Skip to main content

Optimal Scheduling of Hybrid Energy Storage Technologies in the Multi-carrier Energy Networks

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Planning and Operation of Multi-Carrier Energy Networks

Part of the book series: Power Systems ((POWSYS))

  • 307 Accesses

Abstract

Nowadays, multi-carrier energy networks are efficient solutions to boost energy efficiency, decrease energy supply cost, and increase the flexibility of the traditional systems. Among the existing elements, energy storage systems and energy conversion facilities play a special role in the optimal operation of multi-carrier energy networks to supply different energy demands. The preferable characteristic of energy storage systems raises the need to use a comprehensive energy management strategy to connect and manage different layers of energy networks in the scheduling process. To this end, this chapter presents an optimal bidding/offering strategy for the economic participation of the hybrid energy storage unit in the multi-carrier energy markets. This strategy is proposed from the perspective of a storage system owner to maximize the profit of the hybrid storage unit. The power-to-gas (P2G) storage, compressed air energy storage (CAES) unit, and power-to-heat (P2H) storage are considered as energy conversion/storage technologies in the form of a hybrid storage unit to participate in multiple energy markets. To validate the effectiveness of the considered method, the presented optimization problem was successfully applied to a realistic case study and was solved using GAMS/CPLEX. According to the results of this study, the hybrid storage unit’s profit is increased by up to 13.2% with the simultaneous use of the CAES unit, P2G storage, and P2H storage compared to the other case studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

i (NI):

CAES unit

l (NL):

P2G storage

m (NM):

P2H storage

t (NT):

Scheduling time interval

\( {A}_{(.)}^{\mathrm{Min}},{A}_{(.)}^{\mathrm{Max}} \):

Minimum and maximum energy limit

\( {G}_l^{C,\operatorname{Max}},{G}_l^{D,\operatorname{Max}} \):

Maximum stored/supplied natural gas by P2G storage

\( {H}_m^{C,\operatorname{Max}},{H}_m^{D,\operatorname{Max}} \):

Maximum stored/supplied heat by P2H storage

\( {P}_i^{C,\operatorname{Min}},{P}_i^{C,\operatorname{Max}} \):

Min/max charge capacity of the CAES unit

\( {P}_i^{D,\operatorname{Min}},{P}_i^{D,\operatorname{Max}} \):

Min/max discharge capacity of the CAES unit

\( {P}_i^{S,\operatorname{Min}},{P}_i^{S,\operatorname{Max}} \):

Min/max capacity of CAES unit in simple cycle mode

\( {P}_l^{\mathrm{Max}} \):

Maximum allowable power consumption by P2G storage

\( {P}_m^{\mathrm{Max}} \):

Maximum allowable power consumption by P2H storage

VC, VE:

Operating/maintenance costs of compressor and expander

\( {\lambda}_t^{\mathrm{e}},{\lambda}_t^{\mathrm{g}},{\lambda}_t^{\mathrm{h}} \):

Day-ahead wholesale electricity, gas, and heat prices

copm:

Coefficient of P2H storage performance

\( {\eta}_{(.)}^C,{\eta}_{(.)}^D \):

Charge/discharge efficiency of various facilities

A(.), t:

The energy level of various storage technologies

\( {E}_t^{\mathrm{DA}} \):

Bidding/offering capacity of the day-ahead electricity market

\( {G}_t^{\mathrm{DA}} \):

Bidding/offering capacity of the day-ahead gas market

\( {G}_{l,t}^C,{G}_{l,t}^D \):

Stored/supplied natural gas in charge/discharge modes by P2G storage

GIi, t:

Consumed natural gas by the CAES unit

GPl, t:

Produced natural gas by P2G storage

\( {H}_t^{\mathrm{DA}} \):

Bidding/offering capacity of the day-ahead heat market

\( {H}_{m,t}^C,{H}_{m,t}^D \):

Stored/supplied heat in charge/discharge modes by P2H storage

HPm, t:

Produced heat by P2H storage

\( {P}_{i,t}^C,{P}_{i,t}^D \):

Stored/supplied power in charge/discharge modes by CAES unit

\( {P}_{i,t}^S \):

Generated power in simple cycle mode by CAES unit

Pl, t:

Consumed power by P2G storage

Pm, t:

Consumed power by P2H storage

\( {I}_{i,t}^C,{I}_{i,t}^D,{\displaystyle \begin{array}{c}\end{array}}{I}_{i,t}^S \):

