Abstract
In this work we exploited Sentinel-1 satellite radar images processed by means of Persistent Scatterers Interferometry (PSI) techniques for the evaluation of landslide geohazard and impact on a mountainous region. In particular, we used PSI data as starting point in a working chain whose final goal is the estimation of the potential worth of loss of the structures involved by slope instability phenomena. We applied this approach on a test area in the Valle d’Aosta Region (North Italy) where more than fifty percent of the territory is above 2000 m a.s.l. and extensively affected by landslides. Firstly, PSI Sentinel-1 data permitted to scan the territory and to highlight the areas characterized by the highest ground motion rates, namely Active Deformation Areas (ADA). These areas were used to derive the intensity of potential landslides in terms of magnitude. Then, for the different elements at risk (EAR) we estimated both the vulnerability, by referring to values already proposed in literature for similar working scale, and the exposure, by considering the current real estate market values of the EAR in the area. We finally derived color-scale maps showing landslide intensity and values of potential loss expressed in quantitative terms (Euros for square meters). This operational methodology can provide useful indications and outputs for landslide risk management at regional scale. Considering the present availability of Sentinel-1 SAR images with 6-days revisiting time, this procedure can represent an example of satellite InSAR monitoring as supporting tool for Civil Protection activities and geohazard mitigation long-term strategies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barra A, Solari L, Béjar-Pizarro M, Monserrat O, Bianchini S, Herrera G et al (2017) A methodology to detect and update active deformation areas based on sentinel-1 SAR images. Remote Sens 9(10):1002
Bianchini S, Solari L, Casagli N (2017) A gis-based procedure for landslide intensity evaluation and specific risk analysis supported by persistent scatterers interferometry (PSI). Remote Sens 9(11):1093
Catani F, Casagli N, Ermini L, Righini G, Menduni G (2005) Landslide hazard and risk mapping at catchment scale in the Arno River basin. Landslides 2(4):329–342
Catani F, Segoni S, Falorni G (2010) An empirical geomorphology‐based approach to the spatial prediction of soil thickness at catchment scale. Water Resour Res 46(5)
Corominas J, van Westen C, Frattini P, Cascini L, Malet JP et al (2014) Recommendations for the quantitative analysis of landslide risk. Bull Eng Geol Env 773(2):209–263
Cruden DM, Varnes DJ (1996) Landslides: investigation and mitigation. Landslide types and processes. Transportation research board special report 247
Dai FC, Lee CF, Ngai YY (2002) Landslide risk assessment and management: an overview. Eng Geol 64(1):65–87
Giordan D, Cignetti M, Bertolo D (2017) The use of morpho-structural domains for the characterization of deep-seated gravitational slope deformations in Valle d’Aosta. Springer, Cham, pp 59–68
Liu X, Miao C (2018) Large-scale assessment of landslide hazard, vulnerability and risk in China. Geomatics Nat Hazards Risk 9(1):1037–1052
OMI database (2018). Agency of Revenues https://wwwt.agenziaentrate.gov.it
Papathoma-Köhle M, Totschnig R, Keiler M, Glade T (2012) A new vulnerability function for debris flow-The importance of physical vulnerability assessment in alpine areas. Internationale Forschungsgesellschaft. pp 1033–1043
Ratto S, Bonetto F, Comoglio C (2003) The October 2000 flooding in Valle d’Aosta (Italy): event description and land planning measures for the risk mitigation. Int J River Basin Manage 1:105–116
Salvatici T, Tofani V, Rossi G, D’Ambrosio M, Stefanelli CT et al (2018) Application of a physically based model to forecast shallow landslides at a regional scale. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 18(7):1919–1935
Solari L, Barra A, Herrera G, Bianchini S, Monserrat O et al (2018) Fast detection of ground motions on vulnerable elements using Sentinel-1 InSAR data. Geomatics Nat Hazards Risk 9(1):152–174
Solari L, Bianchini S, Franceschini R, Barra A, Monserrat O et al (2020) Satellite interferometric data for landslide intensity evaluation in mountainous regions. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 87:1–16
Trigila A, Iadanza C, Spizzichino D (2010) Quality assessment of the Italian Landslide Inventory using GIS processing. Landslides 7(4):455–470
Van Westen CJ, Van Asch TW, Soeters R (2006) Landslide hazard and risk zonation—why is it still so difficult? Bull Eng Geol Environ 65(2):167–184
Wichmann V (2017) The gravitational process path (GPP) model-GIS-based simulation framework for gravitational processes. Geosci Model Dev 10(9)
Acknowledgements
The work has been conceived and developed in the framework of the “U-Geohaz—Geohazard impact assessment for urban areas” project, co-funded by the European Commission, Directorate-General Humanitarian Aid and Civil Protection (ECHO).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bianchini, S., Solari, L., Barra, A., Monserrat, O., Crosetto, M., Catani, F. (2021). Sentinel-1 PSI Data for the Evaluation of Landslide Geohazard and Impact. In: Guzzetti, F., Mihalić Arbanas, S., Reichenbach, P., Sassa, K., Bobrowsky, P.T., Takara, K. (eds) Understanding and Reducing Landslide Disaster Risk. WLF 2020. ICL Contribution to Landslide Disaster Risk Reduction. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60227-7_52
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60227-7_52
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-60226-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-60227-7
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)