Abstract
This chapter explores the rhetorical articulation, as well as the implications of appeals for consensus and pragmatism in parliamentary discourse on the ‘refugee issue’ in Greece. The analytic corpus consists of transcripts of two debates on refugee policy in the Greek parliament, conducted in spring 2016. Analytic tools and concepts are derived from rhetorical and discursive social psychology, and parliamentary discourse is approached as historically contingent and context-bound communicative action. Analysis indicated that, in the context of debating the alleged connection between the refugee movement and security issues, leading Greek politicians of both the governing and the opposition party warranted their policy choices through recourse to pragmatism and realpolitik. Specifically, in one line of arguing, speakers used the language of unanimity and represented themselves as putting the national above the party interest. According to another common way of arguing, political actors constituted political realism as an indisputable criterion of evaluating policy choices and portrayed their differences with their opponents as differences in effectiveness. The discussion emphasizes the social exclusionary implications of co-articulating appeals to (particular) national interest with pleas to (the alleged as universal) rationality and pragmatism in the context of discussing the refugee issue. It also highlights the potential of a rhetorical approach to political communication to draw attention to its argumentative nature and multiple audiences and to document its historical and social psychological aspects.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
This is the term used in the official statement (European Commission 2016).
- 2.
In two cases in which lengthy digressions from the subject have occurred (to address issues concerned with the procedure), part of the exchange has been omitted. The omission is notated by the use of three dots in brackets.
- 3.
It is a detention camp located in the north of Athens. When SY.RIZ.A was in the opposition, it recurrently criticized the governing party (N.D) for the wretched conditions prevailing in it. During spring of 2015 the SY.RIZ.A-led government began releasing migrants from Amygdaleza following two suicides at the camp. Nevertheless, in November 2016, the facilities of Amygdaleza were again used for the temporary hosting of families of refugees and migrants, as well as for the protective custody of unaccompanied minors.
- 4.
Patras and Igoumenitsa are ports located in Western and Southern Greece which have been transformed into informal centres of immigrants and refugees hoping to leave Greece and continue on to Northern Europe (through Italy).
References
Amnesty International (2017). Amnesty International Annual Report 2016/2017. Retrieved from https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/research/2017/02/amnesty-international-annual-report-201617/
Andreouli, E., Figgou, L., Kadianaki, I., Sapountzis, A., & Xenitidou, M. (2017). “Europe” in Greece: Lay constructions of Europe in the context of Greek immigration debates. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 27(2), 158–168.
Augoustinos, M., & Every, D. (2007). The language of “race” and prejudice: A discourse of denial, reason, and liberal-practical politics. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 26(2), 123–141.
Beasley, V. (2001). The rhetoric of ideological consensus in the United States: American principles and American pose in presidential inaugurals. Communication Monographs, 68(2), 169–183.
Billig, M. (1987). Arguing and thinking. A rhetorical approach to social psychology. Cambridge University Press.
Billig, M. (1988). Methodology and scholarship in understanding ideological explanation. In C. Antaki (Ed.), Analysing everyday explanation: A casebook of methods (pp. 199–215). Sage.
Billig, M. (1991). Ideology and opinions: Studies in rhetorical psychology. Sage Publications.
Billig, M. (1997). The dialogic unconscious: Psychoanalysis, discursive psychology and the nature of repression. British Journal of Social Psychology, 36(2), 139–159.
Billig, M. (1999). Commodity fetishism and repression: Reflections on Marx, Freud and the psychology of consumer capitalism. Theory and Psychology, 9(3), 313–329.
Billig, M., & Marinho, C. (2017). The politics and rhetoric of commemoration: How the Portuguese parliament celebrates the 1974 revolution. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Billig, M., & Marinho, C. (2019). Literal and metaphorical silences in rhetoric: Examples from the celebration of the 1974 revolution in the Portuguese parliament. In A. J. Murray & K. Durrheim (Eds.), Qualitative studies of silence: The unsaid as social action (pp. 21–37). Cambridge University Press.
Bozatzis, N. (2009). Occidentalism and accountability: Constructing culture and cultural difference in majority Greek talk about the minority in Western Thrace. Discourse & Society, 20(4), 431–453.
Bozatzis, N. (2014). Banal occidentalism. In C. Antaki & S. Condor (Eds.), Rhetoric, ideology and social psychology: Essays in Honour of Michael Billig (pp. 122–136). Routledge.
Capdevila, R., & Callaghan, J. E. (2008). ‘It’s not racist. It’s common sense’. A critical analysis of political discourse around asylum and immigration in the UK. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 18(1), 1–16.
Condor, S. (2000). Pride and prejudice: Identity management in English people’s talk about this country. Discourse & Society, 11(2), 175–205.
Condor, S. (2014). Small words, large circles and the spirit of contradiction: Celebrating Michael Billig’s contribution to the social sciences. In C. Antaki & S. Condor (Eds.), Rhetoric, ideology and social psychology: essays in honour of Michael Billig (pp. 1–16). Routledge.
Condor, S., Tileagă, C., & Billig, M. (2013). Political rhetoric. In L. Huddy, D. O. Sears, & J. S. Levy (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 262–300). Oxford University Press.
Dickerson, P. (1998). ‘I did it for the nation’: Repertoires of intent in televised political discourse. British Journal of Social Psychology, 37(4), 477–494.
Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. London: Sage Publications.
European Commission. (2016, March 19). Factsheet on the EU-Turkey Statement. [Press release] Retrieved from http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-16-963_el.htm
Figgou, L. (2013). Essentialism, historical construction, and social influence: Representations of Pomakness in majority talk in Western Thrace (Greece). British Journal of Social Psychology, 52(4), 686–702.
Figgou, L. (2015). Constructions of ‘illegal’ immigration and entitlement to citizenship: Debating an Immigration Law in Greece. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 26(2), 150–163.
Figgou, L. (2016). Everyday politics and the extreme right: Lay explanations of the electoral performance of the neo-Nazi political party ‘Golden Dawn’ in Greece. In C. Howarth & E. Andreouli (Eds.), The social psychology of everyday politics (pp. 206–221). Routledge.
Figgou, L. (2020). Agency and accountability in (un)employment-related discourse in the Era of “Crisis”. Journal of Language and Social Psychology., 39(2), 200–218.
Figgou, L., Sapountzis, A., Bozatzis, N., Gardikiotis, A., & Pantazis, P. (2011). Constructing the stereotype of immigrants’ criminality: Accounts of fear and risk in talk about immigration to Greece. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 21(2), 164–177.
Figgou, L., Sourvinou, M., & Anagnostopoulou, D. (2018). Constructing the “Refugee Crisis” in Greece: A critical discursive social psychological analysis. In Discourse, peace, and conflict (pp. 205–222). Cham: Springer.
Giroux, H. A. (2018). Terror of neoliberalism: Authoritarianism and the eclipse of democracy. Routledge.
Gleeson, J. T., & Higgins, R. C. (Eds.). (2008). Rediscovering rhetoric: Law, language, and the practice of persuasion. Federation Press.
Goodman, S., & Speer, S. A. (2007). Category use in the construction of asylum seekers. Critical Discourse Studies, 4(2), 165–185.
Goodman, S., Sirriyeh, A., & McMahon, S. (2017). The evolving (re) categorisations of refugees throughout the “refugee/migrant crisis”. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 27(2), 105–114.
Hanson-Easey, S., & Augoustinos, M. (2010). Out of Africa: Accounting for refugee policy and the language of causal attribution. Discourse & Society, 21(3), 295–323.
Harmes, A. (2012). The rise of neoliberal nationalism. Review of International Political Economy, 19(1), 59–86.
Hewitt, J. P., & Stokes, R. (1975). Disclaimers. American Sociological Review, 40, 1–11.
Hier, S. P., & Greenberg, J. L. (2002). Constructing a discursive crisis: Risk, problematization and illegal Chinese in Canada. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 25(3), 490–513.
Kirkwood, S., McKinlay, A., & McVittie, C. (2015). ‘He’s a cracking wee geezer from Pakistan’: Lay accounts of refugee integration failure and success in Scotland. Journal of Refugee Studies, 28(1), 1–20.
Kirkwood, S. (2017). The humanisation of refugees: A discourse analysis of UK parliamentary debates on the European refugee ‘crisis’. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 27(2), 115–125.
Kirkwood, S. (2019). History in the service of politics: Constructing narratives of history during the European Refugee “Crisis”. Political Psychology, 40(2), 297–313.
Kurz, T., Augoustinos, M., & Crabb, S. (2010). Contesting the ‘national interest’ and maintaining ‘our lifestyle’: A discursive analysis of political rhetoric around climate change. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49(3), 601–625.
Lemert, C. C. (2015). The end of ideology, really! In C. C. Lemert (Ed.), Sociology after the crisis (pp. 91–121). Routledge.
Lynn, N., & Lea, S. (2003). A phantom menace and the new Apartheid’: the social construction of asylum-seekers in the United Kingdom. Discourse & Society, 14(4), 425–452
Parliamentary debate on security was requested by K. Mitsotakis (2016, March 23). To Vima. Retrieved from http://www.tovima.gr/2016/03/23/politics/pro-imerisias-diataksis-syzitisi-gia-tin-asfaleia-zita-o-k-mitsotakis
Potter, J. (1996). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. Sage Publications.
Rancière, J. (2015). Dissensus: On politics and aesthetics. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Reicher, S., & Hopkins, N. (1996). Self-category constructions in political rhetoric; an analysis of Thatcher’s and Kinnock’s speeches concerning the British miners’ strike (1984–5). European Journal of Social Psychology, 26(3), 353–371.
Rooyackers, I. N., & Verkuyten, M. (2012). Mobilizing support for the extreme right: A discursive analysis of minority leadership. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51(1), 130–148.
Sakki, I., & Pettersson, K. (2018). Managing stake and accountability in Prime Ministers’ accounts of the “refugee crisis”: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 28(6), 406–429.
Sambaraju, R., McVittie, C., & Nolan, P. (2017). ‘This is an EU crisis requiring an EU solution’: Nation and transnational talk in negotiating warrants for further inclusion of refugees. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 27(2), 169–178.
Stavrakakis, Y., Katsambekis, G., Nikisianis, N., Kioupkiolis, A., & Siomos, T. (2017). Extreme right-wing populism in Europe: revisiting a reified association. Critical Discourse Studies, 14(4), 420–439.
Tileagă, C. (2006). Representing the ‘Other’: A discursive analysis of prejudice and moral exclusion in talk about Romanies. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 16(1), 19–41.
Tileagă, C. (2015). The nature of prejudice: Society, discrimination and moral exclusion. Routledge.
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. (2015). Global report 2015. Retrieved from http://www.unhcr.org/gr15/index.xml
Van Dijk, T. A. (1992). Discourse and the denial of racism. Discourse & society, 3(1), 87–118.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Ideology and discourse analysis. Journal of political ideologies, 11(2), 115–140.
Weltman, D. (2004). Political identity and the Third Way: Some social-psychological implications of the current anti-ideological turn. British Journal of Social Psychology, 43(1), 83–98.
Weltman, D., & Billig, M. (2001). The political psychology of contemporary anti-politics: A discursive approach to the end-of-ideology era. Political Psychology, 22(2), 367–382.
Wetherell, M., & Potter, J. (1992). Mapping the language of racism. Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Wooffitt, R. (1992). Telling tales of the unexpected: The organization of factual discourse. Rowman & Littlefield.
Yack, B. (2006). Rhetoric and public reasoning: An Aristotelian understanding of political deliberation. Political Theory, 34(4), 417–438.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Figgou, L., Anagnostopoulou, D. (2020). Consensual Politics and Pragmatism in Parliamentary Discourse on the ‘Refugee Issue’. In: Demasi, M.A., Burke, S., Tileagă, C. (eds) Political Communication. Palgrave Studies in Discursive Psychology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60223-9_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60223-9_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-60222-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-60223-9
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)