Binary variables to show on/off status of facilities

References

  1. Ma T, Wu J, Hao L (2017) Energy flow modeling and optimal operation analysis of the micro energy grid based on energy hub. Energy Convers Manag 133:292–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Nazari-Heris M, Mirzaei MA, Mohammadi-Ivatloo B et al (2020) Economic-environmental effect of power to gas technology in coupled electricity and gas systems with price-responsive shiftable loads. J Clean Prod 244:118769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mohammadi M, Noorollahi Y, Mohammadi-Ivatloo B et al (2017) Energy hub: from a model to a concept—a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 80:1512–1527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Asl DK, Hamedi A, Seifi AR (2020) Planning, operation and flexibility contribution of multi-carrier energy storage systems in integrated energy systems. IET Renewable Power Gener 14(3):408–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mirzaei MA, Oskouei MZ, Mohammadi-ivatloo B et al (2020) An Integrated Energy Hub System based on Power-to-Gas and Compressed Air Energy Storage Technologies in presence of Multiple Shiftable Loads. IET Gener Transm Distrib 14(13)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gorre J, Ruoss F, Karjunen H et al (2020) Cost benefits of optimizing hydrogen storage and methanation capacities for power-to-gas plants in dynamic operation. Appl Energy 257:113967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rashid K, Mohammadi K, Powell K (2020) Dynamic simulation and techno-economic analysis of a concentrated solar power (CSP) plant hybridized with both thermal energy storage and natural gas. J Clean Prod 248:119193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jadidbonab M, Babaei E, Mohammadi-ivatloo B (2019) CVaR-constrained scheduling strategy for smart multi carrier energy hub considering demand response and compressed air energy storage. Energy 174:1238–1250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mirzaei MA, Yazdankhah AS, Mohammadi-Ivatloo B et al (2019) Stochastic network-constrained co-optimization of energy and reserve products in renewable energy integrated power and gas networks with energy storage system. J Clean Prod 223:747–758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ajiwibowo MW, Darmawan A, Aziz M (2019) A conceptual chemical looping combustion power system design in a power-to-gas energy storage scenario. Int J Hydrog Energy 44(19):9636–9642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gholizadeh N, Vahid-Pakdel MJ, Mohammadi-ivatloo B (2019) Enhancement of demand supply’s security using power to gas technology in networked energy hubs. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 109:83–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Shafiee S, Zareipour H, Knight AM et al (2017) Risk-constrained bidding and offering strategy for a merchant compressed air energy storage plant. IEEE Trans Power Syst 32(2):946–957

    Google Scholar 

  13. Xu D, Wu Q, Zhou B et al (2019) Distributed multi-energy operation of coupled electricity, heating and natural gas networks. IEEE Trans Sustainable Energy. 1-1

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chen Y, Wei W, Liu F et al (2017) A multi-lateral trading model for coupled gas-heat-power energy networks. Appl Energy 200:180–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mei J, Wang X, Kirtley JL (2020) Optimal scheduling of real multi-carrier energy storage system with hydrogen-based vehicle applications. IET Renewable Power Gener 14(3):381–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mirzaei MA, Nazari-Heris M, Mohammadi-Ivatloo B et al (2020) A novel hybrid framework for co-optimization of power and natural gas networks integrated with emerging technologies. IEEE Syst J:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  17. Liu X, Yan Z, Wu J (2019) Optimal coordinated operation of a multi-energy community considering interactions between energy storage and conversion devices. Appl Energy 248:256–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mohammadi A, Ahmadi MH, Bidi M et al (2017) Exergy analysis of a combined cooling, heating and power system integrated with wind turbine and compressed air energy storage system. Energy Convers Manag 131:69–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sameti M, Haghighat F (2018) Integration of distributed energy storage into net-zero energy district systems: optimum design and operation. Energy 153:575–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang X, Bie Z, Liu F et al (2020) Bi-level planning for integrated electricity and natural gas systems with wind power and natural gas storage. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 118:105738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lund H, Salgi G (2009) The role of compressed air energy storage (CAES) in future sustainable energy systems. Energy Convers Manag 50(5):1172–1179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Budt M, Wolf D, Span R et al (2016) A review on compressed air energy storage: basic principles, past milestones and recent developments. Appl Energy 170:250–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Eveloy V, Gebreegziabher T (2019) Excess electricity and power-to-gas storage potential in the future renewable-based power generation sector in the United Arab Emirates. Energy 166:426–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Abdon A, Zhang X, Parra D et al (2017) Techno-economic and environmental assessment of stationary electricity storage technologies for different time scales. Energy 139:1173–1187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Michels H, Pitz-Paal R (2007) Cascaded latent heat storage for parabolic trough solar power plants. Sol Energy 81(6):829–837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Laing D, Steinmann W-D, Tamme R et al (2006) Solid media thermal storage for parabolic trough power plants. Sol Energy 80(10):1283–1289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Generalized Algebraic Modeling Systems (GAMS). April 2011. http://www.gams.com

  28. MIBEL (Iberian market, [Online]. http://www.erse.pt/eng/Paginas/ERSE.aspx

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Morteza Zare Oskouei .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zare Oskouei, M., Nahani, H., Mohammadi-Ivatloo, B., Abapour, M. (2021). Optimal Scheduling of Hybrid Energy Storage Technologies in the Multi-carrier Energy Networks. In: Nazari-Heris, M., Asadi, S., Mohammadi-Ivatloo, B. (eds) Planning and Operation of Multi-Carrier Energy Networks. Power Systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60086-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60086-0_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-60085-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-60086-0

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics