Abstract
Nowadays, multi-carrier energy networks are efficient solutions to boost energy efficiency, decrease energy supply cost, and increase the flexibility of the traditional systems. Among the existing elements, energy storage systems and energy conversion facilities play a special role in the optimal operation of multi-carrier energy networks to supply different energy demands. The preferable characteristic of energy storage systems raises the need to use a comprehensive energy management strategy to connect and manage different layers of energy networks in the scheduling process. To this end, this chapter presents an optimal bidding/offering strategy for the economic participation of the hybrid energy storage unit in the multi-carrier energy markets. This strategy is proposed from the perspective of a storage system owner to maximize the profit of the hybrid storage unit. The power-to-gas (P2G) storage, compressed air energy storage (CAES) unit, and power-to-heat (P2H) storage are considered as energy conversion/storage technologies in the form of a hybrid storage unit to participate in multiple energy markets. To validate the effectiveness of the considered method, the presented optimization problem was successfully applied to a realistic case study and was solved using GAMS/CPLEX. According to the results of this study, the hybrid storage unit’s profit is increased by up to 13.2% with the simultaneous use of the CAES unit, P2G storage, and P2H storage compared to the other case studies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- i (NI):
-
CAES unit
- l (NL):
-
P2G storage
- m (NM):
-
P2H storage
- t (NT):
-
Scheduling time interval
- \( {A}_{(.)}^{\mathrm{Min}},{A}_{(.)}^{\mathrm{Max}} \):
-
Minimum and maximum energy limit
- \( {G}_l^{C,\operatorname{Max}},{G}_l^{D,\operatorname{Max}} \):
-
Maximum stored/supplied natural gas by P2G storage
- \( {H}_m^{C,\operatorname{Max}},{H}_m^{D,\operatorname{Max}} \):
-
Maximum stored/supplied heat by P2H storage
- \( {P}_i^{C,\operatorname{Min}},{P}_i^{C,\operatorname{Max}} \):
-
Min/max charge capacity of the CAES unit
- \( {P}_i^{D,\operatorname{Min}},{P}_i^{D,\operatorname{Max}} \):
-
Min/max discharge capacity of the CAES unit
- \( {P}_i^{S,\operatorname{Min}},{P}_i^{S,\operatorname{Max}} \):
-
Min/max capacity of CAES unit in simple cycle mode
- \( {P}_l^{\mathrm{Max}} \):
-
Maximum allowable power consumption by P2G storage
- \( {P}_m^{\mathrm{Max}} \):
-
Maximum allowable power consumption by P2H storage
- VC, VE:
-
Operating/maintenance costs of compressor and expander
- \( {\lambda}_t^{\mathrm{e}},{\lambda}_t^{\mathrm{g}},{\lambda}_t^{\mathrm{h}} \):
-
Day-ahead wholesale electricity, gas, and heat prices
- copm:
-
Coefficient of P2H storage performance
- \( {\eta}_{(.)}^C,{\eta}_{(.)}^D \):
-
Charge/discharge efficiency of various facilities
- A(.), t:
-
The energy level of various storage technologies
- \( {E}_t^{\mathrm{DA}} \):
-
Bidding/offering capacity of the day-ahead electricity market
- \( {G}_t^{\mathrm{DA}} \):
-
Bidding/offering capacity of the day-ahead gas market
- \( {G}_{l,t}^C,{G}_{l,t}^D \):
-
Stored/supplied natural gas in charge/discharge modes by P2G storage
- GIi, t:
-
Consumed natural gas by the CAES unit
- GPl, t:
-
Produced natural gas by P2G storage
- \( {H}_t^{\mathrm{DA}} \):
-
Bidding/offering capacity of the day-ahead heat market
- \( {H}_{m,t}^C,{H}_{m,t}^D \):
-
Stored/supplied heat in charge/discharge modes by P2H storage
- HPm, t:
-
Produced heat by P2H storage
- \( {P}_{i,t}^C,{P}_{i,t}^D \):
-
Stored/supplied power in charge/discharge modes by CAES unit
- \( {P}_{i,t}^S \):
-
Generated power in simple cycle mode by CAES unit
- Pl, t:
-
Consumed power by P2G storage
- Pm, t:
-
Consumed power by P2H storage
- \( {I}_{i,t}^C,{I}_{i,t}^D,{\displaystyle \begin{array}{c}\end{array}}{I}_{i,t}^S \):
-
Binary variables to show on/off status of facilities
References
Ma T, Wu J, Hao L (2017) Energy flow modeling and optimal operation analysis of the micro energy grid based on energy hub. Energy Convers Manag 133:292–306
Nazari-Heris M, Mirzaei MA, Mohammadi-Ivatloo B et al (2020) Economic-environmental effect of power to gas technology in coupled electricity and gas systems with price-responsive shiftable loads. J Clean Prod 244:118769
Mohammadi M, Noorollahi Y, Mohammadi-Ivatloo B et al (2017) Energy hub: from a model to a concept—a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 80:1512–1527
Asl DK, Hamedi A, Seifi AR (2020) Planning, operation and flexibility contribution of multi-carrier energy storage systems in integrated energy systems. IET Renewable Power Gener 14(3):408–416
Mirzaei MA, Oskouei MZ, Mohammadi-ivatloo B et al (2020) An Integrated Energy Hub System based on Power-to-Gas and Compressed Air Energy Storage Technologies in presence of Multiple Shiftable Loads. IET Gener Transm Distrib 14(13)
Gorre J, Ruoss F, Karjunen H et al (2020) Cost benefits of optimizing hydrogen storage and methanation capacities for power-to-gas plants in dynamic operation. Appl Energy 257:113967
Rashid K, Mohammadi K, Powell K (2020) Dynamic simulation and techno-economic analysis of a concentrated solar power (CSP) plant hybridized with both thermal energy storage and natural gas. J Clean Prod 248:119193
Jadidbonab M, Babaei E, Mohammadi-ivatloo B (2019) CVaR-constrained scheduling strategy for smart multi carrier energy hub considering demand response and compressed air energy storage. Energy 174:1238–1250
Mirzaei MA, Yazdankhah AS, Mohammadi-Ivatloo B et al (2019) Stochastic network-constrained co-optimization of energy and reserve products in renewable energy integrated power and gas networks with energy storage system. J Clean Prod 223:747–758
Ajiwibowo MW, Darmawan A, Aziz M (2019) A conceptual chemical looping combustion power system design in a power-to-gas energy storage scenario. Int J Hydrog Energy 44(19):9636–9642
Gholizadeh N, Vahid-Pakdel MJ, Mohammadi-ivatloo B (2019) Enhancement of demand supply’s security using power to gas technology in networked energy hubs. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 109:83–94
Shafiee S, Zareipour H, Knight AM et al (2017) Risk-constrained bidding and offering strategy for a merchant compressed air energy storage plant. IEEE Trans Power Syst 32(2):946–957
Xu D, Wu Q, Zhou B et al (2019) Distributed multi-energy operation of coupled electricity, heating and natural gas networks. IEEE Trans Sustainable Energy. 1-1
Chen Y, Wei W, Liu F et al (2017) A multi-lateral trading model for coupled gas-heat-power energy networks. Appl Energy 200:180–191
Mei J, Wang X, Kirtley JL (2020) Optimal scheduling of real multi-carrier energy storage system with hydrogen-based vehicle applications. IET Renewable Power Gener 14(3):381–388
Mirzaei MA, Nazari-Heris M, Mohammadi-Ivatloo B et al (2020) A novel hybrid framework for co-optimization of power and natural gas networks integrated with emerging technologies. IEEE Syst J:1–11
Liu X, Yan Z, Wu J (2019) Optimal coordinated operation of a multi-energy community considering interactions between energy storage and conversion devices. Appl Energy 248:256–273
Mohammadi A, Ahmadi MH, Bidi M et al (2017) Exergy analysis of a combined cooling, heating and power system integrated with wind turbine and compressed air energy storage system. Energy Convers Manag 131:69–78
Sameti M, Haghighat F (2018) Integration of distributed energy storage into net-zero energy district systems: optimum design and operation. Energy 153:575–591
Wang X, Bie Z, Liu F et al (2020) Bi-level planning for integrated electricity and natural gas systems with wind power and natural gas storage. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 118:105738
Lund H, Salgi G (2009) The role of compressed air energy storage (CAES) in future sustainable energy systems. Energy Convers Manag 50(5):1172–1179
Budt M, Wolf D, Span R et al (2016) A review on compressed air energy storage: basic principles, past milestones and recent developments. Appl Energy 170:250–268
Eveloy V, Gebreegziabher T (2019) Excess electricity and power-to-gas storage potential in the future renewable-based power generation sector in the United Arab Emirates. Energy 166:426–450
Abdon A, Zhang X, Parra D et al (2017) Techno-economic and environmental assessment of stationary electricity storage technologies for different time scales. Energy 139:1173–1187
Michels H, Pitz-Paal R (2007) Cascaded latent heat storage for parabolic trough solar power plants. Sol Energy 81(6):829–837
Laing D, Steinmann W-D, Tamme R et al (2006) Solid media thermal storage for parabolic trough power plants. Sol Energy 80(10):1283–1289
Generalized Algebraic Modeling Systems (GAMS). April 2011. http://www.gams.com
MIBEL (Iberian market, [Online]. http://www.erse.pt/eng/Paginas/ERSE.aspx
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zare Oskouei, M., Nahani, H., Mohammadi-Ivatloo, B., Abapour, M. (2021). Optimal Scheduling of Hybrid Energy Storage Technologies in the Multi-carrier Energy Networks. In: Nazari-Heris, M., Asadi, S., Mohammadi-Ivatloo, B. (eds) Planning and Operation of Multi-Carrier Energy Networks. Power Systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60086-0_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60086-0_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-60085-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-60086-0
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)