Abstract
The interaction of highly coherent light and matter is the key in the science of measurement. In the classical electromagnetic theory, the absorption and dispersion properties of the light propagation in a medium are described by the classical Lorentz oscillator model. The unavoidable phase and intensity fluctuations of a light field, which are commonly characterized by the first- and second-order correlation functions, respectively, broaden the light spectrum and restrict its practical applications in metrology. In order to suppress the spectral linewidth, the light’s frequency is usually stabilized to an optical resonator. Several light-based sensing applications, such as the gravity-wave detection and optical clocks, are briefly introduced.
Notes
- 1.
The one-dimensional Dirac delta function is defined as
$$\begin{aligned} \delta (x-x_{0})= {\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} \infty &{} x=x_{0} \\ 0 &{} x\ne x_{0} \end{array}\right. }, \end{aligned}$$with the integral
$$\begin{aligned} \int _{a}^{b}\delta (x-x_{0})dx= {\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} 1 &{} a<x_{0}<b \\ 0 &{} x_{0}<a~\text {or}~x_{0}>b \end{array}\right. }. \end{aligned}$$The delta function has the scaling and symmetry properties, \(\delta (\alpha x)=\delta (x)/|\alpha |\) and \(\delta (-x)=\delta (x)\). In the three-dimensional case, the delta function takes the form
$$\begin{aligned} \delta (\mathbf{r} -\mathbf{r} _{0})=\delta (x-x_{0})\delta (y-y_{0})\delta (z-z_{0}). \end{aligned}$$The volume integral of \(\delta (\mathbf{r} -\mathbf{r} _{0})\) against a continuous function \(f(\mathbf{r} )\) reads as
$$\begin{aligned} \int _{V}f(\mathbf{r} )\delta (\mathbf{r} -\mathbf{r} _{0})d^{3}{} \mathbf{r} = {\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} f(\mathbf{r} _{0}) &{} \mathbf{r} _{0}\in V \\ 0 &{} \mathbf{r} _{0}\notin V \end{array}\right. }. \end{aligned}$$.
- 2.
The Bohr radius is defined as \(a_{0}=\frac{4\pi \varepsilon _{0}\hbar ^{2}}{m_{\text {e}}e^{2}}\) with the reduced Planck’s constant \(\hbar =1.054\times 10^{-34}\) \(\text {J}\cdot \text {s}\) and the mass of electron \(m_{\text {e}}=9.11\times 10^{-31}\) kg.
- 3.
1 \(\text {a}.\text {u}.=\frac{e^{2}a_{0}^{2}}{E_{\text {h}}}\) with the Hartree energy \(E_{\text {h}}=\frac{\hbar ^{2}}{m_{\text {e}}a_{0}^{2}}=4.35974\times 10^{-18}\) J.
- 4.
In 1958, Schawlow and Townes derived the fundamental (quantum-noise-limited) limit for the spectral linewidth \(\varDelta \omega _{\text {FWHM}}\) of a good-cavity laser with the Lorentzian broadening, i.e., the Schawlow–Townes linewidth [23], \(\varDelta \omega _{\text {FWHM}}=\hbar \omega _{0}\varDelta \omega _{\text {cav}}^{2}/P_{\text {out}}\), where \(\varDelta \omega _{\text {cav}}\) is the linewidth of the cold cavity and \(P_{\text {out}}\) is the laser output power. In 1967, Lax proved that the correct linewidth should be \(\varDelta \omega _{\text {FWHM}}=\hbar \omega _{0}\varDelta \omega _{\text {cav}}^{2}/2P_{\text {out}}\) [24]. The Schawlow–Townes linewidth can be generalized to the form \(\varDelta \omega _{\text {FWHM}}=n_{\text {sp}}\hbar \omega _{0}\varDelta \omega _{\text {cav}}^{2}/2P_{\text {out}}\) [25] with the inversion factor \(n_{\text {sp}}=N_{2}/(N_{2}-N_{1})\). The parameters \(N_{1,2}\) are the populations of the active particles in two lasing states 1 (lower) and 2 (upper), respectively. One has \(n_{\text {sp}}=1\) for an ideal four-level laser.
- 5.
\(R=\frac{e\eta \lambda }{hc}\) with the Planck’s constant \(h=6.626\times 10^{-34}\) \(\text {J}\cdot \text {s}\).
References
M.H. Anderson, J.R. Ensher, M.R. Matthews, C.E. Wieman, E.A. Cornell, Observation of Bose-Einstein condensation in a dilute atomic vapor. Science 269, 198–201 (1995). http://orcid.org/10.1126/science.269.5221.198
K.B. Davis, M.O. Mewes, M.R. Andrews, N.J. van Druten, D.S. Durfee, D.M. Kurn, W. Ketterle, Bose-Einstein condensation in a gas of sodium atoms. Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3969–3973 (1995). http://orcid.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.3969
I. Ushijima, M. Takamoto, M. Das, T. Ohkubo, H. Katori, Cryogenic optical lattice clocks. Nat. Photon. 9, 185–189 (2015). http://orcid.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2015.5
S.M. Brewer, J.S. Chen, A.M. Hankin, E.R. Clements, C.W. Chou, D.J. Wineland, D.B. Hume, D.R. Leibrandt, \(^{27}{\rm Al}^{+}\) Quantum-Logic Clock with a Systematic Uncertainty below \({10}^{-18}\). Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 033201 (2019). http://orcid.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.033201
B.P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T.D. Abbott et al., Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061102 (2016). http://orcid.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102
B.P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T.D. Abbott et al., GW170814: A three-detector observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole coalescence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 141101 (2017). http://orcid.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.141101
A. Ashkin, J.M. Dziedzic, Optical trapping and manipulation of viruses and bacteria. Science 235, 1517–1520 (1987). http://orcid.org/10.1126/science.3547653
J. Zhu, S.K. Ozdemir, Y.F. Xiao, L. Li, L. He, D.R. Chen, L. Yang, On-chip single nanoparticle detection and sizing by mode splitting in an ultrahigh-\(Q\) microresonator. Nat. Photon. 4, 46–49 (2010). http://orcid.org/10.1038/nphoton.2009.237
A.H. Zewail, Laser femtochemistry. Science 242, 1645–1653 (1988). http://orcid.org/10.1126/science.242.4886.1645
J.G. Ren, P. Xu, H.L. Yong et al., Ground-to-satellite quantum teleportation. Nature 549, 70–73 (2017). http://orcid.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23675
S.K. Liao, W.Q. Cai, W.Y. Liu et al., Satellite-to-ground quantum key distribution. Nature 549, 43–47 (2017). http://orcid.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23655
S.K. Liao, W.Q. Cai, J. Handsteiner et al., Satellite-relayed intercontinental quantum network. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 030501 (2018). http://orcid.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.030501
D.J. Griffiths, Introduction to Electrodynamics (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, 1981)
J.H. Poynting, On the transfer of energy in the electromagnetic field. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 175, 343–349 (1884). http://orcid.org/https://doi.org/10.1098/rstl.1884.0016
J.D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics (Wiley, New York, 1962)
S. Das, R. Kumar, T.J. George, A. Bansal, N.K. Lautre, A.K. Sharma, Physics of electrostatic resonance with negative permittivity and imaginary index of refraction for illuminated plasmoid in the experimental set up for microwave near field applicator. Fund. J. Modern Phys. 5, 19–46 (2013)
D.S. Kliger, J.W. Lewis, C.E. Randall, Polarized Light in Optics and Spectroscopy (Academic, New York, 1990)
L. Onsager, Electric moments of molecules in liquids. J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 58, 1486–1493 (1936). http://orcid.org/https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01299a050
H.A. Lorentz, The Theory of Electrons and Its Applications to the Phenomena of Light and Radiant Heat, 2nd edn. (Dover Books, New York, 2011)
R.C. Hilborn, Einstein coefficients, cross sections, f values, dipole moments, and all that. Amer. J. Phys. 50, 982–986 (1982). http://orcid.org/https://doi.org/10.1119/1.12937
H. Katori, M. Takamoto, V.G. Pal’chikov, V.D. Ovsiannikov, Ultrastable optical clock with neutral atoms in an engineered light shift trap. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 173005 (2003). http://orcid.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.173005
T. Okoshi, K. Kikuchi, A. Nakayama, Novel method for high resolution measurement of laser output spectrum. Electron. Lett. 16, 630–631 (1980). http://orcid.org/10.1049/el:19800437
A.L. Schawlow, C.H. Townes, Infrared and optical masers. Phys. Rev. 112, 1940–1949 (1958). http://orcid.org/10.1103/PhysRev.112.1940
M. Lax, Classical noise. v. noise in self-sustained oscillators. Phys. Rev. 160, 290–307 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.160.290
O. Svelto, Principles of Lasers, 5th edn. (Springer, Berlin, 2010), p. 298
D.J.C. MacKay, Information Theory, Inference and Learning Algorithms (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003)
D.S. Elliott, R. Roy, S.J. Smith, Extracavity laser band-shape and bandwidth modification. Phys. Rev. A 26, 12–18 (1982). http://orcid.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.26.12
A. Godone, F. Levi, About the radiofrequency spectrum of a phase noise modulated carrier, in Proceedings of the 1998 European Frequency and Time Forum (1998), pp. 392–396
G. Di Domenico, S. Schilt, P. Thomann, Simple approach to the relation between laser frequency noise and laser line shape. Appl. Opt. 49, 4801–4807 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.49.004801
R. Hanbury Brown, R.Q. Twiss, A test of a new type of stellar interferometer on sirius. Nature 178, 1046–1048 (1956). https://doi.org/10.1038/1781046a0
B. Darquié, M.P.A. Jones, J. Dingjan, J. Beugnon, S. Bergamini, Y. Sortais, G. Messin, A. Browaeys, P. Grangier, Controlled single-photon emission from a single trapped two-level atom. Science 309, 454–456 (2005). http://orcid.org/10.1126/science.1113394
R. Loudon, The Quantum Theory of Light (Oxford Science Publications, Oxford, 2000)
T. Kessler, C. Hagemann, C. Grebing, T. Legero, U. Sterr, F. Riehle, M.J. Martin, L. Chen, J. Ye, A sub-40-mHz-linewidth laser based on a silicon single-crystal optical cavity. Nat. Photon. 6, 687–692 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2012.217
D.G. Matei, T. Legero, S. Häfner, C. Grebing, R. Weyrich, W. Zhang, L. Sonderhouse, J.M. Robinson, J. Ye, F. Riehle, U. Sterr, \(1.5 \mu \rm m\it \) Lasers with Sub-10 mHz Linewidth. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 263202 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.263202
C. Schneider, P. GoldS, S.Höfling Reitzenstein, M. Kamp, Quantum dot micropillar cavities with quality factors exceeding 250,000. Appl. Phys. B 122, 19 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-015-6283-x
S.L. McCall, A.F.J. Levi, R.E. Slusher, S.J. Pearton, R.A. Logan, Whispering gallery mode microdisk lasers. Appl. Phys. Lett. 60, 289–291 (1992). http://orcid.org/10.1063/1.106688
M.L. Gorodetsky, A.A. Savchenkov, V.S. Ilchenko, Ultimate \(Q\) of optical microsphere resonators. Opt. Lett. 21, 453–455 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.21.000453
A.M. Armani, D.K. Armani, B. Min, K.J. Vahala, Ultra-high-\(Q\) microcavity operation in H\(_{2}\)O and D\(_{2}\)O. Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 151118 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2099529
P.B. Deotare, M.W. McCutcheon, I.W. Frank, M. Khan, M. Lončar, High quality factor photonic crystal nanobeam cavities. Appl. Phys. Lett. 94, 121106 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3107263
H. Li, Y. Wang, L. Wei, P. Zhou, Q. Wei, C. Cao, Y. Fang, Y. Yu, P. Wu, Experimental demonstrations of high-Q superconducting coplanar waveguide resonators. Chin. Sci. Bull. 58, 2413–2417 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-013-5882-3
P. Forn-Díaz, J. Lisenfeld, D. Marcos, J.J. García-Ripoll, E. Solano, C.J.P.M. Harmans, J.E. Mooij, Observation of the Bloch-Siegert shift in a qubit-oscillator system in the ultrastrong coupling regime. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 237001 (2010). http://orcid.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.237001
K.B. MacAdam, A. Steinbach, C. Wieman, A narrow band tunable diode laser system with grating feedback, and a saturated absorption spectrometer for Cs and Rb. Am. J. Phys. 60, 1098–1111 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1119/1.16955
R.W.P. Drever, J.L. Hall, F.V. Kowalski, J. Hough, G.M. Ford, A.J. Munley, H. Ward, Laser phase and frequency stabilization using an optical resonator. Appl. Phys. B 31, 97–105 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00702605
K. Numata, A. Kemery, J. Camp, Thermal-noise limit in the frequency stabilization of lasers with rigid cavities. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 250602 (2004). http://orcid.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.250602
T.W. Hansch, B. Couillaud, Laser frequency stabilization by polarization spectroscopy of a reflecting reference cavity. Opt. Commun. 35, 441–444 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4018(80)90069-3
W. Schottky, Über spontane stromschwankungen in verschiedenen elektrizitätsleitern. Ann. Phys. 36, 541–567 (1918). https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.19183622304
J.B. Johnson, Thermal agitation of electricity in conductors. Phys. Rev. 32, 97–109 (1928). http://orcid.org/10.1103/PhysRev.32.97
H. Nyquist, Thermal agitation of electric charge in conductors. Phys. Rev. 32, 110–113 (1928). http://orcid.org/10.1103/PhysRev.32.110
G.C. Bjorklund, M.D. Levenson, W. Lenth, C. Ortiz, Frequency modulation (FM) spectroscopy. Appl. Phys. B 32, 145–152 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00688820
H.R. Carleton, W.T. Maloney, A balanced optical heterodyne detector. Appl. Opt. 7, 1241–1243 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.7.001241
R. Stierlin, R. Bättig, P.D. Henchoz, H.P. Weber, Excess-noise suppression in a fibre-optic balanced heterodyne detection system. Opt. Q. Electron. 18, 445–454 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02041170
J. Kim, S. Takeuchi, Y. Yamamoto, H.H. Hogue, Multiphoton detection using visible light photon counter. Appl. Phys. Lett. 74, 902–904 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.123404
E. Waks, K. Inoue, W.D. Oliver, E. Diamanti, Y. Yamamoto, High-efficiency photon-number detection for quantum information processing. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Q. Electron. 9, 1502–1511 (2003). http://orcid.org/10.1109/JSTQE.2003.820917
R.H. Hadfield, Single-photon detectors for optical quantum information applications. Nat. Photon. 3, 696–705 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2009.230
G.F. Knoll, Radiation Detection and Measurement, 3rd edn. (Wiley, New York, 1999)
A.A. Michelson, E.W. Morley, On the relative motion of the earth and the luminiferous ether. Amer. J. Sci. 34, 333–345 (1887). http://orcid.org/10.2475/ajs.s3-34.203.333
A.D. Ludlow, M.M. Boyd, J. Ye, E. Peik, P.O. Schmidt, Optical atomic clocks. Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 637–701 (2015). http://orcid.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.87.637
D.W. Allan, Statistics of atomic frequency standards. Proc. IEEE 54, 221–230 (1966). http://orcid.org/10.1109/PROC.1966.4634
W.M. Itano, J.C. Bergquist, J.J. Bollinger, J.M. Gilligan, D.J. Heinzen, F.L. Moore, M.G. Raizen, D.J. Wineland, Quantum projection noise: population fluctuations in two-level systems. Phys. Rev. A 47, 3554–3570 (1993). http://orcid.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.47.3554
R.H. Dicke, The effect of collisions upon the Doppler width of spectral lines. Phys. Rev. 89, 472–473 (1953). http://orcid.org/10.1103/PhysRev.89.472
M. Takamoto, F.L. Hong, R. Higashi, H. Katori, An optical lattice clock. Nature 435, 321–324 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03541
E. Oelker, R. B. Hutson, C. J. Kennedy, L. Sonderhouse, T. Bothwell, A. Goban, D. Kedar, C. Sanner, J.M. Robinson, G.E. Marti, D.G. Matei, T. Legero, M. Giunta, R. Holzwarth, F. Riehle, U. Sterr, J. Ye, Demonstration of \(4.8\times 10^{-17}\) stability at 1 s for two independent optical clocks. Nat. Photon. 13, 714–719 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-019-0493-4
M. Takamoto, T. Takano, H. Katori, Frequency comparison of optical lattice clocks beyond the Dick limit. Nat. Photon. 5, 288–292 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2011.34
T. Middelmann, S. Falke, C. Lisdat, U. Sterr, High accuracy correction of blackbody radiation shift in an optical lattice clock. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 263004 (2012). http://orcid.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.263004
T.L. Nicholson, S.L. Campbell, R.B. Hutson, G.E. Marti, B.J. Bloom, R.L. McNally, W. Zhang, M.D. Barrett, M.S. Safronova, G.F. Strouse, W.L. Tew, J. Ye, Systematic evaluation of an atomic clock at \(2\times 10^{-18}\) total uncertainty. Nat. Commun. 6, 6896 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7896
W.F. McGrew, X. Zhang, R.J. Fasano, S.A. Schäffer, K. Beloy, D. Nicolodi, R.C. Brown, N. Hinkley, G. Milani, M. Schioppo, T.H. Yoon, A.D. Ludlow, Atomic clock performance enabling geodesy below the centimetre level. Nature 564, 87–90 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0738-2
S. Blatt, A.D. Ludlow, G.K. Campbell, J.W. Thomsen, T. Zelevinsky, M.M. Boyd, J. Ye, X. Baillard, M. Fouché, R. Le Targat, A. Brusch, P. Lemonde, M. Takamoto, F.L. Hong, H. Katori, V.V. Flambaum, New limits on coupling of fundamental constants to gravity using \(^{87}\rm Sr\) optical lattice clocks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 140801 (2008). http://orcid.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.140801
R.M. Godun, P.B.R. Nisbet-Jones, J.M. Jones, S.A. King, L.A.M. Johnson, H.S. Margolis, K. Szymaniec, S.N. Lea, K. Bongs, P. Gill, Frequency ratio of two optical clock transitions in \(^{171}{\rm Yb}^{+}\) and constraints on the time variation of fundamental constants. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 210801 (2014). http://orcid.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.210801
S. Kolkowitz, I. Pikovski, N. Langellier, M.D. Lukin, R.L. Walsworth, J. Ye, Gravitational wave detection with optical lattice atomic clocksPhys. Rev. D 94, 124043 (2016). http://orcid.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.94.124043
T. Takano, M. Takamoto, I. Ushijima, N. Ohmae, T. Akatsuka, A. Yamaguchi, Y. Kuroishi, H. Munekane, B. Miyahara, H. Katori, Geopotential measurements with synchronously linked optical lattice clocks. Nat. Photon. 10, 662–666 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2016.159
A. Derevianko, M. Pospelov, Hunting for topological dark matter with atomic clocks. Nat. Phys. 10, 933–936 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3137
P. Wcisło, P. Ablewski, K. Beloy, S. Bilicki, M. Bober, R. Brown, R. Fasano, R. Ciuryło, H. Hachisu, T. Ido, J. Lodewyck, A. Ludlow, W. McGrew, P. Morzyński, D. Nicolodi, M. Schioppo, M. Sekido, R. Le Targat, P. Wolf, X. Zhang, B. Zjawin, and M. Zawada, New bounds on dark matter coupling from a global network of optical atomic clocks. Sci. Adv. 4, eaau4869 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau4869
H.J. Metcalf, P. van der Straten, Laser Cooling and Trapping (Springer, Berlin, 1999)
C. Weitenberg, M. Endres, J.F. Sherson, M. Cheneau, P. Schaußler, T. Fukuhara, I. Bloch, S. Kuhr, Single-spin addressing in an atomic Mott insulator. Nature 471, 319–324 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09827
M. Greiner, O. Mandel, T. Esslinger, T.W. Hänsch, I. Bloch, Quantum phase transition from a superfluid to a Mott insulator in a gas of ultracold atoms. Nature 415, 39–44 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/415039a
N. Schlosser, G. Reymond, I. Protsenko, P. Grangier, Sub-poissonian loading of single atoms in a microscopic dipole trap. Nature 411, 1024–1027 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/35082512
D. Barredo, S. de Léséleuc, V. Lienhard, T. Lahaye, A. Browaeys, An atom-by-atom assembler of defect-free arbitrary two-dimensional atomic arrays. Science 354, 1021–1023 (2016). http://orcid.org/10.1126/science.aah3778
M. Endres, H. Bernien, A. Keesling, H. Levine, E.R. Anschuetz, A. Krajenbrink, C. Senko, V. Vuletic, M. Greiner, M.D. Lukin, Atom-by-atom assembly of defect-free one-dimensional cold atom arrays. Science 354, 1024–1027 (2016). http://orcid.org/10.1126/science.aah3752
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Problems
Problems
1.1
A light field is polarized in the x-direction and propagates along the z-axis, \(\mathbf{E} (\mathbf{r} ,t)=\mathbf{e} _{x}E^{(+)}(z,t)+\mathbf{e} _{x}E^{(-)}(z,t)\), in a medium. The electric polarization density of the medium \(\mathbf{P} \) may be written in a similar way, \(\mathbf{P} (\mathbf{r} ,t)=\mathbf{e} _{x}P^{(+)}(z,t)+\mathbf{e} _{x}P^{(-)}(z,t)\). Inserting the above expressions into (1.40), one obtains
The positive-frequency parts \(E^{(+)}(z,t)\) and \(P^{(+)}(z,t)\) may be written in the following way:
where and are the slowly varying amplitudes. The wavenumber \(k_{0}\) is related to the light’s central frequency \(\omega _{0}\) via \(k_{0}=\omega _{0}/c\). Derive the following equation:
in the slowly varying envelope approximation (SVEA)
1.2
Derive the interface conditions for the electromagnetic fields (1.45) and (1.48) by integrating Faraday’s law (1.1a) and Ampère’s law (1.1d) over an oriented smooth surface S bounded by a closed boundary curve C across the interface [see Fig. 1.19a]. Stokes’ theorem
should be applied. The curve C is positively oriented, meaning that the surface S is always on your left side when you are walking along the curve C. The direction of the element vector \(d\mathbf{S} \) is parallel to the unit normal vector of the curve C that follows the right-hand rule. The vector field \(\mathbf{F} \) may be \(\mathbf{E} \) and \(\mathbf{H} \).
Derive the boundary conditions (1.46) and (1.47) by integrating (1.1b) and (1.1c) over a volume V surrounded by a surface S across the interface [see Fig. 1.19b]. Gauss’s theorem
should be used. Here, the vector field \(\mathbf{F} \) may be \(\mathbf{D} \) and \(\mathbf{B} \). The outward-pointing element vector \(d\mathbf{S} \) is normal to the locally planar surface.
1.3
We consider the solution to Poisson’s equation within a volume V. The associated Green’s function \(G(\mathbf{r} ,\mathbf{r} _{0})\) is defined as
where \(G(\mathbf{r} ,\mathbf{r} _{0})\) may be viewed as a potential generated by a point source located at \(\mathbf{r} _{0}\in V\). As \(|\mathbf{r} -\mathbf{r} _{0}|\rightarrow \infty \), \(G(\mathbf{r} ,\mathbf{r} _{0})\) approaches zero. Equation (1.26) is the solution of the above Poisson’s equation. Derive (1.26) by using the fact \(\int _{V}\delta (\mathbf{r} )dV=1\) and Gauss’s theorem.
1.4
The frequency stabilization scheme based on the Hansch–Couillaud method [45] is illustrated in Fig. 1.20a. The incident light (frequency \(\omega \)) output from a laser system is vertically polarized and enters a Fabry–Pérot resonator (central frequency \(\omega _{\text {FP}}\)) via a reflection mirror. A linear polarizer, whose transmission direction forms a \(45^{\circ }\) angle with respect to the incident beam’s polarization, is inserted into the Fabry–Pérot resonator. The reflected wave contains two components with the respective field amplitude \(E_{\parallel }=(E_{0}/\sqrt{2})\cdot r_{\text {FP}}(\omega )\) and \(E_{\perp }=(E_{0}/\sqrt{2})\cdot r_{1}\), where \(E_{0}\) is the amplitude of the incident beam, \(r_{\text {FP}}(\omega )\) is the amplitude reflection coefficient of the Fabry–Pérot resonator [see (1.139a)] , and \(r_{1}\) is the amplitude reflection coefficient of the resonator’s mirror M1. The reflected light passes through a \(\lambda /4\) waveplate and enters a polarization beam splitter (PBS). We assume that the fast axis of the \(\lambda /4\) waveplate is parallel to the transmission direction of the intracavity linear polarizer. Using the Jones calculus, the light fields output from the PBS are given by
The intensities of the outputs from the PBS \(I_{1}\propto |E_{1}|^{2}\) and \(I_{2}\propto |E_{2}|^{2}\) are measured by two photodetectors, respectively. The difference \((I_{1}-I_{2})\) gives the error signal [see Fig. 1.20b]. This error signal is finally fed back into the laser, stabilizing the frequency \(\omega \). Derive the error signal \((I_{1}-I_{2})\).
1.5
In a \(^{87}\)Sr optical lattice clock, the \(^{87}\)Sr atoms are confined in a one-dimensional optical lattice with a potential depth of 20 \(\upmu \)K. The lattice lasers operate at the red-detuned magic wavelength 813 nm. The clock transition wavelength is 698 nm. Estimate the harmonic-oscillation frequency of the atoms moving inside a lattice site and the Lamb–Dicke parameter.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vollmer, F., Yu, D. (2020). Sensing with Light. In: Optical Whispering Gallery Modes for Biosensing. Biological and Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60235-2_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60235-2_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-60234-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-60235-2
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)