Skip to main content

‘The Optimal State of a Republic’: Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
In Search of the Utopian States of America

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Utopianism ((PASU))

  • 151 Accesses

Abstract

This opening chapter illustrates that the term ‘utopia’ is often used in relationship to the United States, despite there being little consensus on what precisely makes the Unites States utopian. I here highlight the most important premise for the upcoming discussion: that ‘utopia’ in the context of the United States refers to utopian practice, that is, to putting utopian visions into reality. Viewing utopian practice, in particular utopian communities, as part of the United States is somewhat paradoxical, since utopian communities originate in dissent with the status quo and therefore stand in an ambivalent relationship to their environment. Fiction about utopian practice casts a spotlight on whether the authors think that a good place can be created in the United States, and by what means. Instead of theorizing about agency and change from the perspective of a system that is up and running, these narratives specifically represent an uncertain moment of utopian production in which the members of the communities and their utopian visions encounter their historical context. In this friction, the texts relate the road to utopia on a practical level, as well as commenting on the mechanisms of the utopian imagination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    ‘Golden’ in the title of Thomas More’s Utopia (1516) is probably used figuratively to mean ‘valuable’ or ‘delightful.’ It may also be one of More’s jests; the utopians themselves do not value gold at all, so Vere Aureus may mean that the book is truly worthless, or that those who appreciate it are fools.

  2. 2.

    While the origins of the dystopian genre are intimately connected to utopian literature, dystopian literature draws on a different set of literary conventions (see Baccolini and Moylan 2013).

  3. 3.

    The term utopian communities was especially prevalent in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, which is the historical time span explored in this book. The idea that these communities are somehow utopian marks the overlap of communal studies and utopian studies to this day (e.g., Claeys 2011, 2017; Madden and Finch 2006; Miller 1998; Sargent 2010). It goes without saying that situating the upcoming analysis within the field of utopian studies is only one of multiple approaches possible. Instead of utopian community, terms such as cult, drop-out, secessionist, communal, grass-roots, counterculture, dissent, and so on could be used to describe subsets of the communities depicted in the narratives, and each of these descriptions brings with it a different set of contexts and theories. On that note, utopia is a problematic choice, the implications of the term being distinctly Eurocentric, nationalist, and imperial. However, recent archipelagic and postcolonial enquiries into utopianism enable me to take, and further develop, a critical approach regarding the grand narratives that underlie utopianism.

  4. 4.

    This is a very condensed definition which includes the main points that accomplished scholars of utopian communities have drawn up: Timothy Miller, for example, outlines his field of study by the following criteria: “A sense of common purpose and of separation from the dominant society. … Some form and level of self-denial, of voluntary suppression of individual choice for the good of the group. … Geographic proximity. … Personal interaction. … Economic sharing. … Real existence … Critical mass … Generally, it seems reasonable to think that an intentional community should include at least five individuals, some of whom must be unrelated by biology or exclusive intimate relationship” (1998, xx–xxii). Chapter 2 provides a more extensive discussion regarding the definition of the subject at hand.

  5. 5.

    While working on this project, I learned of long-standing traditions of utopian practice in, for example, England, France, Germany, Greece, India, Italy, New Zealand, Spain, and Wales. I am sure that most nations have seen their fair share of utopian communities.

  6. 6.

    For those in search of more suggestions, especially of less well-known works, I recommend Lyman Tower Sargent’s Utopian Literature in English: An Annotated Bibliography from 1516 to the Present (2016 and ongoing), as well as the lists compiled by Nan Bowman Albinski (1988), Carol Farley Kessler (1985, 1989, 1995), and Darby Lewes (1989).

  7. 7.

    Throughout this book, I am capitalizing Black, Indigenous, Native, and the like as well as White, when referring to the respective ethnic/racial groups. Writing the former set with an upper case is, for one, honoring the wish of various BIPoC activists and in accordance with a set of contemporary style manuals. Capitalizing White has nothing to do with me honoring Whiteness but is informed by arguments from those who have critically investigated White privilege: a lower case would obscure that Whiteness is very much an identitary category—one that thrives on invisibility, presenting itself and its habitus as ‘natural’ and as the ‘norm.’ Kwame Anthony Appiah (2020) makes this point more eloquently than I ever could, so I would refer interested readers to his article.

  8. 8.

    With the term long nineteenth century I am referring to the time period that starts approximately with the writing of the Constitution of the United States and ends with its entry in the First World War. Obviously, I am evoking Eric Hobsbawm’s terminology for the long nineteenth century in Europe, starting with the French Revolution and ending with the outbreak of the First World War, with the modification that the foundation of the United States is the relevant date within a US American context.

  9. 9.

    I am here employing Jean-Francois Lyotard’s terminology. In The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge (1979), Lyotard made the seminal argument that in postmodernity, because everything is perceived as a narrative, grand narratives have lost their power: “Simplifying to the extreme, I define postmodern as incredulity towards metanarratives” (xxiv). However, especially postcolonial scholars, such as Edward W. Said, have pointed out that grand narratives remain potently active (1996, 18); further, even the recent evocation of a ‘post-factual age’ does not seem to detract from the power of grand narratives as they manifest in nationalism, racism, class, gender binary, and so on: quite to the contrary. While the analyses provided below focus on the nineteenth century, I understand the general framework to be applicable beyond the end of modernity, following Michel Foucault’s suspicions that comparable orders of discourses via such narratives can be found in every society (1970, 56) and that articulating anything outside of them is at best an illusion (1970, 57). Their examination is nonetheless the intellectual’s duty (Said 1996).

  10. 10.

    Of course, in light of various historical and contemporary examples of systemic discrimination on the grounds of race, ethnicity, class, gender, and sexuality this claim of ‘diversity’ has been and is in dire need of reexamination.

  11. 11.

    For an explanation as to why I am capitalizing White, see footnote 7.

  12. 12.

    Fredric Jameson employs the term utopian psychology to denote the approach he takes in Archaeologies of the Future (2005), which underlies my approach to these novels. The next chapter provides a more detailed discussion of utopian psychology.

References

  • Albinski, Nan Bowman. 1988. Utopia Reconsidered: Women Novelists and Nineteenth-Century Utopian Visions. Signs 13 (4): 830–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alcott, Louisa May. [1873] 1981. Transcendental Wild Oats and Excerpts from the Fruitlands Diary. Harvard: Harvard Common Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Benedict. 1983. Imagined Communities. Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appiah, Kwame Anthony. 2020. The Case for Capitalizing the B in Black. The Atlantic, 18 June. https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/06/time-to-capitalize-blackand-white/613159/. Accessed 1 July 2020.

  • Baccolini, Raffaella, and Tom Moylan. 2013. Dystopia and Histories. In Dark Horizons: Science Fiction and the Dystopian Imagination, ed. Raffaella Baccolini and Tom Moylan, 1–12. Hoboken: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balasopoulos, Antonis. 2004. Unworldly Worldliness: America and the Trajectories of Utopian Expansionism. Utopian Studies 15 (2): 3–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudrillard, Jean. 1989. America. New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlant, Lauren G. 1991. The Anatomy of National Fantasy. Hawthorne, Utopia, and Everyday Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhabha, Homi K. 1990. Introduction: Narrating the Nation. In Nation and Narration, ed. Homi K. Bhabha, 1–7. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claeys, Gregory. 2011. Searching for Utopia. The History of an Idea. London: Thames & Hudson.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. Dystopia. A Natural History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Rebecca Harding. 1862. Margret Howth. A Story of To-Day. Boston: Ticknor and Fields.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Bois, William Edward Burghardt. 1911. The Quest of the Silver Fleece. Chicago: A. C. McClurg & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogarty, Robert S. 1990. All Things New. American Communes and Utopian Movements 1865–1914. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. [1970] 1981. The Order of Discourse. Translated by Ian McLeod. In Untying the Text: A Post-Structuralist Reader, ed. Robert Young, 48–78. Boston: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederic, Harold. 1898. Gloria Mundi. Chicago: Herbert S. Stone & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griggs, Sutton E. 1899. Imperium in Imperio. A Study of the Negro Race Problem. Cincinnati: The Editor Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guarneri, Carl J. 1994. The Americanization of Utopia: Fourierism and the Dilemma of Utopian Dissent in the United States. Utopian Studies 5 (1): 72–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatzenberger, Antoine. 2003. Islands and Empire: Beyond the Shores of Utopia. Angelaki. Journal of the Theoretical Humanities 8 (1): 119–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawthorne, Nathaniel. 1852. The Blithedale Romance. Boston: Ticknor, Reed, and Fields.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, Richard. 1985. The Frontier as Social Control. Theory and Society 14 (1): 35–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howells, William Dean. 1880. The Undiscovered Country. Boston: Houghton, Mifflin and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1913. New Leaf Mills. A Chronicle. New York: Harper and Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howland, Marie. 1874. Papa’s Own Girl. New York: Jewett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imlay, Gilbert. 1793. The Emigrants, or the History of an Expatriated Family. 3 vols. London: A. Hamilton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, Fredric. 2005. Archaeologies of the Future. The Desire Called Utopia and Other Science Fictions. New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, Amy. 1999. ‘Left Alone with America’: The Absence of Empire in the Study of American Culture. In Cultures of United States Imperialism, ed. Amy Kaplan, 3–21. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, Carol Farley. 1985. Notes Toward a Bibliography: Women’s Utopian Writing, 1836–1899. Legacy 2 (2): 67–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1989. Women Daring to Speak: United States Women’s Feminist Utopias. Utopian Studies 2: 118–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1995. Daring to Dream. Utopian Fiction by United States Women Before 1950. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewes, Darby. 1989. Gynotopia: A Checklist of Nineteenth-Century Utopias by American Women. Legacy 6 (2): 29–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, Rayford Whittingham. [1954] 1997. The Betrayal of the Negro, from Rutherford B. Hayes to Woodrow Wilson. New York: Da Capo Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, Jean-François. [1979] 1989. The Postmodern Condition. A Report on Knowledge. Translated by Geoff Bennington and Brain Massumi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madden, Etta, and Martha L. Finch, eds. 2006. Eating in Eden. Food and American Utopias. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marin, Louis. 1984. Utopics. Spatial Play. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Timothy. 1998. The Quest for Utopia in Twentieth-Century America. 1900–1960. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1999. The 60s Communes. Hippies and Beyond. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. The Encyclopedic Guide to American Intentional Communities. 2nd ed. Clinton: Richard W. Couper.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2019. Communes in America, 1975–2000. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • More, Thomas. 1516. Libellus Vere Aureus, Nec Minus Salutaris Quam Festivus, de Optimo Rei Publicae Statu deque Nova Insula Utopia. Leuven. English edition: More, Thomas. [1551/1556] 1912. The Utopia of Sir Thomas More. Translated by Ralph Robinson. New York: Macmillan Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, Heike. 2014. The Myths That Made America. An Introduction to American Studies. Bielefeld: transcript.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pitzer, Donald E. 1997. Introduction. In America’s Communal Utopias, ed. Donald E. Pitzer, 3–13. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roemer, Kenneth M. 1976. The Obsolete Necessity. America in Utopian Writings, 1888–1900. Kent: Kent State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1981. Defining American as Utopia. In America as Utopia, ed. Kenneth M. Roemer, 1–15. New York: B. Franklin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Said, Edward W. 1996. Representations of the Intellectual. The 1993 Reith Lectures. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sargent, Lyman Tower. 2007. Utopianism and National Identity. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 3 (2–3): 87–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. Utopianism. A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———, ed. 2016 and ongoing. Utopian Literature in English. An Annotated Bibliography from 1516 to the Present. The Pennsylvania State University Libraries.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slotkin, Richard. [1973] 1996. Regeneration through Violence. The Mythology of the American Frontier, 1600–1860. New York: Harper Perennial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Henry Nash. [1950] 1971. Virgin Land. The American West as Symbol and Myth. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snedeker, Caroline Dale. 1917. Seth Way. A Romance of the New Harmony Community. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Bueren, Thad M., and Sarah A. Tarlow. 2006. The Interpretive Potential of Utopian Settlements. Historical Archaeology 40 (1): 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wegner, Phillip E. 2002. Imaginary Communities. Utopia, the Nation, and the Spatial Histories of Modernity. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, Slavoj, and Fredric Jameson. 2016. An American Utopia. Dual Power and the Universal Army. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Verena Adamik .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Adamik, V. (2020). ‘The Optimal State of a Republic’: Introduction. In: In Search of the Utopian States of America. Palgrave Studies in Utopianism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60279-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60279-6_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-60278-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-60279-6

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics