Testiro-vanii Elektronnogo Golosovaniya v Moskve – Vedomosti. (n.d.). Retrieved June 2, 2020, from https://www.vedomosti.ru/politics/news/2019/02/26/795201-elektronnogo-golosovaniya.

  5. 5.

    Moskvichi s 3 po 9 iyunya smogut vybrat' okruga dlya provedeniya elektronnogo goloso-vaniya—Moskva—TASS. (n.d.). Retrieved June 9, 2020, from https://tass.ru/moskva/6489105.

  6. 6.

    Cel' eksperimenta po vnedreniyu distancionnogo elektronnogo golosovaniya na vy-borah v Mosgordumu – sozdat' dlya moskvichej dopolnitel'nye vozmozhnosti realiza-cii aktivnogo izbiratel'nogo prava. (n.d.). Retrieved June 9, 2020, from https://duma.mos.ru/ru/34/news/novosti/tsel-eksperimenta-po-vnedreniyu-distantsionnogo-elektronnogo-golosovaniya-na-vyiborah-v-mosgordumu-sozdat-dlya-moskvichey-dopolnitelnyie-vozmojnosti-realizatsii-aktivnogo-izbiratelnogo-prava.

  7. 7.

    A. Shaposhnikov: Elektronnoe golosovanie pozvolit kolossal'no podnyat' yavku na vyborah deputatov Mosgordumy—Agentstvo gorodskih novostej «Moskva»—Informacionnoe agentstvo. (n.d.). Retrieved June 7, 2020, from https://www.mskagency.ru/materials/2884983.

  8. 8.

    Aleksej Naval'nyj—Oficial'no: U nas est' to, chego byt' ne dolzhno. «Elektron-noe golosovanie» polnost'yu skomprometirovano. (n.d.). Retrieved June 9, 2020, from https://navalny.com/p/6234/.

  9. 9.

    Dnevnoj fal'sifikat. Dmitrij Oreshkin ob"yasnyaet, kak vvedenie elektronnogo go-losovaniya pomozhet vlastyam vyigriyvat' vybory. (n.d.). Retrieved June 9, 2020, from https://novayagazeta.ru/articles/2020/05/14/85376-dnevnoy-falsifikat.

  10. 10.

     «Okej, golosujte bumazhno» Aleksej Venediktov otvetil na kritiku internet-vyborov v Mosgordumu. My poprosili ekspertov proverit' ego zayavleniya—Meduza. (n.d.). Retrieved June 7, 2020, from https://meduza.io/feature/2019/07/01/okey-golosuyte-bumazhno.

  11. 11.

    Eksperty prokommentirovali otkaz v registracii kandidatov na vyborah v MGD - RIA Novosti. 31.07.2019. (n.d.). Retrieved June 9, 2020, from https://ria.ru/20190731/1557026300.html.

  12. 12.

     «Edinaya Rossiya» ne vydvinula ni odnogo kandidata v Mosgordumu No frakciya edi-norosov v stolichnom parlamente vse ravno budet —Meduza. (n.d.). Retrieved June 8, 2020, from https://meduza.io/feature/2019/06/13/edinaya-rossiya-ne-vydvinula-ni-odnogo-kandidata-v-mosgordumu.

  13. 13.

    Meriya Obeshchala Prozrachnoe Internet-Golosovanie v Moskve. V Itoge Ona Mozhet Opublikovat' Lyubye Rezul'ta-ty, i Proverit' Ih Nikto Ne Smozhet — Meduza. (n.d.). Retrieved June 2, 2020, from https://meduza.io/feature/2019/09/06/meriya-obeschala-prozrachnoe-internet-golosovanie-v-moskve-v-itoge-ona-mozhet-opublikovat-lyubye-rezultaty-i-proverit-ih-nikto-ne-smozhet.

  14. 14.

    Onlajn-Golosovanie v Moskve Dvazhdy Priostanavlivali Iz-Za Sboya - Novosti – Politika – Kommersant. (n.d.). Retrieved June 2, 2020, from https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/4086901.

  15. 15.

    V Moskve Podveli Itogi Eksperimenta s Elektron-nym Golosovaniem — Rossijskaya Gazeta. (n.d.). Retrieved June 1, 2020, from https://rg.ru/2019/09/09/reg-cfo/v-moskve-podveli-itogi-eksperimenta-s-elektronnym-golosovaniem.html.

  16. 16.

    Urnoterapiya. Poluchiv psihologicheskuyu travmu god nazad, vlast' stala otsekat' negativnye scenarii na dal'nih podstupah k uchastkam. CHto iz etogo vyshlo. (n.d.). Retrieved June 9, 2020, from https://novayagazeta.ru/articles/2019/09/10/81915-urnoterapiya?utm_source=tg&utm_medium=novaya&utm_campaign=matematik-sergey-shpilkin-proanalizirova.

  17. 17.

    Bolee 548 tysyach chelovek podali zayavki na uchastie v onlajn-golosovanii—Parlamentskaya gazeta. (n.d.). Retrieved June 7, 2020, from https://www.pnp.ru/social/bolee-548-tysyach-chelovek-podali-zayavki-na-uchastie-v-onlayn-golosovanii.html.

  18. 18.

    Federal'nyj zakon ot 23 maya 2020 g. N 152-FZ “O provedenii eksperimenta po organizacii i osushchestvleniyu distancionnogo elektronnogo golosovaniya v gorode federal'nogo znacheniya Moskve”—Rossijskaya gazeta. (n.d.). Retrieved June 7, 2020, from https://rg.ru/2020/05/25/fz-o-golosovanii-v-moskve-dok.html.

  19. 19.

    Elektronnoe golosovanie na dovyborah v Gosdumu projdet v Kurskoj i YAroslavskoj oblastyah. (n.d.). Retrieved June 13, 2020, from http://actualcomment.ru/elektronnoe-golosovanie-na-dovyborakh-v-gosdumu-proydet-v-kurskoy-i-yaroslavskoy-oblastyakh-2007271358.html?fbclid=IwAR0UdmWrTsGKVDB8x4_ycnwRBOuz_KH4GNPQWYuIcHkC0wzuTCRgQZXnyxQ.

References

  1. Keremoğlu, E., Weidmann, N.B.: How dictators control the internet: a review essay. Comp. Polit. Stud. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414020912278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rød, E.G., Weidmann, N.B.: Empowering activists or autocrats? The Internet in authoritarian regimes. J. Peace Res. 52(3), 338–351 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Karlsson, M.: Carrots and sticks: internet governance in non–democratic regimes. Int. J. Electron. Gov. 6(3), 179–186 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Toepfl, F.: Innovating consultative authoritarianism: internet votes as a novel digital tool to stabilize non-democratic rule in Russia. New Media Soc. 20(3), 956–972 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Christensen, B.: Cyber state capacity: a model of authoritarian durability, ICTs, and emerging media. Govern. Inf. Q. 36(3), 460–468 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Krimmer, R., Duenas-Cid, D., Krivonosova, I.: Debate: safeguarding democracy during pandemics. Social distancing, postal, or internet voting—the good, the bad or the ugly? Public Money Manage. 1–3 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Goos, K., Beckert, B., Lindner, R.: Electronic, internet-based voting. In: Lindner, R., Aichholzer, G., Hennen, L. (eds.) Electronic Democracy in Europe, pp. 135–184. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27419-5_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Krimmer, R.: A structure for new voting technologies: what they are, how they are used and why. In: Bergener, K., Räckers, M., Stein, A. (eds.) The Art of Structuring, pp. 421–426. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06234-7_39

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Berman, J., Weitzner, D.J.: Technology and democracy. Soc. Res. 64(3), 1313–1319 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Calingaert, D.: Authoritarianism vs. the internet. Pol. Rev. 14 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Diamond, L.: Liberation technology. J. Democr. 21(3), 69–83 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.0.0190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Grider, M.: Securing the vote: electronic voting in theory and practice. 9 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Vassil, K., Solvak, M., Vinkel, P., Trechsel, A.H., Alvarez, R.M.: The diffusion of internet voting. Usage patterns of internet voting in Estonia between 2005 and 2015. Gov. Inf. Q. 33(3), 453–459 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.06.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kornreich, Y.: Authoritarian responsiveness: Online consultation with “issue publics” in China. Governance 32(3), 547–564 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Truex, R.: Consultative authoritarianism and its limits. Comp. Polit. Stud. 50(3), 329–361 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414014534196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. MacKinnon, R.: Liberation technology: China’s “networked authoritarianism”. J. Democr. 22(2), 32–46 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Herrnson, P.S., et al.: Early appraisals of electronic voting. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 23(3), 274–292 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439305275850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kshetri, N., Voas, J.: Blockchain-enabled e-voting. IEEE Softw. 35(4), 95–99 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2018.2801546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cheeseman, N., Lynch, G., Willis, J.: Digital dilemmas: the unintended consequences of election technology. Democratization 25(8), 1397–1418 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Oostveen, A.M., van den Besselaar, P.: The academic debate on electronic voting in a socio-political context. In: E-Vote-ID 2019. 17 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Binte Haq, H., McDermott, R., Taha Ali, S.: Pakistan’s internet voting experiment. arXiv:1907.07765 (2019)

  22. Al Siyabi, M., Al Jabri, N., Al-Shihi, H., Al-Khod, A. K.: The uptake of voting participations in oman through e-voting. In: The International Information Systems Conference (iiSC) 2011 Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Al-Khouri, A.M., Authority, E.I., Dhabi, A.: E-voting in UAE FNC elections: a case study. Inf. Knowl. Manage. 2(6), 25–84 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kassen, M.: Politicization of e-voting rejection: reflections from Kazakhstan. Transform. Gov. People Process Policy 14, 305–330 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schedler, A.: Elections without democracy: the menu of manipulation. J. Democr. 13(2), 36–50 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Schedler, A.: The Politics of Uncertainty: Sustaining and Subverting Electoral Authoritarianism. OUP, Oxford (2013)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Kneuer, M., Harnisch, S.: Diffusion of e-government and e-participation in Democracies and Autocracies. Global Policy 7(4), 548–556 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Dukalskis, A., Gerschewski, J.: What autocracies say (and what citizens hear): proposing four mechanisms of autocratic legitimation. Contemp. Polit. 23(3), 251–268 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gerschewski, J.: The three pillars of stability: legitimation, repression, and co-optation in autocratic regimes. Democratization 20(1), 13–38 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Gerschewski, J.: Legitimacy in autocracies: oxymoron or essential feature? Perspect. Polit. 16(3), 652–665 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. von Soest, C., Grauvogel, J.: Identity, procedures and performance: how authoritarian regimes legitimize their rule. Contemp. Polit. 23(3), 287–305 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Tannenberg, M., Bernhard, M., Gerschewski, J., Lührmann, A., Von Soest, C.: Regime Legitimation Strategies (RLS) 1900 to 2018. V-Dem Working Paper. 86 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wahman, M., Teorell, J., Hadenius, A.: Authoritarian regime types revisited: updated data in comparative perspective. Contemp. Polit. 19(1), 19–34 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Bader, M.: Do new voting technologies prevent fraud? Evidence from Russia. In: 2014 Electronic Voting Technology Workshop/Workshop on Trustworthy Elections (EVT/WOTE 2014) (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Dutton, W.H., Danziger, J.N.: Computers and Politics: High Technology in American Local Governments. Columbia University Press, New York (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Brancati, D.: Democratic authoritarianism: origins and effects. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 17, 313–326 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Gandhi, J., Lust-Okar, E.: Elections under authoritarianism. Ann. Rev. Polit. Sci. 12, 403–422 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ananyev, M., Poyker, M.: Do Dictators Signal Strength with Elections? (2018). SSRN 2712064

    Google Scholar 

  39. Gibson, J.P., Krimmer, R., Teague, V., Pomares, J.: A review of e-voting: the past, present and future. Ann. Telecommun. 71(7–8), 279–286 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Goodman, N., Stokes, L. C.: Reducing the cost of voting: an evaluation of internet voting’s effect on turnout. Br. J. Polit. Sci. 1–13 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123417000849

  41. Vassil, K., Weber, T.: A bottleneck model of e-voting: why technology fails to boost turnout. New Media Soc. 13(8), 1336–1354 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Solvak, M., Vassil, K.: Could internet voting halt declining electoral turnout? New evidence that e-voting is habit forming. Policy Internet 10(1), 4–21 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Germann, M., Serdült, U.: Internet voting and turnout: evidence from Switzerland. Electoral. Stud. 47, 1–12 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Reuter, O.J: Political Participation and the Survival of Electoral Authoritarian Regimes. http://ojreuter.com/wp-content/uploads/Turnout_Paper.pdf

  45. Frantz, E.: Voter turnout and opposition performance in competitive authoritarian elections. Electoral. Stud. 54, 218–225 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Heiberg, S., Martens, T., Vinkel, P., Willemson, J.: Improving the verifiability of the Estonian Internet Voting scheme. In: Krimmer, R., et al. (eds.) Electronic Voting. International Joint Conference on Electronic Voting, pp. 92–107. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52240-1_6

  47. Springall, D., et al.: Security analysis of the Estonian internet voting system. In: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pp. 703–715 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Bull, C., Gjøsteen, K., Nore, H.: Faults in Norwegian internet voting. In: E-Vote-ID 2018 Proceedings, pp. 166–169 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Ruijgrok, K.: From the web to the streets: internet and protests under authoritarian regimes. Democratization 24(3), 498–520 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Golosov, G.V.: The regional roots of electoral authoritarianism in Russia. Europe-Asia Stud. 63(4), 623–639 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Turchenko, M.: Electoral engineering in the russian regions (2003–2017). Europe-Asia Stud. 72(1), 80–98 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Ross, C.: Regional elections in Russia: instruments of authoritarian legitimacy or instability? Palgrave Commun. 4(1), 1–9 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  53. Maréchal, N.: Networked authoritarianism and the geopolitics of information: understanding Russian Internet policy. Media Commun. 5(1), 29–41 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Nocetti, J.: Russia’s’ dictatorship-of-the-law’ approach to internet policy. Internet Policy Rev. 4, 1–19 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Maerz, S.F.: The electronic face of authoritarianism: e-government as a tool for gaining legitimacy in competitive and non-competitive regimes. Gov. Inf. Q. 33(4), 727–735 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Chugunov, A.V., Kabanov, Y., Zenchenkova, K.: Russian e-petitions portal: exploring regional variance in use. In: Tambouris, E., et al. (eds.) Electronic Participation. International Conference on Electronic Participation, pp. 109–122. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45074-2_9

  57. Kabanov, Y., Chugunov, A. V.: Electronic “pockets of effectiveness”: e-governance and institutional change in St. Petersburg, Russia. In: Janssen, M., et al. (eds.) Electronic Government. International Conference on Electronic Government, pp. 386–398. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64677-0_32

  58. Coppedge, M., et al.: V-Dem [Country–Year/Country–Date] Dataset v10. Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project (2020). https://doi.org/10.23696/vdemds20

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia

    Bogdan Romanov

  2. National Research University Higher School of Economics, St. Petersburg, Russia

    Yury Kabanov

Authors
  1. Bogdan Romanov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yury Kabanov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yury Kabanov .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia

    Robert Krimmer

  2. Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Baden-Württemberg, Germany

    Melanie Volkamer

  3. Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Baden-Württemberg, Germany

    Bernhard Beckert

  4. University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany

    Ralf Küsters

  5. University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Oksana Kulyk

  6. Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia

    David Duenas-Cid

  7. University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia

    Mihkel Solvak

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Romanov, B., Kabanov, Y. (2020). The Oxymoron of the Internet Voting in Illiberal and Hybrid Political Contexts. In: Krimmer, R., et al. Electronic Voting. E-Vote-ID 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12455. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60347-2_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60347-2_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-60346-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-60347-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation