Skip to main content

Sentinel-1 PSI Data for the Evaluation of Landslide Geohazard and Impact

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Understanding and Reducing Landslide Disaster Risk (WLF 2020)

Part of the book series: ICL Contribution to Landslide Disaster Risk Reduction ((CLDRR))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 910 Accesses

Abstract

In this work we exploited Sentinel-1 satellite radar images processed by means of Persistent Scatterers Interferometry (PSI) techniques for the evaluation of landslide geohazard and impact on a mountainous region. In particular, we used PSI data as starting point in a working chain whose final goal is the estimation of the potential worth of loss of the structures involved by slope instability phenomena. We applied this approach on a test area in the Valle d’Aosta Region (North Italy) where more than fifty percent of the territory is above 2000 m a.s.l. and extensively affected by landslides. Firstly, PSI Sentinel-1 data permitted to scan the territory and to highlight the areas characterized by the highest ground motion rates, namely Active Deformation Areas (ADA). These areas were used to derive the intensity of potential landslides in terms of magnitude. Then, for the different elements at risk (EAR) we estimated both the vulnerability, by referring to values already proposed in literature for similar working scale, and the exposure, by considering the current real estate market values of the EAR in the area. We finally derived color-scale maps showing landslide intensity and values of potential loss expressed in quantitative terms (Euros for square meters). This operational methodology can provide useful indications and outputs for landslide risk management at regional scale. Considering the present availability of Sentinel-1 SAR images with 6-days revisiting time, this procedure can represent an example of satellite InSAR monitoring as supporting tool for Civil Protection activities and geohazard mitigation long-term strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barra A, Solari L, Béjar-Pizarro M, Monserrat O, Bianchini S, Herrera G et al (2017) A methodology to detect and update active deformation areas based on sentinel-1 SAR images. Remote Sens 9(10):1002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bianchini S, Solari L, Casagli N (2017) A gis-based procedure for landslide intensity evaluation and specific risk analysis supported by persistent scatterers interferometry (PSI). Remote Sens 9(11):1093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catani F, Casagli N, Ermini L, Righini G, Menduni G (2005) Landslide hazard and risk mapping at catchment scale in the Arno River basin. Landslides 2(4):329–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catani F, Segoni S, Falorni G (2010) An empirical geomorphology‐based approach to the spatial prediction of soil thickness at catchment scale. Water Resour Res 46(5)

    Google Scholar 

  • Corominas J, van Westen C, Frattini P, Cascini L, Malet JP et al (2014) Recommendations for the quantitative analysis of landslide risk. Bull Eng Geol Env 773(2):209–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruden DM, Varnes DJ (1996) Landslides: investigation and mitigation. Landslide types and processes. Transportation research board special report 247

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai FC, Lee CF, Ngai YY (2002) Landslide risk assessment and management: an overview. Eng Geol 64(1):65–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giordan D, Cignetti M, Bertolo D (2017) The use of morpho-structural domains for the characterization of deep-seated gravitational slope deformations in Valle d’Aosta. Springer, Cham, pp 59–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu X, Miao C (2018) Large-scale assessment of landslide hazard, vulnerability and risk in China. Geomatics Nat Hazards Risk 9(1):1037–1052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OMI database (2018). Agency of Revenues https://wwwt.agenziaentrate.gov.it

  • Papathoma-Köhle M, Totschnig R, Keiler M, Glade T (2012) A new vulnerability function for debris flow-The importance of physical vulnerability assessment in alpine areas. Internationale Forschungsgesellschaft. pp 1033–1043

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratto S, Bonetto F, Comoglio C (2003) The October 2000 flooding in Valle d’Aosta (Italy): event description and land planning measures for the risk mitigation. Int J River Basin Manage 1:105–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salvatici T, Tofani V, Rossi G, D’Ambrosio M, Stefanelli CT et al (2018) Application of a physically based model to forecast shallow landslides at a regional scale. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 18(7):1919–1935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solari L, Barra A, Herrera G, Bianchini S, Monserrat O et al (2018) Fast detection of ground motions on vulnerable elements using Sentinel-1 InSAR data. Geomatics Nat Hazards Risk 9(1):152–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solari L, Bianchini S, Franceschini R, Barra A, Monserrat O et al (2020) Satellite interferometric data for landslide intensity evaluation in mountainous regions. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 87:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trigila A, Iadanza C, Spizzichino D (2010) Quality assessment of the Italian Landslide Inventory using GIS processing. Landslides 7(4):455–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Westen CJ, Van Asch TW, Soeters R (2006) Landslide hazard and risk zonation—why is it still so difficult? Bull Eng Geol Environ 65(2):167–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wichmann V (2017) The gravitational process path (GPP) model-GIS-based simulation framework for gravitational processes. Geosci Model Dev 10(9)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work has been conceived and developed in the framework of the “U-Geohaz—Geohazard impact assessment for urban areas” project, co-funded by the European Commission, Directorate-General Humanitarian Aid and Civil Protection (ECHO).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Silvia Bianchini .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bianchini, S., Solari, L., Barra, A., Monserrat, O., Crosetto, M., Catani, F. (2021). Sentinel-1 PSI Data for the Evaluation of Landslide Geohazard and Impact. In: Guzzetti, F., Mihalić Arbanas, S., Reichenbach, P., Sassa, K., Bobrowsky, P.T., Takara, K. (eds) Understanding and Reducing Landslide Disaster Risk. WLF 2020. ICL Contribution to Landslide Disaster Risk Reduction. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60227-7_52

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics