Abstract
While there is a strong research tradition into analysing prejudiced and racist discourse, the study of explicit, face-to-face allegedly racism is a rarer aspect of discursive research. Previous studies of racist discourse tend not to be of face-to-face interactions with the victim of prejudice. We analyse two publicly available video recordings: the first, taken from a mobile phone recording of a Kenyan woman in Finland at the receiving end of racist abuse from a Finnish woman and, the second, a woman recorded on a mobile phone verbally abusing Muslim women on a bus in London. These recordings are reminiscent of other videos of people being recorded using racist language, which subsequently made their way into social media. We perform a discursive psychological analysis to show how speakers use language that can be construed as allegedly racist, while also trying to frame such talk as in some way justifiable, and how threats are managed in this context. The findings suggest that similar strategies used by speakers when trying to disguise talk as “not racist” are also used to justify talk that is explicitly racist. We conclude by making the argument that face-to-face racism should be analysed in depth and as a phenomenon in its own right and for understanding potential avenues of combating such talk.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
A white New Zealander, as opposed to a Māori.
- 2.
- 3.
See Extract 8.1 title for the original Finnish caption.
- 4.
Video has since been removed by the uploader, as of August 2019.
- 5.
Not featured in the extracts of this chapter, but a frequent insult used by S in the full clip.
- 6.
What Potter (1996) means with this is how a particular description is designed to come across as “mere” description. This orientation is paired with the action orientation of accounts. Thus, accounts are designed to perform actions and to come across as a simple reflection of how things “really” are. Edwards (2003) makes a similar point in relation to racism.
- 7.
- 8.
This raises the interesting question of how the seemingly inclusive category of “everyone” can be used for excluding purposes. That is, however, beyond the scope of our chapter.
- 9.
See Billig et al. (1988) for an overview of the complex relationship between Enlightenment values and prejudice.
References
Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswick, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. Harper and Row.
Antaki, C., & Leudar, I. (2001). Recruiting the record: Using opponents’ exact words in parliamentary argumentation. Text, 21(4), 467–488.
Ashmore, R., & DelBoca, F. (1981). Conceptual approaches to stereotypes and stereotyping. In D. Hamilton (Ed.), Cognitive processes in stereotyping and intergroup behaviour (pp. 1–36). Erlbaum.
Augoustinos, M., & Every, D. (2007). The language of ‘race’ and prejudice: A discourse of denial, reason, and liberal-practical politics. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 26(2), 123–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X07300075
Augoustinos, M., Tuffin, K., & Every, D. (2005). New racism, meritocracy and individualism: Constraining affirmative action in education. Discourse and Society, 16(3), 315–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926505051168
Augoustinos, M., Tuffin, K., & Rapley, M. (1999). Genocide or failure to gel? Racism, history and nationalism in Australian talk. Discourse and Society, 10(3), 351–378.
Billig, M. (1978). Fascists: A social psychological view of the national front. Academic Press.
Billig, M. (1985). Prejudice, categorization and particularization: From a perceptual to a rhetorical approach. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15(1), 79–103.
Billig, M. (1991). Ideology and opinions – studies in rhetorical psychology. Sage Publications.
Billig, M. (2001). Humour and hatred: The racist jokes of the Ku Klux Klan. Discourse and Society, 12(3), 267–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926501012003001
Billig, M. (2002). Henri Tajfel’s ‘cognitive aspects of prejudice’ and the psychology of bigotry. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41(2), 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466602760060165
Billig, M., Condor, S., Edwards, D., Gane, M., Middleton, D., & Radley, A. (1988). Ideological Dilemmas: A social psychology of everyday thinking. Sage Publications.
Burke, S. (2018). The ‘othering’ of Jews and Muslims in the Britain first solidarity patrol. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 28(5), 365–377.
Burke, S., & Goodman, S. (2012). “Bring Back Hitler’s Gas Chambers”: Asylum seeking, Nazis and Facebook: A discursive analysis. Discourse and Society, 23(1), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926511431036
Byford, J. (2006). ‘Serbs never hated the Jews’: The Denial of Antisemitism in Serbian Orthodox Christian culture. Patterns of Prejudice, 40(02), 159–180.
Carr, P., Goodman, S., & Jowett, A. (2019). ‘I don’t think there is any moral basis for taking money away from people’: Using discursive psychology to explore the complexity of talk about tax. Critical Discourse Studies, 16(1), 84–95.
Condor, S. (1988). ‘Race stereotypes’ and racist discourse. Text – Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 8(1–2), 69–90.
Condor, S. (2006). Public prejudice as collaborative accomplishment: Towards a dialogic social psychology of racism. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 16(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.845
Culpeper, J., Iganski, P., & Sweiry, A. (2017). Linguistic impoliteness and religiously aggravated hate crime in England and wales. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 5(1), 1–29.
Di Masso, A., Castrechini, A., & Valera, S. (2014). Displacing xeno-racism: The discursive legitimation of native supremacy through everyday accounts of ‘urban insecurity’. Discourse and Society, 25(3), 341–361.
Drew, P., & Walker, T. (2009). Going too far: Complaining, escalating and disaffiliation. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(12), 2400–2414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.046
Durrheim, K. (2016). ‘Race stereotypes’ and ‘racist’ discourse. In C. Tileagă & E. Stokoe (Eds.), Discursive psychology – Classic and contemporary issues (pp. 257–270). Routledge.
Durrheim, K., Quayle, M., & Dixon, J. (2016). The struggle for the nature of “prejudice”: “prejudice” expressions as identity performance. Political Psychology, 37(1), 17–35.
Edwards, D. (2003). Analyzing racial discourse: The discursive psychology of mind-world relationships. In H. van den Berg, M. Wetherell, & H. Houtkoop-Steenstra (Eds.), Analyzing race talk (pp. 31–48). Cambridge University Press.
Edwards, D. (2005). Discursive Psychology. In K. L. Fitch and R. E. Sanders (Eds.) Handbook of Language and Social Interaction (pp. 257–273). New Jersey: Erlbaum.
Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive Psychology. London: Sage Publications.
Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (2017). Some uses of subject-side assessments. Discourse Studies, 19(5), 497–514.
European Migration Network. (2017). Annual report on migration and asylum policy – Finland 2016. European Migration Network.
European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. (2018). Hate crime recording and data collection practice across the EU. Retrieved from fra.europa.eu. [17th June 2019].
Every, D., & Augoustinos, M. (2007). Constructions of Racism in the Australian Parliamentary Debates. Discourse and Society, 18(4), 411–436. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926507077427
Faulkner, N., & Bliuc, A. (2016). ‘It’s okay to be racist’: Moral disengagement in online discussions of racist incidents in Australia. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 39(14), 2545–2563. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2016.1171370
Fozdar, F., & Pederson, A. (2013). Diablogging about asylum seekers: Building a counter-hegemonic discourse. Discourse and Communication, 7(4), 371–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481313494497
Goffman, E. (1979). Footing. Semiotica, 25, 1–29.
Goodman, S. (2010). “It’s not racist to impose limits on immigration”: Constructing the boundaries of racism in the asylum and immigration debate. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis Across Disciplines, 4(1), 1–17.
Goodman, S. (2014). Developing an understanding of race talk. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8(4), 147–155.
Goodman, S., & Burke, S. (2010). ‘Oh you don’t want asylum seekers, oh you’re just racist’: A discursive analysis of discussions about whether it’s racist to oppose asylum seeking. Discourse and Society, 21(3), 325–340.
Goodman, S., & Carr, P. (2017). The just world hypothesis as an argumentative resource in debates about unemployment benefits. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 27(4), 312–323.
Goodman, S., & Johnson, A. J. (2013). Strategies used by the far right to counter accusations of racism. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines, 6(2), 97–113.
Guerin, B. (2003). Combating prejudice and racism: New interventions from a functional analysis of racist language. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 13(1), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.699
Guimarães, A. S. A. (2003). Racial insult in Brazil. Discourse and Society, 14(2), 133–151.
Hepburn, A., & Potter, J. (2010). Threats: Power, family mealtimes, and social influence. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50(1), 99–120.
Home Office. (2018). Hate crime, England and wales, 2017/18. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/748598/hate-crime-1718-hosb2018.pdf. [15th July 2019].
Jackson, C. (2011). Interaction, gender, identity: A conversation analytic examination of person reference. PhD thesis, University of York.
Leach, C. W. (2005). Against the notion of a ‘new racism’. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 15(6), 432–445.
Lemke, J. L. (n.d.). Violence and language: The signs that hurt. Retrieved April 26, 2020, from http://www.columbia.edu/cu/21stC/issue-1.2/Language.htm
Lynn, N., & Lea, S. (2003). ‘A phantom menace and the new apartheid’: The social construction of asylum-seekers in the United Kingdom. Discourse and Society, 14(4), 425–452. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926503014004002
McGuire, T., Kielser, S., & Siegel, J. (1987). Group and computer mediated discussion effects in risk decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(5), 917–930.
Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 57–101). Cambridge University Press.
Pomerantz, A. (1986). Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims. Human Studies, 9, 219–229.
Potter, J. (1996). Representing reality – discourse, rhetoric and social construction. Sage Publications.
Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology. Sage Publications.
Quinn, B. (2019, October 15). Hate crimes double in five years in England and wales. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/uk. [16th October 2019].
Reynolds, E. (2015). How participants in arguments challenge the normative position of an opponent. Discourse Studies, 17(3), 299–316.
Schegloff, E. A. (1988/1989). From interview to confrontation: Observations on the bush/rather encounter. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 22, 215–240.
Simone Joseph Admits Viral Racist Bus Rant. (2015, 19th of October). Retrieved from https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-34571284. [31st October 2015].
Stokoe, E., & Edwards, D. (2007). ‘Black this, black that’: Racial insults and reported speech in neighbour complaints and police interrogations. Discourse and Society, 18(3), 337–372.
Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. Cambridge University Press.
Taponen, T. (2015, 24th of October). Käsittämätönpurkaustallentuivideolle: “Maamme on tällainen, koskaoletmusta”. Iltalehti. Retrieved from https://www.iltalehti.fi/uutiset/a/2015102420553621. [8th August 2016].
Tileagă, C. (2005). Accounting for extreme prejudice and legitimating blame in talk about the Romanies. Discourse and Society, 16(5), 603–624. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926505054938
Tileagă, C. (2006). Representing the ‘other’: A discursive analysis of prejudice and moral exclusion in talk about Romanies. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 16(1), 19–41.
Tileagă, C. (2007). Ideologies of moral exclusion: A critical discursive reframing of depersonalization, delegitimization and dehumanization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46(4), 717–737.
Tileagă, C. (2013). Political Psychology. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Tileagă, C. (2016). The nature of prejudice – society, discrimination and moral exclusion. Routledge.
Tileagă, C. (2019). Communicating misogyny: An interdisciplinary research agenda for social psychology. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 13(7), e12491.
van Dijk, T. A. (1992). Discourse and the Denial of Racism. Discourse and Society, 3, 87–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926592003001005
Verkuyten, M. (2013). Justifying discrimination against Muslim immigrants: Out-group ideology and the five-step social identity model. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52(2), 345–360. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02081.x.
Wahlbeck, Ö. (2019). To share or not to share responsibility? Finnish refugee policy and the hesitant support for a common European asylum system. Journal of Immigrant and Refugee Studies, 17(3), 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/15562948.2018.1468048
Wetherell, M., & Potter, J. (1992). Mapping the language of racism: Discourse and the legitimation of exploitation. Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Wiggins, S., & Potter, J. (2008). Discursive psychology. In C. Willig & W. S. Rogers (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology (pp. 73–90). Sage Publications.
Wood, C., & Finlay, W. M. L. (2008). British national party representations of muslims in the month after the London bombings: Homogeneity, threat, and the conspiracy tradition. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47(4), 707–726. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466607X264103
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Burke, S., Demasi, M.A. (2020). “This Country Will Be Big Racist One Day”: Extreme Prejudice as Reasoned Discourse in Face-to-Face Interactions. In: Demasi, M.A., Burke, S., Tileagă, C. (eds) Political Communication. Palgrave Studies in Discursive Psychology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60223-9_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60223-9_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-60222-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-60223-9
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